Grant “Corner Office” Williams

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,672
Melrose, MA
It is always nice when NBA writers get to cherrypick their good calls in the draft while ignoring their terrible ones. He did have nice calls on Grant and Clarke, but Kevin O'Connor had Barrett and Culver ahead of Morant, and had Tyler Herro all the way down at 28.

It's obviously impossible to nail every pick, but it is also pretty easy to hit on a few in every draft
O'Connor was also one of the earliest and highest on Jayson Tatum, and his is also known for preferring Brandon Ingram to Ben Simmons.
 

NomarsFool

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 21, 2001
8,234
I don't mean to be the turd in the punchbowl here, but didn't Toronto score on Grant a couple times in a row? Obviously, he had the big block on the 3PA. But, I thought Siakam scored on him like 2 out of 3 possessions in the last few minutes as well.
 

128

Member
SoSH Member
May 4, 2019
10,075
I don't mean to be the turd in the punchbowl here, but didn't Toronto score on Grant a couple times in a row? Obviously, he had the big block on the 3PA. But, I thought Siakam scored on him like 2 out of 3 possessions in the last few minutes as well.
He forced at least two turnovers late in the game, in addition to playing flawless defense on FVV on Toronto's second-to-last possession.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,309
Santa Monica
I don't mean to be the turd in the punchbowl here, but didn't Toronto score on Grant a couple times in a row? Obviously, he had the big block on the 3PA. But, I thought Siakam scored on him like 2 out of 3 possessions in the last few minutes as well.
I'll scoop out that turd.

Grant entered the 4th Quarter at 7:13. Toronto scored 9pts with Granite on the floor for 7 of those minutes.

1. Siakam did drive on Grant right away, GW was stout and replays show PS walking. No call. PS missed shot, Tatum probably should have grabbed the reb but was busy signalling travel to the ref. PS scores on his put back after his miss shot.

2. Next trip down Siakam tried to drive on Grant. GW stout, slows PS down. Smart steals ball from Siakam.

3. 3rd straight trip down that Siakam tries to drive on Granite. GW stops him . Grant steals the ball in the lane

4. Next trip down. Siakam picks Brown. Granite picks up Lowrey. KL goes nowhere and turns the ball over trying to pass back to PS.

5. A couple of picks set on Grant. He picks up Kemba's man and also makes it difficult for PS drive. PS hits a diving, tough drive.

6. Siakam drives on Grant. Phantom Foul called on Grant. even SVG thought Brad should challenge the call

7. Grant switches on to OG. and does nothing in 1 possession

8. next possession. OG picks Smart. Lowry torches Grant going to the rim

1:32 - Theis back in for 11 seconds fouls Lowry. 2pts

1:21 Grant back in

9. Grant gets switched on to FVV. Stops FVV from penetrating.
:13 seconds left Toronto down 3pts and FVV takes a jumper. Grant blocks the attempt

So in the last 7 minutes, of a high leverage game/situation, the Celtics gave up 9pts with Grant on the floor. While Grant mostly guarded an All-Star
 
Last edited:

djbayko

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
25,948
Los Angeles, CA
I'll scoop out that turd.

Grant entered the 4th Quarter at 7:13. Toronto scored 9pts with Granite on the floor for 7 of those minutes.

1. Siakam did drive on Grant right away, GW was stout and replays show PS walking. No call. PS missed shot, Tatum probably should have grabbed the reb but was busy signalling travel to the ref. PS scores on his put back after his miss shot.

2. Next trip down Siakam tried to drive on Grant. GW stout, slows PS down. Smart steals ball from Siakam.

3. 3rd straight trip down that Siakam tries to drive on Granite. GW stops him . Grant steals the ball in the lane

4. Next trip down. Siakam picks Brown. Granite picks up Lowrey. KL goes nowhere and turns the ball over trying to pass back to PS.

5. A couple of picks set on Grant. He picks up Kemba's man and also makes it difficult for PS drive. PS hits a diving, tough drive.

6. Siakam drives on Grant. Phantom Foul called on Grant. even SVG thought Brad should challenge the call

7. Grant switches on to OG. and does nothing in 1 possession

8. next possession. OG picks Smart. Lowry torches Grant going to the rim

1:32 - Theis back in for 11 seconds fouls Lowry. 2pts

1:21 Grant back in

9. Grant gets switched on to FVV. Stops FVV from penetrating.
:13 seconds left Toronto down 3pts and FVV takes a jumper. Grant blocks the attempt

So in the last 7 minutes, of a high leverage game/situation, the Celtics gave up 9pts with Grant on the floor. While Grant mostly guarded an All-Star
Okay, now who wants a drink?
 

HowBoutDemSox

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 12, 2009
10,133
We need a thread title change for his second year - “Grant Williams, stepping up as a sophomore” maybe? Here’s him clowning Embiid:
View: https://mobile.twitter.com/maxacarlin/status/1339017867468169218


Hope his shooting continues 3’s as he did last year after breaking the slump to start, here’s one that’s not a corner three, good to see.
View: https://mobile.twitter.com/celtics/status/1339037092702089217


He also had an impressive seal of Dwight in the paint last night, just clearing him out to set up an easy layup (I forget who got the score, would love to find a clip of that).
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,163
His shot looks so clean/compact. Release is a bit slow, but that's ok as long as he can draw closeouts and screen on the perimeter.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,497
around the way
His shot looks so clean/compact. Release is a bit slow, but that's ok as long as he can draw closeouts and screen on the perimeter.
I'm not a shot expert like some here, but it seemed to have tightened up a bit to me.

Thought that he looked a lot more comfortable on the offensive end. Glad to see it.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,671
Definitely slow release. Which isn't all that bad for we don't want him taking anything but wide open looks anyway
True, but a slow release means that you need to be even wider open than other guys. But here's the thing: everyone's release is slower when they're wide wide open. It's just how it works. The question is whether he can release it more quickly, with similar accuracy, when needed.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,163
His release is slow, but the first step is getting comfortable and making some. You can speed up your shot marginally over time, especially if you’re a 22 year-old with good mechanics. (maybe 23 but too lazy to check)
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
His release is slow, but the first step is getting comfortable and making some. You can speed up your shot marginally over time, especially if you’re a 22 year-old with good mechanics. (maybe 23 but too lazy to check)
Grant just turned 22 a couple weeks ago. He's the third youngest on the team (Romeo is youngest, than Nesmith).

Fun sidenote: Tatum is 5th youngest.
 

DGreenwood

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 2, 2003
2,463
Seattle
Grant just turned 22 a couple weeks ago. He's the third youngest on the team (Romeo is youngest, than Nesmith).

Fun sidenote: Tatum is 5th youngest.
Seven players on the roster that are 22 or younger. That seems like a lot. It'll be down to three by the time the playoffs start, but then it'll be eight players 23 or younger.
 

bakahump

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 8, 2001
7,555
Maine
That's what I love about these high schoool players, man. I get older, they stay the same age.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,309
Santa Monica
Seven players on the roster that are 22 or younger. That seems like a lot. It'll be down to three by the time the playoffs start, but then it'll be eight players 23 or younger.
The Celtics were the least experienced team in the NBA to start last season. Maybe they saw that as a deficiency and that is why they added vets Teague/TT.

They probably are still in the top 5 least experienced this season
Hayward, Kanter, VP, Wanamaker - OUT
TT, Teague, Nesmith, PP - IN

https://www.hoopsrumors.com/2019/11/youngest-oldest-nba-rosters-for-
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,163
Grant has looked completely atrocious this year. His feet are in cement, his decision-making suggests he's permanently drunk, and he can't stop swiping down and fouling. Also fat. Someone needs to get in his ear--NBA careers can end up on the edge faster than you'd think.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,309
Santa Monica
Grant and Marcus look thick around the middle, as opposed to last season.

Smart can live off his rep for a month as he gets back into shape...Grant not so much
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
He has to be the biggest disappointment so far this season. If things don't change soon, I can see some DNP-CDs racking up and him playing or not being based on match ups.
 

NomarsFool

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 21, 2001
8,234
Did he have an interior shot blocked again last night? He needs to be able to post-up smaller players to be able to generate some offense. Shooting is streaky, of course, but he's been awful from 3 this year. You'd sort of think that someone like him would be taking 3PAs for hours a day - it's basically a key component to whether he makes it in the NBA.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,053
His numbers are essentially the same as last year per 36 (outside of SSS FT %, etc) but we want to see an improvement. Hopefully it's coming.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
Did he have an interior shot blocked again last night? He needs to be able to post-up smaller players to be able to generate some offense. Shooting is streaky, of course, but he's been awful from 3 this year. You'd sort of think that someone like him would be taking 3PAs for hours a day - it's basically a key component to whether he makes it in the NBA.
He probably is, it just hasn't translated yet, if it ever does.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,053
Did he have an interior shot blocked again last night? He needs to be able to post-up smaller players to be able to generate some offense. Shooting is streaky, of course, but he's been awful from 3 this year.
What are we looking for here? He's taken 10 of them and hit 3. If he'd hit one more we wouldn't think he's a 40% shooter from three.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,163
His shooting is like number 5 on the current list of concerns. He looks significantly worse than he did in his first games as a rookie.
 

DannyDarwinism

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 7, 2007
4,900
His shooting is like number 5 on the current list of concerns. He looks significantly worse than he did in his first games as a rookie.
He was one of those guys who reworked his body in college- I remember reading about him going to Rick Barnes’s “Fat Camp” and getting down from like 280ish- and I’ve been pretty convinced that he’d have to lighten up from where he was last year in order to keep his feet light enough to stay switchable. Unfortunately it seems like he’s going the other direction with his weight, and that’s just not going to be sustainable for him. His only way forward on defense is to be switchable enough to defend the perimeter against 70% of wings, and strong enough to keep most bigs from getting deep position. I think he’s a guy worth investing in, but he seems like a guy who has to be vigilant with regards to his weight and conditioning.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,218
To underscore the conditioning comments, he has committed 14 fouls in like 80 minutes this year. That’s...not good.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,053
To underscore the conditioning comments, he has committed 14 fouls in like 80 minutes this year. That’s...not good.
I'm still unconvinced that is anything. 1 less foul this year and he's at last years numbers. It's noise this early. I don't think we can say it's indicative of anything yet. This early, the eye test means more, not numbers.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,497
around the way
His shooting is like number 5 on the current list of concerns. He looks significantly worse than he did in his first games as a rookie.
Yeah this. If anything, he seems to have increased his confidence on the offensive end. He has taken a couple strong to the hole (including preseason) and put some low post moves on people. The problem is that he seems to have the mobility of a pregnant yak on both ends. Hurts the screens a bit, but mostly it's that even slow guys are getting by him now.

The hope was that increased footspeed and anticipation, combined with his solid base, would make him switchable 2-5 or at least 3-5. But when slomo is treating you like a traffic cone, it's bad news. Man needs boot camp imo.

Edit: kinda redundant to DDs post, sorry.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,218
I'm still unconvinced that is anything. 1 less foul this year and he's at last years numbers. It's noise this early. I don't think we can say it's indicative of anything yet. This early, the eye test means more, not numbers.
yes, the eye test is worse for him. Still isn’t a good data point in any event.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,571
He definitely looks thicker around the middle but as others have observed, players coming in over their normal playing weight seems to be a common occurrence this year given all that has transpired.

His size bears watching but the eye test also reveals that is making some good progressions too in terms of positioning and leverage. Its absolutely clear some members here are down on him because of his physical limitations which are undeniable. However he appeared to earn the coaching staff's confidence last season and his fundamentals don't seem to have regressed so it probably makes sense to give him a few weeks before we deem his season a disappointing one due to being short, chubby and slow. I suspect burying him on the bench isn't going to do anything for his development or his waist size.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,163
He definitely looks thicker around the middle but as others have observed, players coming in over their normal playing weight seems to be a common occurrence this year given all that has transpired.

His size bears watching but the eye test also reveals that is making some good progressions too in terms of positioning and leverage. Its absolutely clear some members here are down on him because of his physical limitations which are undeniable. However he appeared to earn the coaching staff's confidence last season and his fundamentals don't seem to have regressed so it probably makes sense to give him a few weeks before we deem his season a disappointing one due to being short, chubby and slow. I suspect burying him on the bench isn't going to do anything for his development or his waist size.
I actually think he’ll be fine-ish, but it’s never good for young guys to miss valuable development time, particularly due to fitness issues.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,713
I've said this in game threads as well, but I struggle to see how he is ever going to be more than a fringe rotation/end of the bench guy. He is just so undersized as a forward and doesn't do enough other things well.

If he was some swiss-army knife defensive switching master, maybe he would have more of a role. But every time he goes up against a wing this year they walk by him like he's standing still.
 

DannyDarwinism

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 7, 2007
4,900
He was mostly better than I had expected he would be in defending the perimeter last year- he showed decent footwork and good positioning, so I’m not too moved by his 80 minutes this year. I still think he can ultimately be a PJ Tucker with substantially better passing, but it’s really all about the jump shot and the foot speed for his ability to get on the court enough to develop into that guy.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,713
PJ Tucker would be a great outcome for GWill, I hope you're right.

I would be surprised if Tucker ever looked this overwhelmed guarding average wings at any point of his career, but admittedly that's a total guess since I didn't follow Tucker much early on.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,571
PJ Tucker would be a great outcome for GWill, I hope you're right.

I would be surprised if Tucker ever looked this overwhelmed guarding average wings at any point of his career, but admittedly that's a total guess since I didn't follow Tucker much early on.
PJ Tucker first played in the NBA at 21 with the Raptors after getting drafted in the second round. He was waived after 17 games and did not play in the league for six more years until making it again at age 27. Grant Williams spent the last games of his rookie year playing some high leverage minutes in the ECF. Tucker is a reasonable comp to start with.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,713
Tucker is probably a 99.99% percentile outcome for a second rounder cut after 17 games and not in the NBA for the next 6 years.

Not saying it couldn't work out for GWill in a similar way, but looking at Tucker's career and trying to use it as a comp for a 2nd year player is going to be troublesome. Like saying a backup rookie 6th round QB has a decent chance to be Tom Brady.

If anything, I'd be more interested in a scouting eval from Tucker at that age and if he ever looked this overwhelmed defensively.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,745
If he was some swiss-army knife defensive switching master, maybe he would have more of a role. But every time he goes up against a wing this year they walk by him like he's standing still.
I don't know if he was a "master" but last season, he was a swiss-army knife defensive switcher. Yes, he had trouble with the few true centers in the league but for the most part, he was credibly guarding 2-4. I mean he did a relatively good job - better than TheIs or Kanter - against TOR in the playoffs and was on the floor at crunch time because of that.

This year, it doesn't seem like he's keeping people in front of him and not really guarding guys bigger than him.

I know they are flawed stats but just by comparison, last year his ORtg/Dtg was 104/108. This year they are 98/116. I'm not worried about Grant's offense right now, but the DRtg matches my observations.
 

DannyDarwinism

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 7, 2007
4,900
Tucker is probably a 99.99% percentile outcome for a second rounder cut after 17 games and not in the NBA for the next 6 years.

Not saying it couldn't work out for GWill in a similar way, but looking at Tucker's career and trying to use it as a comp for a 2nd year player is going to be troublesome. Like saying a backup rookie 6th round QB has a decent chance to be Tom Brady.

If anything, I'd be more interested in a scouting eval from Tucker at that age and if he ever looked this overwhelmed defensively.
There’s been some good posts on the comp, I’ll try to find them. Basically they had very similar measurements and college careers, with Grant having significant edges in Assist% and Block%, with better shooting peripherals, while PJ had the edge on the glass. Plus both played for Rick Barnes, who has compared them. Grant has mentioned the comp several times himself. As DeJesus notes, Tucker bounced around Euro for years before making it, so by the time he came over his shot was refined and he added grown man strength to his already sturdy frame.

https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/players/pj-tucker-1.html
https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/players/grant-williams-1.html
 
Last edited:

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,713
Yeah, I get the Tucker comp and also got it at the time. I also don't want to overreach to a few ugly games by Grant....

But to me, Tucker is way more of a ceiling comp at this point than a likely comp for GWill.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,571
Yeah, I get the Tucker comp and also got it at the time. I also don't want to overreach to a few ugly games by Grant....

But to me, Tucker is way more of a ceiling comp at this point than a likely comp for GWill.
This is entirely fair. The only point is Tucker did not show as much promise early on as Grant Williams. Its entirely possible that you and wbcd are right and he won't be playable but it seems a bit premature four games into an unprecedented season and after a very encouraging rookie campaign.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,497
around the way
Tucker is probably a 99.99% percentile outcome for a second rounder cut after 17 games and not in the NBA for the next 6 years.

Not saying it couldn't work out for GWill in a similar way, but looking at Tucker's career and trying to use it as a comp for a 2nd year player is going to be troublesome. Like saying a backup rookie 6th round QB has a decent chance to be Tom Brady.

If anything, I'd be more interested in a scouting eval from Tucker at that age and if he ever looked this overwhelmed defensively.
He looked overwhelmed enough that he didn't have an NBA job. Tucker is not a 1% outcome for Grant.

Grant needs to drop some fat and improve his lateral quickness, and he'll be fine. It's discouraging due to his age and apparent disregard for how close to the deep bench that a guy with his tweener profile is. It's also discouraging since we don't have enough wing depth. But nobody should be writing him off.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,713
Maybe Tucker is a 90th percentile projection?

It’s far more likely Grant ends up having a worse career than Tucker than a better one IMO.
 

DannyDarwinism

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 7, 2007
4,900
I’d have it substantially lower than 90%, but that’s certainly fair. I also think there’s a not-insignificant chance that he ends up better on both sides of the ball than Tucker.

Three months ago the guy was playing decent minutes in the playoffs as a rookie. I’m not going to move my opinion of him too much 80 minutes later.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,497
around the way
I’d have it substantially lower than 90%, but that’s certainly fair. I also think there’s a not-insignificant chance that he ends up better on both sides of the ball than Tucker.

Three months ago the guy was playing decent minutes in the playoffs as a rookie. I’m not going to move my opinion of him too much 80 minutes later.
Yeah. I'm not sure what Tucker does that it's hard to imagine Grant doing. Grant is ahead of where Tucker was at 26.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,309
Santa Monica
Maybe Tucker is a 90th percentile projection?

It’s far more likely Grant ends up having a worse career than Tucker than a better one IMO.
Grant was 2x SEC POY. Played a rotational role on a competitive Celtic team last season. Played key minutes in a deep playoff run.

Rick Barnes, GW/PJ's coach, made the PJ comp. Barnes has a 100% better take on Grant's projection after coaching him for 3 seasons than any of us.

The 2020 shortened off-season/preseason has led to many NBA players resting for 2mths and not working out. Grant clearly being one of them. I wouldn't worry one whit about Grant Williams (or Marcus Smart, who also packed on some pounds and has also played like garbage over 5 games) they will be fine in about 3-4 weeks. The season is long and the first 3 months are all about preparing for the last 4 months.

Should Brad curb Grant's minutes until he can guard 2-5 on the perimeter, absolutely. BUT any post slamming Granite won't age well by season's end.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
I've seen enough people struggle with weight then to just assume Williams will be ok in a few months.

It's not a question of skill, projection or how far along he is. It's conditioning. He's young, in a position to get minutes, and he shows up out of shape.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,713
What’s the median expectation of a 21st pick? Grant didn’t have some major Draft Day slide and hasn’t done anything yet to outperform his draft slot.

He was a successful college player with some skills that may translate to the NBA.

If he turns into PJ Tucker that would be a very good outcome, I don’t think this is too controversial. Most likely he will end up worse than that.