Is this actually in the rulebook? A penalty is negated because it could lead to a scoring chance?“no whistle because they had possession in the offensive zone”
What
The
Fuck
Unless the call is "the puck magically enters the Blues net, it's 2-1", there's no making up that oneI am speechless after that non-call. All I can say is there better be a make-up call coming pronto.
Call singular? Fuck that. We need the ice tilted our way for the rest of the yearI am speechless after that non-call. All I can say is there better be a make-up call coming pronto.
Yep.Bruce has free reign to go off in the postgame. If he doesn’t do it then he isn’t doing his job and isn’t looking out for his guys.
I think it is in reference to stopping play for an injury.Is this actually in the rulebook? A penalty is negated because it could lead to a scoring chance?
No. He meant they weren’t going to whistle bc of the injuryIs this actually in the rulebook? A penalty is negated because it could lead to a scoring chance?
I was thinking the same thing just now, which is really depressing.All pro sports kinda suck now.
And it’s not going to change.So both goals about 5 seconds after obvious penalties not called. Head shots. Holds. I mean... it’s all such fucking bullshit
It’s business. Pure and simple. It’s better for the bottom line somehow if St. Louis wins. Probably worries about their Canadian fan base.This game is so fucking fixed. All pro sports kinda suck now.
He went on to say that the play didn't stop for the player being down because the Blues had the puck. He then went on to talk about how it may have been a trip.Is this actually in the rulebook? A penalty is negated because it could lead to a scoring chance?
NFL? Rams not getting called for PI against Saints though.This game is so fucking fixed. All pro sports kinda suck now.
I honestly forgot about that until now. FuckFucking Blues. Hand passed to the finals. Now this.