Scottyno was claiming the production at 1B looked bad because players-other-than-Dalbec were worse than he was AT FIRST BASE and thus DRAGGED DOWN THE FIRST BASE NUMBERS.Santana OPS to July 31: .554
Gonzalez OPS to July 31: .583
Why again would we expect them to perform better than that at 1B? You are bordering on trolling at this point. Because Santana had a better OPS in his 44 1B PAs he is a better choice?
Edit: it was mentioned upthread but cherry picking a 44 PA sample based on which position the player is playing is Van-esque
But those players weren't worse, and didn't drag down the 1B numbers.
That's all I'm saying. I'm not making a recommendation that Danny Santana should have been made into the regular first baseman. (And why the fuck does everyone keep thinking I'm doing that? Seriously?)