View: https://twitter.com/enosarris/status/1760750494757310714?s=46&t=-M7K07aV9oTvsCKHtZkfZQ
Are they trying to reach new fanbases? Is that the point of this?
Are they trying to reach new fanbases? Is that the point of this?
Good news for fans who are hoping to see an increase in dongs this season. Some of the cheap ass Fanatics pants are see through.
View: https://twitter.com/Mariners/status/1760102598621925721
They're pre-preparing for climate change where the players will be out in 115 weatherNike keeps saying how much lighter these uniforms* are as if the players were lugging around pianos on their backs. It's a shirt and pants, how much can they weigh? Though I suppose if Dave Roberts was in these uniforms, he'd have been safe by two feet.
* I know that this is all marketing speak, but it's so, so dumb. The material costs less, that's what the the main feature is. Anything else is just spin.
What happens when they get wet? If they are see-thru now....They look like a cheap video game that couldn't be bothered to layer the textures. Just waiting for someone to split their pants, which are the ultimate crossover of Costanza's breathability and Leon Black's balls hanging out.
Ratings go up.What happens when they get wet? If they are see-thru now....
Nike didn’t even make these. Fanatics made them and licensed Nike’s logo.It seems like Nike is always ruining uniforms everywhere in every league. They have this primal urge to make everything remarkably different for no good reason.
But I heard that Fanatics is manufacturing these uniforms for Nike and just slapping a swoosh on them.
It’s true that Fanatics is manufacturing the game jerseys for Nike. But (a) Fanatics has been manufacturing Nike’s MLB game uniforms for four years now, because Fanatics owns the old Majestic factory in Pennsylvania, so there’s nothing new about that arrangement, and (b) they’re manufacturing the uniforms according to Nike’s design specs.
In other words, Fanatics is basically serving as a subcontractor here. They do what they’re told by their client, and the client is Nike.
So you’re saying we should blame Nike?
I’m not saying you should blame anyone. Hell, maybe you like the MLB template changes! (I saw yesterday, for example, that some readers prefer the Cardinals’ new jersey script to the old one.) What I’m saying is that whether you like or dislike the changes, those changes came from Nike, not from Fanatics.
I hate Fanatics! Why are you defending them?
I’m not defending (or attacking) anyone. I’m simply trying to provide accurate information, because a lot of people seem to mistakenly believe that Fanatics is responsible for the new MLB uniform template.
Par for the course with the Manfred administration, as this is not the first time that MLB has egg on its face in pursuit of an extra dollar.It really is mind-blowing how a multi-billion dollar organization like MLB is willing to outsource decisions on stuff like 'our players look ridiculous' to a company trying to save a few $
Thanks for this info. I was misinformed. I am loathe to give Fanatics credit, but this seems like a Nike issue. Pathetic all around.But Nike designed them and Fanatics is just following their specs (Fanatics sucks, so it pains me to defend them). Paul Lukas from Uni Watch elaborates:
That could account for the pants, but it doesn't account for things like the Chavis jersey having misaligned numbers (unless the Nike specs are truly insane). What we have here appears to be a bad idea that, independently, has also been badly executed.But Nike designed them and Fanatics is just following their specs (Fanatics sucks, so it pains me to defend them). Paul Lukas from Uni Watch elaborates:
Not to mention that lighter fabric isn't necessarily cooler in the heat. Plus they play games in the cold too.Nike keeps saying how much lighter these uniforms* are as if the players were lugging around pianos on their backs. It's a shirt and pants, how much can they weigh? Though I suppose if Dave Roberts was in these uniforms, he'd have been safe by two feet.
* I know that this is all marketing speak, but it's so, so dumb. The material costs less, that's what the the main feature is. Anything else is just spin.
Not Found. What was it, @Wingack ?There are going to be dozens of these photos:
View: https://twitter.com/icyvert/status/1760783331266834651?s=46&t=-M7K07aV9oTvsCKHtZkfZQ
It was a player bending over from behind, and well, it didn’t leave much to the imagination.Not Found. What was it, @Wingack ?
I still get Not Found. Maybe because I don’t have a Twitter login? Is it the balls pic again?If you click in the link it loads. It’s pretty NSFW.
Ahh. Ewww.It was a player bending over from behind, and well, it didn’t leave much to the imagination.
Great line about Dave Roberts, JMOH! This is all a metaphor of our times, my friend.Nike keeps saying how much lighter these uniforms* are as if the players were lugging around pianos on their backs. It's a shirt and pants, how much can they weigh? Though I suppose if Dave Roberts was in these uniforms, he'd have been safe by two feet.
* I know that this is all marketing speak, but it's so, so dumb. The material costs less, that's what the the main feature is. Anything else is just spin.
Different balls.I still get Not Found. Maybe because I don’t have a Twitter login? Is it the balls pic again?
It’s because the placard (I think that’s what it’s called, the red outline on the front of the Sox jersey) is smaller than the old version.No shortage of reasons to dump on this year's uniforms. They didn't both to align "Dodgers" properly do the second "d" gets partially cut off:
Script and numbers are also smaller. I'm guessing they'll save pennies per jersey on lettering. I'm surprised they're not back to pullovers to save money on buttons.
Well, the whole "hey look we can see every player's junk now!" thing was destined to get traction.It’s amazing to me how much mileage this story is getting. Nike and Fanatics are getting their asses handed to them on all fronts.
It’s amazing to me how much mileage this story is getting. Nike and Fanatics are getting their asses handed to them on allfrontsfonts.
Placket.It’s because the placard (I think that’s what it’s called, the red outline on the front of the Sox jersey) is smaller than the old version.
Yes. Thank you.Placket.
Being a former clothing product development guy still yields some rewards.
https://theathletic.com/5310656/2024/03/01/michael-rubin-fanatics-mlb-uniforms?source=user-shared-article“In this particular case, Nike designs everything, hands us a spec and says, ‘Make this,’” Rubin said. “We have made everything exactly to the spec. Nike and baseball would say, yes, you’ve done everything we’ve asked you to do. Part of changing a uniform is people get uncomfortable, and it takes time (to adjust).”
Yeah, there was a time when you could tell the real deal from a replica or cheap knock off. Now, not so much.I honestly can’t believe how bad Nike shit the bed with these things. Up until this year, the MLB uniforms looked great. Now, every week there seems to be an issue.
And while I like uniforms and all that stuff, I’m not the typical UniWatch poster who hates every single new uniform because of pedantic reason. But this rollout has been a complete disaster from day one. I don’t expect MLB to do anything about it, but man, these things don’t look professional at all.