Not exact games yet, but the first round does in fact start next Saturday.The East 7-8 game is Tuesday nite. That's the first of the play-in games, so I'm guessing Boston's series will start Saturday, not Sunday.
Anyone seen anything about the first-round schedule?
They'll need a healthy Jaylen for the Finals.How far could the Celtics go without Jaylen, or with a severely limited Jaylen?
They'd play Tatum 40-42 minutes/game, so don't have to find *that* much extra offensive initiation. They still go 8 deep, and could play Scheierman/Craig a couple minutes in a huge pinch.
Probably it would come down to whether DWhite+KP could create advantages in the non-Tatum minutes, at least for playing Cleveland.
I'd say they could get through Atl/Orl and Det/NYK, would be something like 40/60 underdogs against Cleveland, and no shot against OKC.
As we saw last year though, big injuries happen to other teams too.
I think they need him for the ECF and the Finals.They won't win it all without Brown. But hopefully he's not really needed in the first round, and the 2 1/2 - 3 weeks off (this week leading up to the first round, and then winning the first round) is enough for him to be ready to rock and roll for the Eastern semi.
A mild preference for Atlanta here, even though Dyson Daniels seems to take particular pleasure in stripping the ball on us.It won't matter, but do we have a preference of Orlando or Atlanta?
Daniels averaged 1 steal every 13 minutes against Boston, his 19th best rate. He averaged 1 steal every 4 minutes against Minnesota. Top 5 (all more than 1 per 8 minutes): MIN, MEM, LAL, TOR, DEN. Bottom 5 (all less than 1 per 23 minutes): GSW, SAS, OKC, DAL, SAC (no steals in 39 minutes played). Dude's an outlier.A mild preference for Atlanta here, even though Dyson Daniels seems to take particular pleasure in stripping the ball on us.
Mild preference for Orlando, though maybe less so if Jaylen is out. I could see Trae getting hot and Atlanta taking it to six games. Orlando scoring enough to keep up with the Cs seems less likely.A mild preference for Atlanta here, even though Dyson Daniels seems to take particular pleasure in stripping the ball on us.
Definitely not worried about Trae. He struggles getting to his sweet spots with the ball against this Boston group of recent years more than any other team in the league….and this doesn’t even account for the playoffs defensive game-to-game planning where familiarity hurts Trae. This is an example of my response in the other thread about players not actually “fearing” another team but recognizing bad matchups. Boston’s defensive personnel is a nightmare matchup for Trae.Mild preference for Orlando, though maybe less so if Jaylen is out. I could see Trae getting hot and Atlanta taking it to six games. Orlando scoring enough to keep up with the Cs seems less likely.
The offensive downgrade is just too big. Even if he were, they'd accept a downgrade there and try to score more than the other team.I asked this question in the bench minutes thread:
Is Craig the best bench replacement to replace Brown's on-ball pressure defense?
Too bad it's not the Pistons against the Hawks for the play-in or my strange geography fact would land better: Detroit is east of Atlanta. Peach City is 33.7488° N, 84.3877° W; the Motor City is at 42.3314° N, 83.0458° W.Sunday is confirmed for Game 1, time TBD (although, why? they're as far east as you can get and both ATL and Orl are east coast teams close to each other) Just put them at 1PM and be done with it,
Game 2 is TBD day too.
Cleveland is eastern time too, so I think they just want to see which matchup is the absolute worst, and also not announce anything for Sunday at all until they have full information.Sunday is confirmed for Game 1, time TBD (although, why? they're as far east as you can get and both ATL and Orl are east coast teams close to each other) Just put them at 1PM and be done with it,
Game 2 is TBD day too.
He might be, in theory. Yet whenever I watch him play he seems to be totally oblivious to the overall defensive scheme that the other 4 guys on his team are playing. That could be a problem unless there's some guarantee that the ballhandler is keeping the ball and going 1 v 1.I asked this question in the bench minutes thread:
Is Craig the best bench replacement to replace Brown's on-ball pressure defense?
Yeah.. JB is great but the team has been winning all season without 1-3 stars almost every night. One reason they’ve been playing everyone all year, I believe, is so that they can play through an injury in the playoffs.This group is 27-4 without JB the past two seasons. It should be able to get to the ECF without him, if necessary.
Agreed on the rest, but I don't think that even the docs here can answer that last question. Cortisone shots have super wide outcome bands. The other shit, like PRP...even more so. On the plus side, they almost never make things worse. But they sometimes do jack shit, and other times, they're miracles.Yeah.. JB is great but the team has been winning all season without 1-3 stars almost every night. One reason they’ve been playing everyone all year, I believe, is so that they can play through an injury in the playoffs.
with that said.. hasn’t the plan all along been for him to get a shot right before the playoffs.. is there a higher probability that that won’t work than it will?
Yeah.. I thought I'd read that on one of these threads.. so worst case scenario the shot doesn't work and we're at the same place we are right now.. which is a hampered JB who can still put in some minutes when needed.Agreed on the rest, but I don't think that even the docs here can answer that last question. Cortisone shots have super wide outcome bands. The other shit, like PRP...even more so. On the plus side, they almost never make things worse. But they sometimes do jack shit, and other times, they're miracles.
Beating the Knicks without JB would be pretty tough. It would also probably require KP to stay healthy, which is never a good bet. We definitely need White/Jrue to level up, if JB is out or hampered. We know they have it in them.This group is 27-4 without JB the past two seasons. It should be able to get to the ECF without him, if necessary.
I'd be very surprised if they rested him. I fully expect him to play.I'm not convinced the team plans to rest Jaylen Brown for the opening round. Washburn made a comment in the Globe that implied the team expects JB to be ready to play for Game 1 of the opening round.
Yeah there's no chance he sits, nor should we want him too. At this point it's clear the team doesn't think rest will help him, so what's the point? Obviously the Celtics can beat the Hawks/Magic without him, and probably the Knicks/Pistons, too. If we've learned everything over the years, it's that finishing these series off as quickly as possible pays dividends down the line. Playing 6 games against the Hawks in and 7 games against the Sixers in 2023 absolutely hurt them against Miami. Needing back to back 7 game series to eliminate the Bucks and Heat in 2022 absolutely hurt them against the Warriors. If JB doesn't play for a round or two maybe the end result doesn't change, but the team has to expend extra energy to win those series, maybe even taking an extra couple of games. We've got actual injury prone players (KP) and older guys (Horford/Holiday) that have a limited number of games in which they can afford to go all out, there is real value in going as deep as possible before needing to go 100%.I'd be very surprised if they rested him. I fully expect him to play.
I've more been musing about what they do if things go downhill, once he starts playing.
Who do we want in the first round coming out of the 7/8 game? Hawks would be my vote.The East 7-8 game is Tuesday nite. That's the first of the play-in games, so I'm guessing Boston's series will start Saturday, not Sunday.
Anyone seen anything about the first-round schedule?
I want the Magic, pretty easily at that. Hawks can actually score, and they have multiple defensive playmakers. A hobbled Jaylen with Dyson in the passing lanes? I’m all set.Who do we want in the first round coming out of the 7/8 game? Hawks would be my vote.
Total agreement. I love his hustle, but he looks like he’s playing rec ball on D. He just flies around everywhere trying to impact at the point of attack.He might be, in theory. Yet whenever I watch him play he seems to be totally oblivious to the overall defensive scheme that the other 4 guys on his team are playing. That could be a problem unless there's some guarantee that the ballhandler is keeping the ball and going 1 v 1.
Yeah I don’t think it matters much from a results standpoint for us but the Hawks would provide us with less of a grind I suppose. Trae’s worst nightmare are Celtics games and not sure how much offense they can produce to keep up with us as we lock him up pretty easily. It really depends on if you prefer a 128-110 final or a 103-86 one.Who do we want in the first round coming out of the 7/8 game? Hawks would be my vote.
Now need the Red Sox to move their game up an hour and we're golden.Sweet love that time slot.
It's hard for me to process scheduling your life around the 2025 Red Sox, especially for a regular game against one of the worst teams of all time, but to each their own.Now need the Red Sox to move their game up an hour and we're golden.
It's more Patriots Day Weekend tradition than the 2025 versionIt's hard for me to process scheduling your life around the 2025 Red Sox, especially for a regular game against one of the worst teams of all time, but to each their own.
Somewhere the Sons of Terry Duerod are furious.It's hard for me to process scheduling your life around the 2025 Red Sox, especially for a regular game against one of the worst teams of all time, but to each their own.
NBA.com has the rest:Game 1: 3:30 p.m. Sunday, ABC
Because there are other games throughout the day and they don't want multiple games at once.Why is the Sunday game at 7 if there is no travel the day before?
Lakers Timberwolves should be the 7PM ET game then. No east coast teams thereBecause there are other games throughout the day and they don't want multiple games at once.
It's also about the give-and-take between ESPN and TNT for game choices and windows. TNT has always had the primetime window as opposed to daytime if both networks are broadcasting on the weekend, so if they rightfully want to alternate Celtics games with ESPN that becomes a late game. Sucks, but it will probably stay the same going forward as the NBA carves more and more slots for NBC and streaming.Lakers Timberwolves should be the 7PM ET game then. No east coast teams there