Picking up on the Yates film study and how reads are only 2 or so options these days. As someone lacking nuance on reads, my impression from the Brady era is that much of Brady's success stems from pre-snap reads or pressure and coverages, mixed with being able to adjust just at snap. Not the later real-time reads once the play develops. There's the basic zone/man reads through motion, but also identifying linemen rushing vs. faking. All of that is before the play. So that the "progression" reads are a lot less important. There's obvious limits to this for a smart QB like Jones, or even experienced guys like Hoyer, whose physical skills hold them back. Is it that there is a read, but that it takes a bit of time to keep the play alive to get to that point, and Jones/Hoyer just lack that split second? Or footwork so that after that split second they are not ready to make the play? In other words, we know little about Maye's pre-read ability, plus I assume the NFL disguises and athletes make the College reads pretty limited. Then there's the bailout "keeping play alive" vs. "pull down and run" on which Daniels/Fields, etc seems weak.
All of that is to say it would seem that Jones should have been the smarter, more comparable to Brady skill set, rather than Maye. Is it just that Brady (and Manning) are at unicorn level pre-snap reads that even smart guys like Jones cannot accomplish, no matter how much film prep they do? Or that the game has moved more toward skills of keeping the play alive, like Mahomes/Josh Allen/Caleb Williams, so that this "let the play break down and make a play" is more acceptable? (and if so, where did Zach Wilson fail, as he had mobility but was still "seeing ghosts" (i.e., making bad reads on the run)