Hah, so it is. Now I can definitely root for the Hawks.The NBA cup game is Friday. This is just a normal regular season game.
Hah, so it is. Now I can definitely root for the Hawks.The NBA cup game is Friday. This is just a normal regular season game.
well, the thing that doesn’t quite translate is the lack of a true pyramid in American hoops. The real sizzle in soccer cups is when the big boys have to play minnows. For those unfamiliar with the English FA Cup, probably the best known of these, the bottom tiers of the pyramid play off first to send a certain number of clubs into the cup proper, but once that occurs the draws are random, no seeding at all- two balls out of the sorting hat play each other, first ball is the home side. (The semis and final are at Wembley).The NBA signed a multi-year deal with Emirates that they expect to result in $500m in revenue each year so yes it is continuing to be a thing. I do think that overseas fans will embrace this Cup more than American fans as they are accustomed to in-season soccer events such as this even if the format is unique.
My head says we should be rooting for the Cavs, but my heart is definitely rooting for the Hawks. I'll prefer to think of this game as win-win.I find myself rooting for the CAVs to beat the HAWKs, which is against the Celtic's long-term interests
I guess this means the CUP works
Cleveland was always going to regress this year when they stopped shooting 42% or whatever from 3. It's too bad that had to happen exactly now.Cleveland in real trouble of blowing this. Mitchell playing like absolute garbage, shooting 2-17 halfway through the 3rd quarter.
win-win feels about rightMy head says we should be rooting for the Cavs, but my heart is definitely rooting for the Hawks. I'll prefer to think of this game as win-win.
They don't have anybody on the roster bad enough to make it worth the effort, at least not among guys getting regular minutes (not compared to Drummond).So who do the Celtics foul tonight to try and win by 30?
No. Head to head is tiebreaker.The C’s can no longer win the group, right?
NM i'm wrong.No. Head to head is tiebreaker.
Chance for wild card, but need big win and some help.
That’s why the Celtics should win by 15+ tonight (favored by 12) to guarantee it.We should be rooting for Orlando (2-0 and +37) to beat the Knicks (3-0 and +15), and for Milwaukee (3-0 and +29) to beat Detroit (2-0 and +4). Boston is currently +14 so if Orlando and Milwaukee win, it's not possible for the Knicks to have a better point differential than Boston, and we'll have a major edge over Detroit.
15 guarantees nothing. Celtics need to win by 24 plus whatever Magic beats the Nets by. If Magic loses, then winning by 15+ is probably “safe” assuming Knicks don’t beat the Magic by 30.That’s why the Celtics should win by 15+ tonight (favored by 12) to guarantee it.
Yeah. Absent a 30 point beatdown on Chicago, it will take a lot of help to get past Orlando.Their best path is for the Magic to win out or lose out, if I’m tracking.
Posted in the game thread, but if two teams tie in point differential, the third tiebreaker is total points scored in Cup games. Unless Detroit scores 142 or Milwaukee scores 148, Boston would win the third tiebreaker. So, I think it's Milwaukee by 5 or Detroit by 6.Orlando winning by so much makes things relatively simple, if frustratingly out of our control:
View: https://twitter.com/SeanGrandePBP/status/1862700346071523703
That Hauser 3 might end up meaning something.
I see this as a win-win, honestly. Adam Silver gave you a better product, which is all you needed because watching the NFL is often a chore (although the game today was a good one).Further, I can’t believe I:
- watched a horrific Cavs @ Hawks 2:30 pm game today from start to ginihs
- was excited to do so starting at nokn
- did it over an NFL game
- Am very excited rooting for a Celtics 20 point win tonight in a generally meaningless late Nov game vs the hapless Bulls.
All because of the Cup. Goddamn you Adam Silver.
2nd this. I liked Indy a lot coming into the season. They still have time. Maybe Hali should stop screwing around with podcasting.also, good christ, the Pacers couldn't even beat Detroit? My high praise for them in the offseason looks foolish now, the Rick Carlisle pixie dust truly is gone with the wind.
I do not believe for one second that The Cup was the only reason you watched that game. Tell me I’m wrong.Further, I can’t believe I:
- watched a horrific Cavs @ Hawks 2:30 pm game today from start to ginihs
- was excited to do so starting at nokn
- did it over an NFL game
- Am very excited rooting for a Celtics 20 point win tonight in a generally meaningless late Nov game vs the hapless Bulls.
All because of the Cup. Goddamn you Adam Silver.
I said this prior to the year....this format is designed for us to see more Indiana's of last year than a Celtics/OKC Final. Looking like Portland and Atlanta are last years Pacers.West Group A contains Houston, Minnesota, Clippers, Sacramento and Portland. How many people would have had Portland advancing out of that group? Not many, I'd wager. And yet they're in a position to do so, if they blow out the Clippers in Inglewood on Tuesday, and a few other points differentials go their way.
It's funny because I think the 2024 Pacers were the more recent version of the 2021 Hawks. Full circle.I said this prior to the year....this format is designed for us to see more Indiana's of last year than a Celtics/OKC Final. Looking like Portland and Atlanta are last years Pacers.
Yes, but it also exposes some silly flaws in the way this is structured. Unless you are really paying attention it's impossible to follow this group round play and qualifying. Everything is too conditional. I get there's rational logic to the format but the Cup will fail if the best teams aren't in it year after year. Fans can handle an upstart or two but not if they are the majority of the qualifying field.Honestly, going 3-1 in the group stage but not advancing to the knockout stage is kinda the best possible outcome long-term, isn't it? By not advancing, they're going to get to play two games against other teams who didn't advance, which should be easier matchups than the teams they'd play in Vegas. And they also avoid the chance of having to play a 83rd regular season game. Save all the bullets for the real playoffs.
Majority of the qualifying field seems like a stretch.Yes, but it also exposes some silly flaws in the way this is structured. Unless you are really paying attention it's impossible to follow this group round play and qualifying. Everything is too conditional. I get there's rational logic to the format but the Cup will fail if the best teams aren't in it year after year. Fans can handle an upstart or two but not if they are the majority of the qualifying field.
Wait, this isn’t true for the non final games right? The schedule is set, you just play the post knockout games against the teams when they would naturally be in your schedule. I thought there were no TBD opponents prior to the final game, and not advancing doesn’t adjust your schedule or future opponents. Is that wrong?Honestly, going 3-1 in the group stage but not advancing to the knockout stage is kinda the best possible outcome long-term, isn't it? By not advancing, they're going to get to play two games against other teams who didn't advance, which should be easier matchups than the teams they'd play in Vegas. And they also avoid the chance of having to play a 83rd regular season game. Save all the bullets for the real playoffs.
It’s easy to follow for people who are already really invested in the sport. It’s not easy to follow for average fans who are not day to day with this stuff. Like, you’re spelling out a scenario where potentially the two best teams thus far this season won’t even make the “quarterfinals” of this tournament - how’s a person who’s not on message boards, not listening to podcasts, not a nightly viewer supposed to get invested in the exercise when sub .500 teams are leading their “groups” and the best teams are knocked out?Majority of the qualifying field seems like a stretch.
Right now it's looking like Rockets, Suns, Warriors, Thunder/Mavs/Blazers/Spurs and Knicks/Magic, Bucks/Pistons, Hawks/Celtics — who are the best teams that aren't going to get a crack at Vegas? Maybe the Nuggets (who we're learning aren't that great this year) and definitely the Cavs. If the Cavs and Cs both miss out, you'd still be left with Knicks, Magic, Bucks/Pistons, Hawks, which is most of the rest of the interesting teams in the East.
I find the "impossible to follow" criticism baffling. It's really not that hard to follow point differential and head-to-head matchups. I think the "have to win by at least 24" or whatever to be pretty entertaining, personally. Completely changes the end-game dynamics.
Well, it would make a certain sense if the tiebreakers were just regular season record instead of point differential, but that would be worlds collidingIt’s easy to follow for people who are already really invested in the sport. It’s not easy to follow for average fans who are not day to day with this stuff. Like, you’re spelling out a scenario where potentially the two best teams thus far this season won’t even make the “quarterfinals” of this tournament - how’s a person who’s not on message boards, not listening to podcasts, not a nightly viewer supposed to get invested in the exercise when sub .500 teams are leading their “groups” and the best teams are knocked out?
Correct, it is far closer to the former than the latter. Aside from your use of "then".This is more like the Ft Myers Mayor’s Cup then an actual championship.
thx. blame my schooling.Correct, it is far closer to the former than the latter. Aside from your use of "then".
I guess those are benefits, but the Cs are getting a top 2-3 seed on autopilot this year, so I don't care much about regular season wins. Would rather see them playing more fun IST games against good teams.Yes, but it also exposes some silly flaws in the way this is structured. Unless you are really paying attention it's impossible to follow this group round play and qualifying. Everything is too conditional. I get there's rational logic to the format but the Cup will fail if the best teams aren't in it year after year. Fans can handle an upstart or two but not if they are the majority of the qualifying field.
For the QF and the SF, you play (in-conference) opponents who you would have played at some point in the regular season, and your Cup game replaced a future game you would have had against them. Those dates are TBD for everyone, and they fill in the last two games as the format dictates. So you don't have additional games against good or bad teams, just the dates of your matchups change.Wait, this isn’t true for the non final games right? The schedule is set, you just play the post knockout games against the teams when they would naturally be in your schedule. I thought there were no TBD opponents prior to the final game, and not advancing doesn’t adjust your schedule or future opponents. Is that wrong?