They weren’t gonna franchise him and Brady’s the best QB in the league with no signs of slowing. If you think Brady goes 3-4 more years, what choice was there?Same.
We just traded the future.
They weren’t gonna franchise him and Brady’s the best QB in the league with no signs of slowing. If you think Brady goes 3-4 more years, what choice was there?Same.
We just traded the future.
It sure wasn’t the ability-to-throw-a-football-accurately thing.I sometimes wonder if he brought in Tebow just to make a point about the whole no distractions thing.
Which means pray for Solder, Thuney, Andrews, Mason, Cannon, and Waddle’s health.I think part of the issue with Kaep is you'd need to completely redo the offense on the fly if Brady goes down because they are about as polar opposite as QBs can get. Granted, they did the same with Jacoby for 2 games last year, and I'm sure McDaniels could come up with some interesting wrinkles with a guy as mobile as Kaep, but let's just pray for TB12's health...
If Jimmy’s as good as we all thought, and thats the case, you trade the 41-year-old in the off-season to a team looking for a stopgap to keep them in contention.Need Jimmy gone to get a Brady extension/restructure done. Maybe there's a benefit doing it now as opposed to after the season. There was no way Jimmy was staying unless Brady retired at the end of this season. I would still keep him though in case Brady gets hurt.
Are we talking about the same guy that signed Tebow?Even if BB believed Kap was in the right (not sure he does given his military allegiances), no chance he goes that route. Guy hates distractions more than fumbles.
Can you think of anyone who might have this type of info? Anyone at all?I love 12, but he’s 40. This makes zero sense unless Jimmy’s looked awful behind the scenes.
There’s nothing that suggests he has 3-4 more years. We’ll be lucky if he’s league-average at 42/43. This is a baffling and insane move when you’ve onsider how difficult it is to find a long-term quality starter in the NFL.They weren’t gonna franchise him and Brady’s the best QB in the league with no signs of slowing. If you think Brady goes 3-4 more years, what choice was there?
That's interesting. Also, Pats don't have very much cap space left.I’m guessing it was part of the deal to some degree. They’d agree to release Hoyer. If we traded for Hoyer we’d have to take the current contract. If they cut him, they pay him the buyout and we can sign him for scrap money. Having said that, its an uneducated guess. Clarity should come on that soon.
Vikings still consider Teddy their starter of the future if he can get healthy.Crazy notion: might the Pats throw the Vikings a 5th for Teddy Bridgewater? I remember New England brought him in when he was a super-touted draft prospect they had zero need for, "just because".
I’m not sure there’s a Brady restructure left right now. They’re gonna have to start paying him like a real elite QB, which is one of the reasons franchising Jimmy wasn’t going to work.Need Jimmy gone to get a Brady extension/restructure done. Maybe there's a benefit doing it now as opposed to after the season. There was no way Jimmy was staying unless Brady retired at the end of this season. I would still keep him though in case Brady gets hurt.
That's my rampant speculation on my prior rampant speculation.Just a question about the mechanics of such things: If it indeed will be Hoyer, why go through the release portion of the deal, instead of just adding him to the deal?
Salary cap?
Unnamed sources?Can you think of anyone who might have this type of info? Anyone at all?
He was talking about Hoyer.His 16 touchdowns to 4 INT ratio says otherwise. Is he an MVP? No. But he’s not bad by any means
They apparently already did.Love it.
I'll love it even more if BB picks up hoyer for free since the 49ers might cut him now.
Yes. His vet status means that if he's cut he doesn't have to go on waivers so he's free to sign anywhere.Just a question about the mechanics of such things: If it indeed will be Hoyer, why go through the release portion of the deal, instead of just adding him to the deal?
Salary cap?
I wasn't responding to you. Hoyer's already been releasedThat's my rampant speculation on my prior rampant speculation.
I get it, “In BB we trust.” Any other analysis = no point.Can you think of anyone who might have this type of info? Anyone at all?
He’s maybe a week or two away from being their starter of their likely playoff team too.Vikings still consider Teddy their starter of the future if he can get healthy.
that is underatable but beyond 2018 can brady be the same qb jimmy g wouild had kept u top 5 even after brady is gone because if u have no qb like denver does the best u can do is 7-9 8-8 even so waiting utill march was the best move this is saying gilmore was a bad move because now u will fran butler and will he want to be in ne past 2018Or bill just realized he is still the best or one of the top 2 QBs in football and if they can protect him, no reason to think he won't be for a while longer
Johnny Manziel is ready to go!Yup -- though I'm sure would come back. At the moment, there is nobody on the roster or practice squad or even IR that plays QB.
No. But run with that.I get it, “In BB we trust.” Any other analysis = no point.
Thanks. Makes sense now. And without putting him in the deal means the Pats aren't responsible for any part of the contract he signed with SF, true?Yes. His vet status means that if he's cut he doesn't have to go on waivers so he's free to sign anywhere.
There's absolutely no way of proving that. If Bill thought Jimmy G was Tom Brady 2.0, he wouldn't have traded him.that is underatable but beyond 2018 can brady be the same qb jimmy g wouild had kept u top 5 even after brady is gone because if u have no qb like denver does the best u can do is 7-9 8-8 even so waiting utill march was the best move this is saying gilmore was a bad move because now u will fran butler and will he want to be in ne past 2018
I don't follow CFB closely but apparently Darnold's stock is dropping a bit. And Niners have tons of cap room, won't be good for another year or two, so I think the logic here would be if you really think a guy is the guy, it's worth it. Plus no guarantee you get the pick.I don't get this from the Niners' perspective. Why rent JG for a year and give up a high draft pick when they can finish the year 2-14, draft Darnold and keep their second rounder.
How much does a top 5 pick make this year compared to what JG will likely be due?
Jesus 12 is the best QB in football. At 40If Jimmy’s as good as we all thought, and thats the case, you trade the 41-year-old in the off-season to a team looking for a stopgap to keep them in contention.
I love 12, but he’s 40. This makes zero sense unless Jimmy’s looked awful behind the scenes.
Yeah, what paulinmyrbeach said -- he's got $6 million left on his contract. Presumably, the Patriots didn't want to pay that much. Or they don't want him.Just a question about the mechanics of such things: If it indeed will be Hoyer, why go through the release portion of the deal, instead of just adding him to the deal?
Salary cap?
Hightower replacement?I think and hope a big deal is in the works. More cap room now. This team needs an impact player on d.
Yes true. Could sign for vet minimum.Thanks. Makes sense now. And without putting him in the deal means the Pats aren't responsible for any part of the contract he signed with SF, true?
I get it, “In BB we trust.” Any other analysis = no point.
More cap room when? Probably less cap room this year. Someone will replace Jimmy on the 53 (almost certainly a new QB) who will be more highly paid than he was.I think and hope a big deal is in the works. More cap room now. This team needs an impact player on d.
shanny wants a ruining qb his dad still watches all of SF practice idk why if i was jimmy i wouild be eyeing minnteota in 2018I don't get this from the Niners' perspective. Why rent JG for a year and give up a high draft pick when they can finish the year 2-14, draft Darnold and keep their second rounder.
How much does a top 5 pick make this year compared to what JG will likely be due?
This is a joke right? Both are questionable at best as NFL starters. One is surrounded by media controversy and has no experience in your system. The other has years of experience with your offense. And without the benefit of training camp and preseason games you’d choose Kaepernick? That’s just plain old stupid.Much, much, much rather have Kaepernick than Hoyer.
This case was made many times this offseason. It makes complete logical sense. If I was running the Pats as a Front Office Football franchise, this is what I would do.If Jimmy’s as good as we all thought, and thats the case, you trade the 41-year-old in the off-season to a team looking for a stopgap to keep them in contention.
I love 12, but he’s 40. This makes zero sense unless Jimmy’s looked awful behind the scenes.
one of them sucks wild ass, the other had a better QBR in his last season than like half the starters in the league today. your politics are showing.This is a joke right? Both are questionable at best as NFL starters. One is surrounded by media controversy and has no experience in your system. The other has years of experience with your offense. And without the benefit of training camp and preseason games you’d choose Kaepernick? That’s just plain old stupid.
If you think they should pick kap for moral or righteous reasons than fine I guess. But from a football point of view that’s just stupid.
Yes, it's a joke. I frequently perfect my stand-up routines on sports message boards.This is a joke right? Both are questionable at best as NFL starters. One is surrounded by media controversy and has no experience in your system. The other has years of experience with your offense. And without the benefit of training camp and preseason games you’d choose Kaepernick? That’s just plain old stupid.
If you think they should pick kap for moral or righteous reasons than fine I guess. But from a football point of view that’s just stupid.