Hold the Mayo? Evaluating Patriots coaching.

Oct 12, 2023
1,273
The Pats didn’t have Drake Maye as their starting QB last offseason. That dynamic alone makes this coming offseason far different.

I don’t understand how you’re so sure of everything in the future. It’s weird.
Teams without good QB sign players all the time. How is knowing you’re going to draft a QB and actually having a QB on the roster any different in terms of strategy?

What’s weird is suggesting Wolf has been anything other than wildly inadequate to this point or any sort of justification for him not spending money to improve the roster last season.

Ah yes but we should expect Wolf to sign a bunch of high priced free agents because Drake Maye has played half a season. Makes total sense. That’s the “Green Bay way” we heard so much about
 
Oct 12, 2023
1,273
We can see how next offseason goes and if it’s as horrible as the past one, I’ll be right here with you. I do expect a spending spree now; they’ve failed to develop WR and Tackle and have the other positions in place.The spree need not be like 2021, but rather at tackle or WR where they have critical needs.

Just like some of the Mayo criticism is early or unfair, so is the Kraft/Wolf criticism that they won’t spend in the future. They had a horrible off season last year. But they spent in 2021 and last season the free agents they went after didn’t come. They deserve major criticism for the results (which were easily foreseeable) but I think you’re a bit early on criticizing the overall process. Even with a perfect offseason (say signing Ridley at their $$) they were going to be very bad this year.

To be completely transparent, I expect a major Tackle or WR to be signed this offseason with Maye here and their overall roster. I expect the contract to be awful value and I expect to fine with that because that’s the price you pay when you are bad and have drafted poorly and need to make someone come to your team. Last offseason they could afford to negotiate with Ridley; they can’t do that this offseason and need to address major holes at two positions.
Other than Higgins, what WR would you consider “major”? Would Mike Williams on a one year 15M deal (or whatever) be “major” and evidence of Wolf being a big spender?

I don’t think Godwin makes it to free agency so if it’s not Higgins, it’s likely going to be dumpster diving for guys on their last legs or the Osborn or Bourne types of the world
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
28,249
Unreal America
Teams without good QB sign players all the time. How is knowing you’re going to draft a QB and actually having a QB on the roster any different in terms of strategy?

What’s weird is suggesting Wolf has been anything other than wildly inadequate to this point or any sort of justification for him not spending money to improve the roster last season.

Ah yes but we should expect Wolf to sign a bunch of high priced free agents because Drake Maye has played half a season. Makes total sense. That’s the “Green Bay way” we heard so much about
Your schtick is boring. There’s a monumental difference between having a high draft pick and having an actual, bona fide, living, breathing QB who can make every throw and seems likely to be a long time starter.

If you can’t fathom why that might be more attractive for free agents then I can’t help you.

One can feel that Wolf hasn’t been particularly great at his job to date (that’s where I fall) and also feel that this coming offseason may be much more productive.

But you’ve decided it’s not possible. So there’s really no need to engage with you anymore.
 

jk333

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 26, 2009
4,449
Boston
Other than Higgins, what WR would you consider “major”? Would Mike Williams on a one year 15M deal (or whatever) be “major” and evidence of Wolf being a big spender?

I don’t think Godwin makes it to free agency so if it’s not Higgins, it’s likely going to be dumpster diving for guys on their last legs or the Osborn or Bourne types of the world
Godwin, Cooper or Higgins, or I’d look at tackles more closely- Bolles and Stanley. An overpriced tackle or WR would help by stabilizing a position. I think their issue is too many holes to fill by only the draft. Their (position) groups are so bad that having flexibility is a negative. Osborn and Bourne don’t realize that they are replacement receivers that Douglas/Polk/Boutte are younger and cheaper versions of. It’s a mess, they shouldn’t have brought Bourne back.

Regarding tackle, if they had a LT and Strange, the line may be functional, it was last year when Brown was healthy.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
3,340
Wolf got his QB. Check. Granted it was not a difficult decision, but he didn't get cute with a trade down, etc. He stuck and picked and it was the right call. It's the most important decision he'll likely make in his time here. His other moves have been mediocre or bad. That's not really all that controversial to say. This is his most important off-season (before the next one, which will also be critical). You either set Maye up to succeed or die trying. This isn't Mac where we have to talk ourselves into his potential and skew the analysis with selcted advanced stats. Maye is a stud. Our eyes and ears do not decieve us. So go get him Higgins, draft an OT or WR in R1. (I'm on the McMillan bandwagon. Him, Higgins, Pop in the slot and go from there. If Deebo comes available at a reasonable price, go for it too.)
 
Oct 12, 2023
1,273
Godwin, Cooper or Higgins, or I’d look at tackles more closely- Bolles and Stanley. An overpriced tackle or WR would help by stabilizing a position. I think their issue is too many holes to fill by only the draft. Their (position) groups are so bad that having flexibility is a negative. Osborn and Bourne don’t realize that they are replacement receivers that Douglas/Polk/Boutte are younger and cheaper versions of. It’s a mess, they shouldn’t have brought Bourne back.

Regarding tackle, if they had a LT and Strange, the line may be functional, it was last year when Brown was healthy.
It would be pretty surprising if Bolles, Stanley or Godwin hit free agency. The Ravens’ cap situation isn’t great but I’d think they’d find a way to franchise Stanley unless they decide to franchise Mekari instead

I would think the Pats would be in on guys like Noteboom, Udoh, Brunskill and the like. I can’t imagine they’re going to be shopping at the top range of tackles based on what we saw last offseason.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
20,236
It would be pretty surprising if Bolles, Stanley or Godwin hit free agency. The Ravens’ cap situation isn’t great but I’d think they’d find a way to franchise Stanley unless they decide to franchise Mekari instead

I would think the Pats would be in on guys like Noteboom, Udoh, Brunskill and the like. I can’t imagine they’re going to be shopping at the top range of tackles based on what we saw last offseason.
Last offseason has zero bearing in what the team will do this offseason.
 

Salem's Lot

Andy Moog! Andy God Damn Moog!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
16,202
Gallows Hill
Last offseason has zero bearing in what the team will do this offseason.
Is ownership actually going to let Wolfe outbid other teams for the top free agents? Or are they going to be in the same ballpark or slightly less than the top offers again (when you account for state tax ) and blame it on the guy’s girlfriend preferring to live in the south?
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
20,236
Is ownership actually going to let Wolfe outbid other teams for the top free agents? Or are they going to be in the same ballpark or slightly less than the top offers again (when you account for state tax ) and blame it on the guy’s girlfriend preferring to live in the south?
Nobody knows seems to be the correct answer. Except Kraft may very well lean on Wolfe a bit harder to get a premier player in a position of need. At least seems feasible to me.

What we do know for certain is that while the Krafts will set an overall budget, Wolfe will be on the hook to figure out how to distribute that budget.
 
Oct 12, 2023
1,273
Last offseason has zero bearing in what the team will do this offseason.
Bizarre take.

You’re suggesting GM’s don’t have patterns or philosophies? Suggesting it has “zero bearing” is suggesting Wolf has no core operating strategy?

Given it’s the same exact front office (unless they’re fired which we know Kraft won’t do), I don’t know how we can’t look at last year as a guide for what these guys want to do. Doesn’t mean it will be an exact repeat of course but suggesting that their approach last offseason is totally different than any approach moving forward is outright bizarre.

GM’s don’t typically radically shift strategy year to year.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
20,236
Bizarre take.

You’re suggesting GM’s don’t have patterns or philosophies? Suggesting it has “zero bearing” is suggesting Wolf has no core operating strategy?

Given it’s the same exact front office (unless they’re fired which we know Kraft won’t do), I don’t know how we can’t look at last year as a guide for what these guys want to do. Doesn’t mean it will be an exact repeat of course but suggesting that their approach last offseason is totally different than any approach moving forward is outright bizarre.

GM’s don’t typically radically shift strategy year to year.
GM's often do switch strategies based on the available players and the team's circumstances and needs. Except I'm not going to waste my time looking it up for you. And doing different things in a new offseason than the past offseason doesn't mean Wolf has no operating strategy. It's not a fucking logic exam.
 
Oct 12, 2023
1,273
GM's often do switch strategies based on the available players and the team's circumstances and needs. Except I'm not going to waste my time looking it up for you. And doing different things in a new offseason than the past offseason doesn't mean Wolf has no operating strategy. It's not a fucking logic exam.
Except the circumstances are very similar

Huge amounts of cash
Poor talent on OL
Poor talent at WR
Bad overall roster

We saw how he handled this last year. Dumpster diving. Expecting a total shift in operating philosophy is fanciful to be kind.

He did nothing other than staying put at 3rd overall and taking Maye which has improved the roster meaningfully and people are expecting multiple massive improvements in external free agency/trades

He comes from the “Green Bay way” which is consistent from year to year as any philosophy is. But sure, let’s expect him to land Tee Higgins, Ronnie Stanley. Makes sense. A guy who wants to draft and develop is going to lay out huge AAV for an injury prone inconsistent tackle (or worse, a 32 year old Bolles). Seems highly unlikely.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
20,236
He comes from the “Green Bay way” which is consistent from year to year as any philosophy is. But sure, let’s expect him to land Tee Higgins, Ronnie Stanley. Makes sense. A guy who wants to draft and develop is going to lay out huge AAV for an injury prone inconsistent tackle (or worse, a 32 year old Bolles). Seems highly unlikely.
Well, I don't expect Wolf to willingly spend a lot of money on an injury-prone JAG tackle either.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
37,915
Is ownership actually going to let Wolfe outbid other teams for the top free agents? Or are they going to be in the same ballpark or slightly less than the top offers again (when you account for state tax ) and blame it on the guy’s girlfriend preferring to live in the south?
Nobody knows, but there are indicators that the Patriots can spend. Reports were that they offered the most for Tyron Smith but he wanted a chance to contend so chose the Jets. Also reporting they offered Aiyuk the best contract but he chose to return to the 49ers.
 
Last edited:

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
48,613
Here
Nobody knows, but there are indicators that the Patriots can spend. Reports were that they offered the most for Tyron Smith but he wanted a chance to contend so chose the Jets. Also reporting they offered Aiyuk the best contract but he chose to return to the 49ers.
They offered a lot to Calvin Ridley, too.

Would have been a big celebration.
 

JimD

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2001
9,116
The media is going to take the kid gloves off after this debacle. Kraft is going to have to issue the dreaded vote of confidence to try and keep the fans and media at bay.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
37,915
And compounds it by calling timeout when the Colts had almost no time left on the play clock. Dead lord.
That was a mistake by the announce team, it was an IND timeout.

The end of game was fine, it's a calculated risk, the kind BB made all the time.

There are plenty of things Mayo (and Covington) did terribly throughout that deserves more criticism than the ending. Make a stop either on the TD or the 2pt. Getting a couple extra seconds (IND probably runs more clock if we take timeouts) and no timeouts wouldn't make a major difference.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
48,613
Here
The clock management combined with playing passive offense at the end of halves did them in, horrible penalties aside.

Mayo is the worst coach this city has seen in a very long time.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
40,142
Hingham, MA
That was a mistake by the announce team, it was an IND timeout.

The end of game was fine, it's a calculated risk, the kind BB made all the time.

There are plenty of things Mayo (and Covington) did terribly throughout that deserves more criticism than the ending. Make a stop either on the TD or the 2pt. Getting a couple extra seconds (IND probably runs more clock if we take timeouts) and no timeouts wouldn't make a major difference.
Not according to the game log. The Pats called timeout first. Then the Colts.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
9,700
Oakland
I have no fucking patience for ultra-conservative play calling when you don't have an elite defense. For the first time in awhile I feel more confidence in letting the offense rather than the defense try to win the game, and clearly mayo doesn't agree.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
13,920
São Paulo - Brazil
He has already reached the Matt Patricia stage of taking credit for the Butler play to divert from criticism, lmao. At least Patricia was actually the DC for it, not an injured player. What a clusterfuck.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
37,915
The timeouts at the end is going to get way too much attention... he made a call, it didn't work out, but at least he made it, the abject failures elsewhere and his consistent shittiness should get way more attention than that one strategy choice.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
48,613
Here
The timeouts at the end is going to get way too much attention... he made a call, it didn't work out, but at least he made it, the abject failures elsewhere and his consistent shittiness should get way more attention than that one strategy choice.
Not sure what this means, though. He had to make a choice one way or the other, it was just he picked the objectively very bad one. You use the timeouts at least until they hit 3rd down.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
13,920
São Paulo - Brazil
Not sure what this means, though. He had to make a choice one way or the other, it was just he picked the objectively very bad one. You use the timeouts at least until they hit 3rd down.
Yup. "Mayo wanted the end the game with a stop". Cool, but by taking timeouts he also ends the game with a stop, only he has a little more time if he doesn't get the stop. Honestly, NOTHING would be lost by taking the timeouts, I feel like I'm taking crazy pills at this defense of the decision.

Elementary, no downside decision, just like challenging the catch earlier in the drive. He froze because he's clueless. Nothing strategic about it, he just sucks.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
40,142
Hingham, MA
Not sure what this means, though. He had to make a choice one way or the other, it was just he picked the objectively very bad one. You use the timeouts at least until they hit 3rd down.
Only timeout he actually did use was to bail the Colts out when the clock was already stopped and they were scrambling to get set.
 

Mystic Merlin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2007
49,576
Hartford, CT
He has already reached the Matt Patricia stage of taking credit for the Butler play to divert from criticism, lmao. At least Patricia was actually the DC for it, not an injured player. What a clusterfuck.
And if what he means to say is that the organization has a history of making that kind of decision, then it’s still dumb because (1) the situations are not really analogous and (2) he’s been distancing himself from the BB era at virtually every other turn, so it comes off as opportunistic to use the BB era as a shield now.
 

AlNipper49

Huge Member
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 3, 2001
45,725
Mtigawi
The media is going to take the kid gloves off after this debacle. Kraft is going to have to issue the dreaded vote of confidence to try and keep the fans and media at bay.
I’ve been resisting being critical. I think there is tremendous value in developing at the coaching level. The issue is Mayo isn’t really developing.

Weird feeling for me. Coaches that I think need to be fired I usually do a pretty good job of finding a reason to hate. I think Mayo seems like a really, really nice dude.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
48,613
Here
Yup. "Mayo wanted the end the game with a stop". Cool, but by taking timeouts he also ends the game with a stop, only he has a little more time if he doesn't get the stop. Honestly, NOTHING would be lost by taking the timeouts, I feel like I'm taking crazy pills at this defense of the decision.

Elementary, no downside decision, just like challenging the catch earlier in the drive. He froze because he's clueless. Nothing strategic about it, he just sucks.
The one downside is Colts can get the ball back down 7 since they had 3 timeouts themselves, but the math there has to work out in favor of taking at least 2. Colts have good odds to score from that part of the field, that time is important for Maye.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
37,915
Not sure what this means, though. He had to make a choice one way or the other, it was just he picked the objectively very bad one. You use the timeouts at least until they hit 3rd down.
There is an argument that you put additional pressure on the offense to execute.... but yeah, it probably is the right call to take the timeouts, I was off by a down on when stuff happened, so he didn't take away the run like I thought he did.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
40,142
Hingham, MA
There is an argument that you put additional pressure on the offense to execute.... but yeah, it probably is the right call to take the timeouts, I was off by a down on when stuff happened, so he didn't take away the run like I thought he did.
You continue to ignore the timeout that he did take on D.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
37,915
You continue to ignore the timeout that he did take on D.
Did he? I thought they corrected that to IND? If he took the timeout there... brutally bad, because a delay is exactly the kind of mistake you're trying to pressure them into.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
34,980
Mayo is a shitty in game coach but the Pats seem ready to play every week given the roster. I cannot imagine a firing.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
48,613
Here
Did he? I thought they corrected that to IND? If he took the timeout there... brutally bad, because a delay is exactly the kind of mistake you're trying to pressure them into.
NE took one, then Colts.

But at that point it probably didn’t matter. There was probably not enough time to use 3 timeouts Anyway.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
37,915
Yes, he 100% did.
Oh yeah, that's terrible.

I've changed my mind, it's not really defensible if you aren't going to actually pressure them. I stand corrected, he mismanaged it much worse than the mild mismanaging I thought. His overall incompetence is of more concern to me, but we can chalk this up in the list.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
48,613
Here
Oh yeah, that's terrible.

I've changed my mind, it's not really defensible if you aren't going to actually pressure them.
Colts had 3 timeouts, so I don’t think there was ever going to be pressure. They had plenty of time to get 7-8 plays off if needed.
 

Ralphwiggum

Well-Known Member
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2012
10,212
Needham, MA
Mayo is a shitty in game coach but the Pats seem ready to play every week given the roster. I cannot imagine a firing.
Drake Maye is the reason why they are in these games. I’m not sure how much credit you can give to Mayo. And yes, he’s a terrible in-game coach and doesn’t seem to be learning from his mistakes.

There’s just too much at stake with what looks like an NFL lottery ticket with Drake at QB. They can’t afford to dick around, and I think there’s real damage that can be done to young players by losing week after week, particularly if the coaching staff is doing more to put you in position to lose than to win.