Drew is walking through that door

Status
Not open for further replies.

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,687
Rogers Park
Smiling Joe Hesketh said:
 
Now this fails the laugh test. God forbid a player improves or something clicks with him.
 
I don't think P91 is right, but I don't think it's ridiculous. The general aging curve with defense is down. If Drew made the improvement UZR shows, he was running against the trend. 
 

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
One thought about Drew's early UZRs:
 
If I understand how UZR is measured, a player's UZR can improve from one year to the next simply because the average talent level of the players at that position has declined. The top six shortstops in defensive value in the NL in 2007 were the following:
 
Omar Vizquel
Troy Tulowitzki (age 22)
J.J. Hardy (age 24)
Jose Reyes (age 24)
Adam Everett
Jimmy Rollins
 
Also in the mix were Khalil Greene in his young defensive-whiz phase, plus veteran or mid-career glove specialists Rafael Furcal, Alex Gonzalez, Cesar Izturis and Jack Wilson. I would guess you could make a plausible case that that was the best collection of defensive shortstop talent in a single league in baseball history. Most of those guys were back in 2008, but by 2009 Everett, Izturis, and Vizquel were gone, and Reyes and Greene had injury-related dips, thinning out the competition a bit. And that's when Drew's UZR kicked up.
 
So you have at least three possible factors interacting to create the sudden jump: the inherent imprecision of UZR, the likelihood that Drew gained skill and/or confidence with playing time, and the fact that his performance may have been measured against a somewhat less lofty bar after his first couple of years.
 
 

Jnai

is not worried about sex with goats
SoSH Member
Sep 15, 2007
16,144
<null>
Plympton91 said:
RBI and Wins judge results, too. They just aren't as predictive of who will hit well next year or on a different team as stats that are purer measures of skill.

I don't believe that in the winter between his 3rd and 4th seasons in the big leagues Steven Drew all of a sudden figured out how to be a better shortstop. Sorry.

And, basically neither do people who understand UZR, because they say you have to "regress individual saasons heavily". That's a fancy way of saying, "our metric really isn't very accurate."

I'm just trying to work through all the reasons it isn't very accurate, and reminding people of that fact.
 
UZR and defensive metrics tend to get a pretty bad rap. Many offensive statistics take 1.5-2 years worth of data to stabilize, but we accept them as accurate in 50 game samples because they feel familiar to us.
 
I'm not saying defensive metrics don't need a lot of work - because they do - but criticizing those who develop them for properly regressing the data doesn't seem quite fair.
 

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
Good article at mlb.com about Drew's arrival and the context thereof. I particularly liked reading this:
 
 
"I talked to [Bogaerts], just me and him," Drew said. "I was kind of in the same boat in Arizona, with [Craig] Counsell there and me coming up. Basically, it's going to hopefully make the team better. ... Going back to last year, he played really well at third. It's not that he can't play short. I just think it makes the club better."
 

ivanvamp

captain obvious
Jul 18, 2005
6,104
nvalvo said:
 
I don't think P91 is right, but I don't think it's ridiculous. The general aging curve with defense is down. If Drew made the improvement UZR shows, he was running against the trend. 
 
I don't pretend to get UZR, but I don't understand the sentiment that suggests that, say, at age 26, a player improves dramatically in the field.  I mean, we have evidence that suggests strongly that lots of players break out offensively around that age (26-28).  Why can't they improve defensively?  Why can't they finally figure out their footwork, or develop a stronger, more accurate arm, or learn to get better reads on batted balls, or refine their glove skills?  If they can do it with the bat, why not with the glove?
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,687
Rogers Park
ivanvamp said:
 
I don't pretend to get UZR, but I don't understand the sentiment that suggests that, say, at age 26, a player improves dramatically in the field.  I mean, we have evidence that suggests strongly that lots of players break out offensively around that age (26-28).  Why can't they improve defensively?  Why can't they finally figure out their footwork, or develop a stronger, more accurate arm, or learn to get better reads on batted balls, or refine their glove skills?  If they can do it with the bat, why not with the glove?
 
Take a look at this piece
 
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,523
Pete Abraham ‏@PeteAbe  25s
Also of interest: Farrell implied that a maximum 10-day minor league stint was negotiated for Drew. Ready or not, he was coming up.
 
This is something that can be done? Most likely explains why Kendrys Morales is not going to MILB first
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,929
Maine
soxhop411 said:
 
Pete Abraham ‏@PeteAbe  25s
Also of interest: Farrell implied that a maximum 10-day minor league stint was negotiated for Drew. Ready or not, he was coming up.
 
This is something that can be done? Most likely explains why Kendrys Morales is not going to MILB first
 
 
Morales is out of options, so the Twins can't send him down unless they DL him first.  Alternatively they could have signed him to a minor league deal with the promise of the major league deal kicking in as soon as he was ready.
 

URI

stands for life, liberty and the uturian way of li
Moderator
SoSH Member
Aug 18, 2001
10,329
Start a new thread for this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.