Maybe Robert Williams two years ago. He's pretty raw. But having some vets around him rather than a bunch of first- and second-year players will help.Perhaps this has been said but Moses Brown is Robert Williams - No?
Maybe Robert Williams two years ago. He's pretty raw. But having some vets around him rather than a bunch of first- and second-year players will help.Perhaps this has been said but Moses Brown is Robert Williams - No?
Walker is relevant to them in terms of marketing/PR as well as ticket sales, IMHO. But yeah, they're just stockpiling picks/youngins with potentialI will admit I was surprised it only cost 1 first round pick to get rid of Walker, I expected it would be more expensive than that, especially this early on. Add in they get an interesting bench guy in return
Good deal for Stevens.
good deal for OKC as well of course, because Walker is irrelevant to them, as is the money for the next 2 years, so worth it in order to take a swing on the highest upside guy available at 16
Well, Stevens also just traded away a player that used to play for him, much more recently, so I'm not sure I really share your concern. If there were other, better options and Brad chose Al over those then I'd have some concern, but there is zero evidence of that (yet, anyway).Initial thought was "oh God Brad is Doc Rivers and going after players that used to play for him or played well against him once." Really hoping that doesn't turn out to be the case. Probably an overreaction on my part.
Really? Moses is a great name.We always call him Jaylen![]()
Here tooReally? Moses is a great name.
I fully intend to type MOSES! on every 2nd chance score this kid gets.
I also call dibs if he ever has 4 points, 4 rebounds, in 4 minutes.
This feels like revisionist history wrt TL. He flashed stuff, but people's opinion of him skyrocketed in the middle of year 3. He was seen as pretty inconsistent with a ton of flaws on D despite his obvious upside.The best thing about this deal cap wise is that Horford's expiring is nice for salary matching. You send it out as 26.5M, but the team getting him back can cut him for $14.5M
So if you're doing a trade for a max type player next offseason, Horford is a better expiring match than a guaranteed one. It's a benefit but not a huge one.
Not really, no. He's much worse than TL was year 2 at everything other than rebounding. Way worse finisher, way worse passer, way worse defending space, worse at the rim defending.
Edit- TL was always a minutes limited guy, but his good minutes were amazing and he had tantalizing across the board skills, basically everything but shooting. Brown is an energy rebounder who hasn't really shown anything on offense, and is more inconsistent on D than TL with a lower ceiling
according to BBref... yep. 2nd best Moses in league historyWho is in second place on all time NBA players named Moses list right now---is he alread there?
I laughed. Thanks for that.Really? Moses is a great name.
I fully intend to type MOSES! on every 2nd chance score this kid gets.
I also call dibs if he ever has 4 points, 4 rebounds, in 4 minutes.
I think the better way to think about Moses is that he is basically younger, cheaper Tristan Thompson. They had remarkably similar stat lines last season in roughly the same amount of MPG.Perhaps this has been said but Moses Brown is Robert Williams - No?
He was wildly inconsistent on both ends... but his production was way better than Brown and the flashes in a number of areas were there. He had an AST% over 10 (Brown is under 2), he had really efficient scoring at the rim numbers, his STL% and BLK% were encouraging. The underlying stats on him were very good.This feels like revisionist history wrt TL. He flashed stuff, but people's opinion of him skyrocketed in the middle of year 3. He was seen as pretty inconsistent with a ton of flaws on D despite his obvious upside.
Two players like that are definitely better than one.If you take out the height, we already have an athletic center who can rebound, block shots and run the floor. And he was drafted at #27. And much better than Moses
There are 3 aspects of the deal
2nd for 2nd = draw basically slight win since we should be better than OKC for a while.
Kemba for Horford = huge win
16 for Moses = gain some floor, lose considerable ceiling
This season will be telling. If he can stay on the court, you pay him.The problem with keeping him is that his rookie deal runs out soon, and I'm not sure he's a guy you want to commit real years and money to.
21yr old Moses Brown 3yrs @ $5.5MM going forward16 for Moses = gain some floor, lose considerable ceiling
They changed this rule.The best thing about this deal cap wise is that Horford's expiring is nice for salary matching. You send it out as 26.5M, but the team getting him back can cut him for $14.5M
So if you're doing a trade for a max type player next offseason, Horford is a better expiring match than a guaranteed one. It's a benefit but not a huge one.
He's Robert Williams, but 6 inches taller. Having athletic length as an option vs. Embiid or Giannis is worth the flyer.Perhaps this has been said but Moses Brown is Robert Williams - No?
His standing reach is shorter than TL's.He's Robert Williams, but 6 inches taller. Having athletic length as an option vs. Embiid or Giannis is worth the flyer.
Having spent some years at his University, this is all I can think of when I hear the name
Missed that change. Makes it less attractive, but yeah even so a 14.5M is a useful salary, and a 26.5M expiring if picked up is easier to package than Kemba's deal.They changed this rule.
A guy going out only counts as the guaranteed portion of his salary.
If they did that next offseason he'd only count as 14.5M going out.
They could send him out as 26.5M, but they'd have to guarantee it first.
But, still more moveable than Kemba.
Saw that. I feel pretty confident that is not the plan. They'd have to let Smart, TL and Fournier walk for nothing, decline the options of Nesmith, Pritchard, Romeo, etc. for no return.
This was my instinct and why I asked about it earlier----lots of things can change before them but the possibility of a max slot wtih Tatum and Brown in place is a pretty interesting thing.
It wouldn't be enough for Beal's max, he'd have to take a paycut.This was my instinct and why I asked about it earlier----lots of things can change before them but the possibility of a max slot wtih Tatum and Brown in place is a pretty interesting thing.
Oh, it does line up to Beal no?
Not to say they plan to "tank" for year to do this, but part of the interesting optionality.
He's 6 fouls who can block a few shots, make a few dunks, and grab some boards. TL is a much more complete player as things stand now, and he's obviously still pretty raw.He's Robert Williams, but 6 inches taller. Having athletic length as an option vs. Embiid or Giannis is worth the flyer.
I own a Tacko jersey. It was a gift, but still.Very good points. But my Tacko-loving son is not happy.![]()
If he’s traded at the deadline, I believe the prorated amount + the $14.5 mil would be less than the $26.5 mil guaranteed final year would be, so that’s an option as well (though a big deadline deal is unlikely).They changed this rule.
A guy going out only counts as the guaranteed portion of his salary.
If they did that next offseason he'd only count as 14.5M going out.
They could send him out as 26.5M, but they'd have to guarantee it first.
But, still more moveable than Kemba.
Brown's production this season was also similar to Tristan Thompson'sHe's 6 fouls who can block a few shots, make a few dunks, and grab some boards. TL is a much more complete player as things stand now, and he's obviously still pretty raw.
The rule is that players are only worth their guaranteed salary now, so next offseason he’s less than ideal as trade bait due to the lower salary and less attractive at the higher one (for the receiving team) unless you’re stapling a lot of talent to him. On the other hand, at next year’s trade deadline that contract’s pure gold. Especially if Jayson does his job and convinces Beal to force his way to Boston…The best thing about this deal cap wise is that Horford's expiring is nice for salary matching. You send it out as 26.5M, but the team getting him back can cut him for $14.5M
So if you're doing a trade for a max type player next offseason, Horford is a better expiring match than a guaranteed one. It's a benefit but not a huge one.
Robert Williams had interest because he was/is an astronaut. He literally was jumping and reaching heights less than 10 guys, and maybe nobody else had ever reached. That he has a space related nickname is excellent. His skill potential was enticing no doubt. Concerns about sustainability of him surviving re-entry have proven to be valid.Moses Brown has value, but in a Ivica Zubac upside sense. Robert Williams had real upside on the offensive side as a passer coming out of the draft. It's what made him pretty promising off the bat.
Forcing to Boston looks a lot more appealing now that the dead weight is getting cleared.The rule is that players are only worth their guaranteed salary now, so next offseason he’s less than ideal as trade bait due to the lower salary and less attractive at the higher one (for the receiving team) unless you’re stapling a lot of talent to him. On the other hand, at next year’s trade deadline that contract’s pure gold. Especially if Jayson does his job and convinces Beal to force his way to Boston…
I'm not sure what your point is. I realize there are more aspects of the deal that I didn't break down. I even said to ignore Kemba for Al (because I thought we could all agree it's a win for the C's). Is there a problem with having 2 athletic centers who can rebound, block shots and run the floor?If you take out the height, we already have an athletic center who can rebound, block shots and run the floor. And he was drafted at #27. And much better than Moses
There are 3 aspects of the deal
2nd for 2nd = draw basically slight win since we should be better than OKC for a while.
Kemba for Horford = huge win
16 for Moses = gain some floor, lose considerable ceiling
That looks as photoshopped as a Kardashian instagram post. No way Average Al is that cut.
This to me is part of the optionality which is valuable in this deal. Celtics do not have a lot of assets to attach to win the bidding in such a trade unless Nesmith/Romeo step forward in first couple of months next year. But they do have potential to send unprotected picks, and they can make a salary match. Ultimately, it is likely only if Beal says he wants Boston there's anything there. Which I do not expect---but is better facilitated by this than with Kemba here.The rule is that players are only worth their guaranteed salary now, so next offseason he’s less than ideal as trade bait due to the lower salary and less attractive at the higher one (for the receiving team) unless you’re stapling a lot of talent to him. On the other hand, at next year’s trade deadline that contract’s pure gold. Especially if Jayson does his job and convinces Beal to force his way to Boston…
This is a great point. We saw how the offensive flow died too often this year. Haywood provided some of that in the past, and NG knows how to make good decisions on that end (hope he can be retained). Al definitely provides brains and facilitation at both ends. And unlike TL, you have to respect his shot.Aside from anything else....
I love Al Horford, he was one of my favorite recent Celtics. I'm looking forward to seeing him play this year if we keep him. He's probably lost a step, but having a big who can stretch and pass and a guy who knows what he's doing is going to be a boon for those bench units (or the starters). One of the big issues last year was we needed Kemba because he's the only vet who knew how to run offense. Having Horford out there as a real option to get the ball, set the offense and either score or make passes to the right man will go a long way.
I liked Stewart coming out, and he just won rookie 2nd team IIRC. If Moses gives us that, it's useful.21yr old Moses Brown 3yrs @ $5.5MM going forward
Funny enough Brown had similar numbers to 2020 #16 pick 20yr old Isaiah Stewart (3yrs @ $12MM next 3 seasons). Stewarts rookie year was pretty much seen as a success.
Brown seemed pretty athletic, 3rd string Centers on the cheap in the meantime are fine. Set screens, PnR, play high-energy defense.
https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/b/brownmo01.html
https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/s/stewais01.html#all_contract
Yes I think you're wrong. I think you can do better than Moses at #16. In fact, you can find someone like Moses as an UDFA sometimes.I'm not sure what your point is. I realize there are more aspects of the deal that I didn't break down. I even said to ignore Kemba for Al (because I thought we could all agree it's a win for the C's). Is there a problem with having 2 athletic centers who can rebound, block shots and run the floor?
All I was trying to say is I don't think you're finding an athletic center like this at #16 in the draft, especially one ready to be a useful bench piece. Maybe I'm wrong. Is there someone I'm missing?
This also gives them additional flexibility to trade TT and insurance if RW gets injured or doesn't sign long term. Maybe that type of player doesn't get you going, but I'm happy they were able to get him in the deal.