Per transfermarkt, Arsenal are 6th in team player value, and 6th in the league. THey are +13 GD above the team below them. Unless one thinks they should just buy more valuable players, I'm not sure how more should be expected of them, or of Wenger.
If they are third in the league in revenues (as they have been in both 15-16 and 16-17 per the Deloitte Money League tables), then why are they sixth in the league in the value of the players? Because they underinvested for many years in the transfer market, because Wenger has long since lost his fastball finding and developing young talent, and because they've been awful in terms of moving players on while they still retain value.Per transfermarkt, Arsenal are 6th in team player value, and 6th in the league. THey are +13 GD above the team below them. Unless one thinks they should just buy more valuable players, I'm not sure how more should be expected of them, or of Wenger.
I think spending is a better gauge than revenues, since revenues are murkier and harder to pin down, and since the two petroclubs and the uberclub can basically buy anyone. If you can spend, that likely means you have more money to spend. ManC and ManU are -220m euros and -157m euros in transfer spending this season, and Chelsea is at -57m. The two clubs that Arsenal actually competes with money wise, clubs that actually have budgets, have done a better job this cycle developing and maximizing talent, but they'll have to sell off eventually to bigger clubs. But it's not like players won't go there, Lacazette and Aubameyang cost £99m pounds (and combined for a pretty goal today).If they are third in the league in revenues (as they have been in both 15-16 and 16-17 per the Deloitte Money League tables), then why are they sixth in the league in the value of the players? Because they underinvested for many years in the transfer market, because Wenger has long since lost his fastball finding and developing young talent, and because they've been awful in terms of moving players on while they still retain value.
Chelsea isn't the big spending club they once were, as Roman doesn't seem to have the appetite to blow through money like he once did. Arsenal have outspent them in the transfer market over the last five years in aggregate and Arsenal's wages are on par with them. City and United are in a league apart. But after that Arsenal are roughly on par with Chelsea and clearly better resourced than either Liverpool or Spurs.I think spending is a better gauge than revenues, since revenues are murkier and harder to pin down, and since the two petroclubs and the uberclub can basically buy anyone. If you can spend, that likely means you have more money to spend. ManC and ManU are -220m euros and -157m euros in transfer spending this season, and Chelsea is at -57m. The two clubs that Arsenal actually competes with money wise, clubs that actually have budgets, have done a better job this cycle developing and maximizing talent, but they'll have to sell off eventually to bigger clubs. But it's not like players won't go there, Lacazette and Aubameyang cost £99m pounds (and combined for a pretty goal today).