Doogie does defense, the Sam Hauser thread

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,697
Right, but that seemed too risky to me. I think they want to be sure he’s back this year no matter what.

As far as future negotiations on an extension, I don’t know how it works as far as potentially ripping up the current option or if it has to be tacked on.

I guess it would be nice to have the choice to bump his salary this year in exchange for lowering it down the road, but maybe they can’t do that anymore.
It has to be tacked on.

He's now locked in for this year on the option.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
39,403
Derrick White's deal?
It's probably Brunson, or one of the max guys. Getting an 8th man for $2M is nice, getting a very good starter for $20M is nice....
but the higher up the player list you go the quicker value increses.

If we eliminate max and rookie it's Brunson though, he made under $25M and was a top 5 MVP candidate and finished as the first man out of 1st team all-NBA.
 

pjheff

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2003
1,673
The biggest risk is for Hauser because his contract is more important to him than it is to Boston, but he's just entering his prime, has been incredibly consistent (maintaining a strong 3p% while increasing his attempts), durable (5 total games missed in the last two seasons), and just had a very impressive playoff run in which he more than held his own on defense despite arguably the best 1v1 scorer in the league targeting him.
I like Sam as much as the next guy, but he averaged 5.4 ppg in the playoffs (after 9 ppg in the regular season). I know that metric may not be as sophisticated as DARKO or LEBRON or RAPTOR, but I’d be hard pressed to label his playoff run as “impressive,” much less “very impressive.”
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
20,792
I like Sam as much as the next guy, but he averaged 5.4 ppg in the playoffs (after 9 ppg in the regular season). I know that metric may not be as sophisticated as DARKO or LEBRON or RAPTOR, but I’d be hard pressed to label his playoff run as “impressive,” much less “very impressive.”
His minutes per game also went from 22 to 15, which is typical for a bench player in the playoffs. Hard to score from the bench. Despite reduced minutes, Hauser did score 8 ppg against the Heat and Mavs, and did play credible defense in the Finals. His ppg average is hurt by his struggles against Indy.

Bottom line is that he will have leverage in any contract negotiations.
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
11,281
San Francisco
I like Sam as much as the next guy, but he averaged 5.4 ppg in the playoffs (after 9 ppg in the regular season). I know that metric may not be as sophisticated as DARKO or LEBRON or RAPTOR, but I’d be hard pressed to label his playoff run as “impressive,” much less “very impressive.”
I thought he was really good. He played great defense throughout, made some hustle plays, and did his usual hitting threes thing.
 

bigq

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,789
He shot 48% from three in the finals. That alone is impressive.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
41,535
Hingham, MA
His minutes per game also went from 22 to 15, which is typical for a bench player in the playoffs. Hard to score from the bench. Despite reduced minutes, Hauser did score 8 ppg against the Heat and Mavs, and did play credible defense in the Finals. His ppg average is hurt by his struggles against Indy.

Bottom line is that he will have leverage in any contract negotiations.
1-14 from 3 against the Pacers, but 26-57 in the other 3 series, for 45.6%. That's pretty great in the playoffs.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
15,014
Sam seems to me that he's in his sweet spot role wise with the C's. If he signs elsewhere to get a bigger role I think he gets exposed.
Agree he is in a great situation, assuming the Celtics can be competitive on the $. But aside from getting more minutes on a worse team, I think Sam's role is what it is.

He will probably get fewer open shots on a team without as much talent, but in general I don't think any team would expect him to do anything other than what he is doing. If someone signs him expecting him to be anything other than a spot up shooter with surprisingly solid D, they probably will not be happy with the result.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
8,777
If Boston signs Hauser in the $17-20 million a year range, what would be the total additional cost per season, instead of just moving Baylor into the designated shooter bench role? $50 million the first season, adding salary difference and penalties? $70 million?
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
15,014
I don't know but if Hauser is going to get 20M per season, I don't think he is long for the Celtics.

They better hope Baylor pans out or they can find another undrafted gem.
 

TomRicardo

rusty cohlebone
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2006
22,036
Row 14
Sam seems to me that he's in his sweet spot role wise with the C's. If he signs elsewhere to get a bigger role I think he gets exposed.
Define exposed? He would look worse on a team like Dallas, but he would look godly on the Nuggets or 76ers.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
10,496
Oakland
I like Sam as much as the next guy, but he averaged 5.4 ppg in the playoffs (after 9 ppg in the regular season). I know that metric may not be as sophisticated as DARKO or LEBRON or RAPTOR, but I’d be hard pressed to label his playoff run as “impressive,” much less “very impressive.”
In addition to his minutes dipping as noted above, the pace slows way down in the playoffs. Boston went from averaging 97.3 possessions to 91.9, and all told Hauser went from averaging 20.2 points per 100 to 19.0 points per 100, basically no difference at all.

Food for thought: Grant Williams experienced an almost identical dip in ppg last year (8.1 in the regular season, 5.1 in the playoffs), then signed a 4/54 contract.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
23,211
Santa Monica
Sounds crazy, but I'm starting to feel meh about the KP salary slot. Not needed for the regular season, maybe undependable in the postseason.

Definitely true that elite shooters get overpaid, but if you get a discount for extending a year early, it still might end up in a reasonable range.
Not crazy in the least. I think we got an early glimpse of future Tatum in these playoffs.

Point Center JT, in high-leverage situations, is going to turn into a thing over the rest of his career. His uniqueness (+increasing size/muscle) will eventually win him an MVP, not just TOP3 upside anymore, once voters understand his overall impact.

Brad/Zarren will use the Center position to add multiple cheap contracts (X, Lukes, Queta types) mostly to absorb the punishment of the regular season.

Meanwhile, Brad will keep unearthing versatile WINGs. Hauser is very worth retaining as long as possible, extremely switchy defensively. Expect they will get Hauser to return on a very team-friendly extension.

I'm guessing a healthy KP will be the first moved out of the TOP5, maybe next Summer's business.
 

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,697
If Boston signs Hauser in the $17-20 million a year range, what would be the total additional cost per season, instead of just moving Baylor into the designated shooter bench role? $50 million the first season, adding salary difference and penalties? $70 million?
Assuming White extends, Horford leaves, everyone else stays and every other roster spot is filled with minimums, the difference between Hauser at 17M, or another player at the minimum instead, would be around 100M difference in salary+tax in year one.

I don't think that's going to happen.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
33,867
A little hard to know how teams will view the growing cap, but Hauser is not likely to get $17 mil. This is like some of the speculation a year ago Grant would get $20 mil/year to me---a bit of an overreach on what the market has shown.

Luke Kennard just had his $14.7 mil option declined; that's probably the high-water mark on what Hauser might think about and if I were guessing he's more toward 4/$50 or something like that.

But, as always, I could be wrong....
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
15,014
I'm guessing a healthy KP will be the first moved out of the TOP5, maybe next Summer's business.
I get the perpetual injury concern with KP, but I feel like people are glossing over how important he is to this team's upside. We did get pretty lucky with opponent injuries and avoiding the best teams in the West.

Tatum and Jaylen are still evolving and this past year will be a huge confidence boost, but KP might still be the ticket to a dynasty vs a 1 year title team.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
15,106
SF
I get the perpetual injury concern with KP, but I feel like people are glossing over how important he is to this team's upside. We did get pretty lucky with opponent injuries and avoiding the best teams in the West.

Tatum and Jaylen are still evolving and this past year will be a huge confidence boost, but KP might still be the ticket to a dynasty vs a 1 year title team.
I don't think people are glossing over it: he's really good. The problem is that if he costs you someone like Hauser, then you're going into this extreme lottery ticket mode, where you're just hoping he stays healthy every spring.

A lot of this probably resolves itself this season: you extend Hauser at any reasonable price, since he's a positive trade asset. You go through the 2025 playoff run. Then you evaluate:
  • did KP stay healthy? If he did, that makes you more willing to go crazy on tax for one wild 2025-26 season
  • how much did Hauser contribute? Did he take a step up, or are there ways to replace him?
In both cases, you go into the summer of 2025 with options.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
8,777
With the chance to threepeat, ownership might be ok with writing a huge penalty check. If Baylor can cover Hauser’s role, Boston would have gotten another value season out of Sam, while setting him up for a payday as a two time champ. Assuming Al is done this season, Boston will have to dump some money into a number two big. Hauser at market salary might not be the best option.

In an ideal world, Al can be effective for two more seasons, Hauser settles on $10-12 million on a four year deal, and Wyc fires up the checkbook throughout the Jays’ prime. I think the Celtics will be fine regardless of Hauser staying or leaving.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
15,014
I don't think people are glossing over it: he's really good. The problem is that if he costs you someone like Hauser, then you're going into this extreme lottery ticket mode, where you're just hoping he stays healthy every spring.

A lot of this probably resolves itself this season: you extend Hauser at any reasonable price, since he's a positive trade asset. You go through the 2025 playoff run. Then you evaluate:
  • did KP stay healthy? If he did, that makes you more willing to go crazy on tax for one wild 2025-26 season
  • how much did Hauser contribute? Did he take a step up, or are there ways to replace him?
In both cases, you go into the summer of 2025 with options.
Unless KP's leg falls off, I think I would rather have KP and Scheierman/random shooter X than keep Hauser + try to find someone to replace KP.

I get the risk, but the reward with KP is really significant. Hauser is a nice 7th/8th man and I hope he stays, but it's much less likely that he is the difference between another title compared to KP.

Agree that as long as you sign Hauser to something reasonable, he is a positive asset and you can reassess after the year. But I strongly lean toward KP if it becomes a choice between the 2 and KP is at all functional.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
23,211
Santa Monica
A little hard to know how teams will view the growing cap, but Hauser is not likely to get $17 mil. This is like some of the speculation a year ago Grant would get $20 mil/year to me---a bit of an overreach on what the market has shown.

Luke Kennard just had his $14.7 mil option declined; that's probably the high-water mark on what Hauser might think about and if I were guessing he's more toward 4/$50 or something like that.

But, as always, I could be wrong....
Your money sounds fair, just think Glushon will want a 2+1 extension so he can head to UFA at 29

Unless KP's leg falls off, I think I would rather have KP and Scheierman/random shooter X than keep Hauser + try to find someone to replace KP.

I get the risk, but the reward with KP is really significant. Hauser is a nice 7th/8th man and I hope he stays, but it's much less likely that he is the difference between another title compared to KP.

Agree that as long as you sign Hauser to something reasonable, he is a positive asset and you can reassess after the year. But I strongly lean toward KP if it becomes a choice between the 2 and KP is at all functional.
I like KP a lot, calling him their 2nd most important player this season (which was wrong in retrospect)

A mildly successful Baylor is here no matter what.

If Brad is told to avoid absurd tax penalties for 2025-26, which group would you rather have (est. salaries):

GROUP A:
Horford (12M) + Sam Hauser (12M) + Xavier Tillman (5M) + PP (7M)

VS.

GROUP B:
KP (30M) + 3 Minimums (7M)

I'm going GROUP A, since Horford or X or Tatum can be their 5-wide Center in the playoffs by then.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
15,014
GROUP A:
Horford (12M) + Sam Hauser (12M) + Xavier Tillman (5M) + PP (7M)

VS.

GROUP B:
KP (30M) + 3 Minimums (7M)

I'm going GROUP A, since Horford or X or Tatum can be their 5-wide Center in the playoffs by then.
Good question, I'm glad we can keep our options open for now.

So many unknowns right now compared to a year from now:

- KP health
- Can Al play much at age 40?
- Is Baylor a decent Hauser replacement?
- Whats the vet min market look like?
- How strict is Wyc on the tax #? (PP at 7M is going to be a deal breaker for him?)
- Are the Celtics coming off a repeat title and going for 3 in a row?

Overall, if KP has a remotely healthy year, I'd prefer to keep him and deal with the rest of the bench as necessary. If that means we lose a 40 year old Al, Hauser, and Tillman, so be it. I have a feeling we can keep PP at that # or make a reasonable trade.
 
Last edited:

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
15,106
SF
All of the above is the best argument for picking up Hauser's option this year: you get to pay him $2M while all this stuff sorts itself out this year.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
23,211
Santa Monica
All of the above is the best argument for picking up Hauser's option this year: you get to pay him $2M while all this stuff sorts itself out this year.
If they extend Sam, they'll have until Feb. 2026 trade deadline to "let it sort itself out".

Brad owning their draft stock will let him optimize their roster for the 2026 playoffs. Something many fail to recognize when these teams include every last pick into a Summer deal. You want pick flexibility when several teams are throwing in the towel at the deadline.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
15,106
SF
Opinions on whether Hauser will extend seem to be diverging a lot, so I'm going to plant my stake in the ground here and say I think he'll extend this summer. Happy to say I'm an idiot if he doesn't.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
13,355
around the way
Opinions on whether Hauser will extend seem to be diverging a lot, so I'm going to plant my stake in the ground here and say I think he'll extend this summer. Happy to say I'm an idiot if he doesn't.
I really hope that you're right. For all of the talk about how 3 guys aren't terribly hard to find, I'd love to keep the one that plays credible defense and already fits the team (assuming that the cost is reasonable).
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
15,106
SF
I really hope that you're right. For all of the talk about how 3 guys aren't terribly hard to find, I'd love to keep the one that plays credible defense and already fits the team (assuming that the cost is reasonable).
Also, they're pretty hard to find.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
32,575
Assuming White extends, Horford leaves, everyone else stays and every other roster spot is filled with minimums, the difference between Hauser at 17M, or another player at the minimum instead, would be around 100M difference in salary+tax in year one.

I don't think that's going to happen.
Exactly. This is why Brad drafted Scheierman. He probably is certain that this will be Hauser’s final year here.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
13,221
Opinions on whether Hauser will extend seem to be diverging a lot, so I'm going to plant my stake in the ground here and say I think he'll extend this summer. Happy to say I'm an idiot if he doesn't.
I am not sure if you posted this earlier but right after the Finals, John Hollinger (at least that's who I remember it being) wrote in an article that he was hearing from multiple places that White and Hauser were definitely getting extensions.

Until I hear rumors to the contrary, I am operating under the assumption that Hauser will stay.

Also, if they have to cut salary after signing Sam, I think PP is the obvious person to get rid of. I think that's the easiest position to fill
 

bigq

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,789
Opinions on whether Hauser will extend seem to be diverging a lot, so I'm going to plant my stake in the ground here and say I think he'll extend this summer. Happy to say I'm an idiot if he doesn't.
I also think he will extend and I’m using this Globe article as the reason for my optimism.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2024/06/29/sports/sam-hauser-celtics-contract-option/?event=event12

A source said the two sides are expected to begin negotiating an extension for the 26-year-old forward after the window for those discussions opens July 9.
Celtics president of basketball operations Brad Stevens declined to discuss Hauser’s contract situation, but made it clear the team views him as a key piece.

“We want Hauser to be here for a long time,” Stevens said.
And the Celtics summer of love rolls on.
 

NomarsFool

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 21, 2001
9,873
It's amazing to me that these guys do bet on themselves. Maybe Miami had no intention/illusions of being able to extend Max Strus, but he was making less than $2 million/year in his last year with Miami, and then went into free agency where he obviously cashed in to get his 4 year, $62 million deal.

Before his last year with Miami, he had made just $2 million in his total career. So, he risked playing that season and potentially suffering a down year or a significant injury to cash in (which he did). Again, maybe Miami was never going to re-sign him, just seems like amazingly risky.
 

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,697
Exactly. This is why Brad drafted Scheierman. He probably is certain that this will be Hauser’s final year here.
I wouldn't be surprised if Hauser signs an extension.

In that example, I meant that I don't think a Hauser extension would start as high as 17M, and that if he extends that they would stay that deep into the tax.

They'll move someone out by the end of 2026 to duck taxes.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
3,771

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
24,953
Pittsburgh, PA
Resigning Hauser is the equivalent of killing Carlo at the end of the Godfather. Not strictly necessary right now but if you're settling all family business, let's just get it done.
Hilarious.

Brad should ink Justise Winslow to the Maine Celtics, for good measure. He's been in Toronto's G-League team the last year.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
32,575
It's amazing to me that these guys do bet on themselves. Maybe Miami had no intention/illusions of being able to extend Max Strus, but he was making less than $2 million/year in his last year with Miami, and then went into free agency where he obviously cashed in to get his 4 year, $62 million deal.

Before his last year with Miami, he had made just $2 million in his total career. So, he risked playing that season and potentially suffering a down year or a significant injury to cash in (which he did). Again, maybe Miami was never going to re-sign him, just seems like amazingly risky.
It is very possible, maybe even likely, that Strus' team took out an insurance policy against an injury that would cost him his perceived market value the following summer.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
23,211
Santa Monica
Yep. Brad knocks the cover off the ball again. Doubt he gets traded since he's starting caliber WING on an absurdly cheap contract. Let's them keep the JAYs
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
15,014
Seems like a fair deal for Sam, a bit higher than the Caleb Martin contract, deservedly so.

Obviously going to be a tax issue a year from now, but they can deal with it then. They should have plenty of tradable "plus value" contracts.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
15,014
Yep. Brad knocks the cover off the ball again. Doubt he gets traded since he's starting caliber WING on an absurdly cheap contract. Let's them keep the JAYs
I'm not sure how many teams would be thrilled with Hauser starting on the wing, though he is definitely a great bench option/top 8 guy to have on the roster.

A year from now someone almost has to get traded.... if not, paying Hauser 10M a season would cost them something silly like 50M+. But I guess we will cross that bridge when we get there.
 

nattysez

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2010
9,808
I'm not sure how many teams would be thrilled with Hauser starting on the wing, though he is definitely a great bench option/top 8 guy to have on the roster.

A year from now someone almost has to get traded.... if not, paying Hauser 10M a season would cost them something silly like 50M+. But I guess we will cross that bridge when we get there.
That's why I thought this would never happen. I am confident Brad and Zarren have a plan.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
15,014
That's why I thought this would never happen. I am confident Brad and Zarren have a plan.
Unless Sam forgets how to shoot, he should be pretty valuable on that contract.

If Baylor pans out and can be a decent Sam replacement, Sam (or PP or KP or someone) is going to be on the move before 2025-2026.
 

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,697
I'm not sure how many teams would be thrilled with Hauser starting on the wing, though he is definitely a great bench option/top 8 guy to have on the roster.

A year from now someone almost has to get traded.... if not, paying Hauser 10M a season would cost them something silly like 50M+. But I guess we will cross that bridge when we get there.
If I were on Team Pritchard, I'd advise him to rent, not buy.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
15,014
If I were on Team Pritchard, I'd advise him to rent, not buy.
Agreed, though he only makes 7M so it wouldn't make as much of a difference compared to sending off Hauser or (gasp) one of the big 5.

A lot will depend on how the team does this year and what injury issues crop up (particularly with KP).