I love that they have the kids in there.Boston locker room after the game:
https://youtube.com/shorts/QOIMZkhCWvQ
I love that they have the kids in there.Boston locker room after the game:
https://youtube.com/shorts/QOIMZkhCWvQ
Swoon. Quoting Coach Nick gets you mega Celtics bucks.
Fixed.It's so easy to see and a lot of people who spend their lives discussing basketballcan't see this.are being asked by their employers to take the bullshit side to drum up ratings / clicks, or manipulate betting lines
That's pretty damning. It's almost as if the Boston offense should just be that whomever Luca is guarding screens for the ball carrier. He'll either get beat or refuse to rotate and it will leave the weakside exposed.
It sort of did go for a full quarter. Tatum hits a 3 to put the Celtics up 58-29 with 4:11 to go in the second. With 4:28 to go in the third, Luka hits a 3 to cut the Celtic lead to 8, 72-64. Brown goes 1-2 at the line with 3:55 to go. That's a 12-minute span where Dallas pounds the Celtics, 35-14.Another positive for this team is that the type of lull they had to start the third went on for whole quarters last year. Joe pulls the trigger on timeouts and they guys respond.
I don't think Dallas plays the brand of defense that our prior opponents did which I think got in Hauser's head.Don’t look now but Hauser might be fixed.
Look at him lumber up the court after the missed layup. He's really struggling to get back.
In fairness to the crowd, it was hard to tell that he was even there last night.
When Luka went to the ground and had to sprint to get back on defense, they showed a picture of Luka's face. I was afraid he was going to collapse right there. I can't find a picture right now; will try to get one later.Look at him lumber up the court after the missed layup. He's really struggling to get back.
This is why the Bird comparisons nauseate me. Bird got his ass into NBA shape and was tenacious on both ends all game. Luka, otoh, is an incredibly offensively talented doughboy who cannot be bothered to get into NBA shape and compete on D. Call me a homer or whatever, but I’ll never have this guy in my top 5. He is a bottom of the barrel defender.Look at him lumber up the court after the missed layup. He's really struggling to get back.
I remember that shot. Looked like a guy with three kids shoveling his car out of a snowbank, the day after a bender.When Luka went to the ground and had to sprint to get back on defense, they showed a picture of Luka's face. I was afraid he was going to collapse right there. I can't find a picture right now; will try to get one later.
Larry was 3 times all-defensive team and 38th all-time in steals per game. Larry had some one-on-one limitations but he was a great help defender and knew where he was supposed to be on defense.This is why the Bird comparisons nauseate me. Bird got his ass into NBA shape and was tenacious on both ends all game. Luka, otoh, is an incredibly offensively talented doughboy who cannot be bothered to get into NBA shape and compete on D. Call me a homer or whatever, but I’ll never have this guy in my top 5. He is a bottom of the barrel defender.
Or, looked a lot like me trying to shovel 28 inches of snow at 10,000 feet in CO like two months ago.I remember that shot. Looked like a guy with three kids shoveling his car out of a snowbank, the day after a bender.
Kyrie going full Native American beads in his presser
A few years ago he and his sister connected to their NA roots by spending time at the Standing Rock Sioux reservation. He’s 1/4 Sioux. My belief is that his connection with the Sioux matured him a bit. Didn’t make him any smarter or less of a horse’s ass but grounded him.to be fair to this piece of shit, I think his mommy is NA
Also, playoff games tend to get louder when they're really close and there's a lot of tension. This one was a laugher for most of the game.Trolling the crowd after losing your 11th straight game to that team after shooting 6-19 takes an extra special level of insanity.
A couple things that scream immaturity with Luka (& athletes like him).Larry was 3 times all-defensive team and 38th all-time in steals per game. Larry had some one-on-one limitations but he was a great help defender and knew where he was supposed to be on defense.
Luka just doesn't give a sh&t. I hope a lot more of these videos come out where Luka is standing around doing nothing - maybe that gets him motivated to get him in shape and play defense at some point in his career.
Assume you saw the Barkley quote. Paraphrasing…”I always say it kills me when people compare Luka to Larry. That said, if Luka beats the Celtics this series, he might earn the Larry comparison. Dallas has no chance.”This is why the Bird comparisons nauseate me. Bird got his ass into NBA shape and was tenacious on both ends all game. Luka, otoh, is an incredibly offensively talented doughboy who cannot be bothered to get into NBA shape and compete on D. Call me a homer or whatever, but I’ll never have this guy in my top 5. He is a bottom of the barrel defender.
This team is a fucking powerhouse!I don’t think we can overstate just how good Jrue and Derrick are at playing basketball. What I mean is that they just know where to be and what to do at all times. On defense last night Derrick just seemed to be able to pick his spots on when to help, double or switch. This wasn’t scheme it was just pure basketball skill and instinct.
Yea, I think Ky and his sister embraced their North American tribal roots during his time with Boston. He used incense to ward off bad spirits before a game a few years ago.A few years ago he and his sister connected to their NA roots by spending time at the Standing Rock Sioux reservation. He’s 1/4 Sioux. My belief is that his connection with the Sioux matured him a bit. Didn’t make him any smarter or less of a horse’s ass but grounded him.
Good stuff. Thanks for posting.All week long, pundits were talking about how DAL torched the #1 defense in the NBA so they shouldn't have problems with BOS. Only a few understood how different BOS's defense is from MIN (plus the fact that BOS had so many blowouts, their defense was probably underrated).
In G5 against MIN, DAL scored something absurd like 120 points per 100 possessions (may be more, don't want to look it up right now) in the half-court. Last night? 77.1 f'ng points per 100 possessions (96.7 /100 possessions overall, a playoff low for DAL).
This article - https://www.sbnation.com/nba/2024/6/7/24173426/nba-playoffs-finals-game-1-celtics-mavericks-luka-doncic-kyrie-irving-jayson-tatum-film-breakdown - is a very good look on how BOS defended. It includes some schematic commentary, which I love. It also includes a video that shows most (if not all) of Luka's missed shots off the PnR. I'm still laughing at all of the commentary who said that BOS wouldn't be able switch Al onto Luka (which they did a lot on March 1 - as if Al really aged tremendously in 3 months?).
Also, PP allowed 1 made FG before garbage time - and that was to PJ Washington. Luka was 0-2 and Kyrie was 0-2.
What a defensive performance - and that includes the 2Q/3Q run by DAL.
Before the series, I figured if BOS could score more than 115, they'd win. Karalis had his magic number at 110. I'm starting to wonder how many times DAL is going to break 100.
Basically it means you should be aware of where you are relative to your teammates and, as appropriate, move off-ball to avoid clogging up an area. You don’t want two guys off ball standing in tight formation because it makes the defenders’ coverage easier/makes it harder for whoever has the ball to create an open look. If you watch the Celtics players off the ball for a few possessions you’ll notice this, eg, guys will shuffle to the perimeter, especially the corners, if they see an action coming or if they otherwise sense a teammate is moving into their area. It’s akin to receivers in football maintaining proper splits/depth in their routes so they aren’t finishing routes on top of each other, but it is a harder in basketball because the gameplay is more fluid.What does it mean to "work really hard to keep your spacing"? I heard it during the broadcast and in a post-game interview by Kyrie.
Yeah, Dallas plays "chessboard" offense. Luka sets up the chessboard, makes a move, and then he shoots or passes directly for a shot, depending on the opponent's reaction.I've never really liked Dallas' offense during the playoffs. It's very heliocentric and reliant on Luka (and to a lesser extent, Kyrie) to make something happen with everyone else standing around in designated spots. The game last night was really just hoping Luka makes some tough shots. When Dallas' went on their run in the third quarter it was really because Luka made a series of extremely difficult shots, and that just isn't sustainable over the course of the game.
It's funny to see how so many people were suckered into talking about individual offensive ability leading up to the series, which led to a ton of focus on "How will the Celtics stop Luka/Kyrie?" and then you watch Game 1 and it's clear the Celtics have a far superior offense because they play five out, everyone moves, and they really swing the ball around to the open man. Luka is the best offensive player in this series from an individual skill perspective, but the Celtics are better at actually putting the ball into the basket than the Mavericks, and that is what matters.
A hugely impressive thing to me was how the Celtics schematically took away Dallas' lob game, which had devastated teams during this run. I don't recall any successful lobs and only a few attempts from the Mavs. That really reduces the effectiveness Lively/Gafford have on offense.
Porzingis' contributions on defense were just as important as his shot making on offense. The Celtics did get carved up at the rim by Indiana, but KP is such a deterrence with his length and timing--he made a bunch of plays in the first half, some of which were highlight blocks and others were just him effecting shots at the basket.
I came away from that Indy series so impressed with the Pacers. They play hard and they play the right way. Maybe next year when they make another deep playoff run, they will start to earn some respect.Yeah, Dallas plays "chessboard" offense. Luka sets up the chessboard, makes a move, and then he shoots or passes directly for a shot, depending on the opponent's reaction.
They don't have guys who can extend advantages, so the possession bogs down if the chess move doesn't lead to a shot.
Compare that to Indiana, who constantly move, reset, react, and force you to defend for 24 seconds. There's a reason that Indiana's offense all season *without* Halliburton was better than Dallas' overall.
#2 reminded me of this piece on Porzingis. Basically, he says his whole game leveled up when he started listening to the stats guys and understanding what efficient play would do for making him more of a winning player. It wouldn’t surprise me if Luka makes a similar leap in a couple years, and then watch out.A couple things that scream immaturity with Luka (& athletes like him).
1. He doesn't go full throttle on his conditioning in-season & off-season.
2. He doesn't explore what the advanced metrics say about his play. Analyzing his play solely on Triple Double/counting stats or just watching film isn't enough these days from a player at his level.
Won't matter if he doesn't get into elite shape. The only guy who wasn't in elite shape in the last like 45 years to have multiple titles as a star is Shaq. And I think he's an entirely different animal. And he was still in much better shape than Luka for most of those titles.#2 reminded me of this piece on Porzingis. Basically, he says his whole game leveled up when he started listening to the stats guys and understanding what efficient play would do for making him more of a winning player. It wouldn’t surprise me if Luka makes a similar leap in a couple years, and then watch out.
Not a great endorsement of the Mavs coaching staff tho…
That all makes sense and while I'm sure it's harder than I'm making it out to be, what's so hard about it? Like, big praise for Boston doing that from the announcers and Kyrie, so why don't all teams space out like that?Basically it means you should be aware of where you are relative to your teammates and, as appropriate, move off-ball to avoid clogging up an area. You don’t want two guys off ball standing in tight formation because it makes the defenders’ coverage easier/makes it harder for whoever has the ball to create an open look. If you watch the Celtics players off the ball for a few possessions you’ll notice this, eg, guys will shuffle to the perimeter, especially the corners, if they see an action coming or if they otherwise sense a teammate is moving into their area. It’s akin to receivers in football maintaining proper splits/depth in their routes so they aren’t finishing routes on top of each other, but it is a harder in basketball because the gameplay is more fluid.
It’s also why teams try to have legitimate shooters at all five spots if possible. If you have a bad shooter, like a Rudy Gobert, out there teams will literally sag off them 10 plus feet if they are standing/moving around the perimeter, allowing the defender to help more on other players.
Carlisle had them doing some special stuff on offense over there, and they get no credit. Respect.I came away from that Indy series so impressed with the Pacers. They play hard and they play the right way. Maybe next year when they make another deep playoff run, they will start to earn some respect.
Personnel mostly. Not every team has 5 players that can all shoot the ball well enough that the defense has to respect themThat all makes sense and while I'm sure it's harder than I'm making it out to be, what's so hard about it? Like, big praise for Boston doing that from the announcers and Kyrie, so why don't all teams space out like that?
One of the things people in general don't get is the Mavs are not going to be as good as the Pacers were on offense. They aren't going to sniff that. Luka and Kyrie want to slow the game down.Carlisle had them doing some special stuff on offense over there, and they get no credit. Respect.
Part of it is just a self-fulfilling prophecy: The Cs always have five shooters on the floor, so all of them get respect from defenders, thus they have good spacing. If X is out there, or Brissy, the defenders start to sag off them and - voila - the spacing gets worse.That all makes sense and while I'm sure it's harder than I'm making it out to be, what's so hard about it? Like, big praise for Boston doing that from the announcers and Kyrie, so why don't all teams space out like that?
Wow, that's nuts. You'd think some random game in Feb or when they were tanking last year and not trying would be the fewest. But nope.This stat is wild
In Game 1, however, Dallas went 1-for-6 on shots off Doncic's passes, and had just 209 total passes as a team, per Second Spectrum's tracking data, the Mavericks' fewest in any game (regular season or playoffs) since player tracking began in the 2013-14 season