I don't post sources for rumors but again, some chatter this morning that the Knicks may be in talks to trade Mitchell Robinson for Trey Murphy
Not that it matters, but Robinson played high school ball in NO for the coach that he moved up to New York last season. Maybe the local boy makes good angle is appealing to the Pelicans?I find it easy to believe the Knicks and their fans would like to do that and pretty hard to believe Pelicans would be interested.
But as always....I could be wrong!
All of this is why I don't think the Knicks will seriously shop Mitchell Robinson, unless they get an equally good defensive center coming back for (somehow) less money. Certainly not for 6'8" wing Trey Murphy. They might be able to get away with playing KAT at center for periods of time, especially in the regular season, but they really need to be able to make him into a defender of wings without a ton of help responsibilities if they're going to reach their potential as a team. And to do that, they need an honest-to-god all-beef center in the middle.Yes, I had already posted about that. But this was half a line, specifically referring to what I had posted before, in order to support a directly related point on a different topic. If that's too much repetition, sorry. But that doesn't seem excessive enough to call me out about it.
At the risk of continuing to talk about KAT and defense, and annoying you further, I think a slightly positive defensive BPM can hide a ton of context, and I'm not sure how much I trust any defensive metric like that anyway.
KAT has had very good defensive coaches most of that time, who have been very focused on hiding him with their schemes. Thibs, who I obviously agree is very good, was never being able to coax a top-20 defense out of a MIN roster with KAT at center (even surrounded by good defensive players, Butler and Wiggins on the wing and not-yet-ancient Taj Gibson at the 4). Finch is also an excellent coach, and got them up to 13th in DRtg in 2022, but with an over-aggressive, borderline gimmicky system that everyone involved decided was never going to allow them to be better than mediocre with KAT as the anchor, especially in the playoffs, which they all actually said directly in the media when they made the Gobert trade.
The counter-factual on the coaching is strong too, because Ryan Saunders wasn't as good at hiding KAT, and the Wolves were worse defensively with KAT on the floor in 2020 than the worst team in the NBA that year (albeit in only 35 games).
So yes, the numbers you're citing indicate that he can be OK defensively, at least in the regular season. But having to scheme around your center defensively to get "OK" defensive impact out of him is a problem in the NBA, and he's also been even worse defensively in the playoffs when opponents can game plan to attack him, by BPM (negative two of those years where he was positive in-season, and close to neutral in the 3rd, with the only significant positive being this past year, when he was on the best defensive team in the league, and they still lost largely because their matchup with Dallas was bad enough they couldn't stop them) and from other measures, including watching almost all of those playoff games. At best, playing him at center gives a team a ceiling defensively that I don't think is high enough to win four series.
The Pelicans are desperate for a center -- Daniel Theis is currently penciled in as their starter. They would also love to get Brandon Ingram somewhere else if they can get any value in return. I would not be shocked if some kind of crazy 6-team trade (or multiple standalone trades) is brewing where a bunch of guys and salaries go all over the place in order to get the KAT deal done while also getting the Pels (and maybe also the Knicks) a C. Also, it seems like Miami would happily move Jimmy Butler, so that's another piece that can be thrown into the hopper.All of this is why I don't think the Knicks will seriously shop Mitchell Robinson, unless they get an equally good defensive center coming back for (somehow) less money. Certainly not for 6'8" wing Trey Murphy. They might be able to get away with playing KAT at center for periods of time, especially in the regular season, but they really need to be able to make him into a defender of wings without a ton of help responsibilities if they're going to reach their potential as a team. And to do that, they need an honest-to-god all-beef center in the middle.
I could see the Knicks believing that someone Trey Murphy's size could be their defensive anchor, IF that guy was a legitimate rim protector against everyone else's penetration.All of this is why I don't think the Knicks will seriously shop Mitchell Robinson, unless they get an equally good defensive center coming back for (somehow) less money. Certainly not for 6'8" wing Trey Murphy. They might be able to get away with playing KAT at center for periods of time, especially in the regular season, but they really need to be able to make him into a defender of wings without a ton of help responsibilities if they're going to reach their potential as a team. And to do that, they need an honest-to-god all-beef center in the middle.
Yeah---but you KNOW you aren't getting a center until January if you deal for Robinson, and you don't really know when/if you get a healthy one after that and for how long. And I like Robinson, but he's a fit on a team as a second big far moreso than one that is desparate for size, imo. That is not to disagree they need size; I'm sure they'd like to move Ingram for it, and also expect the market has disappointed them on Ingram's value.The Pelicans are desperate for a center -- Daniel Theis is currently penciled in as their starter. They would also love to get Brandon Ingram somewhere else if they can get any value in return. I would not be shocked if some kind of crazy 6-team trade (or multiple standalone trades) is brewing where a bunch of guys and salaries go all over the place in order to get the KAT deal done while also getting the Pels (and maybe also the Knicks) a C. Also, it seems like Miami would happily move Jimmy Butler, so that's another piece that can be thrown into the hopper.
I don't see how it gets done cap-wise. Maybe there's some crazy multi-team deal that could make it work initially but Murphy's rookie deal is expiring and it would be completely shocking if Murphy didn't get a new deal in the $25M-$30M range. Even with Brunson's "discount," that a ton of money between KAT, Brunson, OG, Bridges (who is looking for an extension next summer), and Murphy. I think they'd be way over the 2nd apron for years.I don't post sources for rumors but again, some chatter this morning that the Knicks may be in talks to trade Mitchell Robinson for Trey Murphy
If you’re talking Trey Murphy you are speaking my language. One of the most underrated and fly under the radar guys in the league the last two seasons. I’d find it hard to imagine them moving him.Yeah---but you KNOW you aren't getting a center until January if you deal for Robinson, and you don't really know when/if you get a healthy one after that and for how long. And I like Robinson, but he's a fit on a team as a second big far moreso than one that is desparate for size, imo. That is not to disagree they need size; I'm sure they'd like to move Ingram for it, and also expect the market has disappointed them on Ingram's value.
Hey---I could be wrong, but I think NOLA views Trey Murphy as a real building block given his all-around game and in particular his shooting next to Zion. So I'd guess they are pretty eager to keep him, and would want a premium to deal him not a gamble like Robinson. They are in an interesting spot---they have too many wing-types and that's pretty unique situation league-wise. So anything is possible, but this one would really surprise me at least absent some other value coming to them (and Knicks are pretty pick-poor at this point)
I don't think Murphy is a rim protector at all - he's a solid, not exceptional, wing defender and a plus or plus-plus shooter. I think NOLA views him as a Derrick White-like piece, just as a wing. Rightly or wrongly
Agree with you. Murphy is underrated by the public but NBA front offices know how good he is. He's one of the most valuable assets that NO has. If they put him on the open market, they'd get a lot more than Mitchell Robinson.If you’re talking Trey Murphy you are speaking my language. One of the most underrated and fly under the radar guys in the league the last two seasons. I’d find it hard to imagine them moving him.
That comment from Perk was , he said since these teams are making moves like crazy and trying to acquire pieces to reshape their roster, that means they are not scared of the celtics lmao! Perk literally has some of the most moronic takes from all the NBA yappers out there!I thought Perk said nobody was scared of the Celtics?
This! I think Murphy could be the third guy on a very good team and he is only getting better. I can't imagine him being traded at all, never mind for an injured center.If you’re talking Trey Murphy you are speaking my language. One of the most underrated and fly under the radar guys in the league the last two seasons. I’d find it hard to imagine them moving him.
Agreed. I can't imagine the Knicks are getting Trey Murphy for the oft-injured MRob (unless there is a fistful of picks/swaps)This! I think Murphy could be the third guy on a very good team and he is only getting better. I can't imagine him being traded at all, never mind for an injured center.
If I'm the Wolves, something like Randle + filler + 2031 1st + DET protected first for Ingram, with the intent to pay Ingram a lot but not the max, makes a lot of sense.Agreed. I can't imagine the Knicks are getting Trey Murphy for the oft-injured MRob (unless there is a fistful of picks/swaps)
MRob is close to being salary at this point (much like TimeLord last summer).
Trey Murphy is a very valuable player at $5.1MM
Maybe NOLA/Wolves build something around Ingram for Julius Randle+
I think the deal was made, by the Wolves, to balance out the lineup (and contract flexibility). I'm not sure of the trade costs (protected firsts/swaps ), but I think love was just trying to build a trade around Randle/IngramI’m not sure Ingram is any better than Randle. And even if so I’m not giving up Randle and 2 firsts to get him only to have to max him out next year. Biggest reason for this trade was to give Minnesota some flexibility moving forward, no way they throw that plus assets away for Ingram.
Ingram makes some sense for MIN basketball-wise but I don't think he fits salary-wise. They have ANT on a max; Gobert on a near-Max, McDaniels at $30M, and Reid needs more money. It'll be interesting to see if they pay Randle his extension or just let him walk - they can't afford to pay Ingram without (I suppose) letting Gobert walk. And I don't MIN has owners who can stomach hundreds of millions of luxury tax payments year after year.I think the deal was made, by the Wolves, to balance out the lineup (and contract flexibility). I'm not sure of the trade costs (protected firsts/swaps ), but I think love was just trying to build a trade around Randle/Ingram
There were games last year that KAT didn't close and they used Naz Reid in his place.
You can't be paying a guy $50M and he's not closing.
Wolves fans love Naz Reid, they needed a starting spot & 30+mpg for him
Yea. I'm having a hard enough time figuring out what Boston will be doing next season. Have zero feel on the Wolve's next year's business, especially with ARod/Lore lurking.Ingram makes some sense for MIN basketball-wise but I don't think he fits salary-wise. They have ANT on a max; Gobert on a near-Max, McDaniels at $30M, and Reid needs more money. It'll be interesting to see if they pay Randle his extension or just let him walk - they can't afford to pay Ingram without (I suppose) letting Gobert walk. And I don't MIN has owners who can stomach hundreds of millions of luxury tax payments year after year.
The deal stands to save the Wolves over $26m in payroll and luxury tax payments.I think the deal was made, by the Wolves, to balance out the lineup (and contract flexibility). I'm not sure of the trade costs (protected firsts/swaps ), but I think love was just trying to build a trade around Randle/Ingram
There were games last year that KAT didn't close and they used Naz Reid in his place.
You can't be paying a guy $50M and he's not closing.
Wolves fans love Naz Reid, they needed a starting spot & 30+mpg for him
Agreed---I think dumping KAT's immediately-awful contract was a big reason they did this deal. They don't want to replace him with another gigantic contract for a second/third tier star even it's a better fitting one.Ingram makes some sense for MIN basketball-wise but I don't think he fits salary-wise. They have ANT on a max; Gobert on a near-Max, McDaniels at $30M, and Reid needs more money. It'll be interesting to see if they pay Randle his extension or just let him walk - they can't afford to pay Ingram without (I suppose) letting Gobert walk. And I don't MIN has owners who can stomach hundreds of millions of luxury tax payments year after year.
Naz didn't regularly close games over KAT but it did happen in the playoffs & it was odd. They had 3 good BIGs for 2 spots.Well, I've already challenged a lot of the hot takes on KAT, adn would do the same on the notion that the trade didn't improve the Knicks at all. But, hey, time will tell on that -- should be fun.
That said, I'd be curious about the claim that Naz regularly closed games over KAT. The only time I recall that was due to foul trouble.
Who made the claim on Naz closing out games over KAT? I hope it was a media person than someone here. This simply did not happen “regularly” as the only time I recall was the playoff game against Dallas when Towns was horrific that night while Naz, iirc, had it going. Now he was often situationally substituted in the final minute of close games but that was with Slo-Mo replacing him for defense. This did occur regularly but certainly not “benched.”Well, I've already challenged a lot of the hot takes on KAT, adn would do the same on the notion that the trade didn't improve the Knicks at all. But, hey, time will tell on that -- should be fun.
That said, I'd be curious about the claim that Naz regularly closed games over KAT. The only time I recall that was due to foul trouble.
Didn't actually say "regularly" -- that may have been an unfair imputation on my part. But "can't be paying a guy $50M and have him not be closing" does make it sound like a thing. edit: I do recall the playoff game to which Ben Hogan refers. Pretty sure that was more of a one-off? But not 100% sure.......
There were games last year that KAT didn't close and they used Naz Reid in his place.
You can't be paying a guy $50M and he's not closing.
Wolves fans love Naz Reid, they needed a starting spot & 30+mpg for him
That's just this year. It will be more in future years but we don't know until we figure out what MIN does with Randle.The deal stands to save the Wolves over $26m in payroll and luxury tax payments.
The Wolves were bitten BADLY by going all in and deciding to join the upper tier of WC payroll teams JUST before the new CBA with its higher tax penalties was negotiated.Agreed---I think dumping KAT's immediately-awful contract was a big reason they did this deal. They don't want to replace him with another gigantic contract for a second/third tier star even it's a better fitting one.
My guess is they aren't sure yet what they'll do with Randle and are waiting to see how the fit is. It COULD work pretty well, or not well at all.
Yeah that was my point in that this wasn’t about basketball and that it was primarily financial. Naz helped make it possible as did the short term positional replacement in Randle. I don’t expect Randle to be there more than a year.That's just this year. It will be more in future years but we don't know until we figure out what MIN does with Randle.
It happened a handful of times last year, IIRC, but not more than that, amd KAT handled it gracefully.Didn't actually say "regularly" -- that may have been an unfair imputation on my part. But "can't be paying a guy $50M and have him not be closing" does make it sound like a thing. edit: I do recall the playoff game to which Ben Hogan refers. Pretty sure that was more of a one-off? But not 100% sure...
That said, it is true Wolves fans love Naz and he was impressive last year, at least offensively.
Zach Lowe has to be relieved he doesn't have to go full Simmons and be a C's defender through all this. Funny enough, he was the one pumping the Celtics' tires last week and coincidentally(?) ESPN is like 'We can't have that when the Knicks are the flavor of the moment.'This reminds of pre-Finals, when everyone was competing to see who could overpay the most for Luka+Kyrie stock:
View: https://twitter.com/espnnba/status/1840837342854013223?s=46
It isn't like there is some other team who is lead with the glaring example of the biggest mistake he has ever made in professional career.Bobby Marks is a pretty sharp guy; he understood why Lowe was fired and what ESPN is looking for from its commentators...
Yeah, I think I was a bit too sanguine on the trade for the Knicks. I still like it for them but it is a risk because KAT's contract is huge. I also think Thibs is literally the worst coach in the league for this offense, and because they have no depth, he's likely going to play their top 6 into the ground. But their ceiling is higher, and--if they play to their peak talent-- they are legit contenders now. Let's see how things shake out with Robinson and potential depth moves.Well, I've already challenged a lot of the hot takes on KAT, adn would do the same on the notion that the trade didn't improve the Knicks at all. But, hey, time will tell on that -- should be fun.
I get that BPM is flawed. You weren't annoying; you made fair points. I certainly wouldn't try to argue KAT is a good defender, just that I think his shortcomings are overstated, especially in light of how gifted he is offensively. He's pretty much exactly what one would want offensively in.a modern center.At the risk of continuing to talk about KAT and defense, and annoying you further, I think a slightly positive defensive BPM can hide a ton of context, and I'm not sure how much I trust any defensive metric like that anyway.
Agreed. I would venture further to say I doubt they'll resign him. I think a lot of the trade was about getting off the KAT contract so they can build around ANT. The DD contract was also very good value.At this point, I think it’s an open question whether they’ll even consider re-signing Randle at a slightly lower number, or trading him for someone making less annually over more years, or if they’ll decide that they just need to let him walk, and use the savings to re-sign Naz and probably NAW.
KAT is a great offensive center, if anything probably underrated in that regard, even with 4 AS selections and 2 all-NBA, with the vast majority of his value coming on offense.I get that BPM is flawed. You weren't annoying; you made fair points. I certainly wouldn't try to argue KAT is a good defender, just that I think his shortcomings are overstated, especially in light of how gifted he is offensively. He's pretty much exactly what one would want offensively in.a modern center.
Yeah, Randle’s highest and best use is putting up 25 a night for a bad team. That’s only going to be more true as he enters his 30s. I predict he’ll be a good soldier in Minnesota this season, then get a big contract from a lottery team.Yeah that was my point in that this wasn’t about basketball and that it was primarily financial. Naz helped make it possible as did the short term positional replacement in Randle. I don’t expect Randle to be there more than a year.
Ridiculous value. Top 5 most valuable in the league probably (excluding rookie scale guys).The DD contract was also very good value.
Interesting that NYK could get rights to a first round draft pick - essentially a draft pick - back in this deal. I guess they had other teams who were interested in being the third team. Nnaji plays overseas and will be there for a while. CHA gets two players who will immediately be released - Charlie Brown Jr., and Duane Washington - DaQuan Jeffries, a 2025 second-round selection that's the least favorable of the Nuggets or 76ers via the Timberwolves, a 2026 second-round pick from the Warriors via the Knicks, a 2031 second-round selection from New York, and $7.2 million in cash.
Apparently Nnaji hurt his back recently. He's an athletic, rim-running center who didn't play a lot last year. He's a year away from being a year away, at the very least.Knicks fans will meltdown when Bridges, Brunson, and KAT all play 40+ minutes on opening night.
ALSO the Knicks getting the 31st pick sounds much better than the Knicks receiving a 2nd rounder that has never stepped on an NBA floor (while Charlotte receives 3 future 2nd-round picks)
That was kind of my thought...I guess 7yrs out from the first time you go over the 2nd apron may give teams pause (much like the '28 Celtic/Spur pick swap)Is the first round pick drop to 30 really a big deal for teams that are expected to have a pick in the 25+ range anyway?
If I'm the Knicks, move MRob for a vet WING or split his salary in two (for a WING + BIG).Two people to watch here outside of that five-man core are Mitchell Robinson and Deuce McBride. Mitch has two years left. If they want to trade him, I'd say it's important to trade him for someone who either a) is at a similar salary level or b) isn't a free agent until 2026 or later. The last thing you want is to trade him for a 2025 free agent who you'd then have to overpay next summer. That could force you to start your second apron clock a year early. As for McBride, he's making peanuts these next three years. In 2027 he's gonna want to get paid. Doing so obviously creates post-2028 complications because the goal will be ducking the second apron then. Without knowing what kind of player he'll be in three years, though, we can't really say what sort of contract he'd be looking at.
Credit to the Knicks/Thibs who have made 2nds/late picks part of their scrappy brand:Apparently Nnaji hurt his back recently. He's an athletic, rim-running center who didn't play a lot last year. He's a year away from being a year away, at the very least.
It's a flyer, but if you take enough flyers, one hit makes it all worthwhile.
More info from Reddit here: https://www.reddit.com/r/NYKnicks/comments/1fu32fy/charlotte_is_also_trading_james_nnaji_the_no_31/?sort=new
It is a draft pick at the end of tradability not that year.Is the first round pick drop to 30 really a big deal for teams that are expected to have a pick in the 25+ range anyway?