DrewDawg said:
Is he? How many Europeans come over and can immediately contribute on the defensive end? How many are elite rebounders? How's Ricky Rubio's shooting form? Would you describe Enes Kanter as fundamentally sound? How many European players, in the last 5 years, have come over and been able to immediately slide into a starting lineup? Or even play consistently as an above average rotation player? Mirotic, Valanciuius, Splitter, and who else? Antekou--er, the Giannis, I guess?
In other words, I think there's a tendency to blame AAU ball when US prospects aren't fundamentally sound while completely ignoring the hundreds if not thousands of European prospects playing at various levels of basketball in Europe who aren't fundamentally sound. Take Marc Gasol, who Kobe cites by name: he actually played AAU ball and high school basketball in the US and then opted to play professionally in Spain in lieu of playing NCAA basketball. Is it really fair to hold up a guy who spent 6 years playing professionally before making his NBA debut to a 19 year old Andrew Wiggins and then blame AAU for failing to develop him similarly? How is that a fair comp? Let's compare him to age 24 Wiggins when the time comes.
You don't hear a peep about the AAU's shortcomings when it creates LeBron James or Kevin Durant nor do you hear anybody extolling the virtues of the Euro model when it turns out Segei Karasev doesn't know how to dribble, or when the Euroleague's leading scorer turns out to be a below average rotation guy on the Nets.
And I say all of this as somebody who genuinely believes that the NCAA hurts the development of basketball players in the US, and as somebody who thinks there are definite improvements to be made in how we develop young players. But I think the whole "Europeans are more fundamentally sound" trope is a symptom of the fact that by the time Europeans get to the NBA, often times, they have several years of professional basketball behind them and we all too conveniently overlook the young guys who get here and aren't ready to contribute in the NBA. There's a lot to dislike about amatuer basketball in the US, but the issue isn't with what's happening to these kids before they turn 18, the issue is the gray area between the age of 18 and when players should be reasonably expected to be capable of contributing to an NBA team.