Gardner signs a 4/52 extension

Toe Nash

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
5,632
02130
This looks like a coup for NYY when you compare it to Ellsbury's deal.
 
Gardner career: .352 OBP, .381 SLG, +10 UZR/150 in CF. .329 wOBA
Ellsbury: .350 OBP, .439 SLG, +8 UZR/150 in CF. .346 wOBA.
 
If you ignore 2011 Ellsbury has a career .340 OBP and .405 SLG.
 
I don't think the Ellsbury deal is that far above "market value." Gardner could have gotten close to twice this if he had had a good 2014, but I guess you can't knock the security.
 

mabrowndog

Ask me about total zone...or paint
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2003
39,676
Falmouth, MA
A very smart signing, IMO. Speed, decent on-base skills, and defensive range befitting a vast outfield expanse. That's what's needed in both CF and LF for that club. He'll never be a stud at the plate, but turning balls in play into outs is a far more critical need than offense.
 
It also signifies their anointment of Gardner as heir apparent to Jeter for the Marquee Homegrown Yankee crown. His contract potentially takes him through his 15th year in the organization.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,374
The problem with comparing the deals directly is that only one of them can play CF for the Yankees at a time, though.   Gardner's value as a non-CF is a lot less than as one.
 
Seems like a reasonable deal value-wise even so; also suggests Yankees are ok with obp/speed instead of power in the corners.
 

Hoplite

New Member
Oct 26, 2013
1,116
Seems like a fair deal to me. If you take out his 6 WAR season and his 0.3 WAR season, he's been worth approximately $16 million a year. This deal won't start until his age 31 season, so you could reasonably expect him to decline a bit by the end of it.
 
I'm not sure the Ellsbury comparison is apt. Either Ellsbury is a bit of a power hitter, as he suggested in 2011, and he's a much better player than Gardner. Or he's the .750 OPS hitter he's been outside of 2011 and the Ellsbury deal was an overpay. And as already pointed out, only one of them can play centerfield.
 

Toe Nash

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
5,632
02130
When Gardner has played left his defensive metrics have been even more impressive (a ridiculous +36 UZR/150). And the NYY LF is big -- having two CF is an advantage for 81 games a year.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,374
Toe Nash said:
When Gardner has played left his defensive metrics have been even more impressive (a ridiculous +36 UZR/150). And the NYY LF is big -- having two CF is an advantage for 81 games a year.
 
I don't buy that number as a true talent level; I agree it's an advantage to have speed in LF, but his value there is still a good bit less than in CF overall.  That doesn't make it a bad signing, it is mostly about why we can't directly compare the deal to Ellsbury at this point in time.
 

Hoplite

New Member
Oct 26, 2013
1,116
Toe Nash said:
When Gardner has played left his defensive metrics have been even more impressive (a ridiculous +36 UZR/150). And the NYY LF is big -- having two CF is an advantage for 81 games a year.
 
So either Gardner is the greatest defensive player in the history of UZR, or the ballpark adjustments UZR makes for left field in Yankee Stadium need a bit more tweaking (they've been adjusted before).
 
EDIT: Could also be an issue of sample size, didn't realize Gardner has only played ~2,000 innings in left field.
 

mt8thsw9th

anti-SoSHal
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
17,121
Brooklyn
mabrowndog said:
 
It also signifies their anointment of Gardner as heir apparent to Jeter for the Marquis Homegrown Yankee crown.
 
Well, if there's a crown, it should be for a marquis. That does seem like they'd be putting him on a peddle-stool, though.
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 12, 2003
24,796
where I was last at
It also signifies their anointment of Gardner as heir apparent to Jeter for the Marquis Homegrown Yankee crown.
 
 Hopefully it works just as well as Murcer's coronation after Mickey limped out of the Bronx.
 
4/52  for a rangy corner-OF, with good speed, but not a particularly good base-runner, and no power?
 
eh.
 
the risk to this signing is that he throws his back out fielding ground balls getting through SS-3rd 
 

mabrowndog

Ask me about total zone...or paint
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2003
39,676
Falmouth, MA
mt8thsw9th said:
 
Well, if there's a crown, it should be for a marquis. 
 
That's like the 9th time I've unconsciously misused that word on this fucking message board alone.
 

EvilEmpire

paying for his sins
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 9, 2007
17,290
Washington
Glad to hear this. Hope it goes through.

Edit: Didn't realize it was already final when I posted. Good deal. No NTC either, though there is an additional million the Yankees have to pay if they trade him.
 

Granite Sox

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2003
5,064
The Granite State
Gardner's value may be as a CF on the surface, but Victorino is a comp, at least in the positional sense. Vic's shift from CF to the expansive Fenway RF yielded significant defensive benefits for the Sox. I believe the same will hold true for Gardner and the Yankees in The Stadium's LF.
 

Sampo Gida

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 7, 2010
5,044
Gardner is pretty valuable to the Yankees in that LF of theirs.  Maybe Ellsbury can teach him how to be a better base stealer.
 
What would Gardner be worth on the FA market tied to a compensation pick if he turned down a QO?.  Seems it would be worth less than 4/52  after this years experience.  In fact, what are the odds he would even turn down the QO.  Yankees might have been better off giving him a QO and then seeing what happens.  But I am glad Gardner got a nice payday for himself.
 

Al Zarilla

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
59,306
San Andreas Fault
Dick Pole Upside said:
Gardner's value may be as a CF on the surface, but Victorino is a comp, at least in the positional sense. Vic's shift from CF to the expansive Fenway RF yielded significant defensive benefits for the Sox. I believe the same will hold true for Gardner and the Yankees in The Stadium's LF.
Except now the Yankees have two starting outfielders who can't throw. However, they are so fast that one can use the other as a cutoff man a'la Damon and Manny. 
 

TheYaz67

Member
SoSH Member
May 21, 2004
4,712
Justia Omnibus
Didn't see this one coming, and not a bad signing at all. 
 
I think with Jeter soon to retire and Cano off to the West Coast, it started to dawn on the Front Office that if Gardner left as a FA next year, this truly would become an "all mercenary" team with next to no players they actually drafted and developed (outside of a few bullpen pitchers).  So from an "organizational pride" perspective, I could see how it could become a priority to retain Gardner to avoid that embarrassment.   
 
But does shine a light again on the Yankees draft failures/predilection to trade every useful minor league asset before they mature (over the past decade+)....
 

Average Reds

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 24, 2007
35,419
Southwestern CT
It's hard not to like this signing if you are a Yankee fan.  It's also hard not to draw the comparison to Ellsbury and wonder if the open market should have meant such a massive relative overpay for Ells, but that's water under the bridge.  (Yes, I know Ells has more power and I expect he'll show a Granderson-like jump in power with the short porch in right this year.)
 
The analogy to Victorino in right at Fenway is spot on.  The Yankees need two outfielders with the capability to play center given the cavernous nature of LF in their park.
 

InsideTheParker

persists in error
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
40,504
Pioneer Valley
Al Zarilla said:
Except now the Yankees have two starting outfielders who can't throw. However, they are so fast that one can use the other as a cutoff man a'la Damon and Manny. 
Beltran? Because Gardner has a heck of an arm.