MLB and MLBPA have a deal

JimD

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2001
8,694
It might also mean that leadership was a little too caught up in "winning" the negotiation and the majority of the players had a deal they could live with right now.
Or it could mean that players started caving once their paychecks were in danger
 

BringBackMo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
1,330
Lot of interesting stuff in the deal. Per Passan article on ESPN

The minimum salary jumps from $570,500 to $700,000, growing to $780,000

A bonus pool worth $50 million will be distributed among those younger players who have yet to reach salary arbitration. I've not heard of this pool before. Is this a new feature? Anyone know more about this?

12 teams in playoffs

A 45-day window for MLB to implement rules changes -- among them a pitch clock, ban on shifts and larger bases in the 2023 season

The National League adopting the designated hitter

A draft lottery implemented with the intent of discouraging tanking. I hadn't heard that this actually going to make it into the deal. Wow. Can't wait to see how it works.

Draft-pick inducements to discourage service-time manipulation

Limiting the number of times a player can be optioned to the minor leagues in one season
 

ookami7m

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
5,680
Mobile, AL
Need updated schedules so I can plan the pilgrimage for the daughters. After ratification?
 

mikcou

Member
SoSH Member
May 13, 2007
926
Boston
Or it could mean that players started caving once their paychecks were in danger
Seems like a classic short term rank and file wants their paychecks v. long term how do we solve the larger economic issues (e.g., combination of significant revenue sharing and large playoffs tends to decrease ownerhsip incentives to spend; long term decline in player's share, etc.)
 

OCD SS

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Seems like a classic short term rank and file wants their paychecks v. long term how do we solve the larger economic issues (e.g., combination of significant revenue sharing and large playoffs tends to decrease ownerhsip incentives to spend; long term decline in player's share, etc.)
Heard a good analysis (I think Dan Symborski or Ben Lindberg on Effectively Wild?) that the best way for the union to start clawing back their share is incrementally, by introducing as many new payment methods as possible. Once they're in the door it becomes possible to increase income on multiple fronts...
 

PrometheusWakefield

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2009
10,447
Boston, MA
It might also mean that leadership was a little too caught up in "winning" the negotiation and the majority of the players had a deal they could live with right now.
I think it's more like union leadership disclaiming responsibility for what they know is a bad deal for the players, and the players just wanting to play baseball.
 

ArttyG12

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
101
Don't love this, from the ESPN article:
Additionally, player uniforms will feature advertising for the first time, with patches on jerseys and decals on batting helmets.
 

ookami7m

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
5,680
Mobile, AL
Don't love this, from the ESPN article:
Additionally, player uniforms will feature advertising for the first time, with patches on jerseys and decals on batting helmets.
honestly it was going to happen at some point - no reason to fight this at all. Within a month you’ll barely notice them any more than any commemorative patch
 

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
24,628
Lot of interesting stuff in the deal. Per Passan article on ESPN

The minimum salary jumps from $570,500 to $700,000, growing to $780,000

A bonus pool worth $50 million will be distributed among those younger players who have yet to reach salary arbitration. I've not heard of this pool before. Is this a new feature? Anyone know more about this?

12 teams in playoffs

A 45-day window for MLB to implement rules changes -- among them a pitch clock, ban on shifts and larger bases in the 2023 season

The National League adopting the designated hitter

A draft lottery implemented with the intent of discouraging tanking. I hadn't heard that this actually going to make it into the deal. Wow. Can't wait to see how it works.

Draft-pick inducements to discourage service-time manipulation

Limiting the number of times a player can be optioned to the minor leagues in one season
Advertisements on uniforms still in play?

EDIT: Forget it. Just saw it is.
 

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
24,628
Don't love this, from the ESPN article:
Additionally, player uniforms will feature advertising for the first time, with patches on jerseys and decals on batting helmets.
I hate this. More than I hate no baseball? No. But it's still gross.
 

Gash Prex

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 18, 2002
6,837
Seems like a classic short term rank and file wants their paychecks v. long term how do we solve the larger economic issues (e.g., combination of significant revenue sharing and large playoffs tends to decrease ownerhsip incentives to spend; long term decline in player's share, etc.)
The parties appeared to be "close" on a number of issues - like 10 million apart - so its difficult for me to see how it was roundly rejected by the executive committee. 10 million isn't changing the long term trajectory of "larger economic issues" so why did they oppose it so universally?
 

ehaz

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2007
4,954
I heard that the Red Sox (Pivetta is the player rep) were a borderline "no" vote up until the end but ultimately voted "yes." Got the impression that a lot of teams were wavering on whether to vote yes.
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
73,224
I heard that the Red Sox (Pivetta is the player rep) were a borderline "no" vote up until the end but ultimately voted "yes." Got the impression that a lot of teams were wavering on whether to vote yes.
Not a fan of players with relatively short tenure with club to be player reps, although to be fair, I can't give a rational reason for it.
 

Rasputin

Will outlive SeanBerry
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
29,499
Not here
So this is what multiple orgasms feels like.

It sounds to me like the owners get more of what they wanted than the players, but I don't really care, I just want to watch baseball.

Universal DH is cool. Been wanting that for a couple decades.

12 teams in the playoffs? So three wild card teams and only the top two division winners get byes? That's gonna be a thing. Not sure I like it.
 

mikcou

Member
SoSH Member
May 13, 2007
926
Boston
Heard a good analysis (I think Dan Symborski or Ben Lindberg on Effectively Wild?) that the best way for the union to start clawing back their share is incrementally, by introducing as many new payment methods as possible. Once they're in the door it becomes possible to increase income on multiple fronts...
That intuitively makes sense - what theyve been doing in the past hasnt worked. So introduce somethign new... like the pre-arb bonus pool and try to build off of it over multiple agreements.
The parties appeared to be "close" on a number of issues - like 10 million apart - so its difficult for me to see how it was roundly rejected by the executive committee. 10 million isn't changing the long term trajectory of "larger economic issues" so why did they oppose it so universally?
I dont think the executive committee was ever going to stop a deal that its rank and file wanted. They were negotiating a deal that the broader union would accept - doesnt mean that they have to objectively like it. In that vein, the vote is really symbolic.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,186
It's possible (I am just guessing) that the executive board understands much better the value of the grievances which presumably were dropped as part of this deal, hence their 'no' votes.