Much like Newman, the Sox are not “Ready to deliver”– The 2025 Offseason News (& rumors?) Thread

Dewey'sCannon

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
958
Maryland
I'm not convinced that they NEED to add to the offense - I'd rather they spend their money on the bullpen (Tanner Scott). But if they do (primarily to add RH power) here's a plausible direction they could take:

Trade Abreu to CHC for Suzuki and put him in LF, with Duran in CF and either Rafaela or Anthony (whenever he's ready) in RF.

If you can include Yoshida in the deal with the Cubs (either by adding $ or a player, like Wincowski or a mid-level prospect, thenthis would open the door to sign Bregman. My preference would be a three-year deal, with opt-outs and options for years 4 and 5 that vest based on 150 GP.

If they could pull that off, the ;lineup look like this:

Duran - CF
Bregman - 3B
Devers - DH
Casas - 1B
Suzuki - LF
Anthony - RF
Story - SS
Wong - C
Campbell/Grissom - 2B

I think that lineup would score a lot of runs
 

SouthernBoSox

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2005
12,713
I’m positive the Cardinals and Red Sox have talked. I’m also positive the Red Sox will only do a deal if it’s a home run deal.

The Cardinals have zero leverage.
  1. The player has a full NTC
  2. Has already blocked a trade
  3. Has said he wants to play for Boston
  4. Does not fill a position of need for Boston
  5. Has a contract under water
The Cardinals GM stated his main goal of the offseason was to move Arenado and free up money and roster space. They are screwed here.

If I’m Boston I’d take Arenado but it would be more about an acquisition of Herrera than Arenado. I’d say we will give you Wong and Richard Fitts and you’ll give us Herrera + 15mm and we will do your the favor of TAKING Arenado off your hands.

And yea that’s an unfair trade but you’re complete stuck. We don’t need the trade.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
I’m positive the Cardinals and Red Sox have talked. I’m also positive the Red Sox will only do a deal if it’s a home run deal.

The Cardinals have zero leverage.
  1. The player has a full NTC
  2. Has already blocked a trade
  3. Has said he wants to play for Boston
  4. Does not fill a position of need for Boston
  5. Has a contract under water
The Cardinals GM stated his main goal of the offseason was to move Arenado and free up money and roster space. They are screwed here.

If I’m Boston I’d take Arenado but it would be more about an acquisition of Herrera than Arenado. I’d say we will give you Wong and Richard Fitts and you’ll give us Herrera + 15mm and we will do your the favor of TAKING Arenado off your hands.

And yea that’s an unfair trade but you’re complete stuck. We don’t need the trade.
If I'm running the Cards I can't get the words "Go fuck yourself" out of my mouth fast enough.
 

SouthernBoSox

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2005
12,713
If I'm running the Cards I can't get the words "Go fuck yourself" out of my mouth fast enough.
Which is ultimately why I don’t think a deal really lines up. The Cardinals have zero leverage and are better off doing nothing than something.
 

chawson

Hoping for delivery
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
5,229
If I'm running the Cards I can't get the words "Go fuck yourself" out of my mouth fast enough.
I don’t know, I kinda disagree here. To me it genuinely seems like we’re doing them a favor taking Arenado off their books, something maybe no other team is in a position to do.

It’s not exactly relevant to a BOS-STL deal, but the Cards got Arenado from the Rockies for next to nothing — basically four years of a cost-controlled #5 starter (Gomber), who’s been worth an average of <1.0 bWAR per year. They got about 18 bWAR from Arenado in his 4 years, plus cash from COL.

They did great in that trade, and are likely looking at a last place finish or two in the coming years. If I’m in the Cardinals FO, I absolutely do not want to pay Arenado for the back end of that contract. I want to move him now, put newly extended Brendan Donovan at third, and clear the lane for a midseason promotion of JJ Wetherholt at 2B. That’s valuable, and would be a factor in any deal. It will be even harder to find a taker for Arenado down the road as he further declines.
 
Last edited:

SouthernBoSox

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2005
12,713
If you're Boston, the risk of being labeled with the reputation of being a shitty organization to do business with isn't exactly something you try to leverage. That didn't work out so well for Bloom.
Agree to disagree. You can approach the situation with eyes wide open and let it be known you’re really only interested in a deal on your terms.
 

Rasputin

Will outlive SeanBerry
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
30,002
Not here
If you're Boston, the risk of being labeled with the reputation of being a shitty organization to do business with isn't exactly something you try to leverage. That didn't work out so well for Bloom.
Not trading for a player we don't want for the opportunity to pay him a lot more than he's worth is not being a shitty organization to do business with.
 

Hank Scorpio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 1, 2013
8,195
Salem, NH
Red Sox finally made a big splash and signed a certain starting pitcher with the initials “RS”.

Absolutely shocked he’s not a Dodger.

IMG_9818.jpeg
 

The Gray Eagle

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
17,848
Early season Sunday night baseball schedule was announced. Red Sox are on once. April 6 vs St Louis.
A Sunday night game in Boston on April frigging 6th??? Could have been cold but bearable at 1PM, but F-you paying fans, enjoy freezing your asses off at night for no good reason other than ESPN wants it.
 

Mugsy's Jock

Eli apologist
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 28, 2000
15,816
UWS, NYC
Red Sox finally made a big splash and signed a certain starting pitcher with the initials “RS”.

Absolutely shocked he’s not a Dodger.

Wow, I'd missed this!

My son might be the world's #1 Robert Stock fan. We got to know him a little bit back in 2007, when Stock was a C/RP for the Cotuit Kettleers. At the time, he was 17 years old, coming off his freshman year at USC where he had enrolled at just 16 as one of the finest prep prospects in recent memory. He was really poised and happy to chat with local kids hanging around the benches. [Trivia: the 2007 Kettleers had three catchers who would be future major leaguers: Stock, Caleb Joseph, and Yan Gomes.] I was later pleased to learn he was an exceptional student, 'cause dads are like that.

Cut to years later, my son followed Robert Stock on Twitter, because of course he did, and Stock turned out to be a great Twitter follow, sharing candid thoughts about his baseball career and what was going on in the world. Suffice to say, I'm pretty confident Robert's world-view on political issues would not have been in sync with most of his professional baseball teammates.

Welcome home, Robert!
 

Yelling At Clouds

Post-darwinian
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
4,142
They signed local guy Sean Newcomb to a minors deal, too (mentioned in the MiLB thread, too). He’s been pretty bad for a while now, but who knows?
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,886
They signed local guy Sean Newcomb to a minors deal, too (mentioned in the MiLB thread, too). He’s been pretty bad for a while now, but who knows?
Just because I looked this up the other day when talking about what a GM inherits or doesn't from their predecessor, and now Newcomb is here.

We discuss Breslow inheriting Anthony and Campbell from Bloom and how good that is - and they're really excellent prospects. Now think on Anthopolous who inherited a frigging diamond mine in Atlanta in terms of prospects (Acuna, Swanson, Albies, Riley, Anderson and Fried) not to mention Freddie Freeman. At the time, Newcomb (6th) was rated higher in their system than Anderson (7th), Acuna (8th), Fried (9th) and Riley (12th).

It's just interesting to look back at some of the team lists over time.

https://www.mlb.com/milb/prospects/2017/braves/
 

Sin Duda

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,216
(B)Austin Texas
A Sunday night game in Boston on April frigging 6th??? Could have been cold but bearable at 1PM, but F-you paying fans, enjoy freezing your asses off at night for no good reason other than ESPN wants it.
I sure hope you have something positive going on in your life, because you sound like the angriest of angry old men.
 

bosox1534

New Member
Dec 17, 2022
346
A Sunday night game in Boston on April frigging 6th??? Could have been cold but bearable at 1PM, but F-you paying fans, enjoy freezing your asses off at night for no good reason other than ESPN wants it.
I went to the Chiefs Dolphins playoff game last season and the windchill was -30, and it was sold out. I think people will be able to handle a game in April.
 

The Gray Eagle

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
17,848
I have been to Fenway night games in April. It gets ridiculously cold in the bleachers, especially when the wind kicks up.
I also think it's pretty silly to compare an early season baseball game against the Cardinals to an NFL playoff game in terms of fan interest and willingness to deal with cold weather.
And the whole point is that they had the option of playing a day game, until ESPN ordered them to change. They play at night the next day, but that is a Monday, so there's no way they would play a day game. This Sunday game should have stayed a day game though. ESPN could have chosen the Red Sox to play a Sunday night game later in the year, or when they are on the road instead, but they don't care obviously.
 

bosox1534

New Member
Dec 17, 2022
346
I have been to Fenway night games in April. It gets ridiculously cold in the bleachers, especially when the wind kicks up.
I also think it's pretty silly to compare an early season baseball game against the Cardinals to an NFL playoff game in terms of fan interest and willingness to deal with cold weather.
And the whole point is that they had the option of playing a day game, until ESPN ordered them to change. They play at night the next day, but that is a Monday, so there's no way they would play a day game. This Sunday game should have stayed a day game though. ESPN could have chosen the Red Sox to play a Sunday night game later in the year, or when they are on the road instead, but they don't care obviously.
It’s not like you have to go to the game. If you are going to be that miserable don’t go. ESPN doesn’t care because nobody else cares other than you. People who want to go will go, people who don’t won’t go. You’re going to get cold games in April in Boston, just part of the deal. There will be plenty other day games to attend. I’m excited for the team to get some national exposure early in the season.
 

BeantownIdaho

New Member
Dec 5, 2005
652
Nampa, Idaho
Yeah, they could have had an afternoon game, but It's ESPN Sunday NIGHT Baseball... and the Sox are sandwiched between the final four and the championship game on Saturday and Monday. I'm not seeing any problem.
 

StuckOnYouk

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2006
3,646
CT
Yeah its almost like they just want slashers with speed and no slow HR guys?

- like tom said. Duran would have been far more appealing to them
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
29,021
Unreal America
I have been to Fenway night games in April. It gets ridiculously cold in the bleachers, especially when the wind kicks up.
I also think it's pretty silly to compare an early season baseball game against the Cardinals to an NFL playoff game in terms of fan interest and willingness to deal with cold weather.
And the whole point is that they had the option of playing a day game, until ESPN ordered them to change. They play at night the next day, but that is a Monday, so there's no way they would play a day game. This Sunday game should have stayed a day game though. ESPN could have chosen the Red Sox to play a Sunday night game later in the year, or when they are on the road instead, but they don't care obviously.
ESPN is desperately trying to find early season matchups that will deliver strong MLB ratings to capitalize on the momentum the Dodgers-Yankees World Series created. MLB has been slowly disappearing from the national sports scene for years. The Red Sox and Cardinals are 2 of the 5 most popular teams in the game.

They're now playing the game a whole 6 hours later than originally scheduled, which might mean its 10 degrees colder at first pitch. And a million more people will watch the game than if it was Marlins-Braves, Rays-Rangers or Guardians-Angels, which are the only 3 games being played in warmer climates that day.
 

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
25,878
MLB has been slowly disappearing from the national sports scene for years.
I'm not sure that this is quite correct. The World Series and NBA Championship viewership is very similar, and often the sports flip-flop for 1-2 most years. League wide attendance was up this year as well and has been rising.

We kinda have to get past the whole national passtime thing, that stopped happening in the 60s when football took over the nation's imagination with the Super Bowl. I know that it's crazy to a lot of people here, but that's almost 60 years ago! Baseball, basketball and soccer are constantly jockeying for second place, which is about the best that they can hope for.

Do I think that MLB does a really, really, really bad job marketing the game? Absolutely. But I don't think that baseball is disappearing from the national sports scene, it's less pronounced than it once was, but all sports (save football) are.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
48,566
For whatever it's worth, ESPN has given the Sox a B- on their offseason to date.
Yankees get an A...

And it leads with this gem..

Now excuse my while I try and recover from my laughing fit

This might be Brian Cashman's best offseason since he signed CC Sabathia, Mark Teixeira and A.J. Burnett, and traded for Nick Swisher before the 2009 season -- a string of moves that resulted in the Yankees' most recent World Series title. Maybe this run of moves will produce the same result. Amazingly, the Yankees have earned this high grade despite losing Soto to the Mets.
https://archive.ph/bJ5nQ#selection-17891.0-17891.378
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,886
I'm not sure that this is quite correct. The World Series and NBA Championship viewership is very similar, and often the sports flip-flop for 1-2 most years. League wide attendance was up this year as well and has been rising.

We kinda have to get past the whole national passtime thing, that stopped happening in the 60s when football took over the nation's imagination with the Super Bowl. I know that it's crazy to a lot of people here, but that's almost 60 years ago! Baseball, basketball and soccer are constantly jockeying for second place, which is about the best that they can hope for.

Do I think that MLB does a really, really, really bad job marketing the game? Absolutely. But I don't think that baseball is disappearing from the national sports scene, it's less pronounced than it once was, but all sports (save football) are.
Agree.

The more damaging thing - at least for purposes of this board - is that in Boston the interest in the Sox seems to have fallen off dramatically. It was back up in 2021, and that playoff game against the Yankees was outstanding theater.

Unfortunately the team made a self enforced error of not capitalizing on that by doing nothing of note to prop up the team following that run, and letting four of the key players from that run leave in Bogaerts, JDM, Eovaldi, Rodriguez while doing a horrible job replacing them. Now they're probably battling the Bruins for 3rd place in the Boston market, and even that is closer than it has any right to be. Which is astounding to say as I was absolutely certain that whenever the Brady run stopped, the Sox would go right back to #1 in Boston.

Of course, I never really thought that the organization would get to the point it's been from 2019 to present in terms of lack of success combined with lack of massive attempt to address the MLB roster for such a long term. They of course have had their struggles (2012-2015 minus the whole World Series win) but they were always much more relevant.

It's another reason I'm certain that Crochet will be extended. He is the great hope of the pitching staff and probably the only addition made in the last 6 off-seasons (JDM) that have generated any kind of interest or positive buzz. Buehler might be the 2nd...


To be clear, I'm not trying to say winning the off-season is what matters. But - chicken and the egg of course - when you have incredibly boring off-seasons AND that translates to bad seasons, it's tough to rebound from.
 
Last edited:

scottyno

late Bloomer
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2008
11,813
Yeah its almost like they just want slashers with speed and no slow HR guys?

- like tom said. Duran would have been far more appealing to them
He'd be far more appealing to every team, including Boston, because he's a much much better player with a much higher upside. Which is almost certainly why by reports this off-season the Sox considered him untradable while they explored moving Casas for the right deal
 

Marty’s Beret

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 31, 2019
190
…We kinda have to get past the whole national passtime thing, that stopped happening in the 60s when football took over the nation's imagination with the Super Bowl…[snip]
to the included above part of this quote - I think there’s a fundamental difference between America’s sport and America’s pastime. Pastime speaks to me as something you put on the radio to enjoyably “pass the time” while mowing the lawn, or any number of activities (or non activities). Tii ok me baseball is a great way to pass time!
 

Dewey'sCannon

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
958
Maryland
I think the obvious reason football is more popular is because of (1) betting; and (2) fantasy. Although fantasy started as a baseball thing with rotisserie back in the 80's, the weekly schedule for the NFL makes fantasy football much easier to play and more accessible to the masses, which drives ratings for even games involving bad teams (hey, I have a guy playing in that game!). And betting football has always been easy, and even easier now that sports gambling has been legalized. MLB is trying to make inroads on the betting front, but they'll never compete with football on betting or fantasy, which are big drivers of the viewership numbers.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
29,021
Unreal America
I'm not sure that this is quite correct. The World Series and NBA Championship viewership is very similar, and often the sports flip-flop for 1-2 most years. League wide attendance was up this year as well and has been rising.

We kinda have to get past the whole national passtime thing, that stopped happening in the 60s when football took over the nation's imagination with the Super Bowl. I know that it's crazy to a lot of people here, but that's almost 60 years ago! Baseball, basketball and soccer are constantly jockeying for second place, which is about the best that they can hope for.

Do I think that MLB does a really, really, really bad job marketing the game? Absolutely. But I don't think that baseball is disappearing from the national sports scene, it's less pronounced than it once was, but all sports (save football) are.
The data suggests that overall fandom and viewing of the NBA is national in scope. That stands to reason, the NBA has marketed stars over teams for decades.

Baseball is the opposite. It has highly localized fandom and viewing.

So even when the TV ratings look similar, the composition of those numbers is quite different.

But I don't want to drag this thread off topic. My point was simply that Sox-Cards is an extremely attractive matchup for ESPN in early April. If fans have to endure 10-15 degree lower temps then dems the breaks.