Hooking Crochet? 12/8 update: Rumors of Red Sox "just on the periphery," "not aggressors at all" at this point.

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,994
Honolulu HI
This sure reads as an argument to acquire him immediately. Buying a pitching version of Jarren Duran before the final leap! And he's a former 11th overall pick so only tapping into his talent. But yes I wouldn't trade one of our big-4 prospects for him.
Well, yeah, if he's about to take a big leap and put his health issues behind him. But Duran would have been relatively cheap to acquire last offseason because no one knew that was about to happen. I would expect even Chicago doesn't expect that to happen with Crochet or they'd hold on to him till the deadline and sell him for a higher return than they can get now.
 
Last edited:

ALiveH

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
1,207
This sure reads as an argument to acquire him immediately. Buying a pitching version of Jarren Duran before the final leap! And he's a former 11th overall pick so only tapping into his talent. But yes I wouldn't trade one of our big-4 prospects for him.
To me, Mayer straight up for Crochet seems a fair deal for the Sox.
Crochet has higher ceiling & more of a ML track record, while with Mayer you get some extra years of control.
They both have injury risk, so that seems about a wash.
 

loneredseat

New Member
Dec 8, 2023
250
At the beginning of this thread I was kind of anti Crochet, but after watching some of his pitching, he is kinda freaking nasty. And young.
I've also been thinking that the way of the future may be keeping starters on a slightly lower innings count, to have them fresher for the playoffs. This could benefit him.
I know most of the talk has been around Abreu, but what would a trade look like with Durqn on one side and Crochet on the other? They'd be sending something else back, maybe?
 

Scoops Bolling

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 19, 2007
6,184
At the beginning of this thread I was kind of anti Crochet, but after watching some of his pitching, he is kinda freaking nasty. And young.
I've also been thinking that the way of the future may be keeping starters on a slightly lower innings count, to have them fresher for the playoffs. This could benefit him.
I know most of the talk has been around Abreu, but what would a trade look like with Durqn on one side and Crochet on the other? They'd be sending something else back, maybe?
That wouldn't make sense for the White Sox.
 

Scoops Bolling

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 19, 2007
6,184
Because fewer years of control? Or because they are looking for multiple players?
Duran has more control than does Crochet, but rebuilding clubs aren't going to want to consolidate value onto the MLB club, particularly for a guy like Duran who plays the same position as their top OF (Robert), and his secondary position (LF) is filled by Benintendi. It just doesn't make any sense for the White Sox. They need long term building blocks, ideally full rookie scale contract control. A guy like Duran would just be a trade asset for them.
 

Alex Cole's Rec Specs

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 31, 2006
157
South Acton, Mass.
I know most of the talk has been around Abreu, but what would a trade look like with Duran on one side and Crochet on the other? They'd be sending something else back, maybe?
If the Red Sox want to trade Duran and get back Crochet, they'll need a third team involved that wants Duran and is willing to give up prospects for him that you can then trade to Chicago.

San Diego makes a lot of sense given their competitive window and the fact that A.J. Preller was interested in Duran last winter. Also, the Padres two best prospects, Ethan Salas and Leo De Vries, are both position players, which Chicago has reportedly prioritized in Crochet talks.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
22,587
Rogers Park
Well, yeah, if he's about to take a big leap and put his health issues behind him. But Duran would have been relatively cheap to acquire last offseason because no one knew that was about to happen. I would expect even Chicago doesn't expect that to happen with Crochet or they'd hold on to him till the deadline and sell him for a higher return than they can get now.
I don't think they can wait. I don't think they'd get more at the deadline because fewer teams are in the picture, and the risk of injury (as with any pitcher) could torpedo their rebuild.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
7,445
I don't think they can wait. I don't think they'd get more at the deadline because fewer teams are in the picture, and the risk of injury (as with any pitcher) could torpedo their rebuild.
It's pretty amazing how well they actually did last year considering they started the season with Pivetta (inconsistent), Bello (very green... lots of potential), Houck (couldn't get past 4 innings), Crawford (at best a back-end of a rotation guy) and Whitlock (can't stay healthy) as their starting rotation. Then quickly lost their second best hitter, best middle infielder and a promising 2B. I still think if they SERIOUSLY addressed the bullpen and traded for Flaherty or Eovaldi by the middle of July they could have snuck into the playoffs... Mayer's value was likely higher then than now, they possibly could have gotten Crochet then. Clearly debatable, sure.
I just hope they don't nibble around the edges. Even if they don't get Soto and do nothing but add Crochet (or one of the Seattle starters) and add a top quality relief arm, I think they're in a good position for the ALE- assuming the Yankees don't add Soto and the O's don't upgrade their rotation beyond what they had last season.
The Astros look like they're at the end of their reign. The entire AL could be much weaker than last season.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
7,977
It's pretty amazing how well they actually did last year considering they started the season with Pivetta (inconsistent), Bello (very green... lots of potential), Houck (couldn't get past 4 innings), Crawford (at best a back-end of a rotation guy) and Whitlock (can't stay healthy) as their starting rotation. Then quickly lost their second best hitter, best middle infielder and a promising 2B. I still think if they SERIOUSLY addressed the bullpen and traded for Flaherty or Eovaldi by the middle of July they could have snuck into the playoffs... Mayer's value was likely higher then than now, they possibly could have gotten Crochet then. Clearly debatable, sure.
I just hope they don't nibble around the edges. Even if they don't get Soto and do nothing but add Crochet (or one of the Seattle starters) and add a top quality relief arm, I think they're in a good position for the ALE- assuming the Yankees don't add Soto and the O's don't upgrade their rotation beyond what they had last season.
The Astros look like they're at the end of their reign. The entire AL could be much weaker than last season.
Part of it was they got one outstanding, surprise performance through Houck, three league average performances from Bello, Crawford, and Pivetta, and then a lot of weirdly really good innings from part-timers: Whitlock, Fitts, and Criswell were all really good when they were starting. And the "openers" all pitched really well, except for one awful Chase Anderson start.

I don't think they can wait. I don't think they'd get more at the deadline because fewer teams are in the picture, and the risk of injury (as with any pitcher) could torpedo their rebuild.
Yeah, and what if their asset blows up in their face?

But I also feel sometimes like teams get more at the deadline because GMs on the cusp feel pressure to make the playoffs. I feel like the Angels, for example, got a lot from us for Garcia. Like, Lugo, Kavadas, Zeferjahn... None of those guys are great prospects, but they all have significant upside in one way or another. That's way more than the Mariners got for 5 years of Isaiah Campbell, for example.
 

HangingW/ScottCooper

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,726
Scituate, MA
Pulling this from one of the Soto threads:
That said, since this is the Sotoverse thread and I strayed off topic a bit. If they do sign Soto, I think Abreu becomes much more likely to be traded, and it almost becomes necessary. Again, though, I think we need to be prepared to be disappointed in the return for him, because as much as we love him here, I think he loses value playing anywhere other than Fenway for 81 games, and a 114 OPS+ for a 25 year old rookie is quite good, but not exactly elite (it puts him in a range with players like Luis Garcia Jr and Zach Neto, for instance, and I don't think anyone is advocating for the White Sox to trade Crochet for them).

Thinking more outside the box (and far less realistic), if the team values Abreu's defense as much as we do, the Tigers DO need bats, like you said, and Skubal is absolutely the kind of pitcher I would consider moving the #1 MLB prospect for, but the Tigers would have to sweeten the pot a little bit.
I think Abreu + Mayer is a pretty good starting point for Skubal, but are we sure that the Tigers are even shopping him at this point?

92113
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
95,283
Oregon
There is no way the Tigers trade Tairk Skubal. None. They just made the playoffs and they're going to trade the best pitcher in baseball?
But, but, but ... they can get a good-fielding outfielder who hasn't hit lefties yet and a minor leaguer who might be pretty good if he stops getting nagging injuries!!!
 

HangingW/ScottCooper

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,726
Scituate, MA
There is no way the Tigers trade Tairk Skubal. None. They just made the playoffs and they're going to trade the best pitcher in baseball?
I'm in agreement. They were shopping him at the deadline and ultimately had a fantastic August and September. They also are positioned similar to us with one of the best farm systems in baseball. If I'm Detroit I'd be looking to add mid-term contracts (3-4 year) type additions to the team with the expectation that Jobe can contribute in 2025 and Clark and McGonigle can contribute in 2026. Honestly, they'd be a pretty good landing spot for Pivetta and Tyler O'Neil.
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
32,825
Alamogordo
Pulling this from one of the Soto threads:

I think Abreu + Mayer is a pretty good starting point for Skubal, but are we sure that the Tigers are even shopping him at this point?

View attachment 92113
Ha, no, I was totally joking in that part of my post over there. I do not believe the Tigers have any interest in moving Skubal. I should have put a sarcasm notification in there.
 

Yaz4Ever

MemBer
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2004
11,480
MA-CA-RI-AZ-NC
As soon as he won the Cy Young, I knew the Tigers would realize he's pretty good and probably not trade him. We should've offered something last week when he was easily gettable.
 

ElcaballitoMVP

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 19, 2008
4,075
If the Red Sox want to trade Duran and get back Crochet, they'll need a third team involved that wants Duran and is willing to give up prospects for him that you can then trade to Chicago.

San Diego makes a lot of sense given their competitive window and the fact that A.J. Preller was interested in Duran last winter. Also, the Padres two best prospects, Ethan Salas and Leo De Vries, are both position players, which Chicago has reportedly prioritized in Crochet talks.
I would be shocked if the Padres traded either of those guys for Duran, no matter how much Preller likes him. These guys are their Teel and Campbell and are pretty much off limits.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
13,034
yep
it’s sign Soto and Sasaki

Trade Anthony and Mayer for Skubal
If you've signed Sasaki, why in the name of all that's holy would you pay the toll on Skubal? Which would be even more than that. But they already have a bunch of good/solid starters. At Saski you have five legitimate middle of the rotation or better starters. Are you planning on going to an eight man rotation?
 

Yaz4Ever

MemBer
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2004
11,480
MA-CA-RI-AZ-NC
If you've signed Sasaki, why in the name of all that's holy would you pay the toll on Skubal? Which would be even more than that. But they already have a bunch of good/solid starters. At Saski you have five legitimate middle of the rotation or better starters. Are you planning on going to an eight man rotation?
Can never have too much pitching
 

loneredseat

New Member
Dec 8, 2023
250
Trading off Duran for Crochet is a huge over pay. We actually would be losing value.
I wasn't suggesting a straight up trade.
My thought was that we'd be selling high(er) on Duran than Abreu. It's reasonable to think that Abreu has a better year next year than he did this past year, and not so much with Duran. And there may be something additional coming back our way with the Duran deal.
 

johnlos

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2014
323
To me, Mayer straight up for Crochet seems a fair deal for the Sox.
Crochet has higher ceiling & more of a ML track record, while with Mayer you get some extra years of control.
They both have injury risk, so that seems about a wash.
Like this idea and justification.

Also can we please stop fever dreaming about Skubal in the Crochet thread
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
Three way deal: Casas to CHW, Crochet to Toronto, Vladi Jr to us. Maybe contingent on Toronto extending Crochet, which is doable, otherwise that wouldn't be enough to trade Vladi in the division, even in a walk year.

CWS gets a player they need more position-wise, who we love, but hasn't shown enough to make him untouchable. We can then get pitchers in FA if the Sasaki Miracle doesn't happen.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
5,010
Three way deal: Casas to CHW, Crochet to Toronto, Vladi Jr to us. Maybe contingent on Toronto extending Crochet, which is doable, otherwise that wouldn't be enough to trade Vladi in the division, even in a walk year.

CWS gets a player they need more position-wise, who we love, but hasn't shown enough to make him untouchable. We can then get pitchers in FA if the Sasaki Miracle doesn't happen.
I would love Vlad Jr. on the Sox but we’d be getting him at 1-year, $30~ million. Casas seems like too much to give up, to me.
 

ALiveH

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
1,207
Guerrero is so far superior to Casas that the Sox should do this trade in a heartbeat and extend Guerrero. At his best, he's one of the best hitters in all of baseball, never gets injured (touch wood) and only one year older than Casas.

Casas is a slightly above average hitter (for his position) who missed 130 games across the two full seasons he's played.

I think there's no way the CWS trade Crochet for Casas straight up, probably have to throw in another prospect, like Chaise Meidroth, which would still be a no-brainer to get Vlad.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
5,010
Guerrero is so far superior to Casas that the Sox should do this trade in a heartbeat and extend Guerrero.
I’m not about to mount a campaign against acquiring Vlad Guerrero but

Age 23-24 seasons
Casas (‘23-24): 126 wRC+, -11 OAA in 1747 innings
Guerrero (‘22-23): 125 wRC+, -31 OAA in 4653 innings
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
Guerrero is so far superior to Casas that the Sox should do this trade in a heartbeat and extend Guerrero. At his best, he's one of the best hitters in all of baseball, never gets injured (touch wood) and only one year older than Casas.

Casas is a slightly above average hitter (for his position) who missed 130 games across the two full seasons he's played.

I think there's no way the CWS trade Crochet for Casas straight up, probably have to throw in another prospect, like Chaise Meidroth, which would still be a no-brainer to get Vlad.
A little sweetener sounds fine, though you are getting a lot of years of Casas.
 

ALiveH

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
1,207
I’m not about to mount a campaign against acquiring Vlad Guerrero but

Age 23-24 seasons
Casas (‘23-24): 126 wRC+, -11 OAA in 1747 innings
Guerrero (‘22-23): 125 wRC+, -31 OAA in 4653 innings
This is very cherry picked.
Sandwiching those 22-23 seasons, Guerrero had the #3 best OPS+ in baseball at age 22, and #6 best OPS+ in MLB at age 25.
And Vlad has missed a grand total of 12 games in the five seasons he has been a full-time starter, whereas Casas has missed an average of 65 games in the two years he has been a full time starter.
Vlad is a bad defensive third baseman - Toronto has been playing him there which is bad asset allocation. He has been a decent defensive first baseman.

Edit: sorry, initially got bad data, should have double checked on MLB Ref. He's been mostly playing 1B and has been a bad defensive 1B - could still be a good full time DH.
 
Last edited:

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
95,283
Oregon
Vlad is a bad defensive third baseman - Toronto has been playing him there which is bad asset allocation. He has been a decent defensive first baseman.
He only played 12 games at third this past season
 

pjheff

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2003
1,537
I think there's no way the CWS trade Crochet for Casas straight up, probably have to throw in another prospect, like Chaise Meidroth, which would still be a no-brainer to get Vlad.
Do you seriously think that there is any trade proposal where the difference between an offer being accepted or refused is Chase Meidroth?

This is very cherry picked.

And Vlad has missed a grand total of 12 games in the five seasons he has been a full-time starter, whereas Casas has missed an average of 65 games in the two years he has been a full time starter.
You are going to accuse someone else’s data of being “very cherry picked“ and then use Casas’ “average“ of games missed the last two years?
 
Last edited:

ALiveH

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
1,207
Do you seriously think that there is any trade proposal where the difference between an offer being accepted or refused is Chase Meidroth?



You are going to accuse someone else’s data of being “very cherry picked“ and then use Casas’ “average“ of games missed the last two years?
Yes, I think a mid-level prospect, like Chase, could be the difference between a deal being accepted or not. Happens all the time in trades. Chase doesn't have tools, but he's proven everything he can prove in the minors, grades very well in statistical models, and has proven he deserves a shot at the big league level in a low pressure situation, but there just isn't room for him on the sox with our glut of better talent.

The durability is definitely not cherry picked:
Casas has been the opening day starting first baseman for only two years - 2023 and 2024. He missed 30 games in 2023 and 99 games in 2024. He also missed over a month to a high ankle sprain in 2022.
Vlad, on the other hand, has missed a grand total of 12 (!) games over the past five years. He's one of the most durable players in MLB (knock on wood).
 
Last edited:

SuperDieHard

New Member
Jun 13, 2015
42
Three way deal: Casas to CHW, Crochet to Toronto, Vladi Jr to us. Maybe contingent on Toronto extending Crochet, which is doable, otherwise that wouldn't be enough to trade Vladi in the division, even in a walk year.

CWS gets a player they need more position-wise, who we love, but hasn't shown enough to make him untouchable. We can then get pitchers in FA if the Sasaki Miracle doesn't happen.
How about this 3 way instead: Casas to Toronto, Abreu+ Hamilton or Crawford (whichever gets the deal done) to CWS, Crochet and Vlad to Boston. Decent positional prospect from Toronto to CWS…
 

EddieYost

is not associated in any way with GHoff
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,285
NH
Seems like a lot moving out of Boston to facilitate Crochet to another team for one year of Guerrero.
In this scenario Boston gets Vlad and Crochet. Jays send something good to the White Sox
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
22,611
Maine
The durability is definitely not cherry picked:
Casas has been the opening day starting first baseman for only two years - 2023 and 2024. He missed 30 games in 2023 and 99 games in 2024. He also missed over a month to a high ankle sprain in 2022.
Vlad, on the other hand, has missed a grand total of 12 (!) games over the past five years. He's one of the most durable players in MLB (knock on wood).
The 30 games he missed in 2023 were not all for injury. He spent the last 15 games of the season on the IL with shoulder inflammation. Something he and Cora at the time acknowledged he likely could have played through if the team had anything left to play for. The rest were normal rest days and an early season platoon with Justin Turner.

So yeah, it is cherry picking to take one severe injury and average it over two seasons to make it seem like he is injured more often than he really is.