NBA 2018 Trade Deadline Chatter

JakeRae

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
8,167
New York, NY
I think Grizzlies would want their pick back for Evans, and that may end up being too much of a sticking point for them to do a deal with the Celtics. I would not want to give up that pick for Evans.
Ultimately, they should take the best offer, because they derive no value from keeping him. What they want isn't really relevant. It's what the other teams interested in him are willing to pay.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,484
deep inside Guido territory
I think Evans would be the choice over Lou Williams or Aaron Gordon. Williams is going to cost a king's ransom for what the Clippers want him for and I think Evans would be a better long-term fit than Aaron Gordon. Evans can be the 6th man sparkplug off the bench and could pair well with Kyrie in late-game situations.
 

ifmanis5

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2007
63,994
Rotten Apple
I think Evans would be the choice over Lou Williams or Aaron Gordon. Williams is going to cost a king's ransom for what the Clippers want him for and I think Evans would be a better long-term fit than Aaron Gordon. Evans can be the 6th man sparkplug off the bench and could pair well with Kyrie in late-game situations.
Agreed. I've always liked Tyreke. Would gladly move Rozier for him.
 

bowiac

Caveat: I know nothing about what I speak
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
12,945
New York, NY
Ultimately, they should take the best offer, because they derive no value from keeping him. What they want isn't really relevant. It's what the other teams interested in him are willing to pay.
I agree they should take the best offer, but I think it's also the case that teams can get finicky about stuff like this.
 

Swedgin

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2013
702
I think Evans would be the choice over Lou Williams or Aaron Gordon. Williams is going to cost a king's ransom for what the Clippers want him for and I think Evans would be a better long-term fit than Aaron Gordon. Evans can be the 6th man sparkplug off the bench and could pair well with Kyrie in late-game situations.
I don't long term fit enters into the calculus with Evans. He does not come with Bird rights.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,691
I think Evans would be the choice over Lou Williams or Aaron Gordon. Williams is going to cost a king's ransom for what the Clippers want him for and I think Evans would be a better long-term fit than Aaron Gordon. Evans can be the 6th man sparkplug off the bench and could pair well with Kyrie in late-game situations.
I am an admitted Lou Will fanboy but I don't agree. Williams and Evans likely will have similar suitors and while Lou is a much better scorer, Evans is a far superior two way player. Evans relative youth and contract also make him attractive to other teams as well.

The bidders will set the market for these guys versus the Clippers and the Grizzlies so it won't be shocking if Evans is more expensive than Williams in terms of assets going the other way, especially if LA staples Gallinari to Lou.

Finally, while Evans fits the Cs better long term, Williams fits them better for their more immediate need which is getting buckets - especially when Irving sits and Boston is last in the league in scoring.

Either way, they need to get one of the two or Boston won't go very far in the playoffs regardless of what Hayward can give them.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,712
I don't think it will be that easy to pry him away as Ainge doesn't have a history of giving up future assets for a limited role rental. If he does give up something it would signal to me that Evans is more of a long-term guy and that Smart is out the door (which is what I've always expected once his payday was due).
Unless Evans is willing to sign an MLE contract he’s a pure rental. I’ll be shocked if he doesn’t receive better offers, though.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,125

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,712
The cap is not going that far up so if he wants to play for a contender he might only be limited to an MLE-type contract.
On the other hand he’ll be entering his age 29 season and his last shot at a big payday. There’s a pretty good chance that he’ll get an offer to start elsewhere at better money than Boston can pay. So if they trade for him I doubt they’ll be doing any long term planning around him as the odds are that they can’t retain him.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,376
Santa Monica
Top 3 attainable targets:
1. Lou Williams
2. Tyreke Evans
3. Rodney Hood

I'd offer:
1. Our 2018 OR 2019 Celtic's first round pick+ for Lou.
2. Our 2019 1st round pick+ for Evans.
3. A 2nd rounder+ for Hood.

+ includes any of our flotsam and jetsam: Nader, Bird, Allen for above players. Guessing they have late 2nd round value (maybe even less).

Expecting our 2018 first rounder to be above #25 and 2019 above #27.

Not offering Rozier for any of the rentals. Feels like Terry will continue to improve his jumper, and believe he will take over the backup PG role while Marcus heals and potentially signs elsewhere. Also not including Yabusele for any of the rentals, think he has a role next season with work on his 3pt shot and fitness. While I want them to go for it this year, really believe we should keep our eye on 2018-19 when Gordon is fully healthy. Either way, 100% Trust in Danny/Brad.

So am I offering too little or too much?
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,754
Saint Paul, MN
Top 3 attainable targets:
1. Lou Williams
2. Tyreke Evans
3. Rodney Hood

I'd offer:
1. Our 2018 OR 2019 Celtic's first round pick+ for Lou.
2. Our 2019 1st round pick+ for Evans.
3. A 2nd rounder+ for Hood.

+ includes any of our flotsam and jetsam: Nader, Bird, Allen for above players. Guessing they have late 2nd round value (maybe even less).
flotsam and jetsam is not allowed if you are trading the DPE. It is DPE + draft picks only.

I would add Julius Randle to that list.

How about Michael Beasley? Noah Vonleh? Will Barton? Vince Carter?
 

TheRooster

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2001
2,490
no - don't trust the head, maybe - if the braintrust thinks there is hope, sure - athletics scorers are always welcome, no - too old and draws too much attention
 

Captaincoop

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
13,488
Santa Monica, CA
No, I meant Tatum/Brown.

I think Brown would probably fit better in that starting lineup where you don't need the scoring and Tatum would be able to be the lead scorer on the second unit.
Brown and Tatum are not interchangeable or comparable parts at this point. There is Tatum. And then there is Brown.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,691
Top 3 attainable targets:
1. Lou Williams
2. Tyreke Evans
3. Rodney Hood

I'd offer:
1. Our 2018 OR 2019 Celtic's first round pick+ for Lou.
2. Our 2019 1st round pick+ for Evans.
3. A 2nd rounder+ for Hood.

+ includes any of our flotsam and jetsam: Nader, Bird, Allen for above players. Guessing they have late 2nd round value (maybe even less).

Expecting our 2018 first rounder to be above #25 and 2019 above #27.

Not offering Rozier for any of the rentals. Feels like Terry will continue to improve his jumper, and believe he will take over the backup PG role while Marcus heals and potentially signs elsewhere. Also not including Yabusele for any of the rentals, think he has a role next season with work on his 3pt shot and fitness. While I want them to go for it this year, really believe we should keep our eye on 2018-19 when Gordon is fully healthy. Either way, 100% Trust in Danny/Brad.

So am I offering too little or too much?
Williams is tough to value. His gaudy offensive numbers from this season are impressive and he is, by most accounts, a good locker room guy. He also comes with Bird rights.

The problem is that he is 31 years old, is having a career year (so you are buying at the "highs"), is 6'1" and is a poor defender - as others here have noted, he is essentially what most people thought IT would become in his early 30s. So any team acquiring him is doing so for scoring only and if they are angling to resign him, they need a rotation around him that can cover for his defensive deficiencies.

The C's make sense for him and teams like Milwaukee or Toronto or Philadelphia might make sense too. In the West, Utah or maybe even someone like Denver might go after him. However, Williams isn't a player who gets a lower team into contender status - he is a guy who cements a team just outside the league elites.

Evans is tougher because he too is having a career year - and scoring in ways he hasn't before (3p% which could regress), has had a history of injuries and would be a pure rental. That said, he is a decent defender and goes well with the positionless NBA of 2018 so he fits a lot of teams.

Regarding Hood, my guess is that Utah will ask a lot for him given that he younger and under control for these guys. He will be the most expensive because Utah doesn't have to trade him.

I would bet Williams gets moved first and the Grizzlies then maximize Evans' value by auctioning him off to the also rans. I wonder if the markets for both are going to be softer than we might otherwise think because neither is a guy who a smart team would trade significant assets for given their ages, flaws and the fact that neither is a player you can really build around.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,376
Santa Monica
flotsam and jetsam is not allowed if you are trading the DPE. It is DPE + draft picks only.

I would add Julius Randle to that list.

How about Michael Beasley? Noah Vonleh? Will Barton? Vince Carter?
You could save the DPE (for buyouts after the trade deadline) if you sent Larkin/Nader + Draft Pick for Hood or Evans. Lou would take the DPE.

I wonder if using the DPE increases our bargaining power (since the other team gets to save a few $$$ by not taking back salary).

Randle, sure. But doesn't spread the floor

Vonleh, not really the scorer we need on the 2nd unit

Barton, Denver is playoff bound, not sure why they would be motivated sellers.

Beasley, Knicks probably think they are in the playoff hunt and will try to buy.
 
Last edited:

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,754
Saint Paul, MN
I think we need to temper our expectations that there will be someone better than Lou Williams or Tyreke Evans available in the buyout market. If I remember correctly, last year's buyouts included Deron Williams, Andrew Bogut, Matt Barnes, and Jose Calderon.

Who are we expecting to possible maybe be bought out and available? Greg Monroe?
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,376
Santa Monica
I think we need to temper our expectations that there will be someone better than Lou Williams or Tyreke Evans available in the buyout market. If I remember correctly, last year's buyouts included Deron Williams, Andrew Bogut, Matt Barnes, and Jose Calderon.

Who are we expecting to possible maybe be bought out and available? Greg Monroe?
Monroe has been getting minutes lately and Lens has been upset. Lens may be available in a trade? Monroe is probably being offered around if they can't move him I'd imagine they try to buy him out at a discount post-deadline.
 

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,552
Who's more likely to be a future NBA Finals MVP? Tatum by a long shot. His development is more important, so he should be the starter if there's only one spot.
It doesn't matter who starts. They'd probably end up playing the same amount of minutes in this scenario. It's just about fit. Who would be the better guy to take the scoring load on a second unit, Brown or Tatum?
 

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,552
Brown and Tatum are not interchangeable or comparable parts at this point. There is Tatum. And then there is Brown.
I didn't say they were. You don't necessarily need to have your best five players in your starting lineup. People lose their minds over who starts. It's not baseball. They'd both get their minutes, just think it makes much more sense if you can only fit one in a starting lineup that already includes Kyrie and Hayward, the lesser offensive guy would be the choice and the better offensive guy would be used when one of Kyrie/Hayward comes out. Doesn't seem like that hot a take.
 

Captaincoop

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
13,488
Santa Monica, CA
I didn't say they were. You don't necessarily need to have your best five players in your starting lineup. People lose their minds over who starts. It's not baseball. They'd both get their minutes, just think it makes much more sense if you can only fit one in a starting lineup that already includes Kyrie and Hayward, the lesser offensive guy would be the choice and the better offensive guy would be used when one of Kyrie/Hayward comes out. Doesn't seem like that hot a take.
I completely misread your post. I thought you were suggesting trading "Tatum/Brown", not starting one and bringing the other off the bench.

Mea culpa.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,125
Hmm, Sherrod says Grizzlies like Rozier. Kyrie has a “contusion” (yes I know he was kneed) and Rozier gets the start.
Kyrie was banged in Denver game, give him day off. And there's no way we trade our backup PG for Evans.
 

Sprowl

mikey lowell of the sandbox
Dope
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
34,640
Haiku
Will Evans be a good fit with Stevens' switching defenses? He certainly has the size and offensive skills that the Celtics crave, but if he can't master the D, then Stevens will go back to Ojeleye every time.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,125
Woj on ESPN says it's possible Lou Williams signs a new deal with LAC. That does not preclude a deal, it sets a definite value on him.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,691
Woj on ESPN says it's possible Lou Williams signs a new deal with LAC. That does not preclude a deal, it sets a definite value on him.
Interesting. Though that doesn't square with the idea that Clippers are trying to set up to sign a few max free agents.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,172
Here
If they can get Monroe, one of Evans/Williams, and then Hayward back, they have a serious shot. Is it worth the Memphis pick to make a run? Seems like a pretty tough call.
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,754
Saint Paul, MN
If they can get Monroe, one of Evans/Williams, and then Hayward back, they have a serious shot. Is it worth the Memphis pick to make a run? Seems like a pretty tough call.
MEM pick for who? Evans or Williams? That is nuts. That is a potential top of the lottery pick, and something you hold on to when you need to make a big move.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,376
Santa Monica
+ includes any of our flotsam and jetsam: Nader, Bird, Allen for above players. Guessing they have late 2nd round value (maybe even less).
a few hours later and I'm already offering a mea culpa

Nader's +22 tonight spits on my flotsam and jetsam comment
 
Last edited:

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
9,423
San Francisco
MEM pick for who? Evans or Williams? That is nuts. That is a potential top of the lottery pick, and something you hold on to when you need to make a big move.
The Memphis pick has top 8 protection next year, top 6 in 2020, and is unprotected for 2021. They might turn out to be too bad for that pick to convey and then once it does I bet they will have regressed to mediocrity. We can hope.

And anyone who thinks Yabu is anything other than flotsam has not watched him play. Seriously, the guy looks like someone who has never played basketball before. Definitely some athleticism and a big who might be able to shoot is the caramel apple of everyone's eye these days but he's awkward as hell.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,355
Yabu for Evans works. The grizz get a young cost controlled player and the salaries match.
The Grizzlies want a #1 for Tyreke......not a 22-yr guy who has shown in two years that he cannot yet play in this league. Ainge gets hung up on within seconds.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,255
No thanks. I don't want to trade a 22yr old BIG, that can shoot the 3, and controlled for 3+ years on the cheap.
That’s great and all. But the guy is filler and has no trade value. He doesn’t belong in this league and probably won’t last long.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,691
Again, Evans is tough to value too. He has the two way bonafides and decent size. However his 3p% is not really 40% (its 29% in 10 games in January and the Grizzlies have wisely benched him to avoid him either getting hurt or dragging down his ~career high shooting percentages). He also has shown a tendency to get injured.

The Grizzlies are reportedly seeking a first for him and may get it. But its a steep price to pay for a journeyman rental who may not be exactly what the Celtics need, especially if his shooting continues to regress to the mean (which I suspect is more like a 35% 3p shooter - not awful but not exactly a huge upgrade over what Boston already has).

Edit: I will be even more bold in the face of what appears to be a lot of 'Reke love - he is a pretty flawed NBA player and the variance in outcomes for him on a new team, especially given that he would have to learn a brand new system on the fly, is pretty large. I hope he is a fallback if the C's cannot get Williams. In short, Williams would be a pretty big difference maker for the Celtics. Evans not so much.
 

Imbricus

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 26, 2017
4,878
That’s great and all. But the guy is filler and has no trade value. He doesn’t belong in this league and probably won’t last long.
This seems about right. Last night Nader was a pleasant surprise and for once looked like he belonged on an NBA court. I've yet to see a game with Yabusele where I thought the same. Do you remember the game -- was it Milwaukee or Charlotte? -- where Brad expressly sent him in to foul someone, and Yabu couldn't even get that right, and Brad yanked him out of the game in disgust.