It was an epic game from a super duper star.Colin Cowherd was on Timpf's show tonight dumping all over Tatum. There are a few posters here fist pumping him. Tatum had a game of Larry proportions tonight. Suck it, ya'll.
It was the kind of game when we look back at Larry’s career and we are like yeah. He is our guy.It was an epic game from a super duper star.
Get that shit outta here.The funniest thing here isn't just the confidently dumb takes; it's the multiple people saying they're screwed without Udoka. Ime must really have his tentacles deep into the media:
View: https://twitter.com/celticsunite18/status/1802897039308558612?s=46
A bit late to this thread, but ... Dennis Johnson fits the bill in very much a similar way. GREAT defender with ice cold blood in the clutch.I was thinking about this earlier. Jrue is so key. I can't think of a good comp for a Boston team where they brought in a guy who was the missing piece and totally helped solidify the culture. Maybe like Rodney Harrison. Different styles and roles, but similar impact.
Most days in first place!He admit it!
View: https://twitter.com/TheDunkCentral/status/1803082334930862257
Stephen A. Smith says the Lakers are still a better franchise than the Celtics "[The Lakers'] time spent in relevancy is significantly more than [the Celtics]."
Yes, SAS is sticking with his 'the Lakers have been to more Finals than Celtics so they're more relevant' take all morning. To be fair, if you work at ESPN you are forced at gunpoint to talk Cowboys and Lakers all day no matter what.SAS is full of shit. Finals appearances is his new bogey. Fuck him.
I guess by SAS logic the Pats got a lock on the NFL relevant scale and should be good for awhile.Yes, SAS is sticking with his 'the Lakers have been to more Finals than Celtics so they're more relevant' take all morning. To be fair, if you work at ESPN you are forced at gunpoint to talk Cowboys and Lakers all day no matter what.
ESPN likely won't but that's why we have the NBA TV option. I echo your appreciation of the job they did analyzing the game and series as well as interviewing all the Cs people. That channel is almost always the better option than the mouth-breather fare that the WWL puts out.Watched the discussion and interviews on NBA TV in the middle of last night and really liked the group that included Jamal Mashburn, Jamal Crawford and Udonis Haslem. They are all sharp, insightful and appreciative of how great the Celts played this season. They interviewed JB, JT, CJM, Brad, Al and Jrue and to a man the mutual respect and knowledge of the game were on full display. Dennis Scott joined them later and fits in very well with the group. These guys plus Steve Smith are top notch and interesting. I pray that ESPN dumps the trash they’re throwing up against SAS’ wall and go with guys like this next year.
Irks me that we’re force fed a shitbag like Draymond or an idiot like Perk. There are so many guys out there that add value.ESPN likely won't but that's why we have the NBA TV option. I echo your appreciation of the job they did analyzing the game and series as well as interviewing all the Cs people. That channel is almost always the better option than the mouth-breather fare that the WWL puts out.
It’s kind of hilarious. They lost in the first round to Denver in 5, whom lost to the Timberwolves, whom lost to the Mavericks, whom the Celtics just destroyed. I have a real hard time seeing them getting much better next year as well.The Lakers will remain more relevant so long as the national media keeps pushing them as if they’re the most important franchise in the NBA. I mean, what are we doing here.
Perk does a YouTube/podcast? with Richard Jefferson and two others where he's much easier to listen to. Last night he basically said that he felt betrayed by the C's when they lost two years ago..where he'd been a Celts homer.. so he didn't trust this team/duo anymore. I'm sure ESPN has something to do with his hot takes, but he seemed very happy last night that they'd won it.Irks me that we’re force fed a shitbag like Draymond or an idiot like Perk. There are so many guys out there that add value.
Perk was on Pardon My Take recently and kind of admitted that he is often forced to have an angle so they have something to argue about on air for ratings. He may have felt betrayed by the 2022 team but it seems a lot of what he says is a work for engagement at the behest of producers at ESPN.Perk does a YouTube/podcast? with Richard Jefferson and two others where he's much easier to listen to. Last night he basically said that he felt betrayed by the C's when they lost two years ago..where he'd been a Celts homer.. so he didn't trust this team/duo anymore. I'm sure ESPN has something to do with his hot takes, but he seemed very happy last night that they'd won it.
Perks' job is to be the fool. Road Tripping his podcast with RJ is way better if you want thoughtful Perk.Irks me that we’re force fed a shitbag like Draymond or an idiot like Perk. There are so many guys out there that add value.
Yeah.. I think that's what I was listening to... he's much better on there..like light years better.Perks' job is to be the fool. Road Tripping his podcast with RJ is way better if you want thoughtful Perk.
I think Perk.. like everyone else at ESPN has realized that if you aren't SAS or SAS lite you're not getting air time...to the detriment of that entire organization.Perk was on Pardon My Take recently and kind of admitted that he is often forced to have an angle so they have something to argue about on air for ratings. He may have felt betrayed by the 2022 team but it seems a lot of what he says is a work for engagement at the behest of producers at ESPN.
Perk has a role, ESPN wanted their own Shaq. His job is give a backboard to which Windhorst and Lowe can bounce without going after Stephen A. Perk brings a lot of value to ESPN's NBA team but as the fool.I think Perk.. like everyone else at ESPN has realized that if you aren't SAS or SAS lite you're not getting air time...to the detriment of that entire organization.
Perk does a YouTube/podcast? with Richard Jefferson and two others where he's much easier to listen to.
IPerks' job is to be the fool. Road Tripping his podcast with RJ is way better if you want thoughtful Perk.
He admit it!
View: https://twitter.com/TheDunkCentral/status/1803082334930862257
Stephen A. Smith says the Lakers are still a better franchise than the Celtics "[The Lakers'] time spent in relevancy is significantly more than [the Celtics]."
Is ESPN back to doing who’s more now?Yes, SAS is sticking with his 'the Lakers have been to more Finals than Celtics so they're more relevant' take all morning. To be fair, if you work at ESPN you are forced at gunpoint to talk Cowboys and Lakers all day no matter what.
Do you mean Michael Che? I don't think that would work. He's got some pretty stupid opinions about basketball (specifically WNBA) and I don't think he can be the level of professional they needPerk has a role, ESPN wanted their own Shaq. His job is give a backboard to which Windhorst and Lowe can bounce without going after Stephen A. Perk brings a lot of value to ESPN's NBA team but as the fool.
TNT is the best NBA coverage and The Ringer is fantastically entertaining. ESPN had to step their coverage up a lot and Perk is a part of that as is JJ who they are going to lose. Crap Skip is better with Pierce and Keyshawn.
NBA sports talk is just so much better than other sports. We can hit on the Ringer but even wrong they at least get you to think.
I am curious what NBC and Amazon are going to do. NBC sort of has Rich Eisen and they could move Che? I don't think Tirico could carry a studio show with athletes. I am little shocked they aren't using the Olympics to try some things out (Bob Fitzgerald is the play by play guy from the Warriors is calling the games).
I disliked RJ as a player but the way he interacts with Reddick and others is pretty hilarious.. hes constantly giving others shit.. but in an amusing wayI
’ll give it a listen, thanks fellas. And RJ, a guy I didn’t like as a player, has turned out to be pretty good when I hear him calling games. Maybe he brings the best out of Perk.
Che is really good at holding court. He is the head writer of SNL. I think it isn't a slam dunk but I am not sure who NBC is going to dig up. I would guess they grab Kenny and Shaq. Garnett is still under contract with Viacom. Do they drag up Forsburg or White Mamba?Do you mean Michael Che? I don't think that would work. He's got some pretty stupid opinions about basketball (specifically WNBA) and I don't think he can be the level of professional they need
But the Lakers spent a whole decade fighting through Dale Ellis, Kiki Vandeweghe, Alvan Adams, Reggie Theus, Adrian Dantley and Purvis Short to make the Finals. Don't you understand how daunting that gauntlet was????SAS is full of shit. Finals appearances is his new bogey. Fuck him.
Celts have won the most championships, most games, and have better all-time winning % than the MFL
And they did it repping one city and one region.
In head to head its not close, regular season or post-season. Celts lead 9-3 in H2H championships.
And the Celts have a history of being home grown and built with OEM players.
From Wilt to KAJ, to Shaq, to LBJ the Lakers import greatness and championships to stay relevant.
SAS Keep on moving the goalposts, or baskets, you fucking hot take, hot mess dick.
It's a lot easier to be Kerr than Jordan.Gotta ask: given the consistent clutch 3pt shooting, great steals and blocks ... was DW the Celt's best 4th quarter player during these playoffs?
They are? His breakdowns were excellent throughout the playoffs and he was just on SVP last night and they said nary a peep about it being his last Finals. That’s a bummer.While I think Legler has veered off track a bit the last couple of years, I’m still shocked that ESPN is letting his contract expire.
Happily, the Celtics delivered. And the pairing for our soup entree is braised crow.I would LOVE for it to be a 4 or 5 game utter beatdown. It would be nothing but mea culpas for a month.
Weird flex when half the titles were against the Lakers themselves.Of course, today the discourse among the dickbags I call co-workers here in Laker land is that most of our championships were won before color TV.
Here is the thing. If people stopped paying attention to Nick Wright takes - because we probably have school aged lurkers who have more insight - they would likely go away.Um…the Celtics didn’t have “the guy”. They had two of them. Wright is making it seem like this was the Rip Hamilton Pistons.
I don’t honestly believe that half of these people actually thought the Mavs would win the series. It’s all TV bullshit. There’s nothing compelling about picking the 64 win regular season team that was 12-2 heading into the Finals.
Agreed, while I think a couple of them are absolute morons I do suspect that some of this is theatre. That is also, as an aside, part of why Luka's defense isn't talked about as much---it's bad for the product to dump on one of the heroes. It isn't that, say, Redick is unaware Luka's defense is atrocious...it's that it isn't helpful for ESPN's purpose to say it too often, or too early.I don’t honestly believe that half of these people actually thought the Mavs would win the series. It’s all TV bullshit. There’s nothing compelling about picking the 64 win regular season team that was 12-2 heading into the Finals.
SVP was on Russillo just going in on how stupid he thought it was that people didn't get Boston was way better. He said he couldn't believe Legler choose the Mavs and him and Windhorst were making fun of him.I don’t honestly believe that half of these people actually thought the Mavs would win the series. It’s all TV bullshit. There’s nothing compelling about picking the 64 win regular season team that was 12-2 heading into the Finals.