Much like Newman, the Sox are not “Ready to deliver”– The 2025 Offseason News (& rumors?) Thread

Hee Sox Choi

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 27, 2006
6,229
Alonso isn’t Steve Garvey, but I believe he is very good at scooping and picking throws, which could help Devers.
Sean Casey on MLB said Pete Alonso was ”the best in the biz at picking errant throws,” and they even quoted a metric that he lead for picks that backed it up. They joked and said he was a “Super Scooper.”

Would love to add Alonso, put Casas at DH and send Yoshida away with some cash. Then we bash.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
49,513
Sean Casey on MLB said Pete Alonso was ”the best in the biz at picking errant throws,” and they even quoted a metric that he lead for picks that backed it up. They joked and said he was a “Super Scooper.”

Would love to add Alonso, put Casas at DH and send Yoshida away with some cash. Then we bash.
Alonso is an interesting guy to me. Just turned 30 so the power figures to be elite for a few more years but is he now the .230/.324 guy he’s been the past couple of years? He’s been incredibly durable, which is nice. Adding him to 1B and making Casas DH gives you some serious power in the middle of the lineup. Doesn’t have a meaningful split but hits LHP fine.

Separately, he also allows you to trade Casas for pitching, if a meaningful deal opens up. I wouldn’t want him on a deal more than 4-5 years, at most, so it will be interesting to see what kind of market opens up for him.
 

Hee Sox Choi

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 27, 2006
6,229
From a Patreon writer I follow. Really makes me re-evaluate Alonso with the data to back it up:

4) Pete Alonso - FRA, 1B, 30.4 - Alonso's BA unsurprisingly bounced back from a .205 BABIP induced .217 BA in 2023, rising to .240 with a .276 BABIP in 2024, which is right around his career norms. The ebbs and flows of a baseball career are always interesting, with luck being such a big part of the game. Make sure to keep that in mind when evaluating Alonso's career low 34 homers this year too. His 14.4 degree launch was 3.8 degrees lower than last year, so there might have been a conscious attempt to balance out his profile, but 34 homers is a really nice floor to have. And that is basically a reasonable floor with a 95.3 MPH FB/LD EV and a 75.3 MPH swing that is the 16th fastest swing in baseball amongst qualified hitters. Seeing how fast he swings the bat gives added confidence that his skills are not going to tank in his 30's. This is a special talent who should be ripping dingers deep into his mid 30's. - 2025 Projection: 92/37/115/.248/.339/.507/3
 

cantor44

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2020
1,843
Chicago, IL
I agree it seems odd they didn't give TO a QO. Or, sign him for a couple more years. And my fantasy is they sign Teoscar. But with TO gone and Teoscar likely to Dodgers, I suppose Santander, if it ain't long years, is better than not acquiring any RHH slugging. Seeing that Santadner has, well, a tad bit of experience at first means he could be a decent fit - corner outfield, first, DH, and likely means they deal Yoshida.
 

BeantownIdaho

New Member
Dec 5, 2005
632
Nampa, Idaho
Yeah - I agree with several of you on Hoffman being our guy. Cheaper than Scott and he has great stuff. Good K rate and the last two seasons have been consistently very good. Soon to be 32, but I don't see any injury concerns. Projected at 4/44 but we know that could be 20% below market.
 

BeantownIdaho

New Member
Dec 5, 2005
632
Nampa, Idaho
Does a Teo or Santander signing squeeze out someone in the next few years? With Duran, Abreu, Rafaela and Anthony in the mix (along with Yoshida and possibly Campbell), does the signing of an outfielder create a roster crunch in the coming years? Granted a couple of those names could be traded. But, if we are in need of RH power, I am wondering if a 1-2 year DH signing isn't a bad idea. A veteran like Goldschmidt on a 1 year with an option could be a possibility. Yeah, it;s probably 15 million on just a DH (but can play some 1b if needed), but doesn't commit the team to a longer contract. Just a different pivot from Bregman, Teo, Santander, etc.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
8,269
David Price. My view is the list of very top of the market guys this ownership has signed (Manny was the previous ownership) are Price, Crawford, and Lackey. And even Lackey is a stretch. He might fit the Drew/Foulke/Matsuzaka level more. Beyond that, they've never really gone head to head with the other big spenders trying to get the big fish and won. I don't understand the people that expect them to do that now when there are even more big fish fisherman willing to spend at that level.
Exactly. And a lot of those bigger deals worked briefly and then blew up in our faces. I'd much rather the more sustainable approach of drafting really well, acquiring young players entering their prime, and building a winning team I can root for for a number of years over watching the inevitable and rapid deterioration of Corbin Burnes.

And count me in on Jeff Hoffman. He's not a Proven Closer (tm) but I don't think he'll come cheap either. I maintain this team's problem last year was bullpen depth, not starting pitching. Adding Chapman, Whitlock, Hoffman, and Hendriks will put us way ahead of where we were last year.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
22,810
Maine
Does a Teo or Santander signing squeeze out someone in the next few years? With Duran, Abreu, Rafaela and Anthony in the mix (along with Yoshida and possibly Campbell), does the signing of an outfielder create a roster crunch in the coming years? Granted a couple of those names could be traded. But, if we are in need of RH power, I am wondering if a 1-2 year DH signing isn't a bad idea. A veteran like Goldschmidt on a 1 year with an option could be a possibility. Yeah, it;s probably 15 million on just a DH (but can play some 1b if needed), but doesn't commit the team to a longer contract. Just a different pivot from Bregman, Teo, Santander, etc.
A Hernandez or Santander signing surely would squeeze someone out, as soon as this coming season. In fact, I think the only way it will happen is if it's in tandem with a trade of at least one the guys currently in the outfield mix (maybe two if we're counting Yoshida in there). A short-term signing would probably do the same, but the urgency to move someone would be less given that Anthony and Campbell aren't even on the 40-man roster yet.
 

iddoc

New Member
Nov 17, 2006
195
Does a Teo or Santander signing squeeze out someone in the next few years? With Duran, Abreu, Rafaela and Anthony in the mix (along with Yoshida and possibly Campbell), does the signing of an outfielder create a roster crunch in the coming years? Granted a couple of those names could be traded. But, if we are in need of RH power, I am wondering if a 1-2 year DH signing isn't a bad idea. A veteran like Goldschmidt on a 1 year with an option could be a possibility. Yeah, it;s probably 15 million on just a DH (but can play some 1b if needed), but doesn't commit the team to a longer contract. Just a different pivot from Bregman, Teo, Santander, etc.
Embarrassed to admit that I forgot about the QO attached to Santander. Probably not worth losing a pick and giving the Orioles an extra one. Maybe Goldschmidt for 1 year makes more sense. Gleyber probably wants multiple years and to start at 2B. Ugh, I would like get an explanation from Breslow regarding why they didn't even QO O'Neil. Are they convinced Campbell is ready and they are not saying so. Use the DH slot for rest and work in Campbell at multiple positions? Doesn't seem to be the greatest approach for his defensive development.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
9,572
And count me in on Jeff Hoffman. He's not a Proven Closer (tm) but I don't think he'll come cheap either. I maintain this team's problem last year was bullpen depth, not starting pitching. Adding Chapman, Whitlock, Hoffman, and Hendriks will put us way ahead of where we were last year.
I agree, and think as far as depth goes we're currently well ahead of last year, but wouldn't mind one more high lev arm.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
8,269
Embarrassed to admit that I forgot about the QO attached to Santander. Probably not worth losing a pick and giving the Orioles an extra one. Maybe Goldschmidt for 1 year makes more sense. Gleyber probably wants multiple years and to start at 2B. Ugh, I would like get an explanation from Breslow regarding why they didn't even QO O'Neil. Are they convinced Campbell is ready and they are not saying so. Use the DH slot for rest and work in Campbell at multiple positions? Doesn't seem to be the greatest approach for his defensive development.
I might be alone in this, but I think this team needs to see what it has in Anthony and Campbell. They've proven all they need to in the minors. Barring a horrific spring, I think they're destined for the major league roster. For that reason, I really don't see us wanting to bring in Teoscar or Santander on 3-4 year deals. I don't see us splurging on Alonso or even Goldschmidt either. I mean, in an ideal world, I'd like that, but what's more likely, and what makes more sense, given this team's financial constraints, is to sign another relief pitcher and maybe another starter, and extend our young guys where appropriate. Get Campbell and Anthony and Crochet locked down.Campbell's bat is totally can't miss, IMO, and I'd be surprised if the FO wasn't thinking the same.

Campbell is going to win the 2B job out of spring training, unless Grissom has improved as a defender--what I suspect will happen with Grissom, though, is that he'll get moved to left field or DH himself. I think he's got a major league hitter in him. But I don't think there's a major league defender there, at least not an above average one.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
8,269
I agree, and think as far as depth goes we're currently well ahead of last year, but wouldn't mind one more high lev arm.
It's an 87-91 win team IMO already if they get healthy years out of Casas and Story. If 2 out of 3 of Campbell, Anthony, and Grissom all come out guns glazing , well, sky is the limit.

I know I said this last offseason too, of course. And then injuries happened...
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
22,712
Rogers Park
Have to think the Cubs move Suzuki now.
If so, I think he's a good fit.
  • Classic Fenway LF profile: bad range, good arm.
  • Great walk rate (10%), modest K rate (25%) for a power hitter.
  • Very good against lefties (OBP-heavy .843 OPS); still quite good against righties (.817 OPS). Those are career splits.
  • Better away from Wrigley, which is interesting. 0 PA at Fenway Park.
  • Keeps the ball off the ground.
 

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
3,084
Honolulu HI
If so, I think he's a good fit.
  • Classic Fenway LF profile: bad range, good arm.
  • Great walk rate (10%), modest K rate (25%) for a power hitter.
  • Very good against lefties (OBP-heavy .843 OPS); still quite good against righties (.817 OPS). Those are career splits.
  • Better away from Wrigley, which is interesting. 0 PA at Fenway Park.
  • Keeps the ball off the ground.
He’d be great, but all reports suggest that they are much more interested in trading Bellinger.
 

SouthernBoSox

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2005
12,558
He’d be great, but all reports suggest that they are much more interested in trading Bellinger.
Yea but they are gonna have to eat some costs and they won’t get anything for Bellinger.

I’d be willing to actually give up value for Suzuki and think the costs savings would end up being equal when it’s all said and done for the Cubs.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
I might be alone in this, but I think this team needs to see what it has in Anthony and Campbell. They've proven all they need to in the minors. Barring a horrific spring, I think they're destined for the major league roster. For that reason, I really don't see us wanting to bring in Teoscar or Santander on 3-4 year deals. I don't see us splurging on Alonso or even Goldschmidt either. I mean, in an ideal world, I'd like that, but what's more likely, and what makes more sense, given this team's financial constraints, is to sign another relief pitcher and maybe another starter, and extend our young guys where appropriate. Get Campbell and Anthony and Crochet locked down.Campbell's bat is totally can't miss, IMO, and I'd be surprised if the FO wasn't thinking the same.

Campbell is going to win the 2B job out of spring training, unless Grissom has improved as a defender--what I suspect will happen with Grissom, though, is that he'll get moved to left field or DH himself. I think he's got a major league hitter in him. But I don't think there's a major league defender there, at least not an above average one.
You are far from alone! I’m fine with someone they can give a 1-2 year deal to, you can always trade a decent player and if you just gave up cash for him, it won’t hurt to move off him if Anthony or Campbell force your hand.
 

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
3,084
Honolulu HI
You are far from alone! I’m fine with someone they can give a 1-2 year deal to, you can always trade a decent player and if you just gave up cash for him, it won’t hurt to move off him if Anthony or Campbell force your hand.
That’s why a boring signing like Goldschmidt or Canha might make the most sense. If Torres could be had on a reasonable 2yr deal he’d be ideal - but it’s highly unlikely he’d be okay with a DH/bench role, so he’s probably out.
 

cantor44

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2020
1,843
Chicago, IL
A Hernandez or Santander signing surely would squeeze someone out, as soon as this coming season. In fact, I think the only way it will happen is if it's in tandem with a trade of at least one the guys currently in the outfield mix (maybe two if we're counting Yoshida in there). A short-term signing would probably do the same, but the urgency to move someone would be less given that Anthony and Campbell aren't even on the 40-man roster yet.
I think if you assume Antony and Campbell come up at some point this year, and that they add Hernandez or Santander, the first person squeezed is Yoshida. I think he gets moved. Then Rafaels becomes the 10th man super sub. And Grissom and Campbell compete to start at second. If Campbell eventually beats him out (which he will), then Grissom goes to the bench or you trade him - so that last spot would be between Grissom and Gonzalez.
So ultimately you'd have:
C: Wong, 1B: Casas, 2B: Campbell, SS: Story, 3B: Devers, LF: Anthony, CF: Duran, RF: Abreu/Ref, DH/LF: Hernandez (my wish).
Bench: Rafaela, Hamilton, Gonzalez or Grissom, another catcher
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
15,483
I think you want depth, though. Let’s say you don’t sign anyone else and start the season with Campbell and Anthony in the lineup- when, inevitably, a few starters get hurt you are further down the depth chart than if you had kept them in the minors and off the roster for a bit longer. Is there a fear that the team will sign some vets who will be mediocre and that they will just never call up the young guys? I don’t find that realistic. They are going to get their chances no matter where they start the season. Last years team saw 14 players get 150+ PA’s; one fewer than in 2023 and 2022.
 

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
3,084
Honolulu HI
I think you want depth, though. Let’s say you don’t sign anyone else and start the season with Campbell and Anthony in the lineup- when, inevitably, a few starters get hurt you are further down the depth chart than if you had kept them in the minors and off the roster for a bit longer. Is there a fear that the team will sign some vets who will be mediocre and that they will just never call up the young guys? I don’t find that realistic. They are going to get their chances no matter where they start the season. Last years team saw 14 players get 150+ PA’s; one fewer than in 2023 and 2022.
Right, but don’t sign an aging, expensive player like Santander, Hernandez or Bregman just to make sure you have enough depth?
 

Yelling At Clouds

Post-darwinian
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
4,037
That’s why a boring signing like Goldschmidt or Canha might make the most sense. If Torres could be had on a reasonable 2yr deal he’d be ideal - but it’s highly unlikely he’d be okay with a DH/bench role, so he’s probably out.
Not sure if there's space for him without moving some other pieces around, but I like the idea of Goldschmidt as a 1B/DH, if he's amenable to that. He's 37 and coming off his worst season, so I doubt he's going to be too picky.
 

Margo McCready

New Member
Dec 23, 2008
251
I might be alone in this, but I think this team needs to see what it has in Anthony and Campbell. They've proven all they need to in the minors. Barring a horrific spring, I think they're destined for the major league roster. For that reason, I really don't see us wanting to bring in Teoscar or Santander on 3-4 year deals. I don't see us splurging on Alonso or even Goldschmidt either. I mean, in an ideal world, I'd like that, but what's more likely, and what makes more sense, given this team's financial constraints, is to sign another relief pitcher and maybe another starter, and extend our young guys where appropriate. Get Campbell and Anthony and Crochet locked down.Campbell's bat is totally can't miss, IMO, and I'd be surprised if the FO wasn't thinking the same.

Campbell is going to win the 2B job out of spring training, unless Grissom has improved as a defender--what I suspect will happen with Grissom, though, is that he'll get moved to left field or DH himself. I think he's got a major league hitter in him. But I don't think there's a major league defender there, at least not an above average one.
This is where I’m at. I really don’t see any of the QO carrying vets being talked about significantly outperforming these three enough in 2025 to be worth losing the draft picks. And if they do struggle out of the gate, the sooner they’re thrown into the deep end, the sooner they can find their footing in MLB.

If it does turn out to be a worst case Jackson Holliday-like scenario for any of these three, more playing time for Yoshida, Rafaela, Romy or Hamilton isn’t exactly a crisis.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
48,339
-in wait and see mode on Burnes

-remain interested in Walker Buehler

-They talked about Castillo, but Casas wasn’t brought up for that: “Instead, the Mariners were targeting pitching (since they’d have a vacancy if dealing Castillo) and other infield positions”

-Speier mentions Pivetta, Manaea and the below wrt to the Pirates arms


The Pirates — who have excelled at developing young pitchers, and have more in the pipeline behind Rookie of the Year Paul Skenes and Jones, including top prospect Bubba Chandler — rightly seem to seek a monumental package (young big league talent and top prospects) for Jones, who would be under team control for the next five years, making him something of a long shot for anyone. Still, the Red Sox are almost certain to remain engaged so long as the Pirates are fielding offers.

While Jones for now seems far-fetched, the Sox had far more advanced conversations about Mariners righthander Luis Castillo at the Winter Meetings. According to sources, the discussions moved forward enough that the Mariners contacted Castillo’s agent to ask if the pitcher would be willing to waive his no-trade protection (something he has through the 2025 season as part of a five-year, $108 million deal that has three remaining seasons at roughly $72 million, as well player and team options for 2028).
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2024/12/13/sports/red-sox-starting-pitching/
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
8,269
Happy to hear @chrisfont9 and others feel the same as I do...

And I think @TomRicardo is right that Santander and Teoscar are not improvements on Abreu OR Duran in the near or long-term.

I like the idea of getting Goldschmidt on short but substantial money if he's amenable. Statcast thinks he was very unlucky last year (HH% is still 92% percentile!), and the commitment won't be huge. He can at least play a position, which we can't say of Yoshida. We'd still have to send Yoshida off to someone else.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
15,483
Right, but don’t sign an aging, expensive player like Santander, Hernandez or Bregman just to make sure you have enough depth?
Santander is only 30. You wouldn’t be signing him just for depth; it’s because he’s a good player. As far as expensive goes, don’t we want the team to flex their financial muscle?

I’m also really not seeing how his presence would mean they are moving Duran or Abreu. Not in a world where Yoshida and Rafaela are still on the roster.
 

Scoops Bolling

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 19, 2007
6,235
I wonder what it would take to get Mike Burrows from the Pirates. He's been surpassed by multiple guys, but IMO much of that is simply recency bias because he was coming back from TJ. Four pitch mix, needs a little work on his slider but he can spin the ball really well so it's just a matter of figuring out where in the cutter/slider/sweeper mix will work best for him, but the change, curve, and FB are all borderline plus. Has the ceiling of a good middle of the rotation type, with the stuff to fall back to high lev relief if he can't start for whatever reason.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
And count me in on Jeff Hoffman. He's not a Proven Closer (tm) but I don't think he'll come cheap either. I maintain this team's problem last year was bullpen depth, not starting pitching. Adding Chapman, Whitlock, Hoffman, and Hendriks will put us way ahead of where we were last year.
I think the two pretty much went hand in hand. The lack of that 6th, 7th and possible 8th starter waiting in the wings in WOOstah to take the ball when needed seemed to have over-taxed the pen when they were going decent and then injuries and fatigue really exposed the lack of capable arms in WOOstah.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,728
-They talked about Castillo, but Casas wasn’t brought up for that: “Instead, the Mariners were targeting pitching (since they’d have a vacancy if dealing Castillo) and other infield positions”
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2024/12/13/sports/red-sox-starting-pitching/
Good stuff. Thanks. Without giving up too much of the article / paid content, was there any mention as to what happened after the Ms discussion (as in if it was granted, are they still talking, or did they reach an impasse, etc)?

I might be alone in this, but I think this team needs to see what it has in Anthony and Campbell. They've proven all they need to in the minors. Barring a horrific spring, I think they're destined for the major league roster.
Edited down for content, but you're certainly not alone in this.

As someone that advocates strongly the idea of the Sox adding one of Bregman (which I want but don't think there is a realistic chance of it happening); Hernandez, Santander, Kim or CWalker or Arenado - with conditions (I think these are more realistic, though I do believe Hernandez will ultimately end up back in LAD because they apparently have 60 roster spots and a $1b payroll), in no way do I want two of them, nor do I want a scenario where those players are "blocked."

But again - adding ONE of those players in no way blocks Campbell or Anthony.

Second base is wide open - and I truly believe if somehow Bregman ends up in Boston, which again I don't see happening, that the "he could play 2b" is all because you don't in any way, shape or form publicly say that Devers would DH or move from 3b until you have that player. Same goes for Arenado (but they cannot talk about him because he's under contract for another team, of course). Campbell and Grissom will battle it out for that in the spring.

Regarding Anthony, there is a great big hole in LF. It's wide open and ready for him to take. Signing Teoscar or Santander or similar doesn't preclude that. It forces Yoshida out of DH.


All that said, the addition of Crochet (at least in my opinion) means that if Anthony or Campbell were to struggle in spring training and not force their way onto the team, I would not just have them up in Boston to work on the cycle of adjustments that come with all players the way I would have advocated for that pre-Crochet. With the team the last two years, there was (at least in my opinion) no reason to believe they'd be good (and I predicted win totals accordingly, so not hindsight) so it made a ton more sense to just let guys such as Rafaela and Abreu play from jump and get working to see what they had.

It's a bit different calculus now. Adding someone that should be an ace does that. Now, if they struggle in the spring, you send them down until they get sorted back out.

I think most of us assumed that Abreu would need to be out the door to get someone like Crochet (or at least I did) and luckily, he didn't need to be. As such, there is now no reason to add two pieces from those mentioned above, but I do think the need for one exists. Though to be clear, neither Anthony nor Campbell are the ones I think will / should be "blocked."
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
Happy to hear @chrisfont9 and others feel the same as I do...

And I think @TomRicardo is right that Santander and Teoscar are not improvements on Abreu OR Duran in the near or long-term.

I like the idea of getting Goldschmidt on short but substantial money if he's amenable. Statcast thinks he was very unlucky last year (HH% is still 92% percentile!), and the commitment won't be huge. He can at least play a position, which we can't say of Yoshida. We'd still have to send Yoshida off to someone else.
He made $26M last year. I wonder if he might consider two years and what that cost might be.
 

BaseballJones

slappy happy
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
27,221
Santander is only 30. You wouldn’t be signing him just for depth; it’s because he’s a good player. As far as expensive goes, don’t we want the team to flex their financial muscle?

I’m also really not seeing how his presence would mean they are moving Duran or Abreu. Not in a world where Yoshida and Rafaela are still on the roster.
He's a pretty decent baseball player. Maybe a good one. Good power for sure, though this past year was an outlier. But bad OBP (career OBP of .307) and a bad glove (last 4 years with negative dWAR). Not a good baserunner either. Not much speed, doesn't steal bases. So he's basically got the one good tool - power. Which is valuable, and when he's on, he's got legit terrific home run numbers.
 

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
3,084
Honolulu HI
Santander is only 30. You wouldn’t be signing him just for depth; it’s because he’s a good player. As far as expensive goes, don’t we want the team to flex their financial muscle?

I’m also really not seeing how his presence would mean they are moving Duran or Abreu. Not in a world where Yoshida and Rafaela are still on the roster.
He’s Yoshida with more balanced splits and a slightly better glove (he’s merely a bad fielder while Yoshida is terrible) and there are projections that he might get 5 years/$100 million. Even if he only gets four years that’s a lot of money to take on for a fairly mediocre player. Presumably signing him might also lead to the Sox shipping out a subsidized Yoshida in a trade. It’s a lot to give up for a moderate upgrade. Instead, you could sign Canha who plays a similar LF and a good 1b for small money on a one year deal and possibly get more production out of the DH slot with a Yoshida/Canha platoon.
Unless Santander can be signed for a moderate two year deal (which I doubt) he’s just not worth the cost, especially when you consider that they’ll have to give up a draft pick to get him.
 

Sox Pride

New Member
Nov 25, 2005
241
The Triangle
Cubs just traded for Tucker (ESPN)
Cubs acquiring Astros OF Tucker for Paredes, Wesneski

I wonder if they would be open to trade Seiya and what a package for him would look like.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,728
He's a pretty decent baseball player. Maybe a good one. Good power for sure, though this past year was an outlier. But bad OBP (career OBP of .307) and a bad glove (last 4 years with negative dWAR). Not a good baserunner either. Not much speed, doesn't steal bases. So he's basically got the one good tool - power. Which is valuable, and when he's on, he's got legit terrific home run numbers.
He's also a "balanced" baseball player (ie pretty darn good against both RHPs and LHPs). You need some guys like that because the Red Sox are pretty much limited to carrying 13 position players on the roster and not 23. The guys that provide that balance right now on the roster (at least using career numbers with OPS against RHP/LHP) are:

1) Devers (though he's much better against RHPs he's "fine" against LHPs with career .910/.739 OPS split.
2) Casas more balanced, but "less awesome" against RHPs .846/.772
3) Story .785/.963 (he's taken a dive outside of Colorado too, similar to Arenado, but I've spent enough time complaining about Story, so I'll just assume that he's going to magically revert to his career numbers and call him "balanced").

3 out of 9 (and probably more like 2 out of 9).

The next closet option to provide a .700 OPS against both sides of the mound is someone that half the board seems to hate:
4) Connor Wong .727/.686 (which is useful enough for a catcher)

Nobody else reasonably expected to be on the roster with any data against MLB pitching (Duran, Rafaela, Abreu, Yoshida, Refsnyder, Gonzalez, Grissom) has been able to provide a .700 OPS against both sides of the plate and you can't have a platoon caddy for everyone. Clearly Duran provides enough value elsewhere that in no way am I saying he should be platooned, but his performance is markedly worse against LHPs. Which you deal with for the other good stuff, but it's there, also.

Hernandez is .778/.894
Santander is .772/.786
Bregman is .842/.862 (and even though I'm using career number for everyone else, I know someone will bring up Bregman recently, and last year he was .791/.712 so he doesn't have to be platooned like the majority of the line up).
CWalker is .792/.795

*Arenado for his career is .834/.928 but that has dropped of dramatically outside of Coors (much like Story), which is why I want him "last" so to speak, and that's mostly for his defense at 3b.*

You need some guys that are actually useful against both sides of the mound. Boston has two (and three if Story can produce his career splits even though he hasn't in 3 years in Boston). I like Anthony and Campbell too - and neither has shown a split to be concerned about in the high minors. But depending on two rookies to be the 3rd and 4th most consistent or balanced players in your line up seems unfair and like something that isn't a great idea.
 
Last edited:

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
15,483
I’d begrudgingly go to 3 for Santander, but no way in more than that. Sox may be best served seeing what bat is left without a dance partner and willing to settle for a short term deal- it’s bound to happen to someone.
 

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
3,084
Honolulu HI
I’d begrudgingly go to 3 for Santander, but no way in more than that. Sox may be best served seeing what bat is left without a dance partner and willing to settle for a short term deal- it’s bound to happen to someone.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Torres could play as good a LF as Santander and he’s expected to get a shorter deal. Don’t know if he’s up for being a super utility type though.