I think there is a lot to be said for the media environment we are in, across the board, but especially with the NBA and especially on social media, that so many analysts are more obsessed with defending their past takes and trying to craft narratives that they often sound incredibly ignorant about the things that are actually happening. People are afraid of being dunked on in social media, or internally by other media people, that they spend too much time defending their previous statements (I think Lowe has been caught up in this, as an example) and stop providing any real analysis.
What the Celtics have done to the Mavericks this series has been simple and predictable--the Celtics have the personnel to match up against the Mavericks iso-heavy offense that revolves around Luka and Kyrie, and the Celtics will be able to exploit the defensive limitations of those two players on offense. There was also predictable shooting regression from Washington and DJJ, and that has basically led to the Celtics being up 3-0 in the series. None of this should really be a shock, and yet it has contrasted with what many "smart" NBA people expected.
Really, this whole situation got out of whack when Minnesota beat Denver, in one of the craziest back-and-forth series we've seen. That set the table for "Minnesota is going to win the title, they just suffocated the champs" which of course, set up Dallas to be the REAL killers, when Minnesota's offense predictably went to shit in the following series and their defense fell off as they were poorly suited to matchup with Dallas. Dallas entered the Finals with the image that they were a super team, because they went through a Western Conference that really wasn't that great to begin with, and lost it's dominant team when Murray got banged up.
The Celtics calmly took care of business in the Eastern Conference, and really, do Jimmy Butler, Donovan Mitchell, or Haliburton playing in every game really change those series that much? The Celtics wouldn't have blitzed over them anyway. Even Giannis staying healthy, that series might have been pretty tough for the Celtics, but the Celtics were far better than the Bucks throughout the entire season and the Bucks lack depth something fierce.
What the Celtics have done to the Mavericks this series has been simple and predictable--the Celtics have the personnel to match up against the Mavericks iso-heavy offense that revolves around Luka and Kyrie, and the Celtics will be able to exploit the defensive limitations of those two players on offense. There was also predictable shooting regression from Washington and DJJ, and that has basically led to the Celtics being up 3-0 in the series. None of this should really be a shock, and yet it has contrasted with what many "smart" NBA people expected.
Really, this whole situation got out of whack when Minnesota beat Denver, in one of the craziest back-and-forth series we've seen. That set the table for "Minnesota is going to win the title, they just suffocated the champs" which of course, set up Dallas to be the REAL killers, when Minnesota's offense predictably went to shit in the following series and their defense fell off as they were poorly suited to matchup with Dallas. Dallas entered the Finals with the image that they were a super team, because they went through a Western Conference that really wasn't that great to begin with, and lost it's dominant team when Murray got banged up.
The Celtics calmly took care of business in the Eastern Conference, and really, do Jimmy Butler, Donovan Mitchell, or Haliburton playing in every game really change those series that much? The Celtics wouldn't have blitzed over them anyway. Even Giannis staying healthy, that series might have been pretty tough for the Celtics, but the Celtics were far better than the Bucks throughout the entire season and the Bucks lack depth something fierce.