This is where I am but I thought about it for a bit. There is a world where Lawrence gets the right level of coaching and supporting cast and he thrives. But I think it's several years away for this NE team. May as well build around Maye at a far cheaper price.It's not a terrible question. I'm a no, because I'm not sold on Lawrence and that contract is huge. I'd rather be not sold on a guy on a rookie deal.
Trevor Lawrence has Mac Jones as job securityZero chance I'm giving Trevor Lawrence 275 million dollars right now, especially when you have someone like Maye on a rookie deal.
If the Jags dump him...I mean maybe. It really depends on what his market is, but I still love Maye on a long-term rookie deal.
True, though Pederson wouldn't commit to Lawrence after the game.Trevor Lawrence has Mac Jones as job security
Have you watched Joe Burrow this season? Did you watch last night?Good QB on a rookie deal is the biggest market advantage in the league so I'd only trade that for a clear upgrade (like Burrow or something ridiculous), not Lawrence.
What is wrong with Burrow? 70.9% completion, 746 yards, 5 TD, 0 INT, 7.3 Y/A, 7.32 ANY/A, 107.5 ratingHave you watched Joe Burrow this season? Did you watch last night?
You wouldn't trade Maye for Burrow?Have you watched Joe Burrow this season? Did you watch last night?
So where is he going in this scenario?Wait for him to get dumped by the Jags and pick him up for nothing. The new market inefficiency seems to be highly drafted guys who sucked for their first team and sign with a functional organization as free agents.
Yeah, I probably would, I guess I just don't see at the ridiculous level.You wouldn't trade Maye for Burrow?
He's had his ups and downs early this season with the Higgins and Chase drama but yeah, I wouldn't lose much sleep over that trade.
He just appears off to me this season from what I have watched. Although that is probably a result of his team being boiled ass.What is wrong with Burrow? 70.9% completion, 746 yards, 5 TD, 0 INT, 7.3 Y/A, 7.32 ANY/A, 107.5 rating
I might consider not doing it just because of the nature of Burrow and this roster. He's taken 8 sacks and fumbled 3 times this season in 3 games behind a much better O-line. He's a good QB, but he has always taken WAY too many sacks for pressure rate, and it has led to lots of injuries. He'd last maybe 2 games behind this line given his historical pressure to sack ratio.You wouldn't trade Maye for Burrow?
He's had his ups and downs early this season with the Higgins and Chase drama but yeah, I wouldn't lose much sleep over that trade.
He's dirt cheap actually which should be a consideration, and his floor is solid NFL starter. Even in his worst stretch he's still not one of the worst starters in the league.Unless you are particularly high on Lawrence as a top 5-8 QB in the league (I am not), there is no reason to be for this trade. He is expensive and has had a lot of chance to improve, but he hasn't.
Maye's floor is definitely lower, but at this point he has bigger uncertainty on his upside (a good thing). I'd take the X% chance a cheap Maye has to become elite over the dwindling Y% chance an expensive Lawrence will.
I think you’re missing the huge Option bonuses. Wouldn’t the team taking him on be responsible for those?He's dirt cheap actually which should be a consideration, and his floor is solid NFL starter. Even in his worst stretch he's still not one of the worst starters in the league.
Whatever team that, three years from now, has a functional organization but no QB. Probably not us, but you never know.So where is he going in this scenario?
Option bonuses don't transfer, they are owed by the original team at the time they trade or release a player. An example is Wentz, when the Eagles traded him they had to eat the $30M in remaining option bonus.I think you’re missing the huge Option bonuses. Wouldn’t the team taking him on be responsible for those?
Oh, ok. In that case, he is untradable/unreleasable.Option bonuses don't transfer, they are owed by the original team at the time they trade or release a player. An example is Wentz, when the Eagles traded him they had to eat the $30M in remaining option bonus.
Right - I think this is one of those magical hypotheticals where you swap out one player for the other with the contracts, again, magically transferring. I think? The issue with this prompt is that it has hardly any structure to it. Sorry, SJM, nothing personal but you didn't exactly do a lot to outline how this would work.Oh, ok. In that case, he is untradable/unreleasable.
Yeah, I wouldn't want Lawrence on his current deal likely, just because it is huge and I don't know how bad they broke him, but an actual trade where JAX eats the $125M cap hit? Sure sign me up.Right - I think this is one of those magical hypotheticals where you swap out one player for the other with the contracts, again, magically transferring. I think? The issue with this prompt is that it has hardly any structure to it. Sorry, SJM, nothing personal but you didn't exactly do a lot to outline how this would work.
I still can't talk myself into Kenny Pickett.Wait for him to get dumped by the Jags and pick him up for nothing. The new market inefficiency seems to be highly drafted guys who sucked for their first team and sign with a functional organization as free agents.