What is Derrick White's story anyway? He had one year of college at age 22 and then was drafted 29th.
Like, what was he doing before that year of college?
Like, what was he doing before that year of college?
Lol, if they start Derrick White doesn't that mean the two big lineup is over?Unless BS thinks non shooters is the new OBP.
Hopefully.Lol, if they start Derrick White doesn't that mean the two big lineup is over?
He played DII for 3 years at Colorado Springs.What is Derrick White's story anyway? He had one year of college at age 22 and then was drafted 29th.
Like, what was he doing before that year of college?
Three years in division 2.What is Derrick White's story anyway? He had one year of college at age 22 and then was drafted 29th.
Like, what was he doing before that year of college?
Graduated HS at age 17 at 6' tall, only coach who wanted him as NAIA.. that guy got a D-II job.. White grew to 6'2" and the coach brought him in. White played 3 years of D-II ended up 6'4"-6'5", transfered to Colorado for a year, got drafted in the 1st.What is Derrick White's story anyway? He had one year of college at age 22 and then was drafted 29th.
Like, what was he doing before that year of college?
10 plus the 2-ways.C's traded 2 for 1 in White. C's dumped 2 players for nothing. C's traded 3 players for Theis.
They had 14 guys on the roster. They now have 9? Am I missing something?
We have a new system.Theis back to the C's. Good move imo as we needed a better backup big than Freedom - plus Theis knows the C's system
Really? I think we're a lot better.I think we are a little worse today then yesterday. Or maybe the same. But cant see better. And that disappointing for a trade deadline.
White is better than Richardson. We're a better team on the court.I think we are a little worse today then yesterday. Or maybe the same. But cant see better. And that disappointing for a trade deadline.
TatumC's traded 2 for 1 in White. C's dumped 2 players for nothing. C's traded 3 players for Theis.
They had 14 guys on the roster. They now have 9? Am I missing something?
It was just a lot to give up for what doesn't seem like a huge upgrade. Romeo is a pretty good defensive player and can hit the 3 probably about as well as White, no? White is a much better passer, certainly, and a veteran. So, not saying they are equal players - but I don't think Romeo is garbage.White is better than Richardson. We're a better team on the court.
Maybe? But it seems clear he wasn't in the plans here at this point.It was just a lot to give up for what doesn't seem like a huge upgrade. Romeo is a pretty good defensive player and can hit the 3 probably about as well as White, no? White is a much better passer, certainly, and a veteran. So, not saying they are equal players - but I don't think Romeo is garbage.
White is a better passer and defender than DSHad we been able to keep Richardson somehow (another first? Tougher negotiating?) I woulda felt alot better.
My 13 is going nuts. Ready to Fire PBOBS.
I think we are a little worse today then yesterday. Or maybe the same. But cant see better. And that disappointing for a trade deadline.
No one really knows about Romeo's 3 point shot. He's a .305 shooter in a sample size of 105. White is at .344 in a sample size of 872.It was just a lot to give up for what doesn't seem like a huge upgrade. Romeo is a pretty good defensive player and can hit the 3 probably about as well as White, no? White is a much better passer, certainly, and a veteran. So, not saying they are equal players - but I don't think Romeo is garbage.
I think it's a big factor how people value Romeo here. I think he's mostly worthless at the current time and do not lament his departure or consider his inclusion in the trade as anything than fodder and allowing the C's to stay under the tax. If you think he's almost as good as White, then this trade is a disaster.It was just a lot to give up for what doesn't seem like a huge upgrade. Romeo is a pretty good defensive player and can hit the 3 probably about as well as White, no? White is a much better passer, certainly, and a veteran. So, not saying they are equal players - but I don't think Romeo is garbage.
White career 34.4% on 872 attemptsRomeo is a pretty good defensive player and can hit the 3 probably about as well as White, no?
Yes on the first 2 (though I think the gap in 1 is big)So
White>Richardson (I think they are closer then we are giving them credit. Hope the faith in advanced metrics are rewarded).
Theis>Schroder (actually agree with that....)
Nesmith<Romeo (though admittedly not by a whole lot....)
huh? You get your signs wrong? Love to hear the argument for AN over RL.Yes on the first 2 (though I think the gap in 1 is big)
definitely not on the 3rd... but hey you gotta give something to get something, and the real answer is likely:
Buyout guy> Romeo
Buyout guy #2> Nesmith
I am a Romeo fan, I’ve been beating the drum for both him and Nesmith to get more PT this entire year…..but White is a massive upgrade over Romeo right now.It was just a lot to give up for what doesn't seem like a huge upgrade. Romeo is a pretty good defensive player and can hit the 3 probably about as well as White, no? White is a much better passer, certainly, and a veteran. So, not saying they are equal players - but I don't think Romeo is garbage.
hah, I went right over it assuming you set them all up as better on the left, not... current guy on the left.huh? You get your signs wrong? Love to hear the argument for AN over RL.
White is a much, much better initiator/playmaker than Richardson, which is what the team needs. He can relocate to the corner when off-ball (the Horford spot), where he's quite good. I'm a fan of this deal for this specific team.White career 34.4% on 872 attempts
Romeo career 30.5% on 128 attempts
Also, White is more than a 3 and D guy, he's a good NBA basketball player. He is light years better than Romeo (the real question is how much better is White than Richardson).
that's fine in a vacuum BUT it's much more nuanced than that.So
White>Richardson (I think they are closer then we are giving them credit. Hope the faith in advanced metrics are rewarded).
Theis>Schroder (actually agree with that....)
Nesmith<Romeo (though admittedly not by a whole lot....)
This could all be fixed if Nesmith started hitting even 34% of his 3s. Maybe now that Romeo isnt slowly giving him some kind of poison that causes double vision this can happen.
Good point wrt Begarin: he looks like he'll deserve some playing time, and he would have been competing with Romeo and that late 1st for minutes.Hopefully they like what they’ve seen from Madar and Begerin which made trading the first easier as well. You only want so many rookies on the roster.
I think the market picked. I doubt SAS do that deal with NesmithI like the moves. White is the best player of those on the move (by Raptor, Lebron, On-off), so we upgrade the bench. Theis is quality depth. Not surprised to see one of Langford or Nesmith go, hope we picked the right one.
More to the point that’s a pretty good starting backcourt. White’s a net positive on both sides of the ball, and that two combo guard backcourt will make life easier on the Jay Crew. One of them will need to defend the big wing spot, but that’s four switchable defenders and White’s offensive upgrade over Grant Williams and Romeo Langford make it worth the loss of Josh Richardson. I liked Josh, and wish that Boston had been able to keep him (because that would have been a great G rotation), but for White I’ll take it.Do you like Marcus Smart....
Would you like a 2nd one with a bit less defense but probably a bit better offense?
We'll probably never know but it's entirely possible neither team particularly cared which one was in it.I think the market picked. I doubt SAS do that deal with Nesmith
Not only does it suck after the top five, the top five also sucks. About the only guy I like is Jabari Smith Jr, and while he has top 25 potential, I think a top 40 player is his most likely result (an elite 3&D player that makes an all star game or two over his career).The other good thing is, draft sucks after top 5. & his contract isn't toooo out of whack & could look like a good value if he gets a bump from playing with better players.
I’m with you. A Smart/White/Richardson backcourt would have been pretty sweet.I have always had an irrational like for JRich, though, so I'm still meh on it.
Having Tatum I’d rather that the swap of ‘28 firsts was set in stone because that’d be a valuable asset.OK the 2028 1st round pick swap seems a little annoying.... come on Brad.
I start with the following premises:White is a much, much better initiator/playmaker than Richardson, which is what the team needs. He can relocate to the corner when off-ball (the Horford spot), where he's quite good. I'm a fan of this deal for this specific team.
Potentially valuable.Having Tatum I’d rather that the swap of ‘28 firsts was set in stone because that’d be a valuable asset.
Yeah, I don't see a real path to relevance for SA to make me worry too much about a pick swap 6 years from now. We saw with the Kings/Grizzlies how quickly pick valuations can change. I'd obviously prefer not to have that potential liability but the discount rate is pretty high here.Potentially valuable.
2028 is a long way out on an NBA timeline. And as you know, if you root for the actual game versus dreaming on prospects (and there seem to be plenty of folks who care more about individual player development versus seeing a particular team compete - its not my thing but its just as valid of course), the Cs got the best actual NBA player in this trade. Meanwhile, that pick swap is a long odds lottery ticket at best.
For your points 2&3, the thinking on Brad's end is probably thatI start with the following premises:
1) I wasn’t looking to move Richardson. I think he’s a rotation player on a good team and was a solid fit here.
2) I wasn’t looking to move Langford. I think he’s an NBA player who doesn’t hurt you and one day could help you.
3) I wasn’t looking to move draft picks or swaps. I think that they’re the only asset at PBS’s disposal to acquire a third star.
That said, I have been thinking for the last few weeks about the IT acquisition and the PG logjam in Phoenix that precipitated it, wondering if there was a modern equivalent. While Sacramento was the most discussed possibility, San Antonio also qualifies, and it was only this past summer that posters on the board were wondering if White or Murray could be had only to conclude that a deal couldn’t be made without including Smart. Somehow, Stevens acquired Richardson as a salary dump, extended him, built value into him, and turned him into a better player as well as likely starter. A non-impact first round pick and non-impact bench player seems a reasonable price to pay for that upgrade while continuing to hope that pre-game Nesmith can one day become game Nesmith.
Brown can walk away in the summer of 2024. Tatum can walk away in the summer of 2025. Let's not write their names on the 27-28 roster in ink, especially if Tatum continues to be ineligible for the super max.Having Tatum I’d rather that the swap of ‘28 firsts was set in stone because that’d be a valuable asset.
Yeah, New Orleans doesn't exactly look to be cleaning up on the Jrue trade anytime soon.Potentially valuable.
2028 is a long way out on an NBA timeline. And as you know, if you root for the actual game versus dreaming on prospects (and there seem to be plenty of folks who care more about individual player development versus seeing a particular team compete - its not my thing but its just as valid of course), the Cs got the best actual NBA player in this trade. Meanwhile, that pick swap is a long odds lottery ticket at best.
If that happens, Brad won't be the GM anymore anyway. Bit of a principal-agent problem, but it is what it is.Brown can walk away in the summer of 2024. Tatum can walk away in the summer of 2025. Let's not write their names on the 27-28 roster in ink, especially if Tatum continues to be ineligible for the super max.
I don’t disagree with you but I think it’s pretty bad practice to not at least protect top 8 to top 10 on this trade at least. Just a lot of risk to acquire Derrick White (and they had already given up a fair amount)Yeah, I don't see a real path to relevance for SA to make me worry too much about a pick swap 6 years from now. We saw with the Kings/Grizzlies how quickly pick valuations can change. I'd obviously prefer not to have that potential liability but the discount rate is pretty high here.