ESPN Is Pathetic

CoolPapaBellhorn

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2006
1,120
Medfield
BannedbyNYYFans.com said:
Cris Carter giving advice at the rookie symposium last year.
 
I'm guessing he's the speaker that Chris Borland was referencing:
 
 
SHORTLY AFTER HE was drafted by the 49ers in the third round last year, Borland attended the annual rookie orientation put on by the NFL. The league tries to prepare young players for what to expect on and off the field, and it brought in two prominent retired players to give the rookies advice.
 
"Get yourself a fall guy," Borland says one of the former players advised. The former player, whom Borland declined to name, told the rookies that if they ran into legal trouble, their designated 
fall guy would be there to take the blame and, if necessary, go to jail. "'We'll bail him out,'" Borland says the former player assured them.
 
Borland was appalled. "I was just sitting there thinking, 'Should I walk out? What am I supposed to do?' " he recalls. He says he didn't leave the room because he didn't want to cause a scene, but the incident stayed with him.
 

HurstSoGood

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2006
2,190
CC wearing his HOF Yellow, no less. NIce big NFL badge on the chest. Preachin to fools on how to cover their asses. Shocking. 
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
43,975
Here
The NFL season is about to begin, and it seems like 80% of ESPN's top stories have been fantasy football-related. Further down the ESPNFL rabbit hole we go.
 

Byrdbrain

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
8,588
There will be a band named that by the end of the weekend.
If I had a band it already would have happened.
 

Bleedred

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 21, 2001
10,018
Boston, MA
Bleedred said:
Re: Bob Ryan's appearance on the Sportsreporters Sunday and his suggestion that Brady should just accept the 4 game penalty.  I sent him the following email:
 
We'll see if he responds.
____________________________
[SIZE=10pt]Bob,[/SIZE]
 
[SIZE=10pt] [/SIZE]
[SIZE=10pt]As someone whose sports fandom came of age during the Bird era, I loved reading your Celtics coverage.  Moreover, your passion as a sports fan is refreshing in a world where too many of your journalistic brethren declare that they only “root for the story.”  You’re my favorite columnist.[/SIZE]
 
[SIZE=10pt] [/SIZE]
[SIZE=10pt]I saw your appearance on ESPN this weekend discussing “deflategate.”  Your position, as far as I understand it, is that Brady should take the 4 game penalty for the good of the team so that he and the team can prepare for the season without this distraction.  Moreover, you noted that since his reputation is harmed regardless, he should just put this mess behind him.  My view is that if I’m Brady, I don’t care what other people think if they are unwilling to consider the actual facts of the case.  What would be paramount to me is that anyone examining the record of this fiasco in the future be able to conclude that I did nothing wrong.  But I’m not looking to argue the case.  I’d like to ask you to respond to the following hypothetical:[/SIZE]
 
[SIZE=10pt] [/SIZE]
[SIZE=10pt]HYPOTHETICAL[/SIZE][SIZE=10pt]:  Let’s assume that in the year before you retired from full time writing for the Boston Globe, your editor informed you that someone accused you of plagiarizing one of your biggest columns.  You know with certainty that the accusation is false.  Nevertheless, your Editor in Chief and the owner of the paper, after reviewing the “facts”, decide to suspend you for 90 days without pay because they believe that you lied to them and you plagiarized.  The plagiarism accusations and suspension are made public and you are branded a plagiarizer.  You protest vociferously, as there is no solid evidence of plagiarism, in fact, there is good reason to believe that the accuser misunderstood the assertion when the charge was made. Nevertheless, the public believes you are a plagiarizer.  For the sake of this hypothetical, let’s assume that your union permits you to appeal your suspension to your employer, and after significant back and forth, they agree to reduce the suspension to 30 days without pay provided you acknowledge that you plagiarized.  Otherwise, 90 days stands.  For the good of you and your family, and the certainty of putting this behind you, would you agree to accept the reduced penalty and the guilt, even if you did not plagiarize?[/SIZE]
 
[SIZE=10pt] [/SIZE]
 
[SIZE=10pt]I’m genuinely interested in your response.   Again, I have enjoyed your written work and public appearances for all of your career.[/SIZE]
So I emailed Bob Ryan again this morning
 
Me:  I’m sorry you didn’t respond (and would still welcome one), but today’s news is why Brady doesn’t settle for the 4 games.   
 
Ryan Responds:  It's done, pending the NFL's predictable appeal. May we all move on?



 
 

DourDoerr

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 15, 2004
2,939
Berkeley, CA
That's a great email Bleedred and a terrific analogy.  Couldn't be more disappointed in Ryan who I've always liked.  "It's done...May we all move on?"  Uh, no, Bob.  Nobody wants to take responsibility for their "takes."  How about you look over why there shouldn't have been a case in the first place - make the rounds on radio and pound the ideal gas law - and then say you were wrong on this.  Then let's move on.  
 

Bleedred

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 21, 2001
10,018
Boston, MA
DourDoerr said:
That's a great email Bleedred and a terrific analogy.  Couldn't be more disappointed in Ryan who I've always liked.  "It's done...May we all move on?"  Uh, no, Bob.  Nobody wants to take responsibility for their "takes."  How about you look over why there shouldn't have been a case in the first place - make the rounds on radio and pound the ideal gas law - and then say you were wrong on this.  Then let's move on.  
I thought his position on this whole matter was foolish, but generally speaking, I still think he's one of the better sports columnists around.
 

Humphrey

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2010
3,197
In my mind when you start appearing on shows with the likes of Woody Page and Jay Mariotti, you've crossed the line into buffoon territory.
 

Bleedred

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 21, 2001
10,018
Boston, MA
Further back and forth from the bottom up.  Note his backpedalling a bit, and never answering the hypothetical, but I give him credit for responding.  I wrote something similar to Felger...no response yet:
 
[SIZE=10pt]I’m with you, and this is truly humiliating to the NFL.  As you note, because so many people continue to patronize the product is precisely why Roger keeps his job and the majority of owners in his corner.  It’s a multi-billion dollar enterprise, and so long as he is the face of the NFL and takes the slings and arrows, he does his job (to coin a phrase) as the owners want and expect.   I do wonder whether or not these massive legal defeats and attendant embarrassment for the league eventually lead to non-renewal of his contract (at which point he walks away with his $300 million+).  At  a minimum, if they had a competent commissioner, and less megalomaniacal ownership group, perhaps they’d realize that appeals to an independent arbitrator or board of arbitrators mutually agreed up on by the NFL and NFLPA makes a lot of sense and may avoid this excrement show in the future.  Precisely because it makes so much sense, I doubt it ever happens.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=10pt] [/SIZE]
[SIZE=10pt]From:[/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] Ryan, Robert [mailto:ryan@globe.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 1:21 PM
To: Eric
Subject: Re: Your appearance on the sports reporters this weekend[/SIZE]

 
Understand that nothing in sports delights me more than seeing the NFL humiliated. The only problem is people will still patronize the product, regardless. I';m a baseball/basketball man who wouldn't really care if they stopped playing football in the next 5 minutes.
  

 
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Eric wrote:
[SIZE=10pt]I agree.  I just found it a shame that very few people who offered so many opinions clearly hadn’t bothered to read the actual source materials to at least inform those opinions.  Roger Goodell probably skates here, but I cannot conclude anything other than, at least as to league discipline, he is the most spectacularly incompetent commissioners in all of professional sports (Ray Rice, Peterson, Brady, Bountygate, etc.).   The integrity of the game has been besmirched all right, and it has been at the hands of the commissioner.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=10pt] [/SIZE]
[SIZE=10pt]From:[/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] Ryan, Robert [mailto:ryan@globe.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 12:54 PM
To: Eric
Subject: Re: Your appearance on the sports reporters this weekend[/SIZE]
 
Sick of it. Really. Utter nonsense, all of it. Had nothing to do with inflated footballs and everything to do with wanting to punish the Patriots --- finally! --- for all transgressions of the past 12 years, real or imagined.
 
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Eric wrote:
[SIZE=10pt]Unfortunately it’s not over, as the NFL has just announced they intend to appeal, but I do appreciate the response, thank you.  Did you get a chance to read my hypothetical?   I’d still love your thoughts on it.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=10pt] [/SIZE]
[SIZE=10pt]From:[/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] Ryan, Robert [mailto:ryan@globe.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 12:43 PM
To: Eric
Subject: Re: Your appearance on the sports reporters this weekend[/SIZE]
 
 
It's done, pending the NFL's predictable appeal. May we all move on?
 

DourDoerr

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 15, 2004
2,939
Berkeley, CA
Weird.  Hard to square that conversation with his previous thoughts that Brady should take it.  As he is a member of a union, it's even weirder that he'd basically take management's side when it seems it's pretty clear to him that the NFL is power-drunk.
 
And weirder still to engage on everything else and then completely disengage on the hypothetical.  I can't give him credit when he's not taking responsibility.  I'll echo pappymojo - wimp. 
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,556
I think Ryan is still dealing with the fact that his columns don't just disappear like they did for the first 35 years of his career.  Accountability used to last about 24 hours. Not any more
 
To his credit, he's trying, like he always does. But in this case, he's failing.
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
joe dokes said:
I think Ryan is still dealing with the fact that his columns don't just disappear like they did for the first 35 years of his career.  Accountability used to last about 24 hours. Not any more
 
To his credit, he's trying, like he always does. But in this case, he's failing.
I thought he retired? I know he still writes occasionally but other than PTI type stuff how much is he even active anymore?
 

Granite Sox

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2003
5,062
The Granite State
He takes a lot of crap (and deservedly so), but Cris Carter played the Brady result pretty much right down the middle this morning on Mike & Mike.  Repeated all the Brady supporting opinions with sincerity, shared a private conversation he had with Krafty at the HOF (Krafty said, "Tommy look me in th eye..."), and actually was very strong with his opinion that Goodell's sound bite about protecting "the integrity of the shield" was "a bunch of malarkey".  Ripped Goodell for not demonstrating integrity and said the players of the league have as much or more responsibility to protect the integrity of the shield and Goodell should be doing what he can to support them, not tear them down.
 
Also disagreed with Greenberg's comment that Brady's victory won't change people's mind about Brady as a cheater.  "I don't look at Tom Brady as a cheater... and I don't think important people around the league or people I talk with think of him that way."
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,556
I thought he retired? I know he still writes occasionally but other than PTI type stuff how much is he even active anymore?           
 
 
Officially, yeah, he has.  And while Bleedred was responding to a TV appearance, I think Ryan's long, "dark-ages" print career mindset as to the disposability of his work is still with him.
 

Nite Vizhun UV

proctological researcher
SoSH Member
Aug 30, 2002
4,646
Shakedown Street
Speaking of Bob Ryan, he tweeted this yesterday:



Coach Belchick had better walk the straight and narrow in '15 because the rest of the league will be even more intent now on getting NE.
— Bob Ryan (@GlobeBobRyan) September 4, 2015




Coach Belchick had better walk the straight and narrow in '15 because the rest of the league will be even more intent now on getting NE.
8:55 PM - 3 Sep 2015
 

LuckyBen

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 5, 2012
3,396
Nite Vizhun UV said:
 
Speaking of Bob Ryan, he tweeted this yesterday:
 


Coach Belchick had better walk the straight and narrow in '15 because the rest of the league will be even more intent now on getting NE.
— Bob Ryan (@GlobeBobRyan) September 4, 2015
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 

Coach Belchick had better walk the straight and narrow in '15 because the rest of the league will be even more intent now on getting NE.
8:55 PM - 3 Sep 2015

 


 
He is a man of great wisdom and offers a brilliant tweet.
 

Hendu for Kutch

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 7, 2006
6,924
Nashua, NH
Nite Vizhun UV said:
 
Speaking of Bob Ryan, he tweeted this yesterday:
 


Coach Belchick had better walk the straight and narrow in '15 because the rest of the league will be even more intent now on getting NE.
— Bob Ryan (@GlobeBobRyan) September 4, 2015
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 

Coach Belchick had better walk the straight and narrow in '15 because the rest of the league will be even more intent now on getting NE.
8:55 PM - 3 Sep 2015

 


 
Totally.  At this point they're so mad and paranoid, I'd expect to see rule changes and even potentially a huge controversy and penalty made up out of thin air.
 
11:00 PM - 11 Jan 2015
 

SidelineCameras

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2011
1,813
Lose Remerswaal said:
Some of those penalty calls (and the non-reversal) in the first half last night made me say "hmmmm"
Which sets up the vicious cycle narrative of Pats fans being whiny and paranoid and don't we know the officials love us because of the Tuck Rule?

This season has real potential for "just because Pats fans are paranoid doesn't mean everyone else isn't out to get us."
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
SidelineCameras said:
Which sets up the vicious cycle narrative of Pats fans being whiny and paranoid and don't we know the officials love us because of the Tuck Rule?

This season has real potential for "just because Pats fans are paranoid doesn't mean everyone else isn't out to get us."
I plan to avoid the game threads this season for this reason.

At the same time, people who are out to get the Pats remain firmly ensconced in NFL headquarters, with the responsibilities they had last year, and you have to be a rube to assume anything other than bad intentions.

This is why Michael killed Solllozzo -- and rightly so.

We are still very vulnerable to trumped up disciplinary charges if nothing else.