Much like Newman, the Sox are not “Ready to deliver”– The 2025 Offseason News (& rumors?) Thread

jteders1

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 5, 2022
143
Can I ask a question, and I'm sure it's been addressed, but why can't this team just sign Alonso (who appears amicable to a shorter deal), play him at DH and move Yoshida to LF. The lineup would be stellar, and if Anthony forces his way in, you can move Yoshida at the deadline.

CF - Duran
3B - Devers
DH - Alonso
1B - Casas
SS - Story
RF - Abreu
2B - Grissom / Campbell
LF - Yoshi
C - Wong

That's a pretty even lineup with plus hitting up and down it. Basically, are we overthinking this? Yes the defense in LF, 3B and 1B is questionable, but it looks pretty good up the middle. Catcher is clearly in need of an upgrade, but that as been discussed ad nauseam on this board, it's tough to see where that comes from.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,919
Can I ask a question, and I'm sure it's been addressed, but why can't this team just sign Alonso (who appears amicable to a shorter deal), play him at DH and move Yoshida to LF. The lineup would be stellar, and if Anthony forces his way in, you can move Yoshida at the deadline.

CF - Duran
3B - Devers
DH - Alonso
1B - Casas
SS - Story
RF - Abreu
2B - Grissom / Campbell
LF - Yoshi
C - Wong

That's a pretty even lineup with plus hitting up and down it. Basically, are we overthinking this? Yes the defense in LF, 3B and 1B is questionable, but it looks pretty good up the middle. Catcher is clearly in need of an upgrade, but that as been discussed ad nauseam on this board, it's tough to see where that comes from.
Because Yoshida sucks in the field, and also adding Alonso without any subtractions makes it harder work Anthony and Campbell into the lineup.

Alonso would make some sense if they moved Yoshida or Casas (or both). But with Boras calling the shots, he might not settle for the typical "3 years with an opt out" deal until late February, and that's a long time to hang in limbo for something that *might* happen. It's not like when they signed JDM in late February and just moved him into the more or less open DH slot. Acquiring Alonso would mean other significant moves to follow.
 

Max Power

thai good. you like shirt?
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
8,964
Boston, MA
There are so many more options if Yoshida can play the field with his repaired shoulder. I know his range is terrible, but at Fenway it barely matters. And if high strikeout and ground ball pitchers are going, it doesn't matter that much on the road, either.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,807
Because Yoshida sucks in the field, and also adding Alonso without any subtractions makes it harder work Anthony and Campbell into the lineup.

Alonso would make some sense if they moved Yoshida or Casas (or both). But with Boras calling the shots, he might not settle for the typical "3 years with an opt out" deal until late February, and that's a long time to hang in limbo for something that *might* happen. It's not like when they signed JDM in late February and just moved him into the more or less open DH slot. Acquiring Alonso would mean other significant moves to follow.
This.

But for a little more context, Yoshida was horrible in the field before his shoulder injury too.

If one wants to use DRS, in 2023 he was one of the worst LF in the game, with a -4 in only about 700ip. FG gave his defensive rating a -18.5 (for whatever that's worth). Baseball Savant backs this up as well with horrible range, bad "arm value" (whatever the heck that is) and horrible speed from 2023. From any metric one wants to use, he's horrendous defensively, and this was before the shoulder injury as well.

I agree that Alonso as a DH would be one of many ideas for the 2025 Red Sox that I'd be totally on board with, but it's not going to happen.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,807
Ha, I just meant that I thought this was a new, meaningful development.
I think it's totally consistent with what we've heard from Devers any time he addresses the roster over the past few years. He's been begging for them to add MLB talent to the team. Is it a good idea or not, I'm not saying that at all. But every time Devers has spoken (or Tweeted or whatever), it's been about the relative "clarity" of the shortcomings of the roster and wanting to add proven MLB talent to it. This tracks.
 

20Ks

New Member
Jul 11, 2024
138
I think it's totally consistent with what we've heard from Devers any time he addresses the roster over the past few years. He's been begging for them to add MLB talent to the team. Is it a good idea or not, I'm not saying that at all. But every time Devers has spoken (or Tweeted or whatever), it's been about the relative "clarity" of the shortcomings of the roster and wanting to add proven MLB talent to it. This tracks.
So Devers watched a minute and a half clip on twitter IN ENGLISH of a couple of muppets talking with some wierd cuts, words on the screen, and a pretty indistinguishable argument with those words (for me) and then processed it beyond "WTF are they talking about,?"and hit like. Or he (or whomever runs his account) scrolled, saw video of he, Arenado, and Bregman playing baseball, and hit like and kept scrolling.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,807
So Devers watched a minute and a half clip on twitter IN ENGLISH of a couple of muppets talking with some wierd cuts, words on the screen, and a pretty indistinguishable argument with those words (for me) and then processed it beyond "WTF are they talking about,?"and hit like. Or he (or whomever runs his account) scrolled, saw video of he, Arenado, and Bregman playing baseball, and hit like and kept scrolling.
On it's own, means nothing.

Taken in context with his stance from :

2023 trade deadline https://nesn.com/2023/07/red-soxs-rafael-devers-has-strong-stance-on-trade-deadline-needs/

2024 team https://www.mlb.com/news/rafael-devers-on-state-of-2024-red-sox-roster

It tracks that he wants the team to add more MLB talent and would probably at least not chase down Craig Breslow and Alex Cora with a folding chair and a crazy gleam in his eye if it meant him moving off 3b.
 

NickEsasky

Please Hammer, Don't Hurt 'Em
SoSH Member
Jul 24, 2001
9,823
Not sure why the English thing matters. Devers understands English perfectly and speaks it well. He chooses to do interviews in Spanish through the interpreter to avoid miscommunications or misunderstandings.
 

20Ks

New Member
Jul 11, 2024
138
On it's own, means nothing.

Taken in context with his stance from :

2023 trade deadline https://nesn.com/2023/07/red-soxs-rafael-devers-has-strong-stance-on-trade-deadline-needs/

2024 team https://www.mlb.com/news/rafael-devers-on-state-of-2024-red-sox-roster

It tracks that he wants the team to add more MLB talent and would probably at least not chase down Craig Breslow and Alex Cora with a folding chair and a crazy gleam in his eye if it meant him moving off 3b.
Sure he has said that in the past, its good for his image and he might even believe it. I'm contending him liking that tweet is very unlikely to mean anything.
 

20Ks

New Member
Jul 11, 2024
138
Not sure why the English thing matters. Devers understands English perfectly and speaks it well. He chooses to do interviews in Spanish through the interpreter to avoid miscommunications or misunderstandings.
Did you watch the clip? Its like Clockwork Orange.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
So Devers watched a minute and a half clip on twitter IN ENGLISH of a couple of muppets talking with some wierd cuts, words on the screen, and a pretty indistinguishable argument with those words (for me) and then processed it beyond "WTF are they talking about,?"and hit like. Or he (or whomever runs his account) scrolled, saw video of he, Arenado, and Bregman playing baseball, and hit like and kept scrolling.
Devers has previously hinted at wanting them to add guys, he might like the idea of Bregman in some capacity. Or he liked it ironically.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,807
Sure he has said that in the past, its good for his image and he might even believe it. I'm contending him liking that tweet is very unlikely to mean anything.
That's fair. But many posters are so quick to point out what his agent, or the FO, says as gospel that Devers couldn't possibly even remotely consider moving off 3b that submitting contradictory (and equally circumstantial) evidence should be fair game.

I'm fine with consistency. It all matters equally, or none of it matters at all. (I tend to believe the latter.)
 
Last edited:

Chad Finn

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Seconded ... although it's Beyond the Sixth Game

According to this @Chad Finn story, the Rice/Komminsk rumor was in a notes column:

https://www.boston.com/sports/commentary/2020/06/18/boston-sports-worst-almost-trades/
It was Gammons, so only he would know the ratio of reality to speculation there.

By the way, he's working on another book. Every once in a while I get an email from him saying something like, "Can you find a Globe magazine story I wrote on Frank Robinson managing in Puerto Rico in 1973?" Always makes my day to get those requests.
 

20Ks

New Member
Jul 11, 2024
138
That's fair. But many posters are so quick to point out what his agent, or the FO, says as gospel that Devers couldn't possibly even remotely consider moving off 3b that submitting contradictory (and equally circumstantial) evidence should be fair game.

I'm fine with consistency. It all matters equally, or none of it matters at all. (I tend to believe the latter.)
Rafael Devers is a $300 Million business. With a team who's number 1 priority is realizing that $300M. Him "wanting" to play 3rd is whats best for the team right now. It might not be by the time spring training comes, next year or 3 years from now. Him preferring one thing or another is fine, as long as it doesn't effect Devers corp's top priority. I sincerely doubt he was making a statement by liking a goofy tweet.
 

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
25,746
It was Gammons, so only he would know the ratio of reality to speculation there.

By the way, he's working on another book. Every once in a while I get an email from him saying something like, "Can you find a Globe magazine story I wrote on Frank Robinson managing in Puerto Rico in 1973?" Always makes my day to get those requests.
Did he say what it's going to be about?

Because even if it's just an omnibus of all of his Sunday Notes column, I'd pay top dollar for it.
 

BringBackMo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
1,526
That's fair. But many posters are so quick to point out what his agent, or the FO, says as gospel that Devers couldn't possibly even remotely consider moving off 3b that submitting contradictory (and equally circumstantial) evidence should be fair game.

I'm fine with consistency. It all matters equally, or none of it matters at all. (I tend to believe the latter.)
Here is what Devers' agent said.
“He is a third baseman, and he will continue to play third base and work hard to get better at it. That’s his position, that’s what he likes to play, and that’s what he will be playing. At least in the near future, that’s where he will be. Down the road, it’s hard to say. But as of right now, in the near future, he is a third baseman.”
I think it's OK to draw a distinction between a statement like that from a player's agent and the player clicking "like" on some social media video. I don't agree that either those two things matter equally or they don't matter at all.
 

buttons

New Member
Jul 18, 2005
91
Not sure why you put "Sure thing" in quotation marks and said it over and over again in response to "perfomance probability measure with varying ranges" and "higher likelihood of hitting upper end of expectations for a longer time" quantifying probabilities is literally understanding something is not a sure thing.
Here is what Devers' agent said.

I think it's OK to draw a distinction between a statement like that from a player's agent and the player clicking "like" on some social media video. I don't agree that either those two things matter equally or they don't matter at all.
Devers just “liked” a post placing Bregman at 3rd base and him as DH
 

Ragnar Danneskjöld

New Member
Dec 1, 2007
33
Devers is signed until 2033.

I really don't care what his agent thinks or where he wants to play.

If the best configuration for the team is another player at 3B and him being DH then that's what Breslow should do.

It would probably be better for his health and mindset to focus on hitting anyway.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,807
Here is what Devers' agent said.

I think it's OK to draw a distinction between a statement like that from a player's agent and the player clicking "like" on some social media video. I don't agree that either those two things matter equally or they don't matter at all.
From NESN:
https://nesn.com/2022/11/xander-bogaerts-agent-scott-boras-shoots-down-rumor-red-sox/

Speaking of which, The Athletic's Ken Rosenthal reported Tuesday, citing major league sources, that San Diego Padres general manager A.J. Preller recently asked Boras whether Bogaerts would be willing to play infield positions other than shortstop. But Boras denied that report, as well.

"Xander is playing shortstop," Boras told Rosenthal.

From Mass Live
“No one is going to Xander Bogaerts and asking him to play anything other than shortstop,” Boras said.
https://www.masslive.com/redsox/2022/11/xander-bogaerts-rumors-scott-boras-says-red-sox-free-agents-interest-all-at-ss-report.html



One baseball season later, Bogaerts is at 2b.

For the record, I'm 99.9% certain that the Red Sox lineup against RHPs for the next three seasons (injuries aside) will be Casas at 1b, Devers at 3b and Yoshida at DH. I just don't think it's because Devers refuses to move off 3b.
 
Last edited:

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
33,169
Seems like a memoir of his baseball life. The requests are varied. Last one was for Tiant's 2-hitter over Toronto to force the '78 playoff.
Sons of Rick Waits (For One Day Only)

(The period after the massacre and before the playoff could make its own book).
 

nayrbrey

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,857
Driving somewhere most likely

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
13,092
If the Sox give Anthony and Campbell 500+ big leagues at bats each this year, I don’t think they’ll equal 81 wins. They might but I think they’ll take a step backwards.
You must have been a joy 50 years ago telling people the Red Sox were going nowhere if they gave 500 ABs to Rice and Lynn.
 

BringBackMo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
1,526
From NESN:
https://nesn.com/2022/11/xander-bogaerts-agent-scott-boras-shoots-down-rumor-red-sox/

Speaking of which, The Athletic's Ken Rosenthal reported Tuesday, citing major league sources, that San Diego Padres general manager A.J. Preller recently asked Boras whether Bogaerts would be willing to play infield positions other than shortstop. But Boras denied that report, as well.

"Xander is playing shortstop," Boras told Rosenthal.

From Mass Live
“No one is going to Xander Bogaerts and asking him to play anything other than shortstop,” Boras said.
https://www.masslive.com/redsox/2022/11/xander-bogaerts-rumors-scott-boras-says-red-sox-free-agents-interest-all-at-ss-report.html



One baseball season later, Bogaerts is at 2b.

For the record, I'm 99.9% certain that the Red Sox lineup against RHPs for the next three seasons (injuries aside) will be Casas at 1b, Devers at 3b and Yoshida at DH. I just don't think it's because Devers refuses to move off 3b.
I am *not* saying that Rafael Devers will never move off third. What I am saying is that it's silly, in my mind, to compare a clear and unambiguous statement from a player's agent with that player liking a video on social media. I do not agree that either they matter equally or they don't matter at all. That is the only thing I was reacting to.

Maybe you will get your oft-stated wish. Maybe the Sox will sign Bregman, and Devers will happily move to first or DH. I personally do not want Bregman on a deal for five-plus years, and I don't want him at second. But it doesn't matter what I want. It also doesn't matter what I believe will happen, because I have no special insight into what the Sox are planning to do, or how Devers will react to it. I'm simply saying that it's not nothing when your best and highest-paid player reacts to speculation of a position change by having his agent declare that it will not happen.
 

pk1627

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
May 24, 2003
2,686
Boston
All good. The Red Sox haven't made me miserable since Game 7 of the ALCS in 2003, but it's ok if Ras thinks I am.
Why no misery 2010-2015? Only one year in playoffs, many last place finishes, miserable finish in 2011 worse than anything the last 2 years (and led to Bobby V).

You were happy because they signed FA’s (some of the worst). Or did one very unexpected title go a long way?
 

PrometheusWakefield

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2009
10,727
Boston, MA

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
13,092
Remind me of how many World Series they won with Rice and Lynn
I mean the fact that you didn’t even enjoy the ‘75 Sox toppling MLB’s reigning dynasty and getting within one egregiously awful call of beating a 108 win juggernaut is telling.
 

NickEsasky

Please Hammer, Don't Hurt 'Em
SoSH Member
Jul 24, 2001
9,823
Why no misery 2010-2015? Only one year in playoffs, many last place finishes, miserable finish in 2011 worse than anything the last 2 years (and led to Bobby V).

You were happy because they signed FA’s (some of the worst). Or did one very unexpected title go a long way?
Mostly because they won in 04. It doesn't mean I haven't been frustrated with the team since then but 03 was misery.
 

NickEsasky

Please Hammer, Don't Hurt 'Em
SoSH Member
Jul 24, 2001
9,823
I mean the fact that you didn’t even enjoy the ‘75 Sox toppling MLB’s reigning dynasty and getting within one egregiously awful call of beating a 108 win juggernaut is telling.
Well I wasn't alive.
 

SuperDieHard

New Member
Jun 13, 2015
64
Crazy that they had .294 OBP Rick Burleson leading off with Fred Lynn hitting sixth with a .380 OBP.

People didn't really understand baseball in 1978.
Must’ve been a down year for rooster- his batting average was over 290 the two years before…should they have moved him down in the lineup that year or let him ride based on the past two years……brings up the old question of whether a player is really his body of work or his most recent year’s numbers…what they’re presently debating about Bregman…
 

Norm Siebern

Member
SoSH Member
May 12, 2003
7,299
Western MD
I always argue that they didn't choke! Ripping off eight straight wins to make the playoffs after it all seemed to have caved in on them showed remarkable resilience.

Still think Zimmer sucked, though.
+1

I always wondered if Torrez should have/could have started against the Blue Jay that Sunday, saving Tiant for the possible playoff on Monday. Yes, i know that they HAD to win on Sunday against Toronto, and that is why Tiant pitched; but it was Toronto in their second year of existence. If the Red Sox could not trust Torrez against that, then how could they have trusted him against NY for the division title? Just one of those little what if games to play in the mind.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
Must’ve been a down year for rooster- his batting average was over 290 the two years before…should they have moved him down in the lineup that year or let him ride based on the past two years……brings up the old question of whether a player is really his body of work or his most recent year’s numbers…what they’re presently debating about Bregman…
Darrell Johnson wasn’t into advanced metrics like OB%
 

jteders1

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 5, 2022
143
Because Yoshida sucks in the field, and also adding Alonso without any subtractions makes it harder work Anthony and Campbell into the lineup.

Alonso would make some sense if they moved Yoshida or Casas (or both). But with Boras calling the shots, he might not settle for the typical "3 years with an opt out" deal until late February, and that's a long time to hang in limbo for something that *might* happen. It's not like when they signed JDM in late February and just moved him into the more or less open DH slot. Acquiring Alonso would mean other significant moves to follow.
But isn't Fenway's left field exactly where you want someone with a poor glove and a limited range? Is he any worse than Manny? In addition, it makes it easy to slowly bring up Anthony. Maybe you're lucky and Yoshida rocoups some of his value and you can move him at the deadline and eat less salary. Roman Anthony isn't likely to hit better than Alonso or Yoshi, even if he turns out great, it's unlikely he'll match their production in year one.
 

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
25,746
You must have been a joy 50 years ago telling people the Red Sox were going nowhere if they gave 500 ABs to Rice and Lynn.
Yeah. No one tends to listen to six-month-olds. But what are you going to do?

Perhaps that's what I was crying about most, not that I was hungry or had poo-poo in my diapy.

But I mean Rice was 22 in '75 with four years (436 games) in the minor leagues, Lynn was 23 with two years (177 games) in the minors and three at USC. Anthony is 20 with three years in the minors (245 games) and Campbell is 22 with two years (137 games) in the minors and two (I think?) at Georgia Tech.

I mean, it's kinda close but also not really. I'd say that Rice was definitely ready and Lynn was too due to the amount of games they played from ages 18-22/23.
 
Last edited: