Kiké Hernandez tests positive for COVID

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,537
He can apparently catch COVID, but Arroyo really can't catch a break. I hope both are OK.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,870
Maine
Wonderful timing.

Out for an extended period of time suggests non-vaxxed, no? Or at least for Arroyo as a close contact who hasn't necessarily (yet?) tested positive. Hernandez reportedly is experiencing symptoms, so extended period makes sense there. Would think a vaxxed person who tests negative a couple times would be right back on the active roster despite the close contact.

Guess for those who've been asking for a few weeks where is Yairo Munoz, your wish has come true. He's one of the players being called up, and per Ian Browne, will be leading off tonight (if he arrives in time).
 

cantor44

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2020
1,644
Chicago, IL
I don't get it ... why isn't the whole team considered a close contact. he was in the dugout with them yesterday no mask, etc. ...
 

Bob Montgomerys Helmet Hat

has big, douchey shoulders
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Wonderful timing.

Out for an extended period of time suggests non-vaxxed, no? Or at least for Arroyo as a close contact who hasn't necessarily (yet?) tested positive. Hernandez reportedly is experiencing symptoms, so extended period makes sense there. Would think a vaxxed person who tests negative a couple times would be right back on the active roster despite the close contact.

Guess for those who've been asking for a few weeks where is Yairo Munoz, your wish has come true. He's one of the players being called up, and per Ian Browne, will be leading off tonight (if he arrives in time).
That was my first thought about Arroyo as well. If he hasn't tested positive, the "extended period" implies non-vax.
 

Dduncan6er

New Member
Apr 16, 2020
335
Springfield, MA
Wonderful timing.

Out for an extended period of time suggests non-vaxxed, no? Or at least for Arroyo as a close contact who hasn't necessarily (yet?) tested positive. Hernandez reportedly is experiencing symptoms, so extended period makes sense there. Would think a vaxxed person who tests negative a couple times would be right back on the active roster despite the close contact.

Guess for those who've been asking for a few weeks where is Yairo Munoz, your wish has come true. He's one of the players being called up, and per Ian Browne, will be leading off tonight (if he arrives in time).
Get him the Mirabelli police escort!
 

Diamond Don Aase

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 16, 2001
1,094
Merrimack Valley
Guess for those who've been asking for a few weeks where is Yairo Munoz, your wish has come true. He's one of the players being called up, and per Ian Browne, will be leading off tonight (if he arrives in time).
This would have been an ideal opportunity to take a first-hand look at Ryan Fitzgerald before having to make a decision about whether to add him to the 40-man roster this winter. Hopefully Fitzgerald is at least promoted to Worcester to backfill the vacancies there.
 

RobertS975

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
367
Physician here... about 30 % of the positive tests in MA are " breakthrough " cases in vaccinated people. Although severe disease is uncommon, plenty of breakthrough cases have mild to moderate symptoms. One cannot infer that Hernandez is unvaccinated simply because he has symptoms. Delta is a whole 'number beast compared to the original virus. Hoping it stops at Kike!
 

CR67dream

blue devils forevah!
Dope
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
7,554
I'm going home
A quick warning for all that any conversation/speculation about athletes regarding vaccination status needs to happen in the V&N thread created for that purpose. Discussion of roster implications, etc. is fine, but beyond that, there is no wiggle room on this policy.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,271
Well this is bad news. Does give them an opportunity to see what Munoz brings to the table, though. Think they should give him as much run as possible, the less Arauz the better. Another opportunity for Duran as well.

(edit: disregard Arauz comment!)
 
Last edited:

richgedman'sghost

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
May 13, 2006
1,878
ct
A quick warning for all that any conversation/speculation about athletes regarding vaccination status needs to happen in the V&N thread created for that purpose. Discussion of roster implications, etc. is fine, but beyond that, there is no wiggle room on this policy.
Can we ask what is meant by extended period of time? A week or two? Or are they out for the year? Any physicians want to weigh in? Hopefully this doesn't violate the standards of this board.
Who comes off the 40 man to make room for Munoz? I did not think Munoz was on the 40 man roster.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,870
Maine
Can we ask what is meant by extended period of time? A week or two? Or are they out for the year? Any physicians want to weigh in? Hopefully this doesn't violate the standards of this board.
Who comes off the 40 man to make room for Munoz? I did not think Munoz was on the 40 man roster.
I assume "extended period" just means it won't be just a day or two like it was for JD (twice!) or Duran or Barnes or anyone else who's been placed on the COVID IL out of an abundance of caution but tested negative.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,870
Maine
Munoz wold be a great option if he was on the 40 man roster. Maybe Chaim can do something creative to find room.
He doesn't have to. As has been posted, players can be added to the 40-man in place of players on the COVID IL. And can also be removed without a DFA or passing through waivers. Munoz is on his way to Cleveland right now.
 

Looch

New Member
Jul 15, 2021
725
The Yankees streak began when they lost tons of regulars due to COVID plus injuries. They sucked it up with replacements and let’s see what our guys do.
 

Time to Mo Vaughn

RIP Dernell
SoSH Member
Mar 24, 2008
7,261
She must be vaccinated too, and newborns aren't susceptible I think? They should be OK.
That's incorrect. Children under one are at more risk to severe illness due to covid than older children. It is believed that this is due to the fact that infant immune systems are less developed. This is the same reason that the flu is particularly bad for infants.

As NickEsasky mentioned, the baby may have some resistance being in utero when mom was vaccinated.
 

CanvasAlley

New Member
May 22, 2016
75
Los Angeles, CA
That's incorrect. Children under one are at more risk to severe illness due to covid than older children. It is believed that this is due to the fact that infant immune systems are less developed. This is the same reason that the flu is particularly bad for infants.

As NickEsasky mentioned, the baby may have some resistance being in utero when mom was vaccinated.
COVID-survivor here. In regards to children under one year of age, I have also heard they are impacted by a less well-developed immune system. I hope you are correct about in utero vaccine effects.