Yes, but he was also nails on Butler for an important stretch.Jaylen Brown seems so lost on defense way too often.
had a great stretch tonight, some real lapses as usually, but a much better stretch as we pulled away, and a lot more active. That to me is the key... he's not going to learn off-ball defense in the next 2 days, but coming out active and engaged on-ball, and at least having great energy will be a huge benefitJaylen Brown seems so lost on defense way too often.
Was just about to post that. Weird time to post that complaint since Jaylen was really good on defense today.Yes, but he was also nails on Butler for an important stretch.
I'd love to see more of that, his defense on Harden was key against the Sixers. Favorite play of the night though was Grant stuffing Butler, and even managing to keep his mouth shut afterwards.Yes, but he was also nails on Butler for an important stretch.
Celtics are 8-point favorites in Game 5. Seems aggressive.
my biggest concern going into game 5 is that his shot just looks broken, probably an injury thing, but that's tough.Brown with only 1 turnover in Game 4 in 37 minutes. He didn’t shoot well from three, 1-5, and missed 3 FTs, but his 4 first half assists were big, as was his second half defense and ball hawking.
The reverse sweep of Miami would be unbelievable. If Boston locks in for Game 5, I have no doubt they could go back to Miami and get a win, like they did 3x last season.So in that last minute of garbage time, we got cutaways of Alex Rodriguez biting his lip, and grimacing Derek Jeter (As ever). That they both decided to show up tonight thinking they'd see a nice easy preordained sweep of the Celtics, called in some favors to get courtside seats... and to instead send them home to probably lie awake half the night thinking of that week 18 1/2 years ago, hearing the phrase "Boston avoids the sweep" echo through what passes for their brains as they toss and turn, is already some measure of recompense for us.
But I'd prefer to think that they're our good luck charms, that as long as they're a part of some Boston sporting event, the sporting gods will never favor our opponents. And I hope they show up 3 more times in this series.
I couldn't help thinking similar. They brought their 2004 juju with them tonight.So in that last minute of garbage time, we got cutaways of Alex Rodriguez biting his lip, and grimacing Derek Jeter (As ever). That they both decided to show up tonight thinking they'd see a nice easy preordained sweep of the Celtics, called in some favors to get courtside seats... and to instead send them home to probably lie awake half the night thinking of that week 18 1/2 years ago, hearing the phrase "Boston avoids the sweep" echo through what passes for their brains as they toss and turn, is already some measure of recompense for us.
But I'd prefer to think that they're our good luck charms, that as long as they're a part of some Boston sporting event, the sporting gods will never favor our opponents. And I hope they show up 3 more times in this series.
edit: oh, and did you hear what the 3-point makes were, from the announcers as those last seconds ticked down? "19 to 8 advantage", they said. A fateful tally for us if there ever was one.
Unless we are up by 50, I don't think turtling is on the table with this Heat team.In the game chat at halftime, I mentioned that in this series, the Celtics hadn’t yet played one solid stint of Celtics basketball, where they lock in and get stops, and move the ball to pile up threes and layups. They picked the right time to finally lock in, three and a half games into the series. If they can lay a run like that on the Heat to start Game 5, Miami is going to start turtling.
Spo also had this gem of a quote
Their undrafted guys didn’t exactly respond Heat-Culturely once Boston made their run. Bam also tightened up.Unless we are up by 50, I don't think turtling is on the table with this Heat team.
That was my 2004 fan mindset. Win game 4, some teams come back 3-1. Then win game 5,lots of teams come back 3-2. Game 7 put CHB out there.Being down 0-3 is tough. But down 1-3? Much , much easier now.
"NBA teams have overcome 1-3 deficits 13 times, only one of which occurred in the NBA Finals."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_teams_to_overcome_3–1_series_deficits#:~:text=NBA teams have overcome 1,overcome a 3–0 deficit.&text=The Celtics won two games,also won the NBA Finals.
And failed 21 times. So comebacks are at a 35% clip, or a shade above Marcus Smart’s 3pt%.Being down 0-3 is tough. But down 1-3? Much , much easier now.
"NBA teams have overcome 1-3 deficits 13 times, only one of which occurred in the NBA Finals."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_teams_to_overcome_3–1_series_deficits#:~:text=NBA teams have overcome 1,overcome a 3–0 deficit.&text=The Celtics won two games,also won the NBA Finals.
This. It's funny to see people talk about "shooting variance" when the Celtics are out there blocking multiple Heat 3s, fighting over screens, competing with Butler 1-on-1.Beats dead horse update: Celtics use 24 personal fouls and turn over Miami 15 times, and lo and behold hold Miami to 44% shooting and 25% from three (and 99 points).
The headline is "Tatum drops 34 as Celtics win game 4". But it should be "hey, Celtics are better than Miami when they actually fucking try."
If you look hard enough, it's always easy to find something to complain about.White 27 mins, smh
Joe can't wait to bench him, even though Smart is moving like utter crap
That's the difference to me, and that they were more consistent about looking for transition after turnovers and missed baskets. They are a good transition team, both athletically and in decision making. Halfcourt offense against a disciplined defense can be a different story. So the team identify needs to be defense and transition.Make or miss league…
But the intensity ramped way up on defense, particularly once the shots started to fall. Amazing how sloppy the Heat got once the Celtics started pressuring them and stuffing passing lanes.
The Celtics made the extra pass in the 2nd half, and we’re able to get off a ton of 3s… with space.
Let’s see how Vincent’s ankle responds to one day rest, with a flight.
Lol, they dominated the 4th, Mazzulla found something with Grant, and you're complaining?White 27 mins, smh
Joe can't wait to bench him, even though Smart is moving like utter crap
Yeah, I’m not a Mazz fan but he obviously coached a great game last night. Pulled a lot of the right lineup levers, called timeouts at the right times, drew up actual plays that worked after TOS, etc…Lol, they dominated the 4th, Mazzulla found something with Grant, and you're complaining?
Coaching really is a thankless job. Mazz killed it, both in lineup flexibility and getting the players ready to play.
Yes, and Spo also recognized that the Cs could run it all day long: Miami stopped zoning soon after that shot. It may even have been the very next possession.Regarding the action I just described above, here it is:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8kpZDCrjXg
The play happens at the 6:49 mark of this clip.
Here's a still:
View attachment 65172
If Vincent had dropped down, White would have been open for a three. Even as it is, Horford has inside position against Lowry in case Tatum misses. It's a gorgeous little set and they can run that all game long against the zone.
The only game where shooting variance truly made a difference was Game 2, where in the 4th quarter Miami saw some difficult shots go in while the Celtics had some routine ones miss. Of course, it makes a difference in that we would all take the series being tied 2-2 right now.The way to beat Miami's zone - and I think Boston only ran this action one time that I can recall - is to have Tatum flash to the middle at the foul line. He can make that shot all day long, and he's become a good enough passer to be able to kick it out to an open guy if they collapse on him, or, if Adebayo comes from the restricted area to challenge him, dump it down to a teammate for a dunk/layup. The one time they ran it he took a wide open foul line jumper and drained it. Why they don't run that action and surround him with three shooters and Rob (for dunks) is beyond me. It would dice up that zone. Like teams dice up SU's 2-3 that way.
-sigh-
Also, it wasn't just a matter of the Celtics TRYING last night, though they certainly did that. Look at the open shots that Miami had and just missed, compared with them making those at a ridiculous percentage in the first three games. Heck, Butler missed at least 3-4 mid range jumpers that he almost ALWAYS makes, and he even missed two layups.
The teams are pretty evenly matched when both are playing well. Effort has a lot to do with it, but so does...whether the ball goes in or not. Not completely a "make or miss" league, but it really is...kinda. First three games, Boston missed and Miami made. Last night, Boston made and Miami missed. We need three more of those.
Couldn’t agree with this moreThat's the difference to me, and that they were more consistent about looking for transition after turnovers and missed baskets. They are a good transition team, both athletically and in decision making. Halfcourt offense against a disciplined defense can be a different story. So the team identify needs to be defense and transition.
There was a point in the 4th where they seemed to be slipping into milk the clock mode and Miami looked like it would cut into the lead, and then Smart pushed the ball and Jaylen got an and-one. That's wnat they need to do.
There was another small moment in the 4th, game pretty much in hand but not quite, when the defense got sloppy and no one picked up Butler full court and he ran straight down the lane for a dunk. Both Jays were getting back to protect the basket, just to turn for a front row view of Jimmy at the rim. Both immediately looked pissed and started barking at the guards who should've picked him up.That's the difference to me, and that they were more consistent about looking for transition after turnovers and missed baskets. They are a good transition team, both athletically and in decision making. Halfcourt offense against a disciplined defense can be a different story. So the team identify needs to be defense and transition.
There was a point in the 4th where they seemed to be slipping into milk the clock mode and Miami looked like it would cut into the lead, and then Smart pushed the ball and Jaylen got an and-one. That's wnat they need to do.
So it begs the question (is that the right use of this phrase? I need a ruling): Why didn't Boston run this at all the first three games, when the zone was giving them fits? It's like..... the fundamentals of beating a 2-3 zone - get the ball to a good shooter/distributor at the foul line and it opens up all kinds of options. Boston has an elite guy like that in Tatum and they never did this until last night that one time. It's not a coaching genius move to run this....it's literally a basic 2-3 zone busting concept that you learn in middle school. And it WORKS at all levels. So why didn't Boston try it until last night?Yes, and Spo also recognized that the Cs could run it all day long: Miami stopped zoning soon after that shot. It may even have been the very next possession.
100% PUSH THE PACEThat's the difference to me, and that they were more consistent about looking for transition after turnovers and missed baskets. They are a good transition team, both athletically and in decision making. Halfcourt offense against a disciplined defense can be a different story. So the team identify needs to be defense and transition.
There was a point in the 4th where they seemed to be slipping into milk the clock mode and Miami looked like it would cut into the lead, and then Smart pushed the ball and Jaylen got an and-one. That's wnat they need to do.
I will make sure to ask Joe the next time we have dinner.So it begs the question (is that the right use of this phrase? I need a ruling): Why didn't Boston run this at all the first three games, when the zone was giving them fits? It's like..... the fundamentals of beating a 2-3 zone - get the ball to a good shooter/distributor at the foul line and it opens up all kinds of options. Boston has an elite guy like that in Tatum and they never did this until last night that one time. It's not a coaching genius move to run this....it's literally a basic 2-3 zone busting concept that you learn in middle school. And it WORKS at all levels. So why didn't Boston try it until last night?
They made it through the Great Filter of 3-0s, and now things can get interesting.There have been a total of 150 playoff series to go 3-0/0-3. Of those:
92 finished in a sweep (61.3%)
44 finished in Game 5 (29.3%)
11 finished in Game 6 (7.3%)
3 finished in Game 7 (2%)
As we all know, the leading team has won all of those 150 matchups.
Additionally, only 26 of those 150 series have occurred in the conference finals.
Yep. Win tomorrow in the Gahden, and suddenly Miami's throat begins to tighten.They made it through the Great Filter of 3-0s, and now things can get interesting.
Yea. And they usually go to zone when Tatum sits. Fortunately he shouldn’t sit much from here in on out.Yes, and Spo also recognized that the Cs could run it all day long: Miami stopped zoning soon after that shot. It may even have been the very next possession.
Al Horford can also break the zone by getting the ball in the middle. For the most part, I don't understand what the struggle is, either - and it has been a year-long struggle. There was one situation earlier in the series where Miami took advantage of the personnel to shut down the Celtics with zone - this was a point where they had a lineup without Jayson, Al, or Smart in game 2. But usually the zone seems to works even though the Celitcs have the personnel on the court to break it. Maybe they have too much temptation to just try to shoot over it.So it begs the question (is that the right use of this phrase? I need a ruling): Why didn't Boston run this at all the first three games, when the zone was giving them fits? It's like..... the fundamentals of beating a 2-3 zone - get the ball to a good shooter/distributor at the foul line and it opens up all kinds of options. Boston has an elite guy like that in Tatum and they never did this until last night that one time. It's not a coaching genius move to run this....it's literally a basic 2-3 zone busting concept that you learn in middle school. And it WORKS at all levels. So why didn't Boston try it until last night?
Right. Even if you push and then reset into halfcourt, you might have caused a mismatch that can be exploited. When you walk it up slow against no pressure, the defenders get to dictate the matchups.100% PUSH THE PACE
You don't have to take an ill-advised shot just because you hustle getting the ball into the front court. But push the pace and get into your action quickly. Just by pushing the pace you open up options before Miami can set up its defense, and if there's not a good look there, fine, you initiate your half court offense. But it has the added benefit of making Miami WORK, and I think Boston has better depth - especially if Vincent's ankle acts up tomorrow night.
They need Horford in while Tatum is on the bench, because he, too, can break the zone.Yea. And they usually go to zone when Tatum sits. Fortunately he shouldn’t sit much from here in on out.