Fox to Pull Entercom Advertising

Status
Not open for further replies.

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,788
Are we talking about if she benefitted or not: Yes , 
 
or of she welcomed it: I wasn't. I took issue with soxfan's statement 
 
or staged it? No
 
 
 
Rev: Here's the thing: whether or not she benefitted doesn't reflect on her at all
 
me: I agree, I was simply responding to this quote:
 
"The idea that Andrews "benefitted" in any way from having her privacy violated is so stupid and disgusting"
 
and this follow up:
 
"Please explain what you mean by "professional benefit". You really think it is a "benefit" for your boss, your bosses' boss and just about every other male in America and quite a few around the world to have seen you naked?"
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
luckiestman said:
Are we talking about if she benefitted or not: Yes , 
 
or of she welcomed it: I wasn't. I took issue with soxfan's statement 
 
or staged it? No
 
 
 
Rev: Here's the thing: whether or not she benefitted doesn't reflect on her at all
 
me: I agree, I was simply responding to this quote:
 
"The idea that Andrews "benefitted" in any way from having her privacy violated is so stupid and disgusting"
 
and this follow up:
 
"Please explain what you mean by "professional benefit". You really think it is a "benefit" for your boss, your bosses' boss and just about every other male in America and quite a few around the world to have seen you naked?"
 
You haven't answered. Is that because asking the question invades your privacy?
 
You may have benefitted from seeing Erin Andrews naked. She, on the other hand, was the victim of a crime that got the stalker 30 months in jail and the sex offender registry.
 
Suggesting that being the victim of a sex crime is somehow a benefit to the victim is stupid and disgusting. No matter who says it. 
 
 
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,788
soxfan121 said:
You really think it is a "benefit" for your boss, your bosses' boss and just about every other male in America and quite a few around the world to have seen you naked?"
 
You haven't answered. Is that because asking the question invades your privacy?
 
You may have benefitted from seeing Erin Andrews naked. She, on the other hand, was the victim of a crime that got the stalker 30 months in jail and the sex offender registry.
 
Suggesting that being the victim of a sex crime is somehow a benefit to the victim is stupid and disgusting. No matter who says it. 
 
 
 
It doesnt invade shit. Why would I care if my boss saw me naked? I'm sorry I didn't realize that was a real query; I just took it as a lame rhetorical device sort of like you saying I "benefited from seeing Andrews naked."
 
So. I'll answer. Does going on Oprah help motherfuckers sell books? If I got filmed naked and I got on Oprah, yeah, I think it would help my career if I didn't Cruise the moment. 
 
edit: attempt at clarity
 
Jesus Christ, luckiestman is saying her career may benefited from it.  Tons of people have made that argument...maybe it's true, I don't know.  But give the guy a break, he's not saying she was in on it or that she was fucking thrilled by the whole ordeal.  At least I don't think he is.  
 
I guarantee she wished it never happened even if it helped her professionally.  I can't imagine how violated she must have felt.  But how can you argue that it didn't increase her exposure and fame?  She went on Oprah, not many other sports sideline reporters get that invite.  She became a sympathetic victim (rightly so) and that probably enhanced her career. 
 
Why does every disagreement turn into a bunch of holier than thou posters shouting down someone with an altering point of view on this site?  Save the vitriol for those morons who calls her a bitch (Minihane), or a bimbo (Dan Sileo), or who say she should actually thank the peephole guy (Howard Eskin).  
 
Edit - I just read luckiestman's above post...now I'm confused what he thinks.  Did I just defend an idiot?  Whatever.  Is it football season yet?
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,788
I think exactly what you stated. What happened to her was awful, all the publicity from it benefitted her career. The post above yours is about soxfan asking me personally if getting naked and my boss seeing the glory of my nakedness would be beneficial to my career.
 
edit: and, if you're defending me, you are surely defending an idiot, so thanks.
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,444
BannedbyNYYFans.com said:
Jesus Christ, luckiestman is saying her career may benefited from it.  Tons of people have made that argument...maybe it's true, I don't know.  But give the guy a break, he's not saying she was in on it or that she was fucking thrilled by the whole ordeal.  At least I don't think he is.  
 
I guarantee she wished it never happened even if it helped her professionally.  I can't imagine how violated she must have felt.  But how can you argue that it didn't increase her exposure and fame?  She went on Oprah, not many other sports sideline reporters get that invite.  She became a sympathetic victim (rightly so) and that probably enhanced her career. 
 
Why does every disagreement turn into a bunch of holier than thou posters shouting down someone with an altering point of view on this site?  Save the vitriol for those morons who calls her a bitch (Minihane), or a bimbo (Dan Sileo), or who say she should actually thank the peephole guy (Howard Eskin).  
 
Edit - I just read luckiestman's above post...now I'm confused what he thinks.  Did I just defend an idiot?  Whatever.  Is it football season yet?
Awesome.

Lock the thread.
 

Steve Dillard

wishes drew noticed him instead of sweet & sour
SoSH Member
Oct 7, 2003
5,952
Gerry Callahan just called Richard Sherman a "dick," and Steve Deossie said Revis would be viewed as a "dick" (or Dink, didn't catch) when he was a Jet.  Are these terms as sexist as bitch?   In my view they are, but a bunch of people here seem to disagree -- what am I missing about this disparaging term that is reserved for one sex?
 

PBDWake

Member
SoSH Member
May 1, 2008
3,686
Peabody, MA
Connotation.
 
Being a dick generally involves (stereotypical male) behaviors that are looked favorably upon (whether its aggressiveness, taking charge, honesty, etc) taken to an extreme that they did not need to go to. But even then, people use the term favorably a good percentage of the time.
 
There are no positive traits associated with terms like bitch or pussy. There's nothing but negative connotations associated with the female terminology. That's why there's a much heavier feel to the sexism associated with those than dick.
 

Buffalo Head

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 13, 2001
6,864
San Diego, CA
And man calling another man a dick as a pure descriptive is a just a wee bit different than a man calling a woman a "gutless bitch" in the context of a verbal attack, "I hate you. Drop dead."
 

The Talented Allen Ripley

holden
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 2, 2003
12,739
MetroWest, MA
Steve Dillard said:
Gerry Callahan just called Richard Sherman a "dick," and Steve Deossie said Revis would be viewed as a "dick" (or Dink, didn't catch) when he was a Jet.  Are these terms as sexist as bitch?   In my view they are, but a bunch of people here seem to disagree -- what am I missing about this disparaging term that is reserved for one sex?
 
 
Jesus Christ, just shut the fuck up already.
 

Rusty13

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 3, 2007
5,367
Drip....drip....
 
 
The hits just keep coming for WEEI. Yesterday a producer for the “Dennis & Callahan” show got a one-day suspension after an F-bomb accidentally got on the air.
The producer, Craig Sawisch, used a sound cut from the movie “Goodfellas” to introduce a segment on David Ortiz’ war with the Rays, and he missed one of the many F-words Joe Pesci spews.
A source said the station got no complaints but Craig will have a day off to reflect on the screw-up.
It was the latest trouble for the sport-talk station which suspended morning yakker Kirk Minihane last week after he slagged Fox Sports gal Erin Andrews and FOX subsequently pulled their advertising from all Entercom-owned stations. Do stay tuned ...
http://bostonherald.com/inside_track/the_inside_track/2014/07/the_scoop_hits_keep_coming_for_weei
 

CantKeepmedown

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
2,588
Portland, ME
Steve Dillard said:
Gerry Callahan just called Richard Sherman a "dick," and Steve Deossie said Revis would be viewed as a "dick" (or Dink, didn't catch) when he was a Jet.  Are these terms as sexist as bitch?   In my view they are, but a bunch of people here seem to disagree -- what am I missing about this disparaging term that is reserved for one sex?
If your buddy called you a dick, would your reaction be the same if he called your wife a gutless bitch?
 

JayMags71

Member
SoSH Member
Steve Dillard said:
Gerry Callahan just called Richard Sherman a "dick," and Steve Deossie said Revis would be viewed as a "dick" (or Dink, didn't catch) when he was a Jet.  Are these terms as sexist as bitch?
No. Sexism, like racism, is about assertion of power over an oppressed class. As a society, women don't hold the reins of power over men. So, a woman calling a man a dick is not the same as a man calling a woman a bitch. So it certainly doesn't apply when a man uses it on another man.

That's setting aside the rich irony of two of the worst people the Boston sports media has to offer referring to anyone else as dicks. Had it been Smerlas with KKKallahan, the irony detector would have melted.

As another aside, it's wholly unsurprising that Gerry's still upset about Richard Sherman while leaving Minehane's sexism unchallenged. Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.
 

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
24,625
Gerry Callahan just called Richard Sherman a "dick," and Steve Deossie said Revis would be viewed as a "dick" (or Dink, didn't catch) when he was a Jet.
 
 
Guy radio at its best!
 
 Are these terms as sexist as bitch?
 
 
No.
 
In my view they are, but a bunch of people here seem to disagree -- what am I missing about this disparaging term that is reserved for one sex?
 
 

You're wrong and you're willfully missing everything that many people have tried many times to explain to you. Figure it out soon, Steve Dullard.
 

cromulence

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 25, 2009
6,778
Steve Dillard said:
Gerry Callahan just called Richard Sherman a "dick," and Steve Deossie said Revis would be viewed as a "dick" (or Dink, didn't catch) when he was a Jet.  Are these terms as sexist as bitch?   In my view they are, but a bunch of people here seem to disagree -- what am I missing about this disparaging term that is reserved for one sex?
 
Jesus Christ, shut the fuck up. Just stop talking, preferably forever. This is the most pathetic argument in the history of arguments. 
 

Scoots McBoots

nothing Sinista here
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
2,844
Worcester, MA
I wonder if they're doing it precisely for that reason - "Oh, see?  Nobody gets upset when we call somebody a dick!  Stupid liberals!"
 
Of course, I'm giving them too much credit.
 

Steve Dillard

wishes drew noticed him instead of sweet & sour
SoSH Member
Oct 7, 2003
5,952
The Allented Mr Ripley said:
 
Jesus Christ, just shut the fuck up already.
 
 


 You're wrong and you're willfully missing everything that many people have tried many times to explain to you. Figure it out soon, Steve Dullard.


 
 
Sorry if the attempt to question this simple "black and white" issue is causing you frustration.  Just do me a favor and answer the question I posed about what was it that makes this a simple black and white issue.
 
I would not use "dick" or "bitch" in public (though I probably use "bitch about it"), for the same reason I would not use other inappropriate gender neutral language like "asshole."   But in private I would use it based on the gender of the person.  The reason I am not "getting it" in this discussion, or even more, am resisting it, is because people are not only saying the word and dick or others should not be usedon radio, but rather making a further leap that the person using it must be sexist.   I know that is not the case in my instance, so am resistant to the further leap than many have made that Minnihane using it is a sexist.  
 
 

CantKeepmedown said:
And man calling another man a dick as a pure descriptive is a just a wee bit different than a man calling a woman a "gutless bitch" in the context of a verbal attack, "I hate you. Drop dead."
 
I would get it if you stopped at the first part, that a man cannot refer to a woman as a bitch in any context.   But you seem to recognize that that is not enough, so you bring in the other stuff, which blurs the line.  So, is it that
 
(1) that the b-word is equivalent to the n-word and so that no man can ever use the word bitch when referring to a woman,  
(2) he went over the line in attacking one person, regardless of gender,
or (3) you think his words belie that he is sexist/Misogenistic?
 
Is it, (1), (2) or (3), or a combination of each?  If he only referred to her as a bitch, should he be suspended?  If so, is it civility, or sexism that he offended -- if he only did (2), i.e. told her to "drop dead" and called her "gutless" would that be OK?  What if he only did (3), and showed pure sexism by objectifying her and talking about Jenny Dell's breasts, but didn't use the b-word, should he be suspended?
 

 
I have no trouble adding "bitch" the the seven George Carlin words.  I just think it seems that if you go down that road to try and snuff out sexism, using (1) and not (3) is the most facile and least effective way for addressing sexism.  If any of you (or Fox Sports) really want to combat sexism, beond simply furthering sexism by taking an unprecedented step to protect a woman's virtue (which they would not do if someone had insulted Troy Aikman, etc), I suggest a different approach.  My frustration with many of the responses is that they accept (and embrace) the broader sexism inherent in the industry (i.e., replacing an used up eye candy Pam Oliver with a newer eye candy Erin Andrews, embacing Heidi Whatney for replacing Eric Frede, Fox Sports' Jay Mohr making fun of Allysa Millano's weight) while adopting some standard that can make them seem enlightened.  I look forward to how Fox Sports starts using this new policy of protecting all of its employees.
 
 
edit:  and just to be clear and to distinguish myself from others, from the start I have maintained that the most offensive thing said was by D&C (and apparently the MFB folks) suggesting that Andrews benefitted from the crime.
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,444
Isn't there a backwash thread for this?

I'm all for this conversation, but there's no need to reinvent the wheel. We already did this.
 

JohntheBaptist

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
11,404
Yoknapatawpha County
I'm going to set up a Squirm Thinktank and hire Steve Dillard. He's balancing some giant elephants on the heads of those pins, and we need a guy that'll storm into a battle like "showing how the 'gutless bitch' story wasn't actually about sexism" with the nuance and erudition it requires. 
 
You can't teach that, kids (actually, of course you can).
 

Buffalo Head

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 13, 2001
6,864
San Diego, CA
"But you seem to recognize that that is not enough, so you bring in the other stuff, which blurs the line. ... Adding the drop dead does nothing for me, as it is obvious hyperbole."
 
 
This is where the disconnect is. You seem intent on parsing out the words and removing the context -- what our friend Mr. Felger would describe as the "tonality." That's fine if you want to do that. But that's why a lot of people are saying to you, 'You're missing the point." The point is the context. What to you is "other stuff" and "hyperbole" is at the heart of the matter for the people who have a problem with what was said.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,556
Steve Dillard said:
 
 


 


 
 
Sorry if the attempt to question this simple "black and white" issue is causing you frustration.  Just do me a favor and answer the question I posed about what was it that makes this a simple black and white issue.
 
I would not use "dick" or "bitch" in public (though I probably use "bitch about it"), for the same reason I would not use other inappropriate gender neutral language like "asshole."   But in private I would use it based on the gender of the person.  The reason I am not "getting it" in this discussion, or even more, am resisting it, is because people are not only saying the word and dick or others should not be usedon radio, but rather making a further leap that the person using it must be sexist.   I know that is not the case in my instance, so am resistant to the further leap than many have made that Minnihane using it is a sexist.  
 
 
 
 
Here (via JayMags71) is your answer.  And if you don't understand this simple statement, then you will never understand what's going on here.  This is the prime numbers of the issue.
 
No. Sexism, like racism, is about assertion of power over an oppressed class. As a society, women don't hold the reins of power over men. So, a woman calling a man a dick is not the same as a man calling a woman a bitch. So it certainly doesn't apply when a man uses it on another man.
 
 
 

AlNipper49

Huge Member
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 3, 2001
44,902
Mtigawi
Jesus fucking Chris.  We have like 83,567,670.05 threads about this in backwash.  Take it there.
 
If new news pops up can someone PM me and we'll re-open
 
Status
Not open for further replies.