NBA Finals Gamethread or how the NBA has more downtime than Game Of Thrones

djbayko

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
25,948
Los Angeles, CA
No, Green is claiming now that the refs told him the first technical was on Kerr, so when he got the "second" technical, he knew all along he wasn't getting ejected.

If the ref "mistakenly" told the scorers it was on Green, they should say that. But they aren't. The ref is saying "I didn't verbalize to the table who the technical was on..." He's essentially saying "I called a technical, but I didn't tell the scoring table who it was on, and they just assumed it was on Green." On top of that, everyone in the stadium seems to have heard the PA announcer say it was on Green, except the refs, or if the refs heard that, they apparently ignored it and didn't think it was important enough to correct it at the time, or at halftime, or at any other time between the two technicals. Steve Kerr admitted after the game that he thought the first technical was on Draymond, and he thought Draymond was getting ejected after the second one. Based on his and Draymond's reactions after the second technical, there is no doubt in my mind that Draymond is lying when he says he knew the first was on Kerr. I still have it on DVR, and it's pretty clear to me that the technical should have been called on both of them in the first quarter, but even though Kerr ran out on onto the court, Draymond was literally losing his mind two steps away and calling it on either of them would have been warranted.

Below is a story breaking down what happened. Personally, I don't believe in conspiracies, and think it's far more likely that this is incompetence than something shady, but to me, the real problem with the NBA and it's officiating IS the incompetence. I feel like folks who are defending this is as not something underhanded are missing the point. It doesn't need to be a conspiracy to be unforgivable. Like I said, just when you think you've seen it all...It's becoming a farce, and it's too bad, because this really does have the chance to become one of the greatest eras in NBA history, IMO.

https://www.si.com/nba/2017/06/10/warriors-cavs-finals-draymond-green-steve-kerr-technical-foul-refs-referees-controversy
Yes, I realize what Green is saying now. But do you believe him? It's obviously self-serving for him to say that. Sorry that I didn't address that piece, as it definitely clouded my previous post.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,574
The bolded part here is incorrect. The second technical was not the one that Kerr ran at the officials. The second technical foul was the one where Draymond got called for reaching around a player trying to catch a pass. He walked over towards Kerr and started waiving his hands like he usually does (and which results in a technical for almost everyone else in the league). They then teed him up. Kerr didn't do anything that would have led to him getting a technical during that play.

It was the first technical where Kerr ran at the officials. It was on the jump ball play, where Draymond basically sucker punched Shumpert. Green walked away briefly, and then when he realized they called the foul on him, he erupted, right around the same time that Kerr ran at the officials. That's the one that all three scorers said the ref said was on Draymond and later changed after the second technical.

Draymond is now telling everyone he knew he had only one technical, and he knew the first one was on Kerr. If that were even remotely true, then why after he got the "second" technical did he basically put on a full on display, where he refused to leave the court, etc. At that moment, he thought he had been thrown out of the game, and if he's saying otherwise, he's lying. If nothing else, he should have received a second or "third" technical for that display.
I was unclear. Not saying this is where Kerr got T'd up but he could have because he did charge at the officials this time as well.

My over arching point stands. A T on Draymond there is silly and unnecessary. But it's Draymond so people will obviously say he had it coming.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,057
I was unclear. Not saying this is where Kerr got T'd up but he could have because he did charge at the officials this time as well.
w
My over arching point stands. A T on Draymond there is silly and unnecessary. But it's Draymond so people will obviously say he had it coming.
In this story, they have the complete video of the 'second' technical. http://ftw.usatoday.com/2017/06/draymond-green-ejected-game-4-nba-finals-warriors-cavaliers-technical-foul-steve-kerr-referees-john-goble-mike-callahan

At the .50 second mark, you'll see the replay, and the arm wave at the ref from Draymond after the whistle, and then the second whistle for the tee comes in. I agree with you that it's silly and unnecessary, but I have also seen technicals called at least a dozen times in the past couple months on other players in the league for basically the exact same thing. It's exactly why IT4 got his technical(s) in the playoffs. You aren't allowed to throw a dismissive gesture at the refs after a call. So, I have no issue with them giving him one there, if it was his second or his first, because if they are going to call it, they should be consistent and that one has been getting called all the time.

The first technical, IMO, was the far more blatant one. Not only did he deserve that, he should have received a flagrant foul for the hit to Shumpert's head, and I think it was Van Gundy that pointed that out at the time. When he found out the foul was called on him, he was incredulous, and he erupted and that's around the same time Kerr ran at the refs, seemingly in an effort to shield Draymond from them. There really isn't any other explanation for Kerr's reaction because there is no way he would have argued that Draymond didn't foul Shumpert.

Anyway, in the end, I'm just glad the Cavs won, and it didn't end up having an effect on the outcome of the game, but these situations where the refs completely lose control of the court are becoming more and more common. The referees are THE story in like every other game in these playoffs, and the NBA needs to figure out a way to fix this.
 

Valek123

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
982
Upper Valley
The only way the Cavs win is to turn this into a street fight game.

They seem to have gotten the memo and GS appeared for one game to be mentally fragile. We'll see who adjusts tomorrow night.
 

djbayko

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
25,948
Los Angeles, CA
Next season's odds:


Utah with same odds as Lakers?
Here are the odds from a sharper book (Bookmaker). In fact, I'm sure Bovada modeled their odds directly from here or another book. You can see the win probabilities these odds translate to after removing the ~23% juice.

As you can see, arguing the odds between Utah and LA is a bit silly. Vegas is saying that almost no one has a legitimate chance beyond GSW and CLE, except maybe Boston and SA.

Yeah, LA is probably swayed by it's fan base and "OMG, LONZO BALL!!111!!!1!".

 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,057
How in the fuck did Kyrie make that shot after the steal?

And now Lebron. Holy shit. Don't count this team out folks.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,057
That was an awful call on KD.
I thought he pretty clearly put two hands in Kyrie's back and basically pushed him off the court.

Edit: Of course, guys like Tristan, Pachulia, Gortat, Sideshow Bob, etc. have been doing it constantly throughout the playoffs and it almost never gets called.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,057
If one of these games ever ends up close down the stretch, Cleveland better all of a sudden remember how to shoot free throws.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,057
I'm sorry, but I just do not understand how that's a foul on the defensive player. I get the one where the defensive player lands in front of the shooter, and the shooter jumps straight into him, but when the defender is off to the side, he's entitled to that space.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,789
I'm sorry, but I just do not understand how that's a foul on the defensive player. I get the one where the defensive player lands in front of the shooter, and the shooter jumps straight into him, but when the defender is off to the side, he's entitled to that space.

It should be changed but that was the right call tonight.