Joe Mazzulla officially named head coach

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,188
The specific statement he responded to was about Mazz’s general inexperience not his media savvy. I had suggested that “He’s seen by many as too inexperienced for this job” and the response was “The “many” do not include Tatum, Stevens, or Wyc. Or really anyone else directly involved with the team.”
The question to be debated is whether or not keeping Mazzulla was a good decision, not whether any of us have have inside info from the team’s leadership team. Obviously the team’s decision was to keep him. What’s also clear is that there are many in the media and many more fans who don’t have a favorable view of this decision. Nearly 50% of SOSH opposed retaining him, and this is generally a less reactive group than the larger fan base. My guess is a poll of all fans would show 75% (or more) want him gone. And it’s not even true that we know that there wasn’t any internal disagreement regarding keeping Mazzulla. If there was it’s not as if the Cs would send out a press release.
The Cs decided to retain a coach that is widely unpopular with the fans and who has been criticized by many in the media. While there are certainly cogent arguments that have been made in support of that decision “his employers opinions are the only one that matter” isn’t one of those. I mean, jeez man, it’s a discussion board. Discussing controversial team decisions is what we do…
I dunno, I think I would tend to trust the team's leadership over a random fan poll over who should coach the Celtics. And the media's opinion is (a) much less negative towards him than you portray; and (b) totally and absolutely worthless.
 

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,837
Honolulu HI
I dunno, I think I would tend to trust the team's leadership over a random fan poll over who should coach the Celtics. And the media's opinion is (a) much less negative towards him than you portray; and (b) totally and absolutely worthless.
This is getting silly. No one is asking anyone to trust anyone, except you, who wants those of us who disagree with the decision to trust management, because -I guess- it’s their decision. Don’t know if you are going to convince any doubters with that perspective.
And the idea that the media’s view is “totally and absolutely worthless” is ridiculous. The media has far more access to the team than any of us, and unlike the team’s leadership (who has good reason not to divulge internal debates Re: this decision ) they openly share their perspective.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,159
There’s no question that they lost their defensive identity. It’s just a bit too convenient for the players to blame it on lineup construction and suggest that starting Robert Williams would magically recover it.
Totally.

In fact, when the players bought in hard to alternative lineups, they produced some really good D in games 4-7. (I was fine with the defense in game 7: they didn't give up a ton of points, and were probably unlucky to gave up what they did.)

I blame the coaching staff somewhat for not getting them to buy into that during the season to the same degree, but sometimes adversity is needed to jolt people out of mental ruts.
 

Bob Montgomerys Helmet Hat

has big, douchey shoulders
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,658
Celtics assistants Ben Sullivan, Mike Moser and Garrett Jackson are joining Ime Udoka’s staff on the Rockets, @hoopshype has learned. Celtics assistant Aaron Miles has drawn interest from the Rockets and other teams. Jarrell Christian has also drawn interest from teams.

Sounds like every single Asst Coach wants out of Boston
Not surprising, all low level and all have a connect with Ime. Rare that more than 1 or 2 guys on a staff stays on when a new coach takes over, especially if the coach getting fired has a new job.
 

SoFloSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
Didn't they all sign on to work for Ime only to find out as the season started that now they were working for practically one of their subordinates?

It doesn't seem surprising that a bunch of them now want to go join Ime, and probably checked out weeks ago.
 
Last edited:

Just a bit outside

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 6, 2011
8,004
Monument, CO
Didn't they all sign on to work for Ime only to find out as the season started that now they were working for practically one of their subordinates?

It doesn't seem surprising that a bunch of them now want to go join Ime, and probably checked out weeksago.
Yeah. I mean anyone who wants to coach in the NBA wants it known that they will check out if things don’t go exactly according to plan. This is absurd. You really think the assistant coaches stopped trying?
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,278
The interesting thing, however, is that they keyed the almost-comeback against Miami by going back to smaller lineups, but with more effort, attention to detail, and some new schemes there.

My general impression is that there definitely is/was tension regarding defensive philosophy, and Mazzulla bought himself back some credibility in the locker room by showing them in games 4-6 that they could recover a defensive identity without having to play double-big all the time.
It's funny that the narratives never end.

Mazzulla sticks to lineup/rotation....he doesn't adjust.

Mazzulla adjusts in Miami series based on matchups....he's not committed to his defense so there is no identity.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,278
Didn't they all sign on to work for Ime only to find out as the season started that now they were working for practically one of their subordinates?

It doesn't seem surprising that a bunch of them now want to go join Ime, and probably checked out weeks ago.
Weeks ago? We've been discussing this all year but yes espeically once Ime was named coach of the Rockets. All those guys knew they would end up wherever Ime landed....then as the playoffs began they were house shopping with their RE agents the minute practices ended.
 

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,549
Does this mean the guy that looks like Sammy Hagar Jr. is gone or was he medical personnel?
You likely still won't be able to drive 55.

He's a trainer, and preceded Udoka by a year. Though he did come thru San Antonio, so I guess you never know.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,457
Not surprising, all low level and all have a connect with Ime. Rare that more than 1 or 2 guys on a staff stays on when a new coach takes over, especially if the coach getting fired has a new job.
Wasn’t Sullivan the top assistant by the end of the year?
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,658
Wasn’t Sullivan the top assistant by the end of the year?
yeah, but he started the year further down, he wasn't going to be top assistant this year even if he stayed. Not sure he'll even be top assistant in HOU.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,278
For real. There was an obvious experience gap on the staff, but for as terrible as a lot of folks think the coaches were, other teams are sure happy to offer them jobs.
Yeah but not as your key #1 and #2 guys but most importantly there has to be some natural level of disconnection with Mazzulla who was in the second row with all of them last year while they wait for their guy to get a head job. This stuff filters to the players at some level and the timing of some weird stuff occuring once Ime was announced isn't a coincidence from my seat. It was kinda expected as this shit affects culture and togetherness if all involved.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,278
Wasn’t Sullivan the top assistant by the end of the year?
You're a rookie head coach who took the job on two days notice and your top guy was sitting in the second row with you last year.....and everyone knew he was gone this summer. For all the obstacles Mazzulla faced the lack of an experienced staff was at the top of the list.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,159
Yeah but not as your key #1 and #2 guys but most importantly there has to be some natural level of disconnection with Mazzulla who was in the second row with all of them last year while they wait for their guy to get a head job. This stuff filters to the players at some level and the timing of some weird stuff occuring once Ime was announced isn't a coincidence from my seat. It was kinda expected as this shit affects culture and togetherness if all involved.
Yes, I already was on board with Mazzulla, but he's looking better as this stuff shakes out, imo.

The amount of weird vibes and shit he had to deal with was absolutely not normal for a rookie coach, or any coach, and I think he played a tougher-than-realized hand fairly well.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,671
Melrose, MA
At this point, I think it would be legitimately shocking for Mazzulla to be fired. It would be even more shocking if he was fired for Doc Rivers
Maybe Doc will take the lead assistant job. (j/k but worse career moves have been made).
Most significant unknown re: Mazzulla: Will he listen to the experienced coaches that Brad recruits (as opposed to the bench coaches that Joe is allowed to hire)?

It's a potentially awkward dynamic: "Yes, Joe, you could do what you wanted last season because key pieces left midseason and were not replaced, but now I've brought in people with a shit-ton more experience than you, and you need to listen to them. Like, one will install something you might be unfamiliar with, it's called an offense, and we might have another guy helping you scheme on the defensive end because you had that 'I'm utterly lost' look on your face when teams rallied in the 4th over and over again. Yeah, you can fill up a row of seats with your guys, but my guys will report back to me if you're not listening to their advice."
I think the assumption that Brad will be hiring coaches for Joe is wrong. Joe is going to get to hire a full staff, but Brad will have input and sign off. Like a typical NBA coach. Brad might help identify candidates also, but I highly doubt that Brad is going to force people on Joe. I mean, part of that Jay King article talks about disconnects between the players and staff. That's not going to be helped by creating new disconnects, this time within the staff.

I remember, maybe from the Ime intro presser, Brad counseling Ime to not neccessarily go for an experienced NBA coach as an assistant because it would drive speculation.

But this is a vastly different situation - for one thing, Joe will have that speculation no matter who the assistant coaches are. For another, Ime had a ton more experience than Joe, obviously.
It's funny that the narratives never end.

Mazzulla sticks to lineup/rotation....he doesn't adjust.

Mazzulla adjusts in Miami series based on matchups....he's not committed to his defense so there is no identity.
That's a gross oversimplification. And even players criticized Mazzulla for the lack of focus on D.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,188
I think the assumption that Brad will be hiring coaches for Joe is wrong. Joe is going to get to hire a full staff, but Brad will have input and sign off. Like a typical NBA coach. Brad might help identify candidates also, but I highly doubt that Brad is going to force people on Joe. I mean, part of that Jay King article talks about disconnects between the players and staff. That's not going to be helped by creating new disconnects, this time within the staff.

I remember, maybe from the Ime intro presser, Brad counseling Ime to not neccessarily go for an experienced NBA coach as an assistant because it would drive speculation.

But this is a vastly different situation - for one thing, Joe will have that speculation no matter who the assistant coaches are. For another, Ime had a ton more experience than Joe, obviously.
Brad did direct Ime that Mazzulla would be staying on when Ime was hired. Admittedly, the key difference is that Mazzulla was already behind the bench; I don't think CJM has that problem with an incumbent assistant this time around ;)

To restate the obvious, it will be incumbent upon Mazzulla to establish a strong working relationship with his newly hired staff.
 

pjheff

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2003
1,322
Totally.

In fact, when the players bought in hard to alternative lineups, they produced some really good D in games 4-7. (I was fine with the defense in game 7: they didn't give up a ton of points, and were probably unlucky to gave up what they did.)

I blame the coaching staff somewhat for not getting them to buy into that during the season to the same degree, but sometimes adversity is needed to jolt people out of mental ruts.
This team has relied on that adversity — whether it was the bad start to last season (jolting a mid-year renaissance) or the ending of last season’s playoffs (fueling this year’s thermonuclear beginning) — regardless of coaching staff. And it’s a lot of fun when the threes are dropping and they’re rolling opponents by twenty. They just have not shown a willingness or ability to sustain it or, in this case, be accountable for it.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,309
Santa Monica
Yes, I already was on board with Mazzulla, but he's looking better as this stuff shakes out, imo.

The amount of weird vibes and shit he had to deal with was absolutely not normal for a rookie coach, or any coach, and I think he played a tougher-than-realized hand fairly well.
Exactly. Clearly, Joe had an immensely tough hand with his Asst Coaches not aligned with him or the system he was trying to implement. I imagine that energy was passed along to the players during the course of the season.

I'd be very inclined to run it back with this roster with a fresh staff.
(Please hire Drew Hanlon or one of his Senior Coaches at Pure Sweat)
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,556
This is getting silly. No one is asking anyone to trust anyone, except you, who wants those of us who disagree with the decision to trust management, because -I guess- it’s their decision. Don’t know if you are going to convince any doubters with that perspective.
And the idea that the media’s view is “totally and absolutely worthless” is ridiculous. The media has far more access to the team than any of us, and unlike the team’s leadership (who has good reason not to divulge internal debates Re: this decision ) they openly share their perspective.
If *you* (or anyone else) wants to tag his inexperience and its relationship to bad results, that's fine. And not implausible or irrelevant to message board discussions. But "the fans and media" dont like him *is* irrelevant, IMO to that discussion. Its not that media members are know-nothings. Though some are. But do individual media members criticisms bear up under any scrutiny?. (Made up example---reporter x says celtics suck in clutch. Stats say they dont). Some media members are water-carriers for certain agents, etc.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,671
Melrose, MA
Brad did direct Ime that Mazzulla would be staying on when Ime was hired. Admittedly, the key difference is that Mazzulla was already behind the bench; I don't think CJM has that problem with an incumbent assistant this time around ;)
I doubt Joe was part of a "take it or leave it" offer from Brad to Ime. And, reportedly, the players liked Joe and were happy to have him back. I suspect it was more Brad selling Ime on the benefits of keeping Joe around than Brad insisting that Ime keep him.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,159
When we watch a team in the Finals, winning games in the playoffs when their (well-earned, quality) 3s drop, and losing badly when they don't, are we that sure that Joe was crazy for emphasizing taking and making 3s, given the personnel he had?

I'd like to change the personnel somewhat, but holding that constant, I don't see a huge difference between him and Spo, besides one of them having the guys who hit all their open shots.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,457
Whoops, I put that in the wrong thread. Thought this was the finals thread
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,558
Math nerds mess up everything.

Edit: And just to add some substance, even if you disagree with the wide open three strategy, its not just Mazzulla who is employing it. Its how the game is played now.
 

Senator Donut

post-Domer
SoSH Member
Apr 21, 2010
5,527
The coaching industry is all about connections. None of us are privy to who is all involved but Joe certainly has contacts he came up with around the league. It appears Silas is that veteran voice who will be next to him with the rest being younger up and comers. The guy I've brought to before who I hope Silas brings with him (if he does indeed come) is Abdelfattah who can't be feeling all warm and fuzzy after Ime just brought 3 of his guys over and he was originally a Silas hire.
Was hoping for Silas too, but he is heading to Detroit. I’m assuming this means Cassell was offered the “top” assistant job.
View: https://twitter.com/wojespn/status/1665732540429156354
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,558
From Jared Weiss's mailbag column in The Athletic:

Will the Celtics send Joe Mazzulla to charm school? Guy is so unlikeable and is never going to get fans in his corner acting the way he does with the press. Also, will the Celtics actually have plays next season? — Michael R.

This is a great question, even if the phrasing is over the top, because there is a strong discrepancy between the way Mazzulla presents himself to the media and who he is without the cameras on. I like Mazzulla and enjoy talking with him. I know there’s been a few times he has owned me in a press conference and fans will often presume there’s some animosity, but I always thought those were funny and enjoy the banter. We ask tough questions and it’s frankly welcome when we get tough answers.

I’ve found him to be fair and respectful, but it can seem like he tries to pull a Belichick out there for some reason. People ask me what is going on with him all the time. The only thing I’ve been asked about more is whether the Jays were gonna break up early in the 2021-22 season.

I don’t know why he often handles press conferences the way he does. But I would imagine he’ll reassess his approach this offseason to see how showing his personality and the depth of his basketball knowledge on a consistent basis will inspire more confidence in him externally. Belichick and Gregg Popovich can pull that off because they’re legends. If the Celtics didn’t force a Game 7 against Miami, Mazzulla likely would have been on the hot seat. You don’t have to put on a show, but you have to control the narrative and set the tone at the very least.

There was so much pressure on Mazzulla this season, and if he acted more like the person those of us who cover the team talk to on the side, people might appreciate his approach more. They would focus more on his competitiveness and attention to detail. Everyone in the room (hopefully) understands Mazzulla knows 10 times more about basketball than most of us. And while defending his approach helps, also acknowledging the validity of different opinions and explaining those away will go much further. And while he does show that, the frequent short or standoffish answers stick in everyone’s memory.

Part of it is getting used to the kinds of questions thrown at you in the Boston media landscape. You’ll hear five questions about your mindset and whether you shoot too many 3s on a daily basis. It requires a lot of patience for coaches and athletes to hear the same thing over and over and still give full answers. It’s hard for most people to imagine how difficult it is to speak to the media on a daily basis, especially when you were foisted into the head coaching job days before training camp.

But you look around the league and there are plenty of coaches whose charisma has kept them off the hot seat even when people around the NBA say they’re doing a poor job. Mazzulla is doing a better job than he gets credit for, but he also has a lot of work to do this offseason to get his program and this team where it needs to be. This team will be under even more pressure next season, so it’s on him to alleviate that in front of the cameras and show he’s in control.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,309
Santa Monica
I'll never understand why people care one whit how Joe Mazzulla acts with or handles the press.

CJM's assessment should be on his court strategy and getting the most out of the roster.

As far as I'm concerned he can go with 1-word answers to those dumbass end of the Quarter interviews with Cassidy, so we can get back to the action.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,742
From Jared Weiss's mailbag column in The Athletic:

You’ll hear five questions about your mindset and whether you shoot too many 3s on a daily basis. It requires a lot of patience for coaches and athletes to hear the same thing over and over and still give full answers. It’s hard for most people to imagine how difficult it is to speak to the media on a daily basis, especially when you were foisted into the head coaching job days before training camp.
I've always wondered why reporters can't take the time to think of different questions to ask rather than just defaulting to, "What was your mindset when ________________?" or "What was going through your mind when ____________." I mean if a guy can figure out 60+ different uniform configurations, reporters should be able to figure out a unique question for each game; there really is so much to talk about.
 

OurF'ingCity

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 22, 2016
8,469
New York City
I'll never understand why people care one whit how Joe Mazzulla acts with or handles the press.

CJM's assessment should be on his court strategy and getting the most out of the roster.

As far as I'm concerned he can go with 1-word answers to those dumbass end of the Quarter interviews with Cassidy, so we can get back to the action.
I can understand why the media care. I don’t understand why any non-media member cares.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,556
I've always wondered why reporters can't take the time to think of different questions to ask rather than just defaulting to, "What was your mindset when ________________?" or "What was going through your mind when ____________." I mean if a guy can figure out 60+ different uniform configurations, reporters should be able to figure out a unique question for each game; there really is so much to talk about.
I've always wondered why reporters, such as Weiss, dont write a story or two about the very subject he talks about. In real time. "The guy we talk to is not the same guy as the guy who talks at press conferences" seems newsworthy. Not as teh second paragraph of *every* story, but in a similar vein to stories about Tatum's son, or Brown's social causes or similar color pieces.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,181
Imaginationland
I've always wondered why reporters can't take the time to think of different questions to ask rather than just defaulting to, "What was your mindset when ________________?" or "What was going through your mind when ____________." I mean if a guy can figure out 60+ different uniform configurations, reporters should be able to figure out a unique question for each game; there really is so much to talk about.
These aren't long form interviews where the media is trying to learn something interesting and write something that will last, these are quick hit stories that 99% of the time will vanish in a day. I've always assumed that most reporters go into these things not looking to shine a light on something, they are just looking for a quote from the team (player or coach) to back up what they're already planning on writing. If they don't get it right away, they'll keep pushing until they do.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,558
The thing that leapt out of that column for me is that Weiss seems to think fairly highly of Mazzulla.

If I'm the type of person who is convinced that Mazzulla is destined to fail, the tone here might give me pause. Weiss certainly has incentives to take a shot here but does not. Instead he paints a picture of young coach who has skills but needs refining.

I don't know if Mazzulla will ever be a good NBA head coach but given this color as well as his track record to date, its not inconceivable that he gets there over time. Aside from his press conference demeanor, he seems to have all the ingredients.
 

Spelunker

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
11,945
I can understand why the media care. I don’t understand why any non-media member cares.
It's a lot of the press saying that it's important to fans how Mazzulla treats the press.

And some people seem to have bought it, but no, I don't think the average person cares anymore about local press, because that isn't how people consume information anymore. The Globe? The local news? Seriously? How many people even actually watch press conferences these days?
 

Toe Nash

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
5,628
02130
It's funny that the narratives never end.

Mazzulla sticks to lineup/rotation....he doesn't adjust.

Mazzulla adjusts in Miami series based on matchups....he's not committed to his defense so there is no identity.
Yeah, we see this in the "they shoot too many 3s" meme as well. In game 6 they managed to win SHOOTING 20% FROM 3 and only taking 35 of them because they adjusted and got to the line a lot. This may have worked in game 7 too but the guy who got 15 FTA hurt himself on the first play of the game and the guy who got 10 turned the ball over 8 times to those two players got 6 free throws instead of 25 (who knows how the whistle would have gone, but point stands). I am not sure what Joe should have done in that situation other than hope they could make more 3s.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,497
around the way
This is getting silly. No one is asking anyone to trust anyone, except you, who wants those of us who disagree with the decision to trust management, because -I guess- it’s their decision. Don’t know if you are going to convince any doubters with that perspective.
And the idea that the media’s view is “totally and absolutely worthless” is ridiculous. The media has far more access to the team than any of us, and unlike the team’s leadership (who has good reason not to divulge internal debates Re: this decision ) they openly share their perspective.
This is patently absurd, especially the bolded.

The media is hanging on for their dear lives for their industry to survive another day and for their paychecks to continue to clear. And unfortunately, this has brought us to a point where they write what will get clicks and callers with little regard for whether the shit is true or not. That's not to say that there aren't guys that are connected and have sources. They do. Sometimes they print reality too, especially when reality is interesting. But when reality isn't all that interesting, they can and will resort to printing unverified bullshit because boring doesn't pay the bills.

It's not 1985 anymore. Taking anything in print or said on tv/radio without a front-loader full of salt is a mistake. It sucks, but here we are.