Kawhi Leonard is exactly that.Seems accurate.
Is it possible Pierce would be 7'3 with 6'7 height?
+8 APE is extremely rare in the general public, much less so in the NBA.
Kawhi Leonard is exactly that.Seems accurate.
Is it possible Pierce would be 7'3 with 6'7 height?
Rondo was 6’1 with a 6’9 wingspan.Seems accurate.
Is it possible Pierce would be 7'3 with 6'7 height?
Scottie Pippen is almost exactly the same as Kawhi, at 6'8, 7'3Kawhi Leonard is exactly that.
+8 APE is extremely rare in the general public, much less so in the NBA.
And I believe there should be just as many people who have negative wingspans as the opposite, but there are only a handful of those guys in the NBA. Off the top of my head, Kuzma, Herro, Bane, and old friend Svi Mykhailiuk.Having a huge wingspan relative to height is such an advantage for playing basketball that it's almost like being a 7-footer; a shockingly high percentage of humans with that trait are in the NBA.
yeah, I love this.Yup, that's a great comp. Banchero is already a better passer than Pierce (which is impressive, and why Paolo is so intriguing as a player), but it's not hard to imagine Pierce getting better at that in today's game, where there's more of an emphasis on having scoring threats create advantages to initiate, PGs be damned.
Boxing is the only other sport that I can think of where it’s so strongly selected for. Elite rock climbers often have + ape indices but not always, and not so extreme as the NBA.Having a huge wingspan relative to height is such an advantage for playing basketball that it's almost like being a 7-footer; a shockingly high percentage of humans with that trait are in the NBA.
And in the NFL, no? Especially long arms are good both for offensive lineman and for pass catchers. Obviously those arms also need to be attached to a huge human (particularly on the former), but still.Boxing is the only other sport that I can think of where it’s so strongly selected for. Elite rock climbers often have + ape indices but not always, and not so extreme as the NBA.
I think Pierce was always one of a kind. He also made a living with the "upfake-absorb contact-get shot off" move in the midrange.Pierce was well ahead of his time when it comes to efficiency, he was routinely WAY above league average in TS. His TS+ is just below Kawhi, for example, and that’s with those dreadful final two seasons with the Clippers dragging down all of his numbers.
He was an incredible foul grifter, the Harden of his time. He’d be an absolute monster in todays game of PnR/spacing. He shot 37% or better from three 12 times, and had another season of 36.6%. That’s while he played in a league with almost no spacing or movement.
He’d be a top 5-10 player IMO
I feel like the minimum requirements for other skills in football are more difficult to hit such that the wingspan thing is much less common.And in the NFL, no? Especially long arms are good both for offensive lineman and for pass catchers. Obviously those arms also need to be attached to a huge human (particularly on the former), but still.
Is that known as "the Tony Mandrich thing?"I feel like the minimum requirements for other skills in football are more difficult to hit such that the wingspan thing is much less common.
Bad technique for linemen will neutralize even extreme athletic advantages.
Tari Eason 6'8" with 7'3" wingspan (handwidth 11' vs Kawhi 11.25), according to this draft articleScottie Pippen is almost exactly the same as Kawhi, at 6'8, 7'3
If he wasn’t practicing, I’d be more concerned.Am I the only one feeling a little nervous about Tatum sitting last night? I get rest days and I’m 99% sure he plays if the game was an important one, but this is a guy who has spoken about how important it is to play as much as possible, and has played in 93% of possible regular season games in his career, which averages out to 75-76 games played per year. When have we seen him take a rest day after already having the prior 4 days off?
A few posts about this on the general thread, but by giving him last night off they gave him a full week if he plays tomorrow...if they sit him tomorrow since their next game isnt until thursday theyd be giving him 11 rest days. Then the schedule gets pretty nuts - basically every other night with one b2b from 12/19-1/7. 11 games in 20 nights.Am I the only one feeling a little nervous about Tatum sitting last night? I get rest days and I’m 99% sure he plays if the game was an important one, but this is a guy who has spoken about how important it is to play as much as possible, and has played in 93% of possible regular season games in his career, which averages out to 75-76 games played per year. When have we seen him take a rest day after already having the prior 4 days off?
Your cool Thinking Basketball guys just did a podcast on MVP candidates. Ben had JT 4th. Cody - with the caveat that he was trying to predict how the media would vote - had him 6th, with the additional caveat that Cody believes that JT is definitely should be in the top-5.Sean Grande: As we’ve discussed at length on Celtics game broadcasts this year, the dramatic Jayson Tatum on/off numbers have returned. Boston is now… +199 in 690 minutes with Tatum on the floor +2 in 237 minutes with Tatum off the floor Last year was the only year there was no drop off
Another good sign: Tatum is taking more & a slightly higher % of C&S 3s this season.
JT is surrounded by so many good players (now he has to compete with PP for shots) that it's probably too hard to break through the sheer Luka/SGA raw numbers. It's all kind of irrelevant; Joker is in a league all by himself this season (& past years).
JT will just have to settle for winning... a lot
It was definitely odd, but it's the Pistons and I imagine someone else (JB or White) will get the Wiz game off.Am I the only one feeling a little nervous about Tatum sitting last night? I get rest days and I’m 99% sure he plays if the game was an important one, but this is a guy who has spoken about how important it is to play as much as possible, and has played in 93% of possible regular season games in his career, which averages out to 75-76 games played per year. When have we seen him take a rest day after already having the prior 4 days off?
If he comes back and plays a lot in the next stretch, I'll just assume it's a new team MO, especially post-title.Am I the only one feeling a little nervous about Tatum sitting last night? I get rest days and I’m 99% sure he plays if the game was an important one, but this is a guy who has spoken about how important it is to play as much as possible, and has played in 93% of possible regular season games in his career, which averages out to 75-76 games played per year. When have we seen him take a rest day after already having the prior 4 days off?
Bbref MVP tracker has him three behind Jokic and SGAYour coolThinking Basketball guys just did a podcast on MVP candidates. Ben had JT 4th. Cody - with the caveat that he was trying to predict how the media would vote - had him 6th, with the additional caveat that Cody believes that JT is definitely should be in the top-5.
...and only 564 more attempts before he passes 'Toine for chucks from 3 point land!With his next made three, Tatum will pass old friend 'Toine on the all-time 3-point field goal list.
The really underrated thing about last night’s game—and Scal kind of alluded to this midway through the first half—was that this was a night where the C’s needed this kind of game from JT. The Bulls had kind of embarrassed the Celtics a little two nights before. They guarded our outside shooting well and played fast enough that our defense was also consistently late.
I might need an update on my green-tinted specs, but it seems kind of Bird-like. And I'm someone who has Bird comfortably in the top 10 all time.The really underrated thing about last night’s game—and Scal kind of alluded to this midway through the first half—was that this was a night where the C’s needed this kind of game from JT. The Bulls had kind of embarrassed the Celtics a little two nights before. They guarded our outside shooting well and played fast enough that our defense was also consistently late.
The thing is, this was sort of happening again in the first half last night. Neither team was shooting great, and the series of missed dunks by both teams in the first half kind of suggested there was a little attitude on both sides. But it was shaping up to be similarly close game until JT just completely took over in the 3Q.
We talk a lot about Tatum’s unselfishness as a player but less about his ability to dial it up and blow our opponent off the court when the team needs him to. Last night he did because we did. And it was beautiful. But what’s more impressive is how controlled Tatum is about where and when he does it. In this case, he waited for his team to pull it together for like 6+ quarters before he decided to go supernova. First he started crashing the boards and throwing dimes to his teammates. And only when it became clear that wasn’t enough did he start cooking with the heliocentric ball.
Are there any other players like that in the league right now? How many have there been in history? It’s honestly incredible to watch.
In game last night, JT was compared to Bird and Hondo, my 2 favorite players, as the only guy to lead the team in Points, Rebs and Asst over a full season. And JT is still ascending.I might need an update on my green-tinted specs, but it seems kind of Bird-like. And I'm someone who has Bird comfortably in the top 10 all time.
Jayson/Havlicek* have to be 3/4 on the all-time Celtics list, in some order. All due respect to Bob Cousy, Sam Jones, Kevin McHale, Paul Pierce etc.I might need an update on my green-tinted specs, but it seems kind of Bird-like. And I'm someone who has Bird comfortably in the top 10 all time.
The Bulls were really taking away the base Celtics "advantage, ping, ping, 3-pointer" offense for awhile. JT and JB beasted them in the paint, and by the end of the 2nd quarter, Celtics offensive basketball was back.The really underrated thing about last night’s game—and Scal kind of alluded to this midway through the first half—was that this was a night where the C’s needed this kind of game from JT. The Bulls had kind of embarrassed the Celtics a little two nights before. They guarded our outside shooting well and played fast enough that our defense was also consistently late.
The thing is, this was sort of happening again in the first half last night. Neither team was shooting great, and the series of missed dunks by both teams in the first half kind of suggested there was a little attitude on both sides. But it was shaping up to be similarly close game until JT just completely took over in the 3Q.
We talk a lot about Tatum’s unselfishness as a player but less about his ability to dial it up and blow our opponent off the court when the team needs him to. Last night he did because we did. And it was beautiful. But what’s more impressive is how controlled Tatum is about where and when he does it. In this case, he waited for his team to pull it together for like 6+ quarters before he decided to go supernova. First he started crashing the boards and throwing dimes to his teammates. And only when it became clear that wasn’t enough did he start cooking with the heliocentric ball.
Are there any other players like that in the league right now? How many have there been in history? It’s honestly incredible to watch.
Windhorst and others like him are cowards, because it's never "I think brown is better than tatum," it's always "there are some who think tatum isn't the best player on his own team." Nobody serious ever actually says the former because they'd have to defend it, and it's an impossibly stupid stance to take (and one that is only every brought up to bring tatum down, not to uplift brown) that immediately falls apart at the slightest pushback.And all due respect to Jaylen Brown, but the Brian Windhorst statement that Tatum is not the “clear-cut best player” on the Celtics is so ridiculously incorrect that it only proves that Brian Windhorst is either a liar with an agenda or he is an idiot.
I had it on good authority from Matt Moore that this was the correct and sophisticated way to guard Boston, and that NBA coaches were morons for not doing it.I loved the Bird-esque "your coach thinks you can guard ME?" treatment that Tatum gave - was it White? - inside and outside, especially on the back-you-out-so-I-can-blow-by-you-to-dunk play.
The next iteration of The Discourse will come when people realize how good Jaylen is relative to other elite #2s around the league, as opposed to comparing him to Tatum.The Jaylen and Tatum thing is always so disingenuous There’s no rational argument for it being all that close between the two of them, which is why you never see people actually argue it lol, just empty statements.
The gap between a top 15 guy and a top 5 guy is really big lol. Jaylen is awesome, and I wish people would stop using him as a prop.
I don't know if the Jays "figured it out" or if Tatum just did some shit that no one else can really do.The Bulls were really taking away the base Celtics "advantage, ping, ping, 3-pointer" offense for awhile. JT and JB beasted them in the paint, and by the end of the 2nd quarter, Celtics offensive basketball was back.
This was a great example of why Hardwood Paroxysm's "just guard them straight them straight up and don't give up 3s" strategy doesn't work. The Bulls executed that pretty well, but once the Jays figured it out and committed to beating it inside, the Bulls were forced to defend like everyone else does, and the quality 3s + interior 2-on-1s showed up again.
By "figured it out", I mean that Tatum blew up the Bulls attempts to not overhelp on drives/isos against their smaller defenders. Everything after that was icing on the cake: he could have shot 5/15 from 3 and it still would have been a comfortable win.I don't know if the Jays "figured it out" or if Tatum just did some shit that no one else can really do.
If the guy who can beat just about everyone off the dribble and pass really well also goes 9-15 from 3 on these kinds of three pointers, well, you lose.
View attachment 93595
Yeah, I think this is the correct way to frame it. The Jaylen is better than Tatum crowd is almost all media members who don’t watch that closely (TNT guys) and it’s based off of the ECF and Finals where Jaylen made a lot of big shots. As an aside, it’s probably good for both JAYs that this is a narrative. Jaylen has definitely thought that he’s been under appreciated (“I never win shit” after the ECF final) and it gives Jayson more motivationThe next iteration of The Discourse will come when people realize how good Jaylen is relative to other elite #2s around the league, as opposed to comparing him to Tatum.
It really is such a cheat code to have a ball-handling, playmaking wing (as opposed to other player archetypes) as your #2.
It’s one of those things that makes sense when you think about it for a minute. Tatum is averaging 9.5 rebounds per game, the last Celtic to average at least that many rebounds and play 65+ games was…Al Jefferson in 2007. Tatum is going to spend a lot of time being compared to the likes of SGA and Ant over the next few years when it comes to 2-way wings with no weaknesses, it’s a huge point in his favor if he’s averaging close to 10 rebounds a game.
I would have thought KG had done it, that’s the real reason I was surprised. I know his rebounding wasn’t near his Minny levels here, but he was still at 9 a game a few times.It’s one of those things that makes sense when you think about it for a minute. Tatum is averaging 9.5 rebounds per game, the last Celtic to average at least that many rebounds and play 65+ games was…Al Jefferson in 2007. Tatum is going to spend a lot of time being compared to the likes of SGA and Ant over the next few years when it comes to 2-way wings with no weaknesses, it’s a huge point in his favor if he’s averaging close to 10 rebounds a game.