Maybe this is better suited for a different thread, but I wonder if part of the RS apparent reticence in paying top dollar for SP’s includes the fact that they have been having less and less influence on the game as time has gone on. Like you wouldn’t expect a football team to pay top dollar for a cornerback that only plays 70% compared to 99% of the defensive snaps, right?
That said, the drop from 200 innings per season to 170 is only a decrease in percentage of a team’s innings from about 13% to a around 11%, so that may be ascribing more importance than is necessary. It also would just be another factor added to the health and performance concerns for pitchers over 30, so hypothesizing about this might just be an exercise in futility. It’s something that I’ve been chewing on though.
That said, the drop from 200 innings per season to 170 is only a decrease in percentage of a team’s innings from about 13% to a around 11%, so that may be ascribing more importance than is necessary. It also would just be another factor added to the health and performance concerns for pitchers over 30, so hypothesizing about this might just be an exercise in futility. It’s something that I’ve been chewing on though.