My Unrealistic Trade Ideas Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Shane

New Member
Nov 26, 2014
110
With the season having ended, I think it's time to start this thread back up. Here's my ideas:

1. Call up the Marlins to find out about Jose Fernandez. He's about to enter his first arbitration year, and seems like he'll soon get to expensive for them. It would obviously take a big package to get him but I think he's worth it. Does something like Owens, Guerra, Vazquez, Miley, Chavis, Rijo get it done?

2. Ask San Diego about Ross/Kimbrel. Perhaps something like Margot, Shaw, Kelly, Cecchini, and taking on both contracts?

3. Sign Soria and Bastardo. Let's build the next super bullpen.

4. Use cash saved for not going after Price/Greinke/Cueto etc. to lock up Mookie and Bogaerts.

5. Sign Rich Hill to prepare for Clay's annual DL trip

Rotation:

Fernandez
Ross
Buchholz
Porcello
Eduardo
Hill/Wright/Johnson as emergency starters

Bullpen:

Kimbrel
Soria
Bastardo
Uehara
Tazawa
Layne
Barnes

Thoughts?
 

Shane

New Member
Nov 26, 2014
110
Bob Montgomery's Helmet Hat said:
Jose Fernandez is going nowhere.  No chance in hell.
I agree it's unlikely, but if he did go somewhere we'd be in arguably the best position to make a run for him. Good players have been traded before (Cabrera even by the same team), what's to say it couldn't happen again?
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
Shane said:
I agree it's unlikely, but if he did go somewhere we'd be in arguably the best position to make a run for him. Good players have been traded before (Cabrera even by the same team), what's to say it couldn't happen again?
Sure. Start your package with one of Bogaerts//Betts, then add one of Moncada/Devers, then top it off with two of the six nickels you proposed for a quarter and maybe you don't get hung up on.
 

Buzzkill Pauley

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 30, 2006
10,569
Shane said:
I agree it's unlikely, but if he did go somewhere we'd be in arguably the best position to make a run for him. Good players have been traded before (Cabrera even by the same team), what's to say it couldn't happen again?
I agree. Fernandez is arb-eligible in 2016, and the Marlins are nowhere near a competitive team. Stanton will be around long enough to see the next one, but will the Marlins really be able to challenge the Mets and Nats before 2019 w/o adding some young talent through trade?

Fernandez and Harvey, both Boras clients and both set to hit FA after 2018, would be my top trade targets this offseason, as starters go.

Not sure I'd be willing to pull the trigger on the cost in prospects to get either one, but I'd kick the tires for sure.
 

Shane

New Member
Nov 26, 2014
110
Papelbon's Poutine said:
Sure. Start your package with one of Bogaerts//Betts, then add one of Moncada/Devers, then top it off with two of the six nickels you proposed for a quarter and maybe you don't get hung up on.
If we look at the Cabrera trade as a blueprint, it was Cabrera and Willis for Maybin, Miller, Badenhop, Mike Rabelo, Dallas Trahern, and Eulogio De La Cruz. Obviously it turned out terribly for the Marlins, but that's not the point. Maybin was a top 10 prospect. De La Cruz, Trahern, and Badenhop ended up as the 8th, 13th, and 18th best Marlins prospects. Rabelo wasn't much of a prospect at all. Miller was a top 10 prospect the year before, having already graduated to the majors. Just my opinion, but I think that somewhat equates to Swihart (Miller), Devers (Maybin), Johnson (De La Cruz), Chavis (Trahern), Rijo (Badenhop), and Cecchini (Rabelo). However, Cabrera had a lot more value at the time than Fernandez has now, having posted three consecutive seasons of 5+ WAR. And they also got Willis who was only a year removed from four straight 3+ WAR seasons. Because of that, maybe switch Devers to Guerra. So Fernandez for Swihart, Guerra, Johnson, Chavis, Rijo, and Cecchini. So I guess you're right, it's more than I had written, but I don't think they would ask for Mookie even straight up for Fernandez, he has more years of team control and already had a higher WAR this year.
 

Shane

New Member
Nov 26, 2014
110
Buzzkill Pauley said:
I agree. Fernandez is arb-eligible in 2016, and the Marlins are nowhere near a competitive team. Stanton will be around long enough to see the next one, but will the Marlins really be able to challenge the Mets and Nats before 2019 w/o adding some young talent through trade?

Fernandez and Harvey, both Boras clients and both set to hit FA after 2018, would be my top trade targets this offseason, as starters go.

Not sure I'd be willing to pull the trigger on the cost in prospects to get either one, but I'd kick the tires for sure.
The more I think about it, the more sense Fernandez seems to make. Marlins are far out of contention. Fernandez is already entering arbitration, and he's a Boras client. Dombrowski likes power pitchers and has dealt with Miami before. Loria seems not to care much about his fan base, having traded a ton away to the Blue Jays a couple years ago. And Fernandez loves Boston!

http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/mlb/miami-marlins/article26833702.html

I really like Fernandez, even if they asked for Moncada, I might at least think about it.
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
Shane said:
If we look at the Cabrera trade as a blueprint, it was Cabrera and Willis for Maybin, Miller, Badenhop, Mike Rabelo, Dallas Trahern, and Eulogio De La Cruz. Obviously it turned out terribly for the Marlins, but that's not the point. Maybin was a top 10 prospect. De La Cruz, Trahern, and Badenhop ended up as the 8th, 13th, and 18th best Marlins prospects. Rabelo wasn't much of a prospect at all. Miller was a top 10 prospect the year before, having already graduated to the majors. Just my opinion, but I think that somewhat equates to Swihart (Miller), Devers (Maybin), Johnson (De La Cruz), Chavis (Trahern), Rijo (Badenhop), and Cecchini (Rabelo). However, Cabrera had a lot more value at the time than Fernandez has now, having posted three consecutive seasons of 5+ WAR. And they also got Willis who was only a year removed from four straight 3+ WAR seasons. Because of that, maybe switch Devers to Guerra. So Fernandez for Swihart, Guerra, Johnson, Chavis, Rijo, and Cecchini. So I guess you're right, it's more than I had written, but I don't think they would ask for Mookie even straight up for Fernandez, he has more years of team control and already had a higher WAR this year.
There's no such thing as a "blueprint" when reviewing trades, especially those from almost a decade ago. Trying to find a pattern based on the organizations involved is extremely misguided. They have a completely different front office. They are in a completely different financial situation. The dynamic value of prospects has completely shifted in the post PED era. The value of club control has risen dramatically, as has the ability to lock guys up. So trying to compare trade motivations and values from eight years ago is kind of a fools errand.

As to your specific cite to the Cabrera/Willis trade, Willis wasn't exactly a huge score in that deal. I won't go as far as to say he was net negative to the Marlins package, but he wasn't far off. He was horrific the year before and if he didn't lessen the return he didn't improve it either.

Overall, the problem seems to be the same as your issues with labeling and rankings. Just as the "#1" starter on the Rockies =/= the #1 starter on the Dodgers, prospect rankings - be it within an organization or over the league as a whole - are not static. The #8, or whatever, prospect in 2007 does not necessarily equal the #8 prospect in 2015. Just like the #3, or whatever, prospect in the Red Sox organization does necessarily equal the #3 prospect in any other. That player could be more or less valuable. He might slot into a higher or lower ranking in a new organization if he is traded. So comparing rankings really doesn't shed a lot of light on anything.

If you think they should make a move for Fernandez, sure. Kick the tires. They should kick the tires on everyone. But a package headed by Swihart and a pupu platter of c level guys isn't going to get it done and I'm not sure how else to tell you that other than to say you're being unrealistic.

They just committed $300M+ to Stanton. They have revenue streams that have them making money. They have value in Latin stars. They have a good core and can be competitive (they are no less competitive for a playoff spot than the Mets were this time last year). They are making a profit and can handle his arb costs. He is a young, stud "#1" (in the terms you don't like").


Mookie straight up isn't even getting it done. He's not going anywhere.
 

Shane

New Member
Nov 26, 2014
110
Papelbon's Poutine said:
There's no such thing as a "blueprint" when reviewing trades, especially those from almost a decade ago. Trying to find a pattern based on the organizations involved is extremely misguided. They have a completely different front office. They are in a completely different financial situation. The dynamic value of prospects has completely shifted in the post PED era. The value of club control has risen dramatically, as has the ability to lock guys up. So trying to compare trade motivations and values from eight years ago is kind of a fools errand.

As to your specific cite to the Cabrera/Willis trade, Willis wasn't exactly a huge score in that deal. I won't go as far as to say he was net negative to the Marlins package, but he wasn't far off. He was horrific the year before and if he didn't lessen the return he didn't improve it either.

Overall, the problem seems to be the same as your issues with labeling and rankings. Just as the "#1" starter on the Rockies =/= the #1 starter on the Dodgers, prospect rankings - be it within an organization or over the league as a whole - are not static. The #8, or whatever, prospect in 2007 does not necessarily equal the #8 prospect in 2015. Just like the #3, or whatever, prospect in the Red Sox organization does necessarily equal the #3 prospect in any other. That player could be more or less valuable. He might slot into a higher or lower ranking in a new organization if he is traded. So comparing rankings really doesn't shed a lot of light on anything.

If you think they should make a move for Fernandez, sure. Kick the tires. They should kick the tires on everyone. But a package headed by Swihart and a pupu platter of c level guys isn't going to get it done and I'm not sure how else to tell you that other than to say you're being unrealistic.

They just committed $300M+ to Stanton. They have revenue streams that have them making money. They have value in Latin stars. They have a good core and can be competitive (they are no less competitive for a playoff spot than the Mets were this time last year). They are making a profit and can handle his arb costs. He is a young, stud "#1" (in the terms you don't like").


Mookie straight up isn't even getting it done. He's not going anywhere.
Ok, I think it's closer then it may seem to you, but I agree, it would be incredible to get Fernandez for the package I listed. I don't know if I would call Guerra a C-level prospect though. I wasn't saying that copying the Cabrera trade would give a perfect offer, but I thought it was at least a solid guideline. I was too young at the time to remember the exact deal, so I guess you're right about Willis. But still: Cabrera then had more value than Fernandez does today. I really like Fernandez and you could say that other than the A's, the Marlins might be the most likely team to trade a young star (I don't personally like Gray).

I wouldn't say they're as likely to win the division as the Mets were last year. They also have a below-average minor league system. It's hard for me to think that there's any way they could turn down Mookie straight up for Fernandez.

The point is, I think Dombrowski should try incredibly hard to pry him away. We have a ton of guys that a young, rebuilding team would like. Maybe they'd want Castillo too, because of their Cuban market.
 

Snodgrass'Muff

oppresses WARmongers
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2008
27,644
Roanoke, VA
Cabrera had 4.5 years of service time when he was traded. Fernandez has 2. Add that to all the other reasons previously mentioned for why that proposal is a steaming pile of garbage and you have, well, it's still a steaming pile of garbage. Only now it's sitting on an older, dried up turd and a rain soaked Playboy from 1984.
 

Shane

New Member
Nov 26, 2014
110
Snodgrass'Muff said:
Cabrera had 4.5 years of service time when he was traded. Fernandez has 2. Add that to all the other reasons previously mentioned for why that proposal is a steaming pile of garbage and you have, well, it's still a steaming pile of garbage. Only now it's sitting on an older, dried up turd and a rain soaked Playboy from 1984.
What do you hypothetically think it would take to get Fernandez? I'm actually interested to hear other opinions.
 

Snodgrass'Muff

oppresses WARmongers
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2008
27,644
Roanoke, VA
Shane said:
What do you hypothetically think it would take to get Fernandez? I'm actually interested to hear other opinions.
 
Nothing worth paying. The Marlins have zero incentive to move him right now so they have zero incentive to accept anything less than a huge overpay.
 

Shane

New Member
Nov 26, 2014
110
Snodgrass'Muff said:
 
Nothing worth paying. The Marlins have zero incentive to move him right now so they have zero incentive to accept anything less than a huge overpay.
Unless you count that he's a Boras client entering arbitration and he would net a huge package that might not even be an overpay
 

Snodgrass'Muff

oppresses WARmongers
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2008
27,644
Roanoke, VA
Shane said:
Unless you count that he's a Boras client entering arbitration and he would net a huge package that might not even be an overpay
 
He made $651,000.00 last year. He's not going to be expensive next year. And nothing you've described so far comes anywhere near "huge package." This isn't the 2007 Marlins front office. This isn't the 2007/2008 trade market. This isn't this isn't the 2007/2008 offensive/pitching environment. This isn't the 2007/2008 Marlins roster that had no hope of competing any time soon (hint: they have a lot of good young players and may be in as good a position as the Red Sox to make a leap forward, depending on what they do in the off season). The two situations aren't even remotely comparable so using that Cabrera trade as a basis for comparison is a waste of time. You seem to be incapable of grasping the idea of an evolving market. Miguel Cabrera has absolutely nothing to do with what it will cost to get the Marlins to part with Fernandez.
 
What you are suggesting be offered for Fernandez, in this market with the value of young stars as high as it's ever been because the aging curve is getting steeper for players in their thirties, while teams have more money to spend than ever before and after the Marlins just ponied up to the tune of over 300 million to lock Stanton up is a joke.
 
Owens, Guerra, Vazquez, Miley, Chavis, Rijo isn't even close. Dombrowski would be lucky if Jennings waited long enough to hang up to laugh at him first. Swihart, Guerra, Johnson, Chavis, Rijo, and Cecchini might be a worse offer in aggregate. This is a pipe dream just like Stanton was always a pipe dream. Just like people salivating over Gray is a pipe dream. It's not happening.
 

ehaz

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2007
4,954
Shane said:
What do you hypothetically think it would take to get Fernandez? I'm actually interested to hear other opinions.
Swihart, Moncada, Margot, and Owens
 

Shane

New Member
Nov 26, 2014
110
Snodgrass'Muff said:
 
He made $651,000.00 last year. He's not going to be expensive next year. And nothing you've described so far comes anywhere near "huge package." This isn't the 2007 Marlins front office. This isn't the 2007/2008 trade market. This isn't this isn't the 2007/2008 offensive/pitching environment. This isn't the 2007/2008 Marlins roster that had no hope of competing any time soon (hint: they have a lot of good young players and may be in as good a position as the Red Sox to make a leap forward, depending on what they do in the off season). The two situations aren't even remotely comparable so using that Cabrera trade as a basis for comparison is a waste of time. You seem to be incapable of grasping the idea of an evolving market. Miguel Cabrera has absolutely nothing to do with what it will cost to get the Marlins to part with Fernandez.
 
What you are suggesting be offered for Fernandez, in this market with the value of young stars as high as it's ever been because the aging curve is getting steeper for players in their thirties, while teams have more money to spend than ever before and after the Marlins just ponied up to the tune of over 300 million to lock Stanton up is a joke.
 
Owens, Guerra, Vazquez, Miley, Chavis, Rijo isn't even close. Dombrowski would be lucky if Jennings waited long enough to hang up to laugh at him first. Swihart, Guerra, Johnson, Chavis, Rijo, and Cecchini might be a worse offer in aggregate. This is a pipe dream just like Stanton was always a pipe dream. Just like people salivating over Gray is a pipe dream. It's not happening.
I wouldn't call it a pipe dream, just because we know that if for some reason Dombrowski really wanted to, he could easily get him for Mookie, Bogaerts, Moncada, Devers, and Margot. Not saying he should overpay, but he has the ability to.

He'll be slightly more expensive next year, but that's not much of an issue. In three years however, unless he gets hurt, he is gonna get a mega-deal. Could the Marlins afford that? Maybe, but that would be a lot of money for just two players. If they did decide to trade him, they could get a lot more now than in a few years. I'm not the GM, so whatever package I write is kind of pointless. Dombrowski has the resources to go and get him. I'm arguing that he should.

Thinking about it, even though the Marlins won 71 games, it seems unlikely that they'll rebuild - and you could argue that they can trade Fernandez and still not rebuild. They did go out and get a bunch of guys last offseason, obviously not very successfully. Their pitching behind Fernandez is terrible. Perhaps they would be interested in Miley, Kelly, and/or subsidized Buchholz? They've been rumored to be trying to trade Ozuna, so would they like Rusney as a potential replacement that would appeal to their Cuban market? Of course, you wouldn't stop there. It would take a bunch of other prospects on top of that too. However, none of know for sure which of our prospects the Marlins like/dislike, so guessing on a offer is kind of a waste of time. The most we can do is speculate.

Obviously, as in any negotiation, you start low and then build up until you meet the other guy's demand. For me, I'd say my maximum offer would be Eduardo, Swihart, Devers, Miley/Kelly, and a few lower level prospects. I'd be surprised if they don't at least think on that
 

kieckeredinthehead

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2006
8,635
Who was the last bonafide ace to be traded with multiple arbitration years left? Not guys like Arrieta who blossomed post trade, I'm wondering about Cy Young winner/contenders like the Greinke to Milwaukee deal. Do guys like that get traded any more?
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
kieckeredinthehead said:
Who was the last bonafide ace to be traded with multiple arbitration years left? Not guys like Arrieta who blossomed post trade, I'm wondering about Cy Young winner/contenders like the Greinke to Milwaukee deal. Do guys like that get traded any more?
No. And they won't without a friggin gold mine of prospects. Which is why this is such a stupid friggin premise to discuss. It's not happening. Sonny Gray isn't happening. Chris Sale isn't happening. People need to put down the pipe and realize it's not 1998 anymore.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,613
Oregon
Papelbon's Poutine said:
No. And they won't without a friggin gold mine of prospects. Which is why this is such a stupid friggin premise to discuss. It's not happening. Sonny Gray isn't happening. Chris Sale isn't happening. People need to put down the pipe and realize it's not 1998 anymore.
 
But he really really likes Jose Fernandez
 

Shane

New Member
Nov 26, 2014
110
Papelbon's Poutine said:
No. And they won't without a friggin gold mine of prospects. Which is why this is such a stupid friggin premise to discuss. It's not happening. Sonny Gray isn't happening. Chris Sale isn't happening. People need to put down the pipe and realize it's not 1998 anymore.
Only in the same way that Donaldson was a pipe dream last offseason. We have as good a chance as anyone to get at least one starter: the point is that there's a bunch a guys like Sale, Gray, Fernandez, Harvey, Kluber, Ross, Carrasco, Salazar, etc. who could conceivably be put on the market. Some will likely be available, some won't. At this point it's a guessing which. But in the chance that a guy like that is available, we'd better be ready to pounce
 

Drek717

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2003
2,542
Shane said:
Only in the same way that Donaldson was a pipe dream last offseason. We have as good a chance as anyone to get at least one starter: the point is that there's a bunch a guys like Sale, Gray, Fernandez, Harvey, Kluber, Ross, Carrasco, Salazar, etc. who could conceivably be put on the market. Some will likely be available, some won't. At this point it's a guessing which. But in the chance that a guy like that is available, we'd better be ready to pounce
The only similarity between Donaldson and Gray was the team they played for.  Donaldson was a late bloomer who had a breakout season at 27 followed by a modest drop in production at 28 and who qualified as a super two starting the escalation of his salary off early.  Gray has been an elite starter since his first brief stint in the majors at 23 and will miss out on super two status by about 80 days of service time.
 
Had Donaldson repeated his 2014 production and Lawrie played like he did in 2015 everyone would see this as Beane flipping a good 3B for a younger, not quite as good 3B and netting three pitching prospects for the modest downgrade.  Donaldson has been excellent this season and so the narrative has morphed into Billy Beane having an all-star fire sale just because.
 
You can ask why the Red Sox FO failed to be in the discussion on Donaldson, that has merit, but it tells us nothing about the availability of Gray.
 

Drek717

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2003
2,542
Shane said:
Only in the same way that Donaldson was a pipe dream last offseason. We have as good a chance as anyone to get at least one starter: the point is that there's a bunch a guys like Sale, Gray, Fernandez, Harvey, Kluber, Ross, Carrasco, Salazar, etc. who could conceivably be put on the market. Some will likely be available, some won't. At this point it's a guessing which. But in the chance that a guy like that is available, we'd better be ready to pounce
Also, it isn't guessing in the dark to know who will be available from that list.  There is information to make these "guesses" with that make them pretty easy to figure out.
 
Sale - He's just finishing an age 26 season that will likely see his fourth top 6 Cy Young finish in four years.  He's owed $21M over the next two years, then has successive team options at about $12M and $13M for the two years after that.  In short, he's one of the top 10 pitchers in all of baseball in the prime of his career getting paid what a mediocre back of the rotation guy gets in FA both in dollars and committed years.  He's not available.  At all.  Getting Sale isn't just trading a couple good prospects, it's giving the White Sox free pick of about a half dozen pre-arb. players including at least one of Bogaerts or Betts.
 
Gray - He hasn't been quite as good as Sale and doesn't have one of the most team friendly elite player contracts in all of baseball, so maybe he doesn't cost quite as much, but unless Billy Beane suffers an aneurysm the market probably starts at Betts or Bogaerts plus one of the young pitchers.  Want to keep Betts/Bogaerts?  Jump in a fuckin' lake.
 
Frenandez - If Sale and Gray weren't absurd enough lets talk about getting the best under 25 pitcher in all of baseball when he's just getting back from Tommy John.  Because that isn't selling low on the Marlins part at all.  Unless the front office shakeup the Marlins have planned involved putting a five year old in charge they aren't trading Fernandez for anything.
 
Harvey - He's had some public issues with team management and DeGrom and Syndergaard are both really good so I could see Harvey being available, albeit for a steep price that will at the very least require a proven hitter going back to the Mets.  The only real options in that regard the Red Sox have are Betts and Bogaerts, so unless Dombrowski can work some crazy three way magic some other team will likely be a better fit.
 
Kluber - incredibly team friendly deal, just won the Cy Young in 2014.  Last I checked the Indians like winning baseball games.  Why would they trade him?
 
Ross - Just played his first arb. year., plays for a team that over-extended itself financially in 2015 looking for a win now push.  Very possibly available, Pads will quite possibly want to use him to unload bad contracts, not something the Red Sox have room for more of when Ross is probably going to be in the 8-9M range himself following his second arb. award.
 
Carrasco - another prime years cost controlled starter.  Again, why are teams trying to win looking to move these guys?
 
Salazar - maybe available for someone who can address the Indians need at corner OF or corner IF.  Again not something the Sox have to trade.
 
Ross is probably the only real viable suggestion in the bunch.  Salazar and Harvey might be acquirable, but I doubt those discussions go beyond them asking for Betts and the Sox saying no.  You can't expect another club, ones closer to contention than the Red Sox mind you, to take prospects for established high value players.  They want to win, preferably now.
 
If you think the club should trade for young cost controlled pitching you should set your sights at the next rung down, Trevor Bauer or Alex Wood for example, where the club needs to pick a guy ready to take the next step as Dombrowski did when he traded for Max Scherzer.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,590
Somewhere
I'd be more interested in the Sox looking into the "next" candidates for progression. Not necessarily sexy names, but maybe some highly touted prospects who haven't quite put it together in the big leagues yet. An example would be Jordan Lyles. Former top fifty prospect and heavy groundball pitcher. Peripherals aren't great but not terrible, either. Seems like a horrible fit for Colorado. Getting up there in service time and is coming off a toe injury. His upside might be Wade Miley, but it could be better, right? He's 25 years old. 
 
Since a pitcher with that kind of pedigree should not cost a lot, a trade for Lyles (or someone like him) would be a calculated risk. You cut bait if he fails. Of course this doesn't "solve" the top of the rotation, but I've always found it ridiculous when people worry about a team having more than five capable starters -- the sixth and even seventh guy in line is going to get plenty of opportunities.
 

Buzzkill Pauley

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 30, 2006
10,569
Drek717 said:
If you think the club should trade for young cost controlled pitching you should set your sights at the next rung down, Trevor Bauer or Alex Wood for example, where the club needs to pick a guy ready to take the next step as Dombrowski did when he traded for Max Scherzer.
This is the much better course of action, once the tires have been kicked. Coincidentally or not, it's also the course Theo took last offseason to turn the Cubs into a 97-win team. Sign an "ace" and trade for a diamond in the rough.

Of course, sometimes after a bit of polish, the diamond still looks like Joe Kelly...but that's where good pro scouting comes in: choosing the right stone.

Then again, this pretty much exactly describes EdRo, too, so it's not like the situation's all black.
 

NoLastCall125

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 28, 2009
897
Providence, RI
kieckeredinthehead said:
Who was the last bonafide ace to be traded with multiple arbitration years left? Not guys like Arrieta who blossomed post trade, I'm wondering about Cy Young winner/contenders like the Greinke to Milwaukee deal. Do guys like that get traded any more?
 
The one that popped in my head (although he wasn't a Cy Young contender yet but was already an allstar and everyone was pretty stunned he got traded at the time) was Michael Pineda. He was traded after his rookie year at age 22 and put up some pretty good numbers before tiring in the second half of the season. But that's the closest I trade I can think of - so I agree that this rarely happens.
 

pdub

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 2, 2007
517
To be fair to the OP, the title of the thread does have the world "unrealistic" in it. Still, its possible to trade for guys like Fernandez, Sale, and Gray. We would just have to give up a package including at least two of Rodriguez/Bogaerts/Betts/Swihart/Moncada, and then 2-3 players from the Vazquez/Owens/Guerra/Margot/Devers pile. That's a lot. 
 

Byrdbrain

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
8,588
This was spun out of the S,S or T thread and it is now very reasonable to have these proposals in the thread dedicated to unreasonable proposals.
 

Minneapolis Millers

Wants you to please think of the Twins fans!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,753
Twin Cities
Drek717 said:
Also, it isn't guessing in the dark to know who will be available from that list.  There is information to make these "guesses" with that make them pretty easy to figure out.
...
 
Gray - He hasn't been quite as good as Sale and doesn't have one of the most team friendly elite player contracts in all of baseball, so maybe he doesn't cost quite as much, but unless Billy Beane suffers an aneurysm the market probably starts at Betts or Bogaerts plus one of the young pitchers.  Want to keep Betts/Bogaerts?  Jump in a fuckin' lake. ...
People talk with such certainty (and hostility) here, it's puzzling. Gray for Owens and throw-ins won't likely work, but if DD offered Edro, Margot, Devers, and Espinoza, Beane just hangs up? Because there's no Betts or X? Stop, please.

And before anyone screams that DD would be insane to give that up for Gray, I'm not proposing it. I'm simply pointing out that the Sox have a TON of assets at various levels to swing a big deal, without having to include any one player. Not all teams have that flexibility or variety of resources.

I do like the list generally and agree that Ross is a viable target.
 

Shane

New Member
Nov 26, 2014
110
While we're talking about crazy trade ideas, I thought of a few more guys that I'm interested to hear people's opinions on. Obviously these guys would all cost a lot, but you can't get an ace without giving up good people (unless you get lucky with someone like Scherzer/Arrieta).

Julio Teheran: Only 24, on a bad team, coming off a bad year, but had a better second half. Misses a lot of bats.

Chris Archer: Unlikely he'd be traded within the division, but maybe they'd consider it if we had the best package. Always has been good, but took a big leap forward this year into elite tier.

Jacob DeGrom: Probably the most unrealistic name on the list, but the Meta do have a ton of great young pitchers and could use some bats.

Justin Verlander: Terrible contract, but I think he can still pitch. May also allow us to unload Sandoval.

Garrett Richards: Angels have a decent rotation, mediocre offense. Could potentially take a package that had a couple major league level players in addition to prospects.

I'm not saying we're gonna get any of these guys, but I think they all represent interesting possibilities.
 

Drek717

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2003
2,542
Minneapolis Millers said:
People talk with such certainty (and hostility) here, it's puzzling. Gray for Owens and throw-ins won't likely work, but if DD offered Edro, Margot, Devers, and Espinoza, Beane just hangs up? Because there's no Betts or X? Stop, please.

And before anyone screams that DD would be insane to give that up for Gray, I'm not proposing it. I'm simply pointing out that the Sox have a TON of assets at various levels to swing a big deal, without having to include any one player. Not all teams have that flexibility or variety of resources.

I do like the list generally and agree that Ross is a viable target.
Beane might accept that only because he has exceptional job security.  Your average GM wouldn't keep their job long enough after that to see those players come of age.
 
And sure, flushing the #1 farm in baseball for a single guy will get pretty much anyone (see my comment on Sale above) but that should be an obvious fact.  Doesn't make it any more likely to happen however.
 

Buzzkill Pauley

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 30, 2006
10,569
John Marzano Olympic Hero said:
Jesus. This thread.

Come on, we're supposed to be better than this.
I'm not so sure.

As I recall, the last time the Sox farm was this ripe, Theo offered the Mariners a deadline deal of "pick any five" for the 23-year old Felix Hernandez, who was in his first year of arbitration.

That deal didn't get done, but Theo got heard the whole way through (per after-the-deadline reports). And I doubt anything of that magnitude would happen this offseason.

But that doesn't mean DDski won't float a crazy offer. Especially for a young stud like Fernandez.

[edit] Hernandez, Fernandez...yeah, what's the difference
 

Shane

New Member
Nov 26, 2014
110
Buzzkill Pauley said:
I'm not so sure.

As I recall, the last time the Sox farm was this ripe, Theo offered the Mariners a deadline deal of "pick any five" for the 23-year old Felix Hernandez, who was in his first year of arbitration.

That deal didn't get done, but Theo got heard the whole way through (per after-the-deadline reports). And I doubt anything of that magnitude would happen this offseason.

But that doesn't mean DDski won't float a crazy offer. Especially for a young stud like Fernandez.

[edit] Hernandez, Fernandez...yeah, what's the difference
If there's one GM that would have the highest chance of acquiring a young stud, you could argue that it's Dombrowski. We have more than enough to make it happen and still have a great young core/farm system. Would you do something like Swihart, Eduardo, Owens, and Margot for Fernandez? The Marlins would be hard-pressed to turn that down.
 

iayork

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 6, 2006
639
Shane said:
Would you do something like Swihart, Eduardo, Owens, and Margot for Fernandez? 
 
Who the fuck cares if "you" would do that deal? No one remotely relevant to that is here reading this crap, so all you're doing with it is masturbating.
 

Drek717

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2003
2,542
Shane said:
If there's one GM that would have the highest chance of acquiring a young stud, you could argue that it's Dombrowski. We have more than enough to make it happen and still have a great young core/farm system. Would you do something like Swihart, Eduardo, Owens, and Margot for Fernandez? The Marlins would be hard-pressed to turn that down.
If the Red Sox make the trade needed for someone like Fernandez they'll go from the #1 farm to a middle of the pack farm (at best) instantly.
 
And again, why are you assuming the Marlins are even listening on Fernandez?  He just got back from Tommy John.  They aren't going to trade him fresh off TJ and no team is going to trade what they would require with him just off TJ.  It's a nonstarter.
 
If we're going to masturbate (as iayork accurately described it) over hypothetical pitching trades why not focus on the guys who might actually be available for the right price?  Ross, maybe Harvey, then a step down to guys like Alex Wood, Trevor Bauer, etc..
 

Buzzkill Pauley

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 30, 2006
10,569
Shane said:
If there's one GM that would have the highest chance of acquiring a young stud, you could argue that it's Dombrowski. We have more than enough to make it happen and still have a great young core/farm system. Would you do something like Swihart, Eduardo, Owens, and Margot for Fernandez? The Marlins would be hard-pressed to turn that down.
No, I wouldn't. But I would kick the tires.

I'd gamble that the next six years of all three of EdRo and Owens and Swihart together will be worth far, far more to the MLB team than the next three years of Fernandez. Especially considering this is last-place team that needs pieces like them to build around.

Look, this isn't 2009, the heyday of Lester, Beckett, Pedroia, Ellsbury, and Youkilis. The Sox are not now flush off 6 playoff appearances in seven years. More like just the opposite, actually, since they've missed the playoffs 5 of the last 6 years and by now probably have moved a second-hand couch into the AL East basement.

And unlike King Felix was back then, Fernandez is a Boras client and will likely never even consider signing an extension.
 

Shane

New Member
Nov 26, 2014
110
Drek717 said:
If the Red Sox make the trade needed for someone like Fernandez they'll go from the #1 farm to a middle of the pack farm (at best) instantly.
 
And again, why are you assuming the Marlins are even listening on Fernandez?  He just got back from Tommy John.  They aren't going to trade him fresh off TJ and no team is going to trade what they would require with him just off TJ.  It's a nonstarter.
 
If we're going to masturbate (as iayork accurately described it) over hypothetical pitching trades why not focus on the guys who might actually be available for the right price?  Ross, maybe Harvey, then a step down to guys like Alex Wood, Trevor Bauer, etc..
It wouldn't take Mookie, Bogaerts, Swihart, Eduardo, Owens, JBJ, Vazquez, Moncada, Devers, Margot, Espinoza, Benitendi, Guerra, AND Johnson to acquire Fernandez. If we could save some of these guys, we'd have at least a decent young core (including prospects and young major leaguers).

For the same reason we think that Harvey, Ross, Salazar, Carrasco, or Gray in some's opinion are available - we don't know. None of us work in a major league front office, so none of us are gonna know who's available and who's not? It seems conceivable that the Marlins would at least think about what Fernandez would return: within a few years they'll either have to break the bank for him or let him walk, and he could get them a large package of major league and minor league talent. He won't likely be traded, yes, but they would have to at least consider it. And aside from the few weeks he spent on the DL from being pushed back too fast, he sure looked fully recovered from TJ.

And, wow, it would be great to see him in a Red Sox uniform. He would be the best pitcher we've had since Pedro if all went right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.