I watched an inning over the weekend. I won’t watch another. I think it’s insane that we’re pushing forward with MLB and NFL. Huge mistake for everyone involved.
Ditto and that applies to you as well, don't sell yourself short.Yeah, at this point if I had to choose between an injury that keeps Eovaldi from playing and an injury that keeps E5 from the gamethreads, it wouldn't be an easy choice.
I don't think I can even really say a few innings. I turned it on during the top of the 4th and was putting the kids to bed before the 5th was over. Granted they scored 6 runs in the bottom of the 4th so I was watching for something like 45 minutes. But when I got back downstairs I watched something else instead of going back to the game. A lot of that had to do with the lopsided score.Just curious on the pulse of SoSH. Personally I caught a few innings on Friday night, but I haven't watched a single pitch since.
This well summarizes my view. So far, the Sox are getting the Olympics treatment. I suppose if the Yankees suffer a horrendous defeat, I will find a way to watch the highlights.I haven't watched one pitch and I don't miss it at all. I think it's a combo of what's going on in the world and the heinous product they've put on the field. In my mind I've said that this season really doesn't count anyways, but I have to imagine if the team was actually good, I might feel differently. And I could also apply the same logic of not caring because of Covid, but the same doesn't apply for the B's and C's, which I am excited to start watching.
So, some combo of a terrible team and the sport really not doing it for me anymore. The poster that said they would like to cross reference the zero votes with time on the main board would be bingo for me. It's the part of the board that I visit the least.
I don't know--is there really that much difference between the two seasons?An additional thought... I've certainly watched a lot of Sox games when the team was bad. I recall watching a ton in the late summer of 2015, when Luvullo took over managing, because I was riveted to see how the young guys developed. The difference now is that, not only do the Sox look to be awful, but there are a lot of guys playing who won't be part of any future turn-around. So watching a bunch of pitchers get lit up, who will be jettisoned in the next 12-24 months, doesn't hold a lot of appeal.
Ha! Thanks. The damned gamethreads are for better or worse one of the most significant signs of normalcy in this whole stupid thing.Ditto and that applies to you as well, don't sell yourself short.
The game threads prove that misery does love company, but at least we can laugh about it; 2004, 2007, 2013 and 2018 helped in that regard.
What a treat it's going to be watching this team circle the drain while the gashouse gorillas stampede their way to a WS title.
So heartwarming.
Bingo. I decided that I'll be fine catching a national game here and there and just watching the A's or Giants when I want to watch baseball. Also, while I am a big "root for the laundry" guy, seeing Mookie in a Dodgers uniform definitely impacted my enthusiasm for the season.On opening day I went to sigh up for MLB EI and saw that they're charging more than half the price for about a third of the season. So I said fuck that and haven't watching an inning.
Going by this metric, the answer is "the same." Baseball has never been a "need to watch every second" game for me even in a normal season when the Red Sox are good. But my viewing habits haven't changed from prior years - I watched a good chunk of opening day, didn't watch any of the weekend games because I was doing other stuff (but did catch a few inning on the radio on Saturday), watched a few innings on Monday and didn't watch any part of the game yesterday because they were down big before I even had a chance to turn on the TV.I think the questions is "Are you watching less than before?"
I'd also love to cross-reference the results here with how much that poster posts on the main board.
Your screen name always reminds me of the Summer of 75, the Red Sox got Denny Doyle in mid June, he soon ripped off a 17 game hitting streak as that team marched towards a WS match up with the Reds...…………..and I'll never forget him getting thrown out at third in game 6, bases loaded, no outs, on a fly ball to left, Zimmer the third base coach was yelling no, no, no, Denny thought he said go, go, go, he was thrown out by a mile...........good job Zim. I was a fan of the team growing up in the late 1960's, but that Summer, I started a lifelong love affair with this team........right now, I feel like filing for a divorce, but 2004, 2007, 2013 and 2018 say hello.Ha! Thanks. The damned gamethreads are for better or worse one of the most significant signs of normalcy in this whole stupid thing.
This is a good point. While I have been watching, I am basically just rooting for the right guys to perform enough to have some trade value...in a year when teams will probably not be willing to give up much. So...yeah. There are a few young guys on the 60-man that I hope to see as the season progresses.An additional thought... I've certainly watched a lot of Sox games when the team was bad. I recall watching a ton in the late summer of 2015, when Luvullo took over managing, because I was riveted to see how the young guys developed. The difference now is that, not only do the Sox look to be awful, but there are a lot of guys playing who won't be part of any future turn-around. So watching a bunch of pitchers get lit up, who will be jettisoned in the next 12-24 months, doesn't hold a lot of appeal.
I'm in this boat. Did catch the free game of the day though. If MLB pro-rated the cost, I'd probably have paid for it.Zero.
I normally follow mostly via the radio app, and was considering getting MLBTV, but when they jacked the price I decided not to bother (and that was before the quality of the pitching showed itself). When I went to get the radio ap, it looked like more or less the regular full season cost ($20), and I just can't bring myself to give MLB any money whatsoever. When I head to NH for vacation they'll be on TV, I'll check the team out then, if the season gets that far.
I know this doesn't really affect your point, but if Kevin Pillar and Heath Hembree were the two biggest problems on this team that would be a massive step up from where they are now. At this point Hembree is probably like our 4th or 5th best pitcher, and Kevin Pillar is currently sporting an OPS of over 1.500.After Opening Day, I have watched only when there is no competitive baseball game being simultaneously broadcast. I love the Red Sox but still cannot feign interest in a team that seems to believe giving prominent roles to Heath Hembree and Kevin Pillar somehow contributes to the next good Red Sox team.
This is also a good point:It's baseball...after a good long stretch without it. Of course I'm watching just as much as previous years. Just not as invested in W/L...I love that my soundtrack to summer has returned. This years team goals are 1) get to 1SEP for a reset; 2) Get a high draft pick.
Agree with this. It's rare that a Red Sox team has been hopeless since Game Two -- in recent decades, they've only been truly hopeless after some fire sale trade deadlines in 2012, 2014 (that team was basically done after the 11? game losing streak in May), 2015. It is a shame that there aren't a ton of young developing players to root for and watch beyond Verdugo and Chavis. I'm interested to see if 10D can turn it around and whether Devers keeps developing. But the pitching is... yeah.An additional thought... I've certainly watched a lot of Sox games when the team was bad. I recall watching a ton in the late summer of 2015, when Luvullo took over managing, because I was riveted to see how the young guys developed. The difference now is that, not only do the Sox look to be awful, but there are a lot of guys playing who won't be part of any future turn-around. So watching a bunch of pitchers get lit up, who will be jettisoned in the next 12-24 months, doesn't hold a lot of appeal.
Yes, to me, there is a vast difference. Xander and Betts were among the guys I was watching intently in 2015. Plus just the vibe of the season changed dramatically when Lovullo took over and the team responded with wins. Who am I watching intently now? Everyone you listed, aside from Verdugo, and maybe Chavis, is a known commodity. Obviously people can disagree, but is there a real sense that we're watching a young team develop in 2020?I don't know--is there really that much difference between the two seasons?
2015 had:
Bogaerts in 2nd full season
Betts in first full season
JBJ get 160 fewer PAs than season before
ERod in first season
Barnes
I see no one else on that roster that was a "young guy" to watch develop.
2020 has the following guys that could plausibly be part of turnaround:
Bogaerts
Chavis
Devers
Benintendi
Verdugo
Erod (potentially)
Downs (maybe)
Not sure how different that really is--there's definitely more young offensive guys now but there's just NO pitching. And that makes half of each game a horror show.
This is where I'm at too. 2015 was fun because it was...different. You could root for guys to do well because they were young and starting out, and that kind of carried to the team collectively. It was nice because for once it wasn't World Series or they suck.An additional thought... I've certainly watched a lot of Sox games when the team was bad. I recall watching a ton in the late summer of 2015, when Luvullo took over managing, because I was riveted to see how the young guys developed. The difference now is that, not only do the Sox look to be awful, but there are a lot of guys playing who won't be part of any future turn-around. So watching a bunch of pitchers get lit up, who will be jettisoned in the next 12-24 months, doesn't hold a lot of appeal.
Denny Doyle was my first sports autograph and probably my first interaction with anyone famous. It was my first Fenway game, and the two things I recall are walking out on the first base side and seeing the beautiful green bathed in light, and then after the game Denny Doyle signing the envelope that our tickets came in, when we passed it through the chain link fence you could stand near to try to see the players.Your screen name always reminds me of the Summer of 75, the Red Sox got Denny Doyle in mid June, he soon ripped off a 17 game hitting streak as that team marched towards a WS match up with the Reds...…………..and I'll never forget him getting thrown out at third in game 6, bases loaded, no outs, on a fly ball to left, Zimmer the third base coach was yelling no, no, no, Denny thought he said go, go, go, he was thrown out by a mile...........good job Zim. I was a fan of the team growing up in the late 1960's, but that Summer, I started a lifelong love affair with this team........right now, I feel like filing for a divorce, but 2004, 2007, 2013 and 2018 say hello.
If this year is considered a bridge year, I think Remagen sums it up.
I don't know--Devers is 22. Verdugo is 24. Benintendi was the age of JBJ in 2015. But I was leaning more on the side of there being a number of guys that will be a part of the next 90+ win Sox team.Yes, to me, there is a vast difference. Xander and Betts were among the guys I was watching intently in 2015. Plus just the vibe of the season changed dramatically when Lovullo took over and the team responded with wins. Who am I watching intently now? Everyone you listed, aside from Verdugo, and maybe Chavis, is a known commodity. Obviously people can disagree, but is there a real sense that we're watching a young team develop in 2020?
I think my calculus would be different if the NBA and NHL weren't about to return. There's only so many hours in the day to devote to watching sports. In the 2015 example I cited, there was nothing else going on that August, so spending a couple hours a day watching that team was a fine way to pass the time. This August I'm choosing between two teams that have championship aspirations, and what looks to be a dreadful Sox team. And if the NFL and college football come back in September, the Sox will slide even further down my list of priorities.I don't know--Devers is 22. Verdugo is 24. Benintendi was the age of JBJ in 2015. But I was leaning more on the side of there being a number of guys that will be a part of the next 90+ win Sox team.
I get you though, there *is* a difference.
In the end, I love baseball. I'm going to watch as much as feasible, but yeah, if I get home late and it's 9-1 in the 7th, I'm likely not tuning in. In fairness, if the Sox were up 9-1 I likely wouldn't either at that point, unless sometime fun is going on--X has 4 hits or someone has 3 dingers and will get another AB.
If it's 6-1 I'm probably following on the app and if they get a couple on base I'll flip over.
Thanks for sharing both of those stories.Denny Doyle was my first sports autograph and probably my first interaction with anyone famous. It was my first Fenway game, and the two things I recall are walking out on the first base side and seeing the beautiful green bathed in light, and then after the game Denny Doyle signing the envelope that our tickets came in, when we passed it through the chain link fence you could stand near to try to see the players.
My dad has some amazing autographs. Probably the most amazing is a souvenir training card that they handed out when he watched Muhammad Ali in a public session before the Liston fight. The card has a tale of the tape on both sides for the two fighters and identifies Ali as "Cassius Clay." This would have been in very early 1964, but he signed it Muhammad Ali. It's a real neat piece of history, because he hadn't changed his name yet and was facing serious pressure from the fight promoter not to identify as Muhammad Ali, so the signature on the card is an early symbol of his defiance. It's a pretty cool thing to have.
So, what does that have to do with anything? The point is that even with that training card and some other amazing stuff (an RFK autograph, for example), nothing comes close to that Denny Doyle autograph. We have it in plastic. It's not quite my Rosebud, but it's close. I wish we had kept the tickets, because I don't know if is from 1975 or 1976. I would like to hope it was 1975, but I've tried a lot of different ways to figure it out and I'm just not sure. I remember 1975 vividly, and I would think that visit to Fenway, if it was 1976, would have been memorable to me for being the year after the world series, and since it wasn't, I think it must have been just after the trade for Doyle. But I'm just guessing.
why on earth did Directv give you extra innings for free? how can that happen to me? (want to watch the Oakland games)I have watched far too much of it. I was going to cancel my extra innings subscription when I saw the price, but DirecTV gave it to me for free. Based on their current performance, I overpaid.
Wow -- great stuff. There are probably a million people who say that were at the Bobby Orr game, and so it must be cool to be one of the ones who really was.Not to derail this thread, but even though they stink this year, having sports back in whatever form it's in for as long as it lasts is helping me get through the current shitshow we are all dealing with.
Gotta agree 100%.....Can't say my viewing habits have changed much at all. I've seen the first few innings of the night games (I usually crash 9-9:30 every night), all of Saturday's game, none of Sunday's. It's baseball. I like baseball. Even ugly sloppy baseball.