#DFG: Canceling the Noise

Is there any level of suspension that you would advise Tom to accept?


  • Total voters
    208

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
jimbobim said:
Multiple reports from ESPN and SI have alluded to media obligations generally that have been avoided due to ongoing court proceedings. I don't know when they become mandatory, but I can see the NFL using that lever to apply pressure eventually. 
There's no way the NFL fines or says anything about not speaking to the press to Brady about this before Berman issues a ruling. None.

And the grievance from the NFLPA on a fine after the ruling would be filed before the ink was dry on the twitter announcement.
 

Stevie1der

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 6, 2009
1,073
Morrisville, NC
jimbobim said:
Multiple reports from ESPN and SI have alluded to media obligations generally that have been avoided due to ongoing court proceedings. I don't know when they become mandatory, but I can see the NFL using that lever to apply pressure eventually. 
 
That strikes me as a very cynical ploy by the league that would not play very well in Judge Berman's court.
 

MuppetAsteriskTalk

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2015
5,413
I would think at some point Brady says he can't take any questions on DG due to the court proceedings, then ignores any DG questions. If he doesn't get other questions he can just walk away from the mic. He will handle it fine.
 

PeaceSignMoose

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 13, 2006
1,745
Boston
soxfan121 said:
There's no way the NFL fines or says anything about not speaking to the press to Brady about this before Berman issues a ruling. None.

And the grievance from the NFLPA on a fine after the ruling would be filed before the ink was dry on the twitter announcement.
 
The NFL has reached a settlement with Tom Brady of the New England Patriots.  Tom Brady will not be suspended or fined for any wrongdoing regarding the AFC Championship Game.
 
The NFL has also suspended Tom Brady for 4 games due to failure to fulfill media obligations.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
Whatever obligations he has, I don't read that policy as requiring him to go to the podium.  I wonder if there's some other policy that requires podium-ing. (The NFL seems to have lots of policies.)
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,394
PeaceSignMoose said:
 
The NFL has reached a settlement with Tom Brady of the New England Patriots.  Tom Brady will not be suspended or fined for any wrongdoing regarding the AFC Championship Game.
 
The NFL has also suspended Tom Brady for 4 games due to failure to fulfill media obligations.
 
As noted in some other place here, Berman would roast RG and the NFL for this in a way that they would find incredibly unpleasant.   The NFL may be used to doing whatever it wants, but on a matter (or closely related to a matter) before a sitting federal district court judge they are situated very differently, and I'm confident at least their outside counsel will tell them that in no uncertain terms.
 
Obviously, if the 'second' suspension is legitimately unrelated to the ongoing proceeding that is different, but the scenario described above won't happen.
 

BelichickFan

New Member
May 11, 2015
34
California
For those of us who don't watch Game of Thrones, which I believe the Patricia T-Shirt is from, can you explain it ?  I'm under the impression the North was basically screwed over the would always "remember".  Is that a fair explanation of the shirt ?
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,591
Somewhere
BelichickFan said:
For those of us who don't watch Game of Thrones, which I believe the Patricia T-Shirt is from, can you explain it ?  I'm under the impression the North was basically screwed over the would always "remember".  Is that a fair explanation of the shirt ?
 
The royal house of the north (Stark) is essentially destroyed, through various acts of treachery. Although ruled by other houses, the residents of the north remain loyal to the Starks.
 
In the Game of Thrones universe, Roger Goodell is the equivalent of Hodor.
 

( . ) ( . ) and (_!_)

T&A
SoSH Member
Feb 9, 2010
5,302
Providence, RI
Devizier said:
 
The royal house of the north (Stark) is essentially destroyed, through various acts of treachery. Although ruled by other houses, the residents of the north remain loyal to the Starks.
 
In the Game of Thrones universe, Roger Goodell is the equivalent of Hodor.
 
Fuck that.  Don't insult Hodor.
 
Roger Goodell is Penny.  Useless, whiny and tiny.  
 

allstonite

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 27, 2010
2,492
I'd say Ramsay Snow. Acting irrational and malicious to try to legitimize himself in the eyes of his father. In this instance, his father Roose Bolton is all of the owners collectively. Also ties nicely with Brady/The Patriots being the North and remembering.
 

dcdrew10

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
1,399
Washington, DC via Worcester
Kilgore A. Trout said:
Wouldn't he be Joffrey?
 
Definitely Joffrey. A little power hungry egomaniac who thinks he rules, but really is just doing the bidding of a council of his elders. When he tries to do something on his own or for a select few of his councilors he screws it up royally. Most people hate him, but because of his goon squad and sycophants no one can openly say/do anything against him. He was born on third base, but thought he his a home run.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRZmVvMyaog
 
skip to 1:20
 

PeaceSignMoose

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 13, 2006
1,745
Boston
allstonite said:
I'd say Ramsay Snow. Acting irrational and malicious to try to legitimize himself in the eyes of his father. In this instance, his father Roose Bolton is all of the owners collectively. Also ties nicely with Brady/The Patriots being the North and remembering.
 
So, Troy Vincent is Reek?
 

drbretto

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 10, 2009
12,148
Concord, NH
Do any of you even watch Game of Thrones? Goodell may be mentally equivalent to Hodor, Penny and that 12 year old breastfeeder, but he's pretty obviously Joffrey from just about every angle. And Brady is Jon Snow. And we're the north. Wells is Gran Maester Pycell. Florio is Tyrion. Sean Berry is Ramsey.
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,479
Guys, this thread has pulled far enough off the tracks.
 
Shut the fuck up about Game of Thrones, please.
 

drbretto

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 10, 2009
12,148
Concord, NH
Kenny F'ing Powers said:
Guys, this thread has pulled far enough off the tracks.
 
Shut the fuck up about Game of Thrones, please.
 
You're right. We need to save server space for the next person who wants to ask if there's going to be a defamation suit.
 

Dahabenzapple2

Mr. McGuire / Axl's Counter
SoSH Member
Jun 20, 2011
8,927
Wayne, NJ
soxhop411 said:
https://twitter.com/AlbertBreer/status/633380038503698432
 
 
Ralph Vacchiano ‏@RVacchianoNYDN  10m10 minutes ago
John Mara on @WFAN660 on DeflateGate: "I just want it to be over with one way or the other. We're all tired of hearing about it.
This type of comment makes me physically ill.
 
If you 'all" wanted it to be over with, maybe you "all" ought to have investigated what your boy Roger did. And grew a fucking pair and said something other than commending him for his decision, asshat. I actually had respect for the Mara family but no more.
 
 
btw - what is your beef?? your team isn't going through anything? The Patriots have lost draft choices and their QB has been under attack for 8 months???
 
STFU, Sir!!!
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,614
OnWisc said:
The owners are the real victims here. Too bad their hands are tied.
 
Somehow I doubt Mara would be so blasé about his own reputation going through the wringer.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,950
AZ
You want it to be over?  Pick up the fucking phone.
 
You and your colleagues created this monster and this mess -- you want the player to clean up after you?  Go.  Fuck.  Yourself. 
 
Your co-owner already fell on his sword for you, at great personal cost and at the risk of angering his fan base, which he loves dearly.  
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,173
Here
OnWisc said:
The owners are the real victims here. Too bad their hands are tied.
The audacity of Tom Brady to drag John Mara through this ordeal even longer by maintaining his innocence. Won't someone please think of the elderly?
 

LuckyBen

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 5, 2012
3,396
So does that mean if the NFL loses in court, the owners will grow a pair and tell Goodell to shut down any appeal? Would RG even listen?
 

dcdrew10

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
1,399
Washington, DC via Worcester
soxhop411 said:
https://twitter.com/AlbertBreer/status/633380038503698432
 
 
Ralph Vacchiano ‏@RVacchianoNYDN  10m10 minutes ago
John Mara on @WFAN660 on DeflateGate: "I just want it to be over with one way or the other. We're all tired of hearing about it.
Mara can get fucked. He's one of the owners who has been running his mouth in the media and I am fairly certain he's one of the owners encouraging the NFL to screw the Patriots and probably playing the Tywin Lannister/Don Barzini role as the real driving force behind the scenes.
 

cornwalls@6

Less observant than others
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
6,285
from the wilds of western ma
Yeah, fuck him and the rest of them for not showing any reason/sanity/decency, and putting a stop to this disgraceful farce months ago. They either actively in some cases, or through silent, tacit approval in others, wanted to see A. The Pats get slammed, because so few of these fucking losers have figured out how to beat them on the field, and B. to shove their heels even deeper into the throat of the NFLPA. And now it's turned into a monster that has gotten out of their control. They are lower than fucking FIFA. Tarted up gangsters.
 

( . ) ( . ) and (_!_)

T&A
SoSH Member
Feb 9, 2010
5,302
Providence, RI
Super Nomario said:
Did I miss something where he blamed Brady for this dragging out?
His quote is kind of open ended. He could be expressing a wish that the NFL does what they need to do to settle and move on or he could very well mean that Tom should drop his appeal, kiss the ring and serve the four games.

I for one am going to assume the second meaning, because fuck him.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
dcdrew10 said:
Mara can get fucked. He's one of the owners who has been running his mouth in the media and I am fairly certain he's one of the owners encouraging the NFL to screw the Patriots and probably playing the Tywin Lannister/Don Barzini role as the real driving force behind the scenes.
 
Please cite sources when making this sort of "fairly certain" speculation. Thanks.
 

ipol

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,237
The Dirty Mo'
Super Nomario said:
Did I miss something where he blamed Brady for this dragging out?
 
He stated, "one way or the other." He and his partners are capable of being "one way."  One assumes Brady is "the other" to which he refers.
 
Edit: pluralization.
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
Super Nomario said:
Did I miss something where he blamed Brady for this dragging out?
Seeing that he supported the commissioner's decision isn't Brady the only party who's to blame? If the commissioner's penalty is appropriate than Brady should just do the time.
 

OnWisc

Microcosmic
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2006
6,933
Chicago, IL
Taking it at face value, I think he's just tired of the situation without directing any particular blame toward Brady. But even interpreted it in the most benign way possible, the comment still makes him appear incredibly obtuse. Goodell works for Mara, has a lengthy track record of handling curveballs worse than Javier Baez, and this time around has victimized a future HoFer and a franchise that is not Mara's. Yet Mara's "tired of hearing about it."

Fuck off. I'm increasingly filled with self-loathing every time I put a cent in the pocket of these out of touch dickbags.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,394
Shelterdog said:
Seeing that he supported the commissioner's decision isn't Brady the only party who's to blame? If the commissioner's penalty is appropriate than Brady should just do the time.
 
I read him differently.   I think saying, today, "I just want it to be over with one way or the other" is a huge movement away from the commissioner.   We know that a couple months ago he thought NFL was right.  But he did not say that today, he said 'one way or the other' which is very different.
No quote I have seen since the hearing makes me as confident that RG is losing the PR battle.
 
 

dcdrew10

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
1,399
Washington, DC via Worcester
soxfan121 said:
 
Please cite sources when making this sort of "fairly certain" speculation. Thanks.
You mean besides the fact that Mara is the designated a Goodell tire pumper in the media (especially since the Kraft and Goodell schism) and that he oversaw the Mueller "investigation" into the Rice video? Let's just say I've got a feeling like Belichick did when people wanted a timeout before the Butler INT.
 

Average Reds

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 24, 2007
35,429
Southwestern CT
Well, yeah.

It's kind of obvious that Mara appears not to have expected Brady and the NFLPA to have pushed back as vigorously - or perhaps as effectively - as they have. And Mara seems to (finally) understand that it's not good for business if this continues on. Even worse if the NFL is exposed as a bunch of unethical clowns in the process.

In short, they picked on the wrong guy.

Edit: to PKB
 

ipol

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,237
The Dirty Mo'
PedroKsBambino said:
 
I read him differently.   I think saying, today, "I just want it to be over with one way or the other" is a huge movement away from the commissioner.   We know that a couple months ago he thought NFL was right.  But he did not say that today, he said 'one way or the other' which is very different.
No quote I have seen since the hearing makes me as confident that RG is losing the PR battle.
 
 
This isn't the first time such quotes have been cited as good news. They weren't then; I'm of the opinion they aren't now.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,394
Average Reds said:
Well, yeah.

It's kind of obvious that Mara appears not to have expected Brady and the NFLPA to have pushed back as vigorously - or perhaps as effectively - as they have. And Mara seems to (finally) understand that it's not good for business if this continues on. Even worse if the NFL is exposed as a bunch of unethical clowns in the process.

In short, they picked on the wrong guy.

Edit: to PKB
 
If I were guessing, there's roughly these groups of owners at this point:
 
1. Irrational haters (Irsay, Woody, possibly Biscotti)  who simply love the Pats being taken down a notch and care more about that than anything else in this situation
2. Protect the Shielders (Mara, Rooney, Jones, Blank, pre-Deflategate Kraft) who bleed NFL colors and are heavily inclined to protect the commissioner as the face of the league.
3. Silent majority (no idea, them being silent)  who want to get on with making money and initially found the Pats complaints about this to be a distraction...and now find the entire episode (including RG's behavior) to be a distraction
4. Goodell haters (Benson family, possibly others, likely Kraft today) believe RG needs to go and if this is what does it...they'll take it
 
What we saw initially was the public support of group 2, and what I suspect Kraft heard loud and clear privately is the views of group 2 and 3.
What I suspect, and have seen various anonymous reports of, is that group 3 feels it is bad for the brand to have this bleeding into this season, and to have the process be exposed as so indefensible.
 
I read Mara's quote as an indication that group 2 is getting there as well, and that is where RG feels pressure.
 

RG33

Certain Class of Poster
SoSH Member
Nov 28, 2005
7,233
CA
In all seriousness though, this "I'm so sick of hearing about this" sentiment is only a good thing for Brady and the NFLPA. When/If Judge Berman decides on something by September 4th, there is no downside to the owners/fans being pissed about this story not going away for Brady and the NFLPA. There is a lot of downside for Goodell and the NFL to continue to pursue things IF Berman vacates the suspension. It wouldn't be a surprise to me if some of the owners voiced concerns about further action by the NFL, and instead implored RG to just accept the fact that the Patriots were losing $1 million and two draft picks and to move on from Brady.
 

ivanvamp

captain obvious
Jul 18, 2005
6,104
ipol said:
All owners are diametrically opposed to the union. For them, there is only one entity to blame.
This is an interesting dynamic. In a factory, the product they sell may be assembled by the workers, and if the owners can find other ways to produce the same quality product (see: automation), they'll do it with little regard for the labor.

But in pro sports, the labor IS the product. Without the labor, there's nothing to sell, and no way for the owners to make money. So it's irratonal to have this disdain for labor in pro sports because without them, pro sports, and the gobs of money the owners make through pro sports, simply would not exist. I understand they want the labor to perform as cheaply as possible, but that's different from having a disdain for and and adversarial relationship with, the players.