Let's talk about Michael Pineda

OfTheCarmen

Cow Humper
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2007
5,240
JimBoSox9 said:
Which would only make Rothschild the crown dunce of the whole affair.  Pitching coaches discouraging stickum?  Sure thing.  
 
In general I would agree, but in this specific case/game, after the national media hub-bub after the last incident I could easily see Rothschild saying "hey, dont pull any shit out there today, spotlight will be too hot.".  No, Rothschild isnt the Mother Theresa of pitching coaches, but I could see him discouraging it for that game.
 

Doctor G

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 24, 2007
2,331
Snodgrass'Muff said:
 
 
 
 
 
You guys are missing my point.  Slicking his hair with oil would make the ball more slippery and thus, make the ball behave erratically, more akin to a spit ball.  What we know, and all of baseball knows is that Clay uses the sunscree+rosin mix to make his fingers a bit tacky or sticky to enhance grip and make it easier to control where the ball is going.
 
Sterling is a moron for taking what we know, and spinning it into something on the opposite end of the spectrum with absolutely no evidence to support it.  His pitches weren't moving unexpectedly and he wasn't having trouble locating them.  The idea that he was oiling his hair is preposterous and unnecessary since we know he was doing something else.  Why not just say what happened instead of trying to make it sound worse?  Or, if you are going to trump it up, at least do it in a believable way... not in a way that couldn't possibly be more different.
NESN cameras have shown Buchholz pouring water from a water bottle on his head in the dugout betweeen innings.
 

Doctor G

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 24, 2007
2,331
JimBoSox9 said:
Which would only make Rothschild the crown dunce of the whole affair.  Pitching coaches discouraging stickum?  Sure thing.  
Supposedly Girardi and Rothschild spoke to Pineda who doesn't speak English. Maybe what Cashman was pissed off about was that Tony Pena his bench coach was somehow not able to advise his pitcher how to  " cheat better." 
 

ThePrideofShiner

Crests prematurely
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
10,764
Washington
Bud Selig weighed in, albeit briefly, at an Associated Press Sports Editors commissioners meeting today:
 
APSE ‏@APSE_sportmedia 6h
Selig on Pineda/pine tar: "There's a million ways to do it. This one, I can understand why Joe Torre reacted how he did. It was obvious."
 
 
 
Edit: I have no idea how to make Tweets show up properly. If someone wants to PM me instructions, that'd be great.
 

derekson

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2010
6,248
ThePrideofShiner said:
Bud Selig weighed in, albeit briefly, at an Associated Press Sports Editors commissioners meeting today:
 
APSE ‏@APSE_sportmedia 6h
Selig on Pineda/pine tar: "There's a million ways to do it. This one, I can understand why Joe Torre reacted how he did. It was obvious."
 
 
 
Edit: I have no idea how to make Tweets show up properly. If someone wants to PM me instructions, that'd be great.
 
Just paste the plain text link to the tweet in your post. That's it.
 
For example:
 
https://twitter.com/APSE_sportmedia/status/459754441655480320
 

mt8thsw9th

anti-SoSHal
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
17,121
Brooklyn
For fuck's sake, just use the rosin bag. All statements like that do is bail Pineda out. Of course it helps grip, but its main use is to doctor the ball. Will MLB look into rules preventing hitters from taking steroids because it might help them grip the bat more tightly?
 

EvilEmpire

paying for his sins
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 9, 2007
17,271
Washington
mt8thsw9th said:
For fuck's sake, just use the rosin bag. All statements like that do is bail Pineda out. Of course it helps grip, but its main use is to doctor the ball. Will MLB look into rules preventing hitters from taking steroids because it might help them grip the bat more tightly?
If pitchers were just using rosin, you might have a point. But since most are using less obvious stuff than pine tar, and also cheating, I don't see what the problem is in reevaluating substances in general.

Also, your statement is the first time I've heard anything that suggests pine tar doctors the ball and presumably changes movement. Everything I've seen talks about grip. Do you have anything to back that up?
 

Average Reds

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 24, 2007
35,413
Southwestern CT
EvilEmpire said:
If pitchers were just using rosin, you might have a point. But since most are using less obvious stuff than pine tar, and also cheating, I don't see what the problem is in reevaluating substances in general.

Also, your statement is the first time I've heard anything that suggests pine tar doctors the ball and presumably changes movement. Everything I've seen talks about grip. Do you have anything to back that up?
Unless you slathered it on so heavily that the ball was brown, it doesn't change the aerodynamics of the ball

It is used for grip, period.
 

Moosey

Mooseyed Farvin
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
4,227
CT
Better grip is kind of a big deal.  If pine tar provides grip above and beyond that which could be achieved by the rosin (which it does), then the application as a grip aid or in ball doctoring should not matter.  The pine tar itself does not doctor the movement, the ability to grip the ball better provides the pitcher with a greater ability to apply more torque on the ball, which equals greater movement.
 
Both give the pitcher an advantage he would not have otherwise under the current rules.
 

Moosey

Mooseyed Farvin
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
4,227
CT
Yeah, I agree, I guess what I am saying is that the effect of better grip is potentially equal to doctoring the ball and there's a lot of back and forth about it and there really doesn't need to be.  Both give the pitcher an advantage above and beyond the rules.*  Basically my retort was more general than to just the current swing of this thread.
 
Plus, all Pineda had to do was watch Major League for potential hiding spots.
 
*as currently constituted.
 

EvilEmpire

paying for his sins
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 9, 2007
17,271
Washington
FarvinMoosey said:
Yeah, I agree, I guess what I am saying is that the effect of better grip is potentially equal to doctoring the ball and there's a lot of back and forth about it and there really doesn't need to be.  Both give the pitcher an advantage above and beyond the rules.*  Basically my retort was more general than to just the current swing of this thread.
 
Plus, all Pineda had to do was watch Major League for potential hiding spots.
 
*as currently constituted.
I think most of us are in agreement as to grip. Grip is important enough that we've been hearing for weeks about how most pitchers feel compelled to cheat in order to improve it. Most if them of course use substances other than pine tar and are much more subtle about it.

I absolutely hate the idea of a Yankee pitching coach or teammate feeling obligated to school Pineda on how to cheat better. I also don't much care for all the splitting of hairs on how some ways of cheating for better grip are more or less acceptable than others. Cheating is cheating. Thankfully there hasn't been a lot of that in these forums, but listening to talking heads on various broadcasts talk about it that way irritates me.

If the practice of illegally augmenting grip is so widespread, I'd prefer the league evaluate it and either approve it or increase vigilance against it.
 

Sampo Gida

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 7, 2010
5,044
Average Reds said:
Unless you slathered it on so heavily that the ball was brown, it doesn't change the aerodynamics of the ball

It is used for grip, period.
 
http://edge.si.com/edge/2014/04/24/pineda-and-pine-tar-scientists-take
 
Alan Nathan says
 


Spin results in movement, so creating friction between the fingers and the surface of the ball, the seams or the white part of the ball, is very important.”
 
Nathan, who blogs about the physics of baseball, said that he truly believes Pineda—and many pitchers in baseball—use pine tar only for grip. But it’s not out of the question that the substance could be used in other ways.
 
“Taken to an extreme, putting a foreign substance like pine tar on the ball can do more,” Nathan says. “It can affect the trajectory. It can give the ball unexpected movement. I doubt that is what was going on, but a real glob of pine tar could make the ball move a lot. But that would be hard for a pitcher to get away with. In the hands of a reasonably skilled pitcher, a lot can be done when the ball is loaded up.”
 
Nathan being a  bit diplomatic there, but aside from his "belief" on what most pitchers use it for, hardly the stuff of good science, he basically is saying that in the hands of a skilled pitcher, pine tar can be used to do more than provide a better grip.
 
Frankly, umpires should be able to detect the use of pine tar simply by inspecting the balls which they never seem to do, so not sure why using a big glob of pine tar would be hard to get away with.  Pineda certainly looked to have more than enough pine tar in which to do more than just improve grip, and the fact he used it in the climate controlled dome in Toronto suggests he was using it for more than grip.
 

HriniakPosterChild

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 6, 2006
14,841
500 feet above Lake Sammammish
EvilEmpire said:
I absolutely hate the idea of a Yankee pitching coach or teammate feeling obligated to school Pineda on how to cheat better. I also don't much care for all the splitting of hairs on how some ways of cheating for better grip are more or less acceptable than others. Cheating is cheating. Thankfully there hasn't been a lot of that in these forums, but listening to talking heads on various broadcasts talk about it that way irritates me.
 
 
Someone once said: If you ain't cheatin', you ain't tryin'. (I think it was Abner Doubleday, shortly after he invented baseball in Cooperstown, NY, but I am having trouble finding a link for it.)
 
I have heard the YES commentators explain that hitters want the pitchers to have a better grip because, my goodness, they don't want the pitchers to miss their spots. That doesn't make sense to me. If the pitcher is trying to spot a fastball in the Maddux low and away spot on the black, and the ball ends up middle-middle, why is the hitter going to be upset about that?
 
--
Edit: formatting.
 

themactavish

New Member
Aug 4, 2010
75
St. Cloud, MN
HriniakPosterChild said:
 
 
Someone once said: If you ain't cheatin', you ain't tryin'. (I think it was Abner Doubleday, shortly after he invented baseball in Cooperstown, NY, but I am having trouble finding a link for it.)
 
I have heard the YES commentators explain that hitters want the pitchers to have a better grip because, my goodness, they don't want the pitchers to miss their spots. That doesn't make sense to me. If the pitcher is trying to spot a fastball in the Maddux low and away spot on the black, and the ball ends up middle-middle, why is the hitter going to be upset about that?
 
--
Edit: formatting.
 
Of course, both grip and location vary along a spectrum.  No hitter wants a pitcher to be so wild as to be all over the place, and speaking as a former pitcher who nailed a mascot or two in his day, a bad grip (say, from the cold) can lead to such disasters.  So in this sense, hitters are certainly willing to have pitchers have a good enough grip to avoid danger.  But no, they wouldn't wish them to have pinpoint control (not that grip alone guarantees any such thing), and neither would they want them to be able to get an extra feel on a good curveball (for instance).  I always found that extra grip made it far easier to throw a much sharper curveball.
 

JimBoSox9

will you be my friend?
SoSH Member
Nov 1, 2005
16,675
Mid-surburbia
Bingo. You just can't define bright lines between grip, spin, control, movement. You can make a general characterization about scuffing the ball vs loading the ball vs hand stickum, but the edges between them are extremely blurry. The devil's in the details and we'll never know enough about each guy's process to be able to tease out the real impact.
 

terrisus

formerly: imgran
SoSH Member
I had thought a player had to actually be physically able to play in order for a suspension to take place - so that, for instance, a suspension couldn't take place during a time when a player was injured and wouldn't have been playing anyway.
 
Is that only if they're officially on the DL? Or am I just imagining that was the case entirely?
 

JohntheBaptist

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
11,404
Yoknapatawpha County
terrisus said:
I had thought a player had to actually be physically able to play in order for a suspension to take place - so that, for instance, a suspension couldn't take place during a time when a player was injured and wouldn't have been playing anyway.
 
Is that only if they're officially on the DL? Or am I just imagining that was the case entirely?
 
It seemed to me that Sherman was suggesting that the 10 days of downtime is long enough that he can't just jump back, so he has to ease back into it, which could take the 3-4 weeks. I don't think he's saying he's injured.
 

rembrat

Member
SoSH Member
May 26, 2006
36,345
That makes no sense. If a player is suspended is he barred from any baseball activity? Could he not pitch simulated games? 
 

JohntheBaptist

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
11,404
Yoknapatawpha County
rembrat said:
That makes no sense. If a player is suspended is he barred from any baseball activity? Could he not pitch simulated games? 
 
Yeah it is weird. I'm guessing you can't practice with the team or whatever, but that means he can't throw? Wonder if it's just a little fib to help limit the innings even more.
 
Maybe terrisus is right and something happened today, shutting him down for 10 days from now? Who knows.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,449
deep inside Guido territory

EvilEmpire

paying for his sins
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 9, 2007
17,271
Washington
Oh well. His innings were going to be limited anyway, and at least now he'll be back when the weather is warmer. Maybe he can use the time to figure out the whole pine tar thing.
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,443
Do both teams use the same rosin bag?

Never really thought of that before.
 

rembrat

Member
SoSH Member
May 26, 2006
36,345
Is the Doc in the house? Could this 'lat strain' be related to his shoulder?
 

derekson

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2010
6,248
 
 
Pineda is returning this season from shoulder surgery. When he pulled himself from the simulated game, the initial inclination was that his lat muscle was sore and Girardi said “the good thing is it’s not in his shoulder.” The subsequent diagnosis is not as good. The Daily News spoke with an orthopedic surgeon – who is not treating Pineda – but said the Teres Major plays a role in the stability of the shoulder socket.

Source: http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball/yankees/pineda-pulls-simulated-game-putting-return-jeopardy-article-1.1773245#ixzz30Txgtpnb
 
Looks like it's not actually a lat injury for Pineda but a muscle strain up by the shoulder to the Teres Major muscle.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,471
While throwing in a simulated game towards the end of April, Yankees starter Michael Pineda suffered a strain of the teres major muscle in his shoulder. The diagnosis purported Pineda would need three or four weeks to recover. Unfortunately for the Yankees, Pineda will need more than four weeks now, according to manager Joe Girardi, via Jorge Castillo of The Star-Ledger.
Pineda played catch at a distance of 60 feet on Saturday, Castillo writes, and everything went well, but Girardi is in no mood to rush the right-hander considering his four starts this season were his first for the Yankees since they acquired him in January 2012 in the Jesus Montero trade.
Pineda, of course, made headlines when he was caught on national television with pine tar on his neck, but when he wasn’t brazenly breaking baseball’s rules, he was pitching well for the Yankees. In four starts, the 25-year-old posted a 1.83 ERA with 15 strikeouts and three walks over 19 2/3 innings.
 
http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/05/11/michael-pineda-will-need-more-than-four-weeks-to-recover-from-shoulder-strain/
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,137
Van Everyman said:
They must really not want him to serve that suspension.
 
The suspension is already served, unless this is some joke I'm missing.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,137
He is scheduled to start game 162 in Sunday, but has been dominant in the 12 starts he's managed to make before and after his suspension/injury. He has only given up more than 2 ERs in a game once in those 12 starts, a ridiculous 1.93 ERA and 0.86 WHIP, holding the oppostion to a collective .547 OPS. 
 
If he and Tanaka are healthy next year (admittedly a big if), NY has a very tough 1/2 at the top of the rotation to build around.