if rubbing the ball tightens the stitching, or makes the leather contract, would that increase the PSI?SumnerH said:
The NFL hasn't released those numbers yet. But Bill's statement that the rubbing process "stimulates something inside that raises the PSI" is really "heats the ball up enough to raise the PSI"--it's essentially the sauna theory without the sauna.
mauidano said:So what's Curt Schilling's take on all of this?
Corsi said:heath evans now talking about creation theory? COME ON
lambeau said:The sauna theory was right! Now Bill says it wasn't heated air, but somehow they got the internal temperature up pretty high--he says by friction. A freaking sanding belt? He achieves a 1.5 psi drop over an hour to game conditions: 11.0 PSI--brilliant!
What he doesn't discuss is that a month is spent on these balls to get them worn in and tacky--nobody ever suggested a mad rubbing process (with hot water?) two hours prior to gametime. That makes no sense. But kudos!
Especially since they rub their balls withRedOctober3829 said:Rubbing the balls with the brush creates friction. Friction creates heat.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rChfsndsIiAOmar's Wacky Neighbor said:"Now hit my music!!!!!!"
No.SeoulSoxFan said:
@AlbertBreer Boil it down, and what Belichick just did -- in the most forceful way possible -- was create plausible deniability.
Didn't he say they tell the refs to get it to 12.5?Nick Kaufman said:
No. Here's what happened.
The Pats process to achieve desired texture artificially inflates PSI by 1. Refs get it at 12.5.
Then they play on a cold field. The PS drops by 1.5 because of the weather. But it also loses 1PSI it gained by the treatment process.
Then, when the ball gets back into heated offices, it gains 0.5 PSI.
This explains the lost 2PSI to a t.
lambeau said:The sauna theory was right! Now Bill says it wasn't heated air, but somehow they got the internal temperature up pretty high--he says by friction. A freaking sanding belt? He achieves a 1.5 psi drop over an hour to game conditions: 11.0 PSI--brilliant!
What he doesn't discuss is that a month is spent on these balls to get them worn in and tacky--nobody ever suggested a mad rubbing process (with hot water?) two hours prior to gametime. That makes no sense. But kudos!
snowmanny said:Didn't he say they tell the refs to get it to 12.5?
well this was last minute, so maybe they were the only two hanging around the studioPedroKsBambino said:
Heath Evans and Nate Burleson trying to understand physics is embarassing. Them going to creation theory is equally so.
NFLN should have found an actual scientist to appear---those two are no better equipped to discuss this subject than I am to play right tackle in the super bowl.
Friction?SumnerH said:
The NFL hasn't released those numbers yet. But Bill's statement that the rubbing process "stimulates something inside that raises the PSI" is really "heats the ball up enough to raise the PSI"--it's essentially the sauna theory without the sauna.
Yeah so they were probably at 11.8 or something, the refs said close enough and didn't inflate them, they dropped to 10.5 or so, and here we are.Nick Kaufman said:
He did and he doesn't know what they did. But probably, because TB likes his balls on low PSI, they just gave them, the lowest PSI possible.
I could actually imagine Taran Killiam doing a solid BBsoxhop411 said:SO... SNL will have something on this tonight I bet...
SeoulSoxFan said:
@AlbertBreer Boil it down, and what Belichick just did -- in the most forceful way possible -- was create plausible deniability.
ObstructedView said:Obviously a tour de force, but I have absolutely zero doubt that this will fail win over a single pitchfork-wielder. They'll just spin it to fit their narrative - arrogant, smartest guy in the room, defiant....
But I am heartened that the team is clearly doubling/tripling down, as it would seem to suggest that they're confident the league doesn't have anything.
Infield Infidel said:if rubbing the ball tightens the stitching, or makes the leather contract, would that increase the PSI?
I couldn't hear it either but my thought is it was about the officials just by BB's responseloshjott said:At the end BB took a question that we couldn't hear and said setting like "good question, I don't know the answer"
Anyone catch the question?
Bob420 said:Did he mean that their balls ate 1 psi higher than normal? I highly doubt he would screw that up but Brady likes Hus footballs on the soft side and their prep work increases the PSI. Is it possible to rub a ball and increase PSI? Honest question for the smart folks. It also sounds like he was saying that the refs would need to or did release air to 12.5.
Someone who is a little more physics-inclined want to comment on this? What could they do to a ball that would raise its internal pressure?Nick Kaufman said:
No. Here's what happened.
The Pats process to achieve desired texture artificially inflates PSI by 1. Refs get it at 12.5.
Then they play on a cold field. The PS drops by 1.5 because of the weather. But it also loses 1PSI it gained by the treatment process.
Then, when the ball gets back into heated offices, it gains 0.5 PSI.
This explains the lost 2PSI to a t.
peeves5478 said:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rChfsndsIiA
Eddie Jurak said:Someone who is a little more physics-inclined want to comment on this? What could they do to a ball that would raise its internal pressure?
RedOctober3829 said:Rubbing the balls with the brush creates friction. Friction creates heat.....