I've yet to watch the interview, but they were talking about this on NBA Radio, including Tim Legler, and it *seems* that the court of public opinion is starting to slide in favor of the young Celtics players.
Some points they made (I was on a call and couldn't hear all of it):
1-Leaders don't have to continually tell people they're leaders.
2-No NBA player will willingly take backseat, and they shouldn't.
3-Irving not going to game 7 was seen by NBA types are not very leader-ish.
Said that this can still resolve itself by seeing how this version of Celtics perform in postseason. If they see Irving get them over the hump they couldn't get over last year then this may go one way. If they don't get as far then it spins the other.
I'm coming to the realization that I thought the Celtics future used to be 2 paths:
1-Irving, AD trade, let's roll
2-Irving, young guns, let's roll
and that may not be the case any longer.
This is why we pay Ainge though. And since nothing will resolve itself this year, might as well enjoy what we have now, because all that meticulous planning may be out the window because this team overperformed last year. Seems weird that playing so well may have changed the future trajectory of the franchise--that had we just bowed out earlier last year, some of this may not have cropped up. Of course, if the issues are tied to Irving and his leadership style, it's likely it would have popped up somehow anyway.