Do you think the Red Sox interest in Juan Soto is genuine?

We being real or nah?


  • Total voters
    425
  • Poll closed .

pinkhatfan

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2011
175
I think this is a bit of a false choice - if they fail to sign him, that means their interest wasn't genuine?

For what it's worth, I voted yes. The Red Sox seem to be putting the effort into convincing Soto to sign here.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
40,918
Hingham, MA
Because there's silly money - 12 years, $550 million ($45.8m/year) - and then there's SILLY money - 15 years, $750 million ($50m/year). I'm sure the Sox had no problem with silly money. Pretty sure they don't literally have a blank checkbook and aren't ok with SILLY money.
Guess I disagree with this. $150M out in the 2037-2040 range shouldn't move the needle.
 

santadevil

wears depends
Silver Supporter
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
6,770
Saskatchestan
I feel like they definitely interested and to me, it makes a lot of sense
Soto will be a star no matter where he goes, but it's a bit different in Boston and he can be the next guy that is an absolute legend here, along with the other Dominican legends that have played here

Not too many other teams seem to have this other than the Yankees and a bit less, the Dodgers
(caveat: I don't follow a lot of other teams closely, but it doesn't seem the same)
 

Mooch

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
5,281
So that's it? The Sox should never show interest in a player that the Mets are intensely interested in?
This is tied to one specific generational player here. Each FA has a different set of circumstances. The path on Soto was pretty well established here, no?
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
40,918
Hingham, MA
20 years ago about another generational player, seems just as relevant today

"Unlike the Yankees, he chose not to go the extra distance for his fans in Boston," Steinbrenner said of Henry. "It is understandable, but wrong that he would try to deflect the accountability for his mistakes on to others and to a system for which he voted in favor. It is time to get on with life and forget the sour grapes."
 

BaseballJones

slappy happy
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
27,417
What contract terms do you all think the Red Sox rightly and justifiably would say no thank you to?
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
This is tied to one specific generational player here. Each FA has a different set of circumstances. The path on Soto was pretty well established here, no?
So there is just one acceptable outcome for you. They either try and are successful or try and fail in which case you'll be upset that they even tried in the first place.
 

Sille Skrub

Dope
Dope
SoSH Member
Mar 3, 2004
6,187
Massachusetts
20 years ago about another generational player, seems just as relevant today

"Unlike the Yankees, he chose not to go the extra distance for his fans in Boston," Steinbrenner said of Henry. "It is understandable, but wrong that he would try to deflect the accountability for his mistakes on to others and to a system for which he voted in favor. It is time to get on with life and forget the sour grapes."
Get out of my head. This has been exactly what I have been thinking of during Sotomania.
 

Mooch

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
5,281
So there is just one acceptable outcome for you. They either try and are successful or try and fail in which case you'll be upset that they even tried in the first place.
If the "try" was to somehow think that not being the highest bidder would get Soto? Yep.
 

Brianish

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 11, 2008
5,873
If the "try" was to somehow think that not being the highest bidder would get Soto? Yep.
This is the real thing. It's a definitional issue. I think, for those of us saying no, all the visible effort - the PR campaign, bringing out Papi and Rafi - is what the Sox are doing *instead of* trying to be the highest bidder.
 

Hangdog Dane

New Member
Dec 18, 2023
3
I think they are interested in Soto, you would be a complete idiot if not. However, the amounts of money being thrown around are ridiculous. I believe that they are in a spending mood and are really looking to add high priced talent but I don't believe that are stupid enough to be the highest bidder at this point and internally, they know that. Not getting Soto will be ok with me as long as they take the money that they don't use for Soto to get 2-3 high priced talents to improve the team . But based on "past performance", it doesn't seem like if they lose out on Soto, that's what will happen. I really hope I'm wrong and get piled on in a few days too...
 

Max Power

thai good. you like shirt?
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
8,964
Boston, MA
So whoever signs him is stupid?
Maybe. If getting outbid on a free agent means you weren't actually trying, then signing a guy who ages like Trout or Pujols or Murphy or Banks to a 15 year deal means you're stupid. It's all about the results, right?
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
54,474
So there is just one acceptable outcome for you. They either try and are successful or try and fail in which case you'll be upset that they even tried in the first place.
If the Sox interest was legitimate, they should have assumed they would have to make the highest offer. Soto was set up to play in NY last season so if the money is less or even with the Yankees/Mets, he is unlikely to bite (I am setting aside all the soft stuff like Ortiz courting him or whatever mythical connection there is between the DR and Fenway because that doesn't seem to overwhelm money as a driver, ever). And if they were tied with, say LA, you have to assume the Dodgers get the push there given that its LA and they stock a roster to compete every year.

Boston seems to be a well regarded destination for players but they are a mid market team that hasn't really been relevant in baseball for half a decade. It really feels like they should have been prepared to pay a premium to get Soto in Boston - there is no *winning* a deal like this and people with that mentality shouldn't be near negotiations like this. If we find out they didn't, they weren't really serious (when someone has the chance, please explain why a number like $600mm means they are legit - its just unsubstantiated talk).

We live in a results world and they don't even have a discernable process for roster building except shopping at the "slightly loved" store.
 

Archer1979

shazowies
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
9,054
Right Here
I believe that its genuine. They might have their offer bested by the Mets but they are certainly trying to get this done. If the Mets beat their offer, I suspect it will be for a number that will just tie too much capital up for the proposed length of the contract. There is a ceiling, and there should be. I just hope that its high enough that it gets the deal done. Worst case scenario is if he signs somewhere else and the numbers were something that the Sox should have bested.
 

bosox1534

New Member
Dec 17, 2022
342
This thread seems silly to me, obviously they have serious interest. If they are willing to spend a minimum of $600M on one player, you cannot tell me there isn’t serious interest. If they get beat by Steve Cohen offering $700M or more, so be it, that’s an irresponsible move made by a desperate owner and team. I applaud them for going out there and making an effort to get a game changing player, however I will not fault them if they don’t end up signing him. Nobody expected the Sox to even be a contender for Soto, so I don’t see the need to get upset if he doesn’t sign there. Plenty of other guys on the market that will help this team immensely; it isn’t Soto or bust.
 

WilhelmScream

New Member
Dec 22, 2022
61
Watertown, MA
The two possible outcomes thing is lame. Signing him isn't the only way to have genuine interest.

Lot of Boston fans have perfected playing the victim card.
 
Last edited:

Bigdogx

New Member
Jul 21, 2020
328
So whoever signs him is stupid?
At the numbers i seen this morning in the 15/705+ range i would not fault the Red Sox for bowing out. I get that this sport has these idiotic term deals but i would not extend this far for a guy that only hits! He doesn't play the field particularly well, doesn't have a great arm, what happens when he is no longer in his prime and his bat speed is down and he is hitting .250-.275 with 20 hr and 65 rbi's a season as a DH and you still have 7-8+ years of his contract?
 

cantor44

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2020
1,848
Chicago, IL
The thing is, I don't really know what the Red Sox can spend. I'm pretty ignorant here.

We know they are the listed, what was it, 4th on the Miserly Index (spent the 4th least amount of their revenue on their roster, which is absolutely unacceptable given the ticket prices and the devotion of New England fans). Maybe this was an interstitial phase, and now they are ready to spend. If The Red Sox became the last team on the miserly index, spending biggest share of their revenue on their roster, what would that look like? How high would their payroll be? (Though I understand wanting to avoid luxury tax penalties, or avoid them in successive years).

I also don't understand how any owner can kick in their own money to pay salaries, which folks keep saying about Cohen (this makes no sense to me - does this actually happen? - owner's purchase organizations but they don't fund them out of pocket, they spend the money the organization makes to pay salaries, yes?).

So, there is a lot of money the Red Sox can spend, but there is some limit out there. What's that limit? And there's an amount that still allows them to build a sustain a team around Soto and an amount that begins to compromise that, in relationship to that limit.

Can they give a 700 Million dollar contract to Soto and still get a FA starting pitcher, another reliever, a solid RHH bat, a trade for another arm? Maybe they can. If so, I'm unbothered by the 700 million. OTOH, if that 700 million is going to make them a top heavy roster with a big star at the top, but lots of holes underneath him they can't address with money, then, no, maybe a line is being crossed with Soto now, and they should step back.

But it does seem they are sincere.
 

Pat Spillane

New Member
Feb 12, 2021
75
You think they’re going to spend time and effort to pretend to go after free agents?

that seems dumb to me.

Yes of course to appease the fan base and make them think they are in in when they know they will be outbid. Plenty of owners of all kinds of sportsclubs do this. I dont think the Sox are doing this now but yes it happens all the time
 

loneredseat

New Member
Dec 8, 2023
286
Because there's silly money - 12 years, $550 million ($45.8m/year) - and then there's SILLY money - 15 years, $750 million ($50m/year). I'm sure the Sox had no problem with silly money. Pretty sure they don't literally have a blank checkbook and aren't ok with SILLY money.
Right. I have no issue with this whatsoever.
 

P'tucket rhymes with...

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2006
12,336
The Coney Island of my mind
Hope isn't a strategy. Every indiciation all along was that Cohen would do just that.

Look, I REALLY want Soto. But if this ends up the case, I''ll be pretty angry with the Sox for even going down this path in the first place.
So you want him, but you're pissed that they even bothered exploring the signing because they wouldn't go into it determined to outbid a loose cannon with more money than Croesus.

Do I have that right?
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,919
There is zero chance they would go through all this trouble knowing they would not get him, and be left with the resulting fan disappointment.
 

NickEsasky

Please Hammer, Don't Hurt 'Em
SoSH Member
Jul 24, 2001
9,823
The two possible outcomes thing is lame. Signing him isn't the only way to have genuine interest.

Lot of Boston fans have perfected playing the victim card.
A lot Boston fans miss consistent playoff baseball after paying some of the highest ticket prices, too.
 

Sox Pride

New Member
Nov 25, 2005
248
The Triangle
Of course they're interested in Soto. He's one of the best hitters in the game and he's available in his mid-twenties for only money.
Are they going to sign him at any cost? No. That's not true of any player.

I also believe they were honestly in on Yamamoto last year. Once again, a possibly dominant player in his mid-twenties for only money.

Did I believe they were in on every other player they were linked with?
Of course not. A lot of that is agents trying to drive up the price of their player.

They said they weren't interested in large contracts for pitchers in their thirties since the David Price and Chris Sale experiences.
That doesn't mean they don't want to spend.

But they have a limit.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
54,474
There is zero chance they would go through all this trouble knowing they would not get him, and be left with the resulting fan disappointment.
What trouble did they go through, exactly? They made an offer, they did their media spin and they live with the outcome. Its not like Breslow had to summit Everest or anything. They did some PJ traveling and had a few phone calls. That's pretty much a day ending in Y for most of their fans, sans the private plane.
 

Mooch

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
5,281
So you want him, but you're pissed that they even bothered exploring the signing because they wouldn't go into it determined to outbid a loose cannon with more money than Croesus.

Do I have that right?
Again, what about Cohen did we not know going into this? Flip this around: The biggest free agent in a generation, in the prime of his career, represented by Scott Boras is on the market. You know that there’s an interested party out there who will spend top dollar on him. Your strategy all along was to somehow convince him to take less money to come to Boston? Really? And you’re ok with the Sox wasting time like this?

Hey, if it works? Mea MAXIMA Culpa. But otherwise, this seemed like a pointless exercise since, well: It really never works.
 

astrozombie

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 12, 2022
788
There is zero chance they would go through all this trouble knowing they would not get him, and be left with the resulting fan disappointment.
Quite the opposite. All this trouble is supposed to signal how absolutely committed they are to winning and fielding the best team possible. And even if they don't get the guy (again!) it's because of other factors like Soto never wanting to be here, or other teams willing to pay more for Soto's services, or something else that was outside of ownership's control. But fans should be excited that they tried.
At least I am guessing that's how ownership sees it.
 

bosox1534

New Member
Dec 17, 2022
342
Again, what about Cohen did we not know going into this? Flip this around: The biggest free agent in a generation, in the prime of his career, represented by Scott Boras is on the market. You know that there’s an interested party out there who will spend top dollar on him. Your strategy all along was to somehow convince him to take less money to come to Boston? Really? And you’re ok with the Sox wasting time like this?

Hey, if it works? Mea MAXIMA Culpa. But otherwise, this seemed like a pointless exercise since, well: It really never works.
This isn’t really accurate at all. Going after the top free agent signals to others players and agents that you are serious about spending money this offseason, and it increases fan morale knowing that at least on the surface it seems as if they are going to work hard to improve the team this offseason. I don’t understand what you’re so upset about, would you rather have had them just never be in it in the first place? The only thing it cost was a few plane rides and some Zoom meetings. I for one have been very intrigued by the whole process and am enjoying all the drama taking place, however at this point am also kind of ready for him to just sign so we can move on with the offseason.
 

Mooch

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
5,281
This isn’t really accurate at all. Going after the top free agent signals to others players and agents that you are serious about spending money this offseason, and it increases fan morale knowing that at least on the surface it seems as if they are going to work hard to improve the team this offseason. I don’t understand what you’re so upset about, would you rather have had them just never be in it in the first place? The only thing it cost was a few plane rides and some Zoom meetings. I for one have been very intrigued by the whole process and am enjoying all the drama taking place, however at this point am also kind of ready for him to just sign so we can move on with the offseason.
You know what shows that you’re serious about spending money? Actually doing it.
 

RS2004foreever

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2022
1,577
Because there's silly money - 12 years, $550 million ($45.8m/year) - and then there's SILLY money - 15 years, $750 million ($50m/year). I'm sure the Sox had no problem with silly money. Pretty sure they don't literally have a blank checkbook and aren't ok with SILLY money.
It is the difference between just a silly walk and a VERY silly walk.
 

bosox1534

New Member
Dec 17, 2022
342
You know what shows that you’re serious about spending money? Actually doing it.
Ok, only one of the marquee free agents has signed, it’s December 6th, and the winter meetings haven’t even concluded yet. Come back in March, and then your complaints can be justified if they didn’t spend. Stop being so negative and have a little faith the team that has won 4 World Series in 20 years is going to come through when they say they’re going to come through. Things could be a lot worse, just ask the Oakland/Sacramento/Vegas Athletics fans.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
40,918
Hingham, MA
Ok, only one of the marquee free agents has signed, it’s December 6th, and the winter meetings haven’t even concluded yet. Come back in March, and then your complaints can be justified if they didn’t spend. Stop being so negative and have a little faith the team that has won 4 World Series in 20 years is going to come through when they say they’re going to come through. Things could be a lot worse, just ask the Oakland/Sacramento/Vegas Athletics fans.
I look forward to reading this statement again next December, just like the last few Decembers!
 

Average Reds

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 24, 2007
36,432
Southwestern CT
The Mookie situation left scars.
That’s a big part of it, but - and this is where my scars begin to show - when they begin to issue/leak statements about the lengths they are going to try to get (insert target), I assume that we’ve entered the “acceptance” phase of grief.

If you are a serious player involved in end-stage negotiations, you keep your damn mouth shut.

edit: it’s entirely possible that the leak came from Soto’s side. But that’s not how I read it. YMMV.
 

bosox1534

New Member
Dec 17, 2022
342
I look forward to reading this statement again next December, just like the last few Decembers!
I don’t get the point of being negative all the time towards this team, it does nobody any good. There are few things that bring me more joy than Red Sox baseball, and even though some seasons are better than others, I don’t feel the constant disdain a lot of you feel during subpar seasons. You can be critical, sure, but the constant negativity is getting old.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
22,900
Maine
You know what shows that you’re serious about spending money? Actually doing it.
And if they offer $750M and Soto takes $751M from the Mets, is that because the Sox aren't serious about spending money or because Soto liked the Mets money more?

I don't know why we remove all other parties from the equation when discussing spending. Were the Giants not serious about spending on Aaron Judge, or was it that he truly preferred to go back to the Yankees all along? Seeing a guy sign elsewhere does not automatically equal the Red Sox didn't want it badly enough. Maybe the player didn't want to be in Boston badly enough.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
49,671
I don’t get the point of being negative all the time towards this team, it does nobody any good. There are few things that bring me more joy than Red Sox baseball, and even though some seasons are better than others, I don’t feel the constant disdain a lot of you feel during subpar seasons. You can be critical, sure, but the constant negativity is getting old.
Not everyone perceives frustration as “negativity”.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
The idea that the Sox are performatively going through the motions and have no sincere interest in signing Soto is preposterous. These people all have real relationships -- Papi with Soto, Theo and Henry and Cora and the other Sox execs with Boras, etc. -- and to embark on an elaborate campaign of bullshitting because they think the fans on twitter will be sated by it is beyond unreal. It's not always about us. These are humans doing difficult jobs for insane sums of money. They are not going to collectively light their reputations on fire to win the internet.

If they are only serious up to, say, $600m, that's not serious enough to get it done, but they would have been booted from the table by now.

It's easy to catastrophize things where we only have bits of information. Same with the news, politics, Porzingis' ankles and so on. But just because we can imagine a scenario doesn't make it a real-life possibility.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
49,671
And not everyone expresses it in a negative fashion.
Which is perfectly fine. It’s not our job to try to regulate how people express themselves. We all adhere to the same community rules and are dealt with when we don’t. It doesn’t bother me one iota if someone is too rosy or too “negative”.
 

NickEsasky

Please Hammer, Don't Hurt 'Em
SoSH Member
Jul 24, 2001
9,823
And if they offer $750M and Soto takes $751M from the Mets, is that because the Sox aren't serious about spending money or because Soto liked the Mets money more?

I don't know why we remove all other parties from the equation when discussing spending. Were the Giants not serious about spending on Aaron Judge, or was it that he truly preferred to go back to the Yankees all along? Seeing a guy sign elsewhere does not automatically equal the Red Sox didn't want it badly enough. Maybe the player didn't want to be in Boston badly enough.
This is kind of the problem if your strategy is to keep your powder dry unless you get the unicorn under 30 free agent. Guess what? Lots of other teams are going to want said unicorn and it's going to get expensive. Or they just sign with the Dodgers because the team spends money and has a loaded roster.