There's a pretty significant gap between these outcomes. I think you can win with Cousins, but not with Dalton.Feeling a Dalton / Cousins type career. Which I think with the right team around him could mean a ring
You think so? First 5 years Dalton went 50-26-1, 62.3%, 5.0% TD, 2.9% INT. He was pretty good.There's a pretty significant gap between these outcomes. I think you can win with Cousins, but not with Dalton.
I'd have Lance higher for sure in terms of situation to succeed (I think it would have been the best spot for any of the QBs including Jones)No real idea, although I optimistically voted for a high-range outcome (solid career with a couple Pro Bowls).
My general thoughts are:
- I think many people are too down on him due to perceived athletic limitations.
- At the same time, most of us tend to underestimate the likelihood of any QB busting or just being fairly mediocre. Being good at QB is hard.
- At the same time, team/coaching context is really important to success and if you had to rank 1st round QBs drafted in the last 10-15 years by "team/coaching context favorability index" I think Jones would be pretty close to the very top. Other than Mahomes in KC, maybe Lamar in Baltimore, I'm not sure who you'd actually have higher. You could imagine a situation in which Jones wasn't really that special, but BB/McD got every ounce of his talent out of him and did a great job putting him in situations where he could succeed, so that he made a few Pro Bowls and had a good run as a perceived upper tier (if not elite) QB.
I was just thinking about QBs in prior year drafts but I agree that Lance should rank ahead of him if included, for all the reasons you say. He is in a great spot.I'd have Lance higher for sure in terms of situation to succeed (I think it would have been the best spot for any of the QBs including Jones)
The Patriots have good coaching, but pretty mediocre offensive talent. I think SF has significant advantages in play design on offense, and at basically every skill position. I mean is there anyone here who wouldn't trade our WR/TE/RB group for theirs? And anybody who wouldn't rather have Shannahan design the offense and call plays than Josh?
This is a great point--while talent is the largest determinative factor in success, the situation (organization, coaching etc.) is key as well. Even if Fields has substantially more talent than Mac, he is going to a worse environment in most respects, where he will likely be thrown to the wolves in a desperate last-ditch effort by management to win. Does that somewhat level out their chances?At the same time, team/coaching context is really important to success and if you had to rank 1st round QBs drafted in the last 10-15 years by "team/coaching context favorability index" I think Jones would be pretty close to the very top. Other than Mahomes in KC, maybe Lamar in Baltimore or Goff in LA, I'm not sure who you'd actually have higher. You could imagine a situation in which Jones wasn't really that special, but BB/McD got every ounce of his talent out of him and did a great job putting him in situations where he could succeed, so that he made a few Pro Bowls and had a good run as a perceived upper tier (if not elite) QB.
I agree too, I love Fields, but when I saw he went to CHI I winced, same reason I'd be higher on Wilson if he weren't going to the Jets.. organizational and coaching stability can be big. I think NE was a good spot for any of the QBs, and obviously I would have preferred the guy with more tools... in part BECAUSE I trust the coaching staff, and think they could fix his issues and unlock that huge upside, but it also means I think Mac Jones will be an NFL starter now that he's going to be here.This is a great point--while talent is the largest determinative factor in success, the situation (organization, coaching etc.) is key as well. Even if Fields has substantially more talent than Mac, he is going to a worse environment in most respects, where he will likely be thrown to the wolves in a desperate last-ditch effort by management to win.. Does that somewhat level out their chances?
That’s a pretty narrow gap.Injuries aside, I think Mac's ceiling is Derek Carr, and floor is Jay Cutler. We could be bitching about his lackadaisical approach, or wooed by his accuracy.
This feels right. Jimmy G almost won a Super Bowl, and by all rights probably should have if the Niners D had held up a bit better.Seems the obvious comp to me is Jimmy G. Not someone that will put the team on his back but in the right system will be as productive as his weapons allow him to be.
Is it? Carr's been to 3 PBs in 8 seasons; Cutler 1 in 11. Carr's a 64% career passer, with 67% or better his last 3 years. Cutler was a 62% career passer, with only one season at 66%. Carr's record is terrible, but it'd be pretty much impossible to put that on his shoulders. The Raider D has been middling for a very long time. I don't think there's anybody who'd take best season Cutler over best season Carr.That’s a pretty narrow gap.
That kind of competitive drive and work ethic is off the charts and reminds me of Bird, Brady, Pedro...guys who didn't look the part, but willed themselves to excel.Then Jones set his focus on another marquee event. Rivals held a quarterback competition with the top players in the country, and Jones made it his sole priority — not just to win, but also to beat Lawrence.
It was Jones’ way of proving that he belonged in the conversation among the top quarterbacks in his class, and there was no better way to do it than to take down a generational prospect.
The competition involved a variety of throws into nets — 25 yards to the corner of the end zone, roll right and throw toward the sideline, roll left and do the same, and on and on. Each net had a tight window.
Jones was so serious about winning that he had a net to set up in his backyard. He practiced relentlessly, even noticing the importance of aiming slightly high to give the ball a more generous angle to sink the throw.
Of course, Jones crushed the final round against Lawrence and won the competition.
I love it.This article at The Athletic is very, very interesting and gives a great insight into the very determined will of Mr. Mac Jones.
That kind of competitive drive and work ethic is off the charts and reminds me of Bird, Brady, Pedro...guys who didn't look the part, but willed themselves to excel.