So crediting Mayo for offensive improvements and Maye’s development which seemingly would have almost nothing to do with his actual coaching is a point in his favor?
And owning the poor performance? By calling players soft and being “unable to control the players once they cross the white line”
Really reaching to find things to like about his coaching performance
He’s a defensive guy. The defense looks sloppy and poorly coached. The decisions and gameplans are inconsistent to be kind. How is that not more heavily weighted than offensive output (which IMO is a credit to AVP especially considering Mayo called AVP “head coach of the offense”)
I don’t think Mayo has anything to do with the offense other than big picture stuff (let’s go for it here, punt there, call a timeout here, kick a FG there etc). He’s already said AVP runs the show on that side of the ball so the offense being merely bad instead of horrendous while the defense and special teams suck isn’t really reason to think he’s anything resembling a decent head coach.
Sure we can credit him with bringing in AVP, but also offset by Covington and Springer who seem totally inept
Yes he has on many times made statements that have tried to deflect the blame on himself. The examples you mentioned are good I probably don't need to mention any others but I certainly could.
Even if he does occasionally take blame which he does it's terrible media training to leave quotes out there like " I can't control what happens once the players are in between the white lines."
Some fans are accusing that of being like an out of context quote but a head coach has to recognize that if you say that it's going to be all over the media.
I was not early on the train of trying wanting to fire the coach I wasn't particularly bullish on him but I'm not against the idea of having like a player's coach and a rah-rah type of guy. I kind of like Pete Carroll.
But I just think even if it's kind of unfair because of the terrible roster there are two key variables here.
1) I don't think we're going to be able to attract any good coordinators if he's the head coach because people don't think he's qualified and they're going to feel their answering to somebody that they should be working above. That might be in part why some people didn't take job offers for the Patriots this year and we had to settle for an offensive coordinator way down on our list.
2) even if it's not fair so to speak that he only gets one year with this terrible roster, that's a separate question from whether he's the best person for the job. Even if you think he was dealt a really really raw deal in terms of roster does that mean he's actually the best person for the job?
The other argument seems to be about trying to keep continuity but I would argue that if you don't think he's going to make it you just better off cutting it off now so you can try to develop a rapport with the next guy.
I might even consider just nuking the entire leadership if I craft and firing Elliott wolf bringing in a GM and then having him start a search for a head coach with an institutional program in mind and not this hodgepodge strategy.
I think the ownership expected Belichick to probably get the record here before he left so they were kind of left in a rush to put together a staff and they built it from the head coach first and the GM second it's just a mess.
Call it a mulligan you're going to have to change 90% of the roster anyways and just start over