General Celtics thread: 24-25 edition

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
32,111
It's a fair point. Jrue hasn't looked great.

16th NBA season + 34 + a sizeable extension are all legitimate concerns

Sometimes, you forget he's on the court with the JAYs and White's offensive role expansion. Then, all of a sudden, swing-swing will lead to open Corner3 for Jrue. It's pretty comforting for us & demoralizing for the opponent.
I’m going with “not fair.” This is what Jrue has done every year since he’s been established. His TS% last November was 51.7% then 61.9, 61.2, 68.5, and 67.0 the next 4 months.

His final year in Milwaukee….50.4 and 55.8 the first two months. 57.0 to 63.6 each of the final 6 months. The year prior….47.8 in November, above 57.7 every other month.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
22,246
Santa Monica
I’m going with “not fair.” This is what Jrue has done every year since he’s been established. His TS% last November was 51.7% then 61.9, 61.2, 68.5, and 67.0 the next 4 months.

His final year in Milwaukee….50.4 and 55.8 the first two months. 57.0 to 63.6 each of the final 6 months. The year prior….47.8 in November, above 57.7 every other month.
Ha, deep run in the playoffs combined with the Olympics.

He needs downtime, zero Jrue worries here
 

jmcc5400

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2000
5,864
Let’s not forget we’ve faced the 30th most difficult strength of schedule prior to last night (the Cavs game vs Raptors bumped us up to 29).
Right - but I think it’s still projected to be 25th toughest the rest of the way, since they’re East-heavy and don’t play themselves.
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
6,934
Lynn
Let’s not forget we’ve faced the 30th most difficult strength of schedule prior to last night (the Cavs game vs Raptors bumped us up to 29).
I’m not really basing off of difficulty of schedule though, just what we’ve seen as they’ve gone 95-24 over their last 119.

Team is a juggernaut, and a lot of teams stink lol.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
22,246
Santa Monica
Let’s not forget we’ve faced the 30th most difficult strength of schedule prior to last night (the Cavs game vs Raptors bumped us up to 29).
They play in the East and they avoid playing the best team in the NBA.

So we can save everyone the suspense...The Celtics SOS will be easy all season.
 

bostonbeerbelly

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 26, 2008
2,258
San Fran
I said this last year, and it was true. 60 win teams are special.
On pace for 68 wins and their 3 losses - they had the lead in the last 4 minutes of all 3, and had a shot to win 2 of them on JB jump shots. This team even taking it easy, just isn't going to lose many games. They will have a few mental lapses and let downs, but I think 65 is certainly in the cards depending on how easy they take March. (and health...)
 

Red Averages

owes you $50
SoSH Member
Apr 20, 2003
9,632
Pritchard to me is really a perfect trade candidate. He’s a fun player who can put butts in seats and to many eyes looks much better than he actually is. With the great contract, I think you can get back a really solid rotational player who will give you more when it counts on a consistent basis, though I wonder if salary matching is going to be a problem.

Man…Portland is where Pritchard played college ball, and it would of course be very risky, but if Timelord is still healthy come the trade deadline…
There is close to 0% chance he will be traded. Valuable contracts are even more valuable to a team way over the penalty.
 

Red Averages

owes you $50
SoSH Member
Apr 20, 2003
9,632
Out of the rotation Jrue is probably the one to get traded, unfortunately. Al might hang them up so trading Zinger is a no-go IMO and PP is too valuable for a tax-edging roster even if he regresses some.
As stated previously, this is 100% spot on.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
8,425
Boston bench was on fire against the Clippers. 10-14 from three (previous to garbage time), and 41 points on 22 shots from PP, Hauser, and Neemy, who were plus 30, plus 27, and plus 29, respectively.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
12,880
around the way
Queta made me look stupid tonight.

15-3 is nice lol, team is a machine.
I feel like a bit of crow as well. The defense held nicely for most of the game, even with the PP, Queta, Hauser + 2 starters configuration. Everyone was where they were supposed to be.

It's only when the team gets so confident that they take half a quarter off defensively and give careless turnovers in bunches that a game like this is close. This team's only opponents are the trainers table and their own psyches.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
48,613
Here
Queta looked like a different player tonight, a lot more professional. It’s hard to explain, but he reminds me a bit of a crazy whirling dervish energy wing like a young Nesmeth. Sometimes the game slows down for them and they figure it out and become big-time contributors, other times it never quite clicks. Queta seems to be teetering a bit on two divergent career paths, but if we get good Queta he’d be a real boon to the bench and treat to watch.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
47,684
Melrose, MA
There is close to 0% chance he will be traded. Valuable contracts are even more valuable to a team way over the penalty.
Agreed. They also don't have someone else to do what he does - after White and Holiday, there isn't another trusted ballhandler on the roster. Even if his role shrinks in the playoffs (and at this point that might be a matchup-dependent thing), he still adds value by soaking up those regular season minutes.

I would not call Pritchard irreplaceable by any means, but given where the C's are, their cap situation, and the type of asset it would take to be worth it for the Celtics, I have trouble imagining that there is a deal worth doing out there.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
20,236
Regular season playing time for Pritchard is what will help keep Jrue fresh for the games that count. That's not a minor thing, and there's no-one else on the roster that's suited for such a role right now.

Kornet (who's clearly dealing with an injury) and Queta spell the bigs, while Hauser and even Walsh help the wing rotation. It would be nice if Tillman can get untracked into a rotation spot, but that's way down the list of concerns right now. Springer will get to enjoy his new home in February.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
40,142
Hingham, MA
Another blah game from Jrue last night. He's at 29% from 3 in November. Just 5-20 overall the last two nights, 2-14 from 3. But, looking at his game logs from last year, he had a bunch of early season clunkers as well (as discussed yesterday). He really turned it up at the end of November last year (33.8% from 3 through his first 15 games, 45.3% thereafter)
 

BaseballJones

slappy happy
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
26,876
Porzingis is back. Boston is sitting at 15-3 (.833), which is a 68-win pace. Beat Chicago on Friday, and then it's the biggest game of the year so far on Sunday, at Cleveland.
 

BaseballJones

slappy happy
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
26,876
Why would Boston want to or need to trade anyone right now? They're a freaking machine. A great combination of veterans, young players, and stars in their prime. Ride this thing as long as you can.
 

astrozombie

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 12, 2022
711
I had some low expectations for the game last night (no idea how KP was going to do) and was thrilled to see that team firing on all cylinders. KP really takes that team over the top in ways that I am not sure I properly appreciated.
Jrue has been quiet so far, but I am not that concerned. It's early in the season and if he wants to pace himself for the playoffs, that's fine. He certainly knows how to handle his workload at this point in his career. Plus PP is taking those minutes which seems to be working out for everyone.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
24,278
Pittsburgh, PA
God that was fun last night.

Why would Boston want to or need to trade anyone right now? They're a freaking machine. A great combination of veterans, young players, and stars in their prime. Ride this thing as long as you can.
I think everyone bringing up the subject is thinking about next summer, and the looming tax bill for the 25-26 season. But we can talk about that in the ownership-change thread and the tax-situation thread. Nobody is looking to get rid of him (although from the way tims4wins is talking about Jrue, you never know...)

Jrue the Damaja deserves some praise, though, because he's the least flashy of our top-6, so it's easy to under-appreciate him. Even his sheer availability is too easy to take for granted.
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
I had some low expectations for the game last night (no idea how KP was going to do) and was thrilled to see that team firing on all cylinders. KP really takes that team over the top in ways that I am not sure I properly appreciated.
Jrue has been quiet so far, but I am not that concerned. It's early in the season and if he wants to pace himself for the playoffs, that's fine. He certainly knows how to handle his workload at this point in his career. Plus PP is taking those minutes which seems to be working out for everyone.
You have to think that KP's return juiced the players almost as much as (more?) than it did the fans. KP seems like he is extremely well-liked by his teammates so I'm sure they have all been pulling for his return.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
12,880
around the way
God that was fun last night.


I think everyone bringing up the subject is thinking about next summer, and the looming tax bill for the 25-26 season. But we can talk about that in the ownership-change thread and the tax-situation thread. Nobody is looking to get rid of him (although from the way tims4wins is talking about Jrue, you never know...)

Jrue the Damaja deserves some praise, though, because he's the least flashy of our top-6, so it's easy to under-appreciate him. Even his sheer availability is too easy to take for granted.
Agree with all of this.

Regarding the trade/upgrade ideas, there's a certain gluttony to wanting to corner the market fully that I can relate to also. Like, sure, it would be wonderful if a springy big who could hit the occasional 3 was available for Springer's salary slot. That guy doesn't exist, but I can't fault people for wishcasting.

Mostly what you said though. Stuff's likely coming in the next year or two, because the lux penalties are so draconian, so folks are imagining what that looks like. But some folks are trying to add extra bathrooms to the fully operational battle station.
 

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,560
Saskatoon Canada
Pritchard to me is really a perfect trade candidate. He’s a fun player who can put butts in seats and to many eyes looks much better than he actually is. With the great contract, I think you can get back a really solid rotational player who will give you more when it counts on a consistent basis, though I wonder if salary matching is going to be a problem.

Man…Portland is where Pritchard played college ball, and it would of course be very risky, but if Timelord is still healthy come the trade deadline…
What?
Why on earth would they make that trade?
Queta is a poor man's TL anyway.
 

astrozombie

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 12, 2022
711
You have to think that KP's return juiced the players almost as much as (more?) than it did the fans. KP seems like he is extremely well-liked by his teammates so I'm sure they have all been pulling for his return.
Agreed. Plus I heard (probably from this board) that KP reallllly wanted to get back. And this is one of the most chill/supportive locker rooms anyone has ever been around. They seem like a legit team which is awesome.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
40,142
Hingham, MA
Agreed. Plus I heard (probably from this board) that KP reallllly wanted to get back. And this is one of the most chill/supportive locker rooms anyone has ever been around. They seem like a legit team which is awesome.
There was a shot of the bench late last night with DWhite sitting between JT and Luke and they were having a blast. It's just a little thing but I fully agree they are a true team.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
24,278
Pittsburgh, PA
Queta is a poor man's TL anyway.
A poor man who nevertheless has excellent medical care, and consequently has two working knees.

I have PTSD from the TimeLord era, in that every time Queta or Porzingis jump for a ball, whether it's for a block or a slam or a lob, I wince when they land. As you know better than any of us, Reg, it's not the jumping that's the problem, it's the landing...
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
6,934
Lynn
I think poor man’s Rob is definitely overstating it, Rob had incredible feel for the game and was multiple tiers ahead athletically.

He’s a big body with some upside.
 

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,560
Saskatoon Canada
I think poor man’s Rob is definitely overstating it, Rob had incredible feel for the game and was multiple tiers ahead athletically.

He’s a big body with some upside.
I think his feel for the game is really overstated. A guy with even a good feel for the game would figure out how to catch the ball six feet from the hoop with back to the hoop and score. Rob never figured that out. Queta (you can see the wheels turning it happens so slowly) has recognized he has time to score a few times and made a move. Rob had a ton of space because he could not shoot and made some decent passes. He certainly was nothing special in reading D rotations. He was (all of this is past tense) one of the greatest vertical athletes ever, so he made a huge impact. But, the incredible rotations off the ball during last year's title run were less likely with him out there. He did struggle against physical guys too. I would see no reason to give up anything close to Pritchard to upgrade our third big.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
9,700
Oakland
I think poor man’s Rob is definitely overstating it, Rob had incredible feel for the game and was multiple tiers ahead athletically.

He’s a big body with some upside.
Yeah Rob is/was the platonic ideal of the super bouncy lob threat/rim protector, with the addition of a decent passing touch and the ability to move his feet pretty well while defending the perimeter. Rob made 2nd team all-defense at age 24, Queta spend much of his age 24 season in the g league. They are both athletic big men who are lob threats and can defend the rim, I don't think it's worth comparing them beyond that. It's like calling Kuzma a poor man's Tatum because they are both big athletic wings with a knack for shot creation.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
33,201
A poor man who nevertheless has excellent medical care, and consequently has two working knees.

I have PTSD from the TimeLord era, in that every time Queta or Porzingis jump for a ball, whether it's for a block or a slam or a lob, I wince when they land. As you know better than any of us, Reg, it's not the jumping that's the problem, it's the landing...
The higher you jump, the harder you land???
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
33,201
I think his feel for the game is really overstated. A guy with even a good feel for the game would figure out how to catch the ball six feet from the hoop with back to the hoop and score. Rob never figured that out. Queta (you can see the wheels turning it happens so slowly) has recognized he has time to score a few times and made a move. Rob had a ton of space because he could not shoot and made some decent passes. He certainly was nothing special in reading D rotations. He was (all of this is past tense) one of the greatest vertical athletes ever, so he made a huge impact. But, the incredible rotations off the ball during last year's title run were less likely with him out there. He did struggle against physical guys too. I would see no reason to give up anything close to Pritchard to upgrade our third big.
The trade isn't possible so really no need to discuss it. Rob makes something like $12M; PP makes something like $8M; BOS can't take in more salary than it sends out and BOS can't aggregate contracts.

Even this summer if BOS decides it needs to restructure given the impending luxury tax, POBOBS is a smart man and after watching what happened to the availability of TL, Marcus, and Brogdon versus KP and Jrue and BOS's run last year versus teams that kept losing players, I have to think Brad is going to avoid getting guys who are known health risks. At least I would.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
24,278
Pittsburgh, PA
He's also exceedingly unlikely to choose to get older at any position, rather than younger, when replacing any outgoing player. And of course, the two most likely to not be on our team are the oldest - Horford and Holiday. When you add age, you add injury risk, so the two are correlated, but you also cost yourself potential upside in development. I don't see that as Brad's style. The next 5 years his main job will be improving his batting average on adding young projects on rookie-scale deals and hoping they develop into contributors. Between Hauser and Queta, and possibly Walsh, his average is solid at the moment, but that's where he's gotten a lot of his plus-value work done, and will need to continue to do so in a world where his starting lineup alone puts them into the tax.
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
6,934
Lynn
I think his feel for the game is really overstated. A guy with even a good feel for the game would figure out how to catch the ball six feet from the hoop with back to the hoop and score. Rob never figured that out. Queta (you can see the wheels turning it happens so slowly) has recognized he has time to score a few times and made a move. Rob had a ton of space because he could not shoot and made some decent passes. He certainly was nothing special in reading D rotations. He was (all of this is past tense) one of the greatest vertical athletes ever, so he made a huge impact. But, the incredible rotations off the ball during last year's title run were less likely with him out there. He did struggle against physical guys too. I would see no reason to give up anything close to Pritchard to upgrade our third big.
I couldn’t disagree more. Rob’s bball iq was elite on both ends, and they didn’t care about him developing a post game, they wanted a rim runner.

His only issue was his body, which is why I was one of the few people who was willing to move him for Jrue, when the rumors started. Love Rob, just can’t depend on him.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,831
I would love nothing more than for Jrue to shoot like 33% from 3 all year long, so opposing teams during the playoffs decide he's the one they are going to sag off on, then we park his ass in the corner and watch him all of a sudden hit 50%+ from there, spending no energy on that end, and being a complete fucking menace on defense.

This entire regular season is just about staying healthy. They are good enough to win 60 games fucking sleepwalking with good health.

And I wouldn't do a thing with the roster. We can worry about next season and taxes when next season and taxes come along. A lot of shit changes in the league in the offseason, so it's all just guesswork anyway. Develop guys, stay healthy, have fun and then pedal to the floor when it matters.
 

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,560
Saskatoon Canada
I couldn’t disagree more. Rob’s bball iq was elite on both ends, and they didn’t care about him developing a post game, they wanted a rim runner.

His only issue was his body, which is why I was one of the few people who was willing to move him for Jrue, when the rumors started. Love Rob, just can’t depend on him.
Sorry I disagree. This is just loving a guy on your team too much. I never said anything in gamethreads when people gushed when he found a cutter who was wide open, becasue it was game threads, His exceptional athleticism allowed him to do things and get to places others couldn't and he had a good feel. Frequently his length quickness and jumping ability allowed him to effect plays few others could when he made a read. A lot of what people call smarts is often physical ability, especially reactions time. Was Manny really a smarter hitter than Terry Francona? Kevin Millar, etc? An athlete like TL with average IQ is elite player at least on D. Even when he was a beat late on closeouts his crazy length caused misses. I loved when a guy thought he was open because Rob ball watched then his go go gadget arms caused a miss anyway. Rob could stay down on fakes and jump after the defender and still block the shot. That isn't smarts, but allows him to not bite on fakes, which looks really smart. To his credit he learned to make the most out of his body. I am curious of your evidence he had elite IQ offensively. Who else is on your list? I measn he passed better than Tristan Thompson and didn't think he was a scorer like Daniel Theis. Don't you think an elite offensive mind would know to turn away from the d and drop step dunk? Especially when playin gon what to him was a nerf hoop. If Rob had elite IQ defensively he would be perhaps the best defender ever since he is at the very top of defensive athletes. If had elite D IQ he would be Bill Russell. I mean he was pretty great on D, but not the GOAT. He hovered around 1 steal per 36 minutes, pretty similar to Gianis, who we can agree relies on more on athleticism than IQ. Now Tatum has elite defensive IQ. He is so good at reading and directing closeouts. You have to rewind it to see just how perectly he read a play. When I rewound Rob's great plays you would frequently see him react the same time as other players, but the explosiveness and quickness were nuts. He had Hakeem quick jump skills, but got even higher.

My theory on Rob's his long build and extreme power are too much for the human body. He is like the WW2 fighter prototypes that flew so fast the wings fell off. His build allowed him to do things maybe nobody else could do, but the light, long frame cannot handle the Gs.
 
Last edited:

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
11,045
San Francisco
Sorry I disagree. This is just loving a guy on your team too much. I never said anything in gamethreads when people gushed when he found a cutter who was wide open, becasue it was game threads, His exceptional athleticism allowed him to do things and get to places others couldn't and he had a good feel. Frequently his length quickness and jumping ability allowed him to effect plays few others could when he made a read. A lot of what people call smarts is often physical ability, especially reactions time. Was Manny really a smarter hitter than Terry Francona? Kevin Millar, etc? An athlete like TL with average IQ is elite player at least on D. Even when he was a beat late on closeouts his crazy length caused misses. I loved when a guy thought he was open because Rob ball watched then his go go gadget arms caused a miss anyway. Rob could stay down on fakes and jump after the defender and still block the shot. That isn't smarts, but allows him to not bite on fakes, which looks really smart. To his credit he learned to make the most out of his body. I am curious of your evidence he had elite IQ offensively. Who else is on your list? I measn he passed better than Tristan Thompson and didn't think he was a scorer like Daniel Theis. Don't you think an elite offensive mind would know to turn away from the d and drop step dunk? Especially when playin gon what to him was a nerf hoop. If Rob had elite IQ defensively he would be perhaps the best defender ever since he is at the very top of defensive athletes. If had elite D IQ he would be Bill Russell. I mean he was pretty great on D, but not the GOAT. He hovered around 1 steal per 36 minutes, pretty similar to Gianis, who we can agree relies on more on athleticism than IQ. Now Tatum has elite defensive IQ. He is so good at reading and directing closeouts. You have to rewind it to see just how perectly he read a play. When I rewound Rob's great plays you would frequently see him react the same time as other players, but the explosiveness and quickness were nuts. He had Hakeem quick jump skills, but got even higher.

My theory on Rob's his long build and extreme power are too much for the human body. He is like the WW2 fighter prototypes that flew so fast the wings fell off. His build allowed him to do things maybe nobody else could do, but the light, long frame cannot handle the Gs.
Yeah, I mean when he came into the league he couldn't get minutes cuz he had no idea where to be or what he was doing out there. Its not like he became a genius over the course of two seasons.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
32,111
My opinion he is pretty smart guy becasue he came so far.
This point hits hard right here.

When TL was at A&M he played in a double big frontcourt with thick 6-11 Tyler Davis. The Aggies packed in a zone and their opponents often did the same to protect against Davis destroying them inside (he still did anyway).

So when TL left after a couple year he didn’t develop any offensive game nor any defensive versatility aside from weak side blocked shots into the 3rd row. He was extremely raw but he quickly picked up schemes and became passable defending PNR but using his strengths to dissuade ballhandlers. His passing improved a ton since he entered the NBA too.
 

reggiecleveland

sublime
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2004
28,560
Saskatoon Canada
This point hits hard right here.

When TL was at A&M he played in a double big frontcourt with thick 6-11 Tyler Davis. The Aggies packed in a zone and their opponents often did the same to protect against Davis destroying them inside (he still did anyway).

So when TL left after a couple year he didn’t develop any offensive game nor any defensive versatility aside from weak side blocked shots into the 3rd row. He was extremely raw but he quickly picked up schemes and became passable defending PNR but using his strengths to dissuade ballhandlers. His passing improved a ton since he entered the NBA too.
I think if I was a moneyball in hoops i would find late blooming bigs and teach them to play. In my short time in pro basketball I worked with two guys that were just lob guys in college and they are both stretch 4/5s now. It wasn't
rocket science, they were both strong FT shooters, and hard workers. But it took a coach to give them confidence they could be more since the role of rim protector/lob guy was drilled into them. IMHO opinions american AAu and college coaches are the worst for limiting guys in this way.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
32,111
I think if I was a moneyball in hoops i would find late blooming bigs and teach them to play. In my short time in pro basketball I worked with two guys that were just lob guys in college and they are both stretch 4/5s now. It wasn't
rocket science, they were both strong FT shooters, and hard workers. But it took a coach to give them confidence they could be more since the role of rim protector/lob guy was drilled into them. IMHO opinions american AAu and college coaches are the worst for limiting guys in this way.
I agree that bigs can be the slowest to develop and a lot of that has to do with the position having so many intricacies that you can only grasp with reps and experience along with added strength that comes with growing up.
 
Last edited:

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
33,201
Could have put this in Queta's thread but it seems more general. Seems that CJM has made a conscious choice - at least in this part of the season - to have his Cs guard on the perimeter rather than drop. According to tweet below, Queta is 1st in NBA am9ng Cs defending guards as he spends 34.2% of his defensive minutes on guards in the Cs very switch-heavy scheme.

Al id #4; Luke is #6. I suspect they go back to more drop coverage with KP.

Tweet below: "The Celtics are locking down the 3-point line and leaving their bigs to guard basically everything else / Queta looks bad on defense by design, because Boston’s bigs are doing a big lift so everyone else can stay home on the perimeter"

92408

 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
14,305
SF
Could have put this in Queta's thread but it seems more general. Seems that CJM has made a conscious choice - at least in this part of the season - to have his Cs guard on the perimeter rather than drop. According to tweet below, Queta is 1st in NBA am9ng Cs defending guards as he spends 34.2% of his defensive minutes on guards in the Cs very switch-heavy scheme.

Al id #4; Luke is #6. I suspect they go back to more drop coverage with KP.

Tweet below: "The Celtics are locking down the 3-point line and leaving their bigs to guard basically everything else / Queta looks bad on defense by design, because Boston’s bigs are doing a big lift so everyone else can stay home on the perimeter"

View attachment 92408

It's an interesting tradeoff: they're definitely paying the price with weak interior defense, and their overall defensive rating doesn't suggest it's been hugely effective.

At the same time, they are 8th in DRtg, so it's not that bad, and they're holding down the fort with mostly min contract centers, while the perimeter guys play defense somewhat on cruise control.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
22,246
Santa Monica
Could have put this in Queta's thread but it seems more general. Seems that CJM has made a conscious choice - at least in this part of the season - to have his Cs guard on the perimeter rather than drop. According to tweet below, Queta is 1st in NBA am9ng Cs defending guards as he spends 34.2% of his defensive minutes on guards in the Cs very switch-heavy scheme.

Al id #4; Luke is #6. I suspect they go back to more drop coverage with KP.

Tweet below: "The Celtics are locking down the 3-point line and leaving their bigs to guard basically everything else / Queta looks bad on defense by design, because Boston’s bigs are doing a big lift so everyone else can stay home on the perimeter"

View attachment 92408

Thanks for posting.

If your classic Center (Q & Luke) is being asked to stay on the perimeter with guards, would the next move be to add a minimum 4? (they have tried to shoehorn Tillman into that role)

KornXQ on minimums is a no-brainer, but that table has me pining for a stronger/taller bench WING this summer when Kornet/Springer leave.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
33,201
It's an interesting tradeoff: they're definitely paying the price with weak interior defense, and their overall defensive rating doesn't suggest it's been hugely effective.

At the same time, they are 8th in DRtg, so it's not that bad, and they're holding down the fort with mostly min contract centers, while the perimeter guys play defense somewhat on cruise control.
Bobby Manning had some numbers about this here: https://www.celticsblog.com/2024/11/28/24307762/joe-mazzulla-satisfied-with-celtics-defense-despite-slow-start-kristaps-porzingis-boston-tatum-brown.

According to Manning, they are basically traded off rim protection (going from 3rd to 24th allowing opponents to shoot 65% at the rim) for 3PAs (reducing attempts from 37.9 to 35) and TOs (forcing 13.9/game as opposed to the league low 12.0/game last year).

Manning also wrote this: "Mazzulla vowed before training camp that the team would adapt to a changing league while it attempts to repeat, and after many around the league anticipated a surge in three-point volume to mirror how the Celtics weaponized it, Boston only allowed 40+ attempts four times. Last year, it happened 25 times, leading to six extra Celtics losses when opponents got hot."

Thanks for posting.

If your classic Center (Q & Luke) is being asked to stay on the perimeter with guards, would the next move be to add a minimum 4? (they have tried to shoehorn Tillman into that role)

KornXQ on minimums is a no-brainer, but that table has me pining for a stronger/taller bench WING this summer when Kornet/Springer leave.
If the Cs wanted to add a minimum 4 they could do worse than adding Brissett, who apparently is still looking for work. (Frankly, I don't understand why PHI doesn't add him.)

I think I'm in the vast minority but I'm still not convinced POBOBS will jettison Springer at the deadline, although after almost a year, I would have thought he try to add some arc to his shot.

But if Springer does go, adding Brissett and LW4 at the deadline would both save money and increase this season's championship odds. Slightly.