Grade the Crochet Trade

Grade the trade

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1


Results are only viewable after voting.

Lose Remerswaal

Experiencing Furry Panic
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
No need to rehash the complaints or plaudits. The NEWS thread about the acquisition has some great pro and con analysis. But let's hear what everyone thinks. Hate it? Like it? Love it? Not giving a Wait and See option, as that's too easy

The board doesn't allow unlimited choices, so rank the trade from 1 to 10, with 1 being HATE IT and 10 being LOVE IT
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
20,976
Somewhere
10 in terms of addressing a need, 6-7 in terms of value (paid the freight).

9 overall, since the former is more important.
 

billy ashley

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
1,265
Washington DC
Wrote this on social media:


Steep price for Boston to pay. A good haul for the White Sox. A ton of upside and a ton of risk for both teams.

Crochet is maybe the best pitcher in baseball on a pitch per pitch bases, but his health history and pitching style are terrifying. You could tell me he wins 3 Cy Youngs over the next 5 seasons and I would not be surprised. You could also tell me he never pitches 100 IP in a season again, and I would not be surprised.

For the White Sox, they're getting 2 top 100 prospects, an interesting bat and a change of scenary talented arm.

-Kyle Teel is first name in the headlines, but he's actually pretty low ceiling. He looks like a solid average defensive catcher, and a solid average offensive player. He's a guy that should have a long career in the majors, but probably won't stand out. Reports are he needs to work on some of the finer points of catching (framing, blocking, etc.) but he's an excellent athlete and a hard worker. Offensively, it's a good hit skill but not much power projection.

-Braden Montgomery is the lottory ticket, here. Switch hitter, would have been a top 5 pick in last years draft had he not had a leg injury late in the NCAA season. Corner outfielder so the bat has to carry, but he profiles to not be a liability out there, good athlete. Really high upside. Tons of raw power. Decent amount of swing and miss, though.

-Chase Meidroth is a guy who is a fabulous hitter but has no power to speak of. Good fielder at 3b/2b, stretch at SS. HAs done nothing but hit in the minors. Question is whether the hit skill can carry enough with very little ability to impact the ball. We've seen a number of guys like that flame out in the majors recently. Amazing approach, knows the strike zone incredibly well.

-Winkleman Gonzalez has filthy stuff and zero command. He's out of option years and has failed to stick in the rotaiton in the upper minors two seasons in a row. He did well when converted to a long relief role. 2 years ago he got some top 100 consideration. An intereting reclamation project. Someone who the Red Sox really didn't have space for, but another team might be able to fix.
 

pokey_reese

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 25, 2008
16,437
Boston, MA
I gave it an 8 for now, as the team is hopefully much better for the next two years no matter what (and the potential specific value that comes from having a 'must watch' pitcher each time through the lineup), balanced against the steep cost in my presumed future value of Teel. If we get a fully healthy 2025 out of Crochet, or sign him to even a modestly team friendly extension, this becomes a 9 for me.
 

normstalls

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 15, 2004
4,649
I went 9 as well, but that is with the assumption he is extended beyond the next 2 years.
 

johnnyfromspain

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
64
I gave it a 10.
Sure, good prospects had to be sacrificed, but this is to be expected. You have to give quality players in exchange for quality players.
This is a great trade because it automatically makes the Red Sox a much better team for 2025, and beyond. Not only that, if offers the FO leverage for future negotiations in the rest of this offseason, as they are no longer desperate for starting pitching. They can choose to shop for more starting pitchers, or not. They can also concentrate on acquiring a C and perhaps a RH power hitter. But the team as is today, can surely compete for the American League East top spot.
 

3_games_down

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2007
140
Coastal NC
9. The Red Sox can afford to overpay in prospect capital. The Dodgers, Mets and Yankees are seemingly unconcerned with the CBT. The Red Sox did an exciting thing today!
 

shaggydog2000

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 5, 2007
12,776
8. They gave up good prospects, but got a shot at having the most desirable thing in Baseball: an ace in his prime.
 

The Filthy One

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 11, 2005
3,638
Los Angeles
I gave it an 8, but I'm feeling better and better about it the more I sit with it. This is exactly the sort of deal they've been hesitant to make the last few years. And I would much rather have starters who strike people out (while avoiding walks) than those who don't. So I think Crochet is a good bet to outperform Burnes and Fried starting immediately. Admittedly, those pitchers have a longer track record of success, but pitcher durability is too volatile to hang much on that.
 

DavidTai

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
1,462
Herndon, VA
9.

Free agency had its own risk, didn't think the risk of the extra years was worth it on an over 30 pitcher, and no guarantee that even if the Sox outbid everyone that the player wouldn't just go somewhere else anyway because he wanted to be closer to home.

Getting a potential ace at age 25 is amazing.
 

Hank Scorpio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 1, 2013
8,124
Salem, NH
9. I have concerns about Crochet’s ability to throw 150+ innings, and losing Teel and Montgomery hurt.

But maybe we just traded Swihart and Margot for 25 year old Chris Sale.
 

Mantush

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 30, 2014
780
I gave it a 5. I’m ambivalent. I know the models show the team barely overpaid, but I have concerns regarding Crochet’s ability to pitch effectively for an entire season. I’m also worried about his character. I recall reports that he would refuse to pitch for a contender last year if he was traded without an extension. I don’t think that’s the right attitude to have as an MLB player.
 

Brianish

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 11, 2008
5,873
I gave it a six, but if we extend Crochet for a reasonable price, my grade will skyrocket. I'll raise it again if we get Burnes as well because then it looks like part of a precise, aggressive plan.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
12,491
I gave it a six, but if we extend Crochet for a reasonable price, my grade will skyrocket. I'll raise it again if we get Burnes as well because then it looks like part of a precise, aggressive plan.
Came to post this exact same thing.

I am at a 6 but if they can extend Crochet for something reasonable (IE not FA prices) then I go up to a 7. If he's not extended or he's extended at a ludicrous rate, I am down to a 5
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
I gave it an 8 for now, as the team is hopefully much better for the next two years no matter what (and the potential specific value that comes from having a 'must watch' pitcher each time through the lineup), balanced against the steep cost in my presumed future value of Teel. If we get a fully healthy 2025 out of Crochet, or sign him to even a modestly team friendly extension, this becomes a 9 for me.
Exactly my take, get the extension and it's an easy 9. It's OK if the guys we shipped out end up being good. Until the White Sox eliminate us from the playoffs, it's not our problem.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
40,918
Hingham, MA
I gave it a 5. I’m ambivalent. I know the models show the team barely overpaid, but I have concerns regarding Crochet’s ability to pitch effectively for an entire season. I’m also worried about his character. I recall reports that he would refuse to pitch for a contender last year if he was traded without an extension. I don’t think that’s the right attitude to have as an MLB player.
That was all because of his return from injury and innings limit.

I wrote this in the other thread, but I haven't been this excited to watch a Sox starter pitch since they traded for Sale.

I gave it an 8. The reality is it will be 10 if he pitches like an ace, regardless of how the prospects turn out.
 

Fishercat

Svelte and sexy!
SoSH Member
May 18, 2007
8,768
Manchester, N.H.
INC.

If I'm grading it as it presently stands, it's a 5-6 purely because he's only got two years locked in and the Sox dealt four legit (two very good to great) prospects for him. If the Sox have him pitch for two years and let him go to free agency and get a comp pick back where maybe they take a new Chase Meidroth, that's only going to be worth it if he's among the best pitchers in baseball for those two years in the rotation for 25+ starts a year. It's a souped up version of the Burnes trade.

However, if the Sox do extend him to a non-insane deal, I'd probably creep this one up to an 8-9 or so. The price is fair from a deal perspective and as much as the Sox would love to have a cornerstone catcher, the Sox need that true ace caliber SP to really be in the running as a regular title contender. Crochet is one of the handful of arms who can do that, with risk of course. I'm just going to be more excited if he's doing this for Boston in 2029 than if he has two nice years in Boston and then cashes in for 10/400 in LA.
 

Sin Duda

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,177
(B)Austin Texas
I gave it a 5. I’m ambivalent. I know the models show the team barely overpaid, but I have concerns regarding Crochet’s ability to pitch effectively for an entire season. I’m also worried about his character. I recall reports that he would refuse to pitch for a contender last year if he was traded without an extension. I don’t think that’s the right attitude to have as an MLB player.
Don't equate unwillingness to pitch well beyond his previous innings high with a poor attitude. He, in essence, was saying, if you want me to endanget my arm health, then you have to give me assurance that I'll get paid long term. And I'm sure his agent put him up to it (as I would too if I was his agent). I have no idea what Crochet's attitude is like, but I read his position on getting an extension if traded as smart. Can you see it that way?
 

AlNipper49

Huge Member
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 3, 2001
45,976
Mtigawi
A 10 would be for a fleecing which this was not, so a 9. Subtract one more for Teel instead of a prospect at a glut position.

8

Love the logic and strategy getting a younger pitching with elite skills. That part gets a 10 from me.
 

ookami7m

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
6,050
Mobile, AL
8: Right strategy to assess the biggest need the org has. Teel hurts but you have to pay big prices to get big ticket items. And we needed this ticket.
 

scottyno

late Bloomer
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2008
11,753
JFC at the 5 people so far voting this a 1 or a 2. I'm sure they're the same people who have been screaming they need to improve the major league roster and they just got one of the better projected pitchers in baseball without touching the major league roster
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
49,334
Here
This is an 8 for me, which becomes a 10 if/when they get a really nice long-term extension by leveraging his cheap next two seasons and prior injury history. And it's a 3 if they don't.
 

Traut

lost his degree
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
13,081
My Desk
It can only get so hard. While catching matters, it is hardly a position that causes teams to win championships. Pitching does win championships. They got a top of the line, young, starter. This is way better than dumping money on Burnes or Fried.
 

Mantush

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 30, 2014
780
Don't equate unwillingness to pitch well beyond his previous innings high with a poor attitude. He, in essence, was saying, if you want me to endanget my arm health, then you have to give me assurance that I'll get paid long term. And I'm sure his agent put him up to it (as I would too if I was his agent). I have no idea what Crochet's attitude is like, but I read his position on getting an extension if traded as smart. Can you see it that way?

Don't equate unwillingness to pitch well beyond his previous innings high with a poor attitude. He, in essence, was saying, if you want me to endanget my arm health, then you have to give me assurance that I'll get paid long term. And I'm sure his agent put him up to it (as I would too if I was his agent). I have no idea what Crochet's attitude is like, but I read his position on getting an extension if traded as smart. Can you see it that way?
That makes much more sense. I can understand his position then. I’m still not 100% sure it’s the correct attitude to have in a team sport, but it’s more tenable when put that way. That’s very different than how I recall the articles I read presenting it.

I’ll bump the grade up by 1 or 2. I think we gave up a lot, but he’s an incredible pitcher when healthy.
 

Yaz4Ever

MemBer
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2004
11,507
MA-CA-RI-AZ-NC
9. Addresses a YUGE need for us without moving the top 3 prospects, Abreu, or Casas. Would’ve preferred moving Mayer and didn’t realize Teel was being shopped. Signing him to an extension now could make this a 10.
 

shepard50

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 18, 2006
8,543
Sydney, Australia
I gave it an "I'm thrilled" 8. Yes, Crochet has injury history and a scary delivery, and the Ks could mean he will have high pitch counts. But he is a good bet to be an ace for years to come. And we need that...like, a lot.

Good haul for the White Sox, but that's what aces cost and odds are longer on prospects for a reason. I like that this signals GFIN, and what will really make this trade worthwhile for me, is getting a righty bat somewhere that can really hit for power.
 

pk1627

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
May 24, 2003
2,686
Boston
Seems like an awful lot. I was there when the Sox paid great prospects for Pedro, Schilling, Beckett and Sale. Of all of these trades, I think Teel was a keeper.

However, it makes the team immediately better and tells me the contention window is wide open. 6
 

Merkle's Boner

Well-Known Member
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2011
4,230
9. I wanted either Burnes, Fried, or Crochet and so I’m happy we got one. Mayer is my binky so I’m cool with losing Teel.
 

xc world cup

New Member
Dec 3, 2012
5
East Montpelier, VT
Absolutely the right deal, for a reasonable price. And he's been seen wearing 45! And, CB needed to do something real that took courage and said, "we're in business". And, Crochet may be extendable. And, what if CB, et al, really can improve pitchers around the margins? Crochet looks devastating already. For me, the Sox have gotten much better on and off the field, by making this big move.
 

24Dewey@Cooperstown

talent scout
Dec 1, 2024
18
That was all because of his return from injury and innings limit.

I wrote this in the other thread, but I haven't been this excited to watch a Sox starter pitch since they traded for Sale.

I gave it an 8. The reality is it will be 10 if he pitches like an ace, regardless of how the prospects turn out.
Of course the reality WILL BE a 10 if he pitches like an ace. BUT you cannot just toss out the “regardless” of how the prospects turn out. Short sightedness and nearsightedness will cripple a franchise. Just sayin’ for a friend….
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
33,056
Alamogordo
Absolutely the right deal, for a reasonable price. And he's been seen wearing 45! And, CB needed to do something real that took courage and said, "we're in business". And, Crochet may be extendable. And, what if CB, et al, really can improve pitchers around the margins? Crochet looks devastating already. For me, the Sox have gotten much better on and off the field, by making this big move.
To be fair, I'm not sure I want Bailey fucking with Crochet, after he broke Giolito last year.

Let Crochet work, he's already one of the best in the game.
 

20Ks

New Member
Jul 11, 2024
138
They just got a cost controlled Ace. Without giving up anyone on their roster, or any of their top 3 prospects. To sweeten the pot his arb years until 2027 are dampened because of the CWS using him as a reliever, and then shutting him down last year. I only voted 10 because 11 wasn't an option. He will be extended because its in everybodys best interest.

For everyone concerned about getting a catcher. Those are available. 25 yr old aces not so much.

Anyone care how well Carl Pavano and Tony Armas jr's careers panned out?
 

The_Powa_of_Seiji_Ozawa

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2006
8,439
SS Botany Bay
I'm at an 8 right now. I hate losing Teel at C, would have preferred to trade Mayer from that group given the infield depth in the system, even if Mayer's ceiling is higher. Teel has 1 full season of minor league ball under his belt, and I think his hitting is being underrated by some. But with that said, the team needs high end starting pitching and Crochet is as good a bet as anyone to become a potential long term ace if he remains healthy. My rating would go up to a 10 if Boston can ink him to a long term extension while adding another quality starting pitcher and an upgrade/complement at catcher, positioning them to contend in 2025 and beyond.
 
Last edited:

pciprotti

New Member
Sep 8, 2008
6
I went with 6. My prediction, for him with Sox, is that it looks like Clay Bucholtz' career from 2013-2017. One amazing injury-prone year, and then pretty washed after that. Not sayin that these two pitchers are anything alike, just in terms of overall impact on winning. It's a 6 because there's a shot it turns out far better.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
28,803
Unreal America
9. A 10 would be when we acquired Sale and Beckett, because those guys had a longer track record. Aside from that, it's a killer deal.
 

PrometheusWakefield

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2009
10,727
Boston, MA
10/10.

Garrett Crochet last year was the best pitcher in baseball on a per-inning basis and has every potential to be the kind of elite performer that this team has lacked for years. This team is now in prime position to have a pitcher of that level of ability for all of his prime years.

Kyle Teel is a high floor prospect who is likely to be an average major league regular. His best case scenario is an above-average bat who doesn't hurt you defensively at cheap money for his years of team control. It's wildly optimistic to expect anything more than that out of him. A catcher of his upside is available every offseason.

Branden Montgomery is the opposite kind of prospect, a promising athlete with a questionable hit tool who could be anything. Every year there are a dozen guys like that and two out of every three you never hear about again, because they hit a wall when it comes to making contact against elite pitching. Show me the guy can hit at AA before I care about trading him in a deal like this.

Chase Meredroith and Wilkelman Gonzalez are both guys nearing the point where the team either needed to commit to them at the major league level or not, and in both cases the answer is not.

People who are negative about this trade are exaggerating the value of the guys we gave up. They are also missing the many flaws on the free agent alternatives.

Blake Snell is a terrible bet to stay healthy and effective through his 30s and was always going to stay on the West Coast anyway. Corbin Burnes has serious red flags in his declining peripherals and performance in measurements like Stuff+, which shows reduced break and poorer outcomes on the cutter that is his signature pitch. Max Fried is fine and I wanted him but he's only had one season with 4+ WAR, and I don't think you can count on him 1.55 BB/9 rate again.

I bet by this time next year two of those three contracts look bad. The problem isn't just that they are huge money it's that they are huge money for guys who just aren't that great.

This was the best way to improve the biggest two weaknesses on our team, which are starting pitching and the absence of elite talent and we didn't give away anything that isn't replaceable.
 
Last edited:

P'tucket rhymes with...

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2006
12,336
The Coney Island of my mind
Nine for me, and I say that as someone who probably wouldn't have made the trade during my GM-for-a-day fantasy. High risk, but with a potentially very high reward. Dinged a point for Teel rather than Mayer, although CB probably had little control over that. ChiSox actually did well to wait until Fried was off the market, as it probably raised the pressure and price for more than one GM out there.

Edit--or, what @The_Powa said above, including the assumption that he'll be extended.
 
Oct 12, 2023
1,518
They just got a cost controlled Ace. Without giving up anyone on their roster, or any of their top 3 prospects. To sweeten the pot his arb years until 2027 are dampened because of the CWS using him as a reliever, and then shutting him down last year. I only voted 10 because 11 wasn't an option. He will be extended because its in everybodys best interest.

For everyone concerned about getting a catcher. Those are available. 25 yr old aces not so much.

Anyone care how well Carl Pavano and Tony Armas jr's careers panned out?
You can’t possibly be comparing the Pedro deal to this one

this is a good trade. But Crochet has thrown 219 innings in his career. Pedro had almost 800 of incredible production before being acquired

nobody cares about Pavano and Armas for the same reason nobody cares about Margot or Hanley Ramirez or Moncada/Kopech. Those deals worked out

trading good/great prospects isn’t a bad thing but let’s not pretend Crochet is anywhere near the established presence that Pedro (or Sale, or even Kimbrel or Beckett) were
 

loneredseat

New Member
Dec 8, 2023
286
I think I know less than most people on this board, so I was really, really glad to see that so many of you disagreed with me (I gave it a 2). But I also did not make the assumption that we'd extend him.
And sorry scottyno. My thought that was we traded 4 of our top 10 (ish) prospects for two years of control. And that's from a good farm system. 24 years for 2. That was my thinking.
 

TheWave

New Member
Nov 12, 2007
9
I love the trade. Top of the rotation starter is not a dime a dozen, and you're going to give up something to get something. You can project talent all you want, but this big market team can't be in rebuild mode forever. This team has the economics to acquire any established MLB free agent talent to replace any of those four prospect IF they were to pan out in the future. Do you really want to be saddled with Fried and his eight year deal at his age?
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
28,803
Unreal America
I think I know less than most people on this board, so I was really, really glad to see that so many of you disagreed with me (I gave it a 2). But I also did not make the assumption that we'd extend him.
And sorry scottyno. My thought that was we traded 4 of our top 10 (ish) prospects for two years of control. And that's from a good farm system. 24 years for 2. That was my thinking.
I think it's more reasonable to assume that we will extend him. Why do this if we're not committed to extending him? It'd make no sense. I don't think Breslow is a dummy. And we literally know that Crochet wants an extension. He demanded it of potential acquiring teams just 5 months ago.

Also not sure I follow the logic that each of the 4 guys we shipped out would definitely spend 6 years on the Sox major league roster. If one of them did we'd probably consider that a win.
 

Beomoose

is insoxicated
SoSH Member
May 28, 2006
22,071
Exiled
I'm knocking it to 7 mainly on the Catcher question, Teel wasn't just a Big 4 he was the only C in the system who looked like he could be an everyday player in the near future. Its still a trade that we needed to do and I have no issue with people going 8 on it, just remain concerned about our future behind the dish.
 

pedro1918

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
5,331
Map Ref. 41°N 93°W
I gave it a seven.

Obviously, if Crochet is extended, and excels, it will go up. I expect both of those things to happen, but it is not guaranteed.

If Teel goes on to be a stud, it will go down. I was looking forward to having a home grown stud catcher for a decade plus. I know, it's a crap shoot but it was nice to think about. I don't really put Henderson in the equation because he has yet to play a game for the organization and we dealt from a position that has numerous good options.

Of course if Crochet turns into a stud, perennial CY candidate, what Teel does won't really matter. Which is kind of the point.

So maybe I just typed myself into an 8?
 

FlexFlexerson

Member
SoSH Member
I provisionally give this an 8. Great pitcher and the price in prospects was high but neither side fleeced the other and the needs fit each organization pretty well. Watching the Sox got immediately more enjoyable with the signing, which is what we're all here for at the end of the day. I'll bump this up to a 9-10 if we get a few more pieces this off-season that indicate we'll be using Crotchet's two years to compete for a championship and/or if we get an extension done that makes him an anchor for multiple title runs.

I dunno about our FA approach and the constraints ownership may have there, but this feels like it's in Breslow's wheelhouse and I'm quite happy with the process and results. Makes me feel more optimistic for this club than I've felt in a while.