Celtics hire Ime Udoka as HC

chilidawg

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 22, 2015
5,972
Cultural hub of the universe
"Ton of great shooters" caught my eye as well. After the J's the next 3 core rotation guys are Richardson, Smart and Schroeder, all of whom you'd be thrilled if they shot league average from 3. They can defend and do some ball handling, but shooters not so much. Nesmith and PP are the guys who might project to be great shooters, but we'll see how they develop.
 

128

Member
SoSH Member
May 4, 2019
10,086
"Ton of great shooters" caught my eye as well. After the J's the next 3 core rotation guys are Richardson, Smart and Schroeder, all of whom you'd be thrilled if they shot league average from 3. They can defend and do some ball handling, but shooters not so much. Nesmith and PP are the guys who might project to be great shooters, but we'll see how they develop.
Not sure it qualifies as "great shooting," but Horford's career percentage of 36.4 from beyond the arc is more than respectable.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
I dont care about the total weight of their shooters part of the comment. I do care about moving the ball. Not just at the assist level. In order to get the defense to move (and thus give the offense some sort of advantage) the ball and the players have to move, just for the sake of movement. That happened far too few times last year. I'm not certain that will necessarily translate into gains in assist rate, but I think that's a secondary consideration. As frustrating as Hayward was when he seemingly turned down open shots, I think that's what he recognized. Garnett did as well. And I think Horford will be tremendously valuable there. The idea is to convince the best players that there is plenty of time to go iso if the clock gets too low, but unless there's a hot mismatch or a seriously open shot early, job 1 is to make the defense move.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,211
I dont care about the total weight of their shooters part of the comment. I do care about moving the ball. Not just at the assist level. In order to get the defense to move (and thus give the offense some sort of advantage) the ball and the players have to move, just for the sake of movement. That happened far too few times last year. I'm not certain that will necessarily translate into gains in assist rate, but I think that's a secondary consideration. As frustrating as Hayward was when he seemingly turned down open shots, I think that's what he recognized. Garnett did as well. And I think Horford will be tremendously valuable there. The idea is to convince the best players that there is plenty of time to go iso if the clock gets too low, but unless there's a hot mismatch or a seriously open shot early, job 1 is to make the defense move.
+1.

This roster is not good enough to have 4 players stand around and force Tatum to pound the ball into the Bruins logo while he is double teamed. The team's most exciting stretches in recent years were the first 3/4 of the 2017-18 season, and the pre-bubble 2019-20 season, and there was plenty of ball movement to go around. Injuries ultimately upended both teams, but a lack of ball movement was notable in the subsequent seasons in both cases.
 

bakahump

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 8, 2001
7,558
Maine
"We have 2 Great astronauts and some average to ok-ish engineers." ~ NASA

Is Ime supposed to say that?
I mean if you want your stars to pass the ball its as much an attempt to mind control them as it is the public. Maybe more so. "Jayson and Jalen...pass the ball these guys are good. They are NBA players. They will hit the shots."
He certainly isnt going to win that battle with "Guys Pass the ball. Smart and Schroder might hit the shot if you do. Maybe."
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,124
They may not be above average 3 point shooters, but they may be above median 3 point shooters!
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,337
"We have 2 Great astronauts and some average to ok-ish engineers." ~ NASA

Is Ime supposed to say that?
I mean if you want your stars to pass the ball its as much an attempt to mind control them as it is the public. Maybe more so. "Jayson and Jalen...pass the ball these guys are good. They are NBA players. They will hit the shots."
He certainly isnt going to win that battle with "Guys Pass the ball. Smart and Schroder might hit the shot if you do. Maybe."
Yeah, coachspeak is funny to hear. Even funnier from Tatum and Brown’s perspective hearing their new coach tell them to allow for worse scorers to try and score the ball like this is a rah-rah Big-10 team. At the end of the day we know Tatum and Brown are iso scorers and that is what they are going to do.
 

CreightonGubanich

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 13, 2006
1,384
north shore, MA
Yeah, coachspeak is funny to hear. Even funnier from Tatum and Brown’s perspective hearing their new coach tell them to allow for worse scorers to try and score the ball like this is a rah-rah Big-10 team. At the end of the day we know Tatum and Brown are iso scorers and that is what they are going to do.
Sure, but even iso scorers need to be able to make plays for other guys. It's not like Udoka wants them to run a bunch of iso plays for Josh Richardson while Tatum and Brown stand in the corner. He wants them to be able to make the right read, after they beat their man off the dribble and the defense collapses around them. The team may not have great shooters, but they have plenty of guys capable of knocking down open jump shots. But they can't create those shots if Tatum and Brown don't move the ball better.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
Yeah, coachspeak is funny to hear. Even funnier from Tatum and Brown’s perspective hearing their new coach tell them to allow for worse scorers to try and score the ball like this is a rah-rah Big-10 team. At the end of the day we know Tatum and Brown are iso scorers and that is what they are going to do.
That's fine. They are good at it. As long as they dont begin the iso with 20 seconds left on the shot clock . . . .
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,337
That's fine. They are good at it. As long as they dont begin the iso with 20 seconds left on the shot clock . . . .
This is why I want Schroeder with the first unit to initiate the offense inside of 30 feet which can create other actions by forcing the defense to retreat. When Smart brings the ball over halfcourt it typically results in Tatum or Jaylen extend 30-35 feet from the basket to accept the pass against pressure which limits their options.
 

teddykgb

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
11,090
Chelmsford, MA
There are also different types of iso scoring. Tatum and Brown staring at an entirely set defense while there’s 14 on the clock and needing to get through all that is a high degree of difficulty operation. You’d hope Udoka wants to live the ball more to get those guys the ball in more advantageous positions to score.

With the older illegal defense rules you could truly isolate a scorer 1 on 1 by clearing a side out. But the isolate term has taken on a meaning of “scoring without ever truly intending to pass the ball”. Better offenses than ours of the last few seasons have done a better job of getting scorers into 1 v 1 or 1 v 2 type of attacking scenarios where you’re asking the scorer to deal with his defender and know where the help is coming from. You also open up more possibilities for defensive rotation mistakes and easy baskets. I sincerely hope that Udoka is talking about ball movement for this reason
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,322
Lynn
I have questions about Jaylen, but he’s not an isolation scorer. Only did it 7.1% of the time last year, well below guys like Holiday, Brogdon, Bam, even below players like LaMelo. He’s not good when he does it either, been atrocious the last two years when going iso.

Tatum does it a bunch (18% this past season, 15.7% two seasons ago). Was only in the 42nd percentile this past season as an iso scorer. He does have somewhat of a track record of being good in iso situations though, two seasons ago he was in the 75th percentile, and this past short playoff run, he was in the 95th percentile, on HUGE volume (39% of the time).

I’d like to see Jaylen stay around the 7%, and Tatum back down to 15/16%.

They need to find a way to create offense when Tatum isn’t in the game.They had an offensive rating of 114.8 when Tatum was in games last year, and 105.9 when he sat. A swing of 8.9 is crazy, no other rotation player had a swing of even half of that.
 
Last edited:

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,337
I have questions about Jaylen, but he’s not an isolation scorer. Only did it 7.1% of the time last year, well below guys like Holiday, Brogdon, Bam, even below players like LaMelo. He’s not good when he does it either, been atrocious the last two years when going iso.

Tatum does it a bunch (18% this past season, 15.7% two seasons ago). Was only in the 42nd percentile this past season as an iso scorer. He does have somewhat of a track record of being good in iso situations though, two seasons ago he was in the 75th percentile, and this past short playoff run, he was in the 95th percentile, on HUGE volume (39% of the time).

I’d like to see Jaylen stay around the 7%, and Tatum back down to 15/16%.

They need to find a way to create offense when Tatum isn’t in the game.They had an offensive rating of 114.8 when Tatum was in games last year, and 105.9 when he sat. A swing of 8.9 is crazy, no other rotation player had a swing of even half of that.
I think there is a disconnect to what an iso actually is. An iso isn’t necessarily a one-on-one penetration but also includes jumpers in those same isolated matchups which is a large part of both of their games.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,835
I think there is a disconnect to what an iso actually is. An iso isn’t necessarily a one-on-one penetration but also includes jumpers in those same isolated matchups which is a large part of both of their games.
Do post-ups count as isolations? I think they are recorded as separate "post-ups" in the tracking data, but both Tatum and Brown are very capable skill-wise in exploiting a switch onto a smaller defender and punishing them back-to-the-basket. It's one of the reasons spacing from the non-J players is so important, as well as having people who can recognize the mismatch and throw good entry passes.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,781
Last season, Brad couldn’t get his team to play offense the way he wanted to play. When the Celtics move the ball, they can put up a lot of points. Driving lanes open up for the Jays, who finish well and recently have developed drive and dish skills.

Udoka needs to implement an offense that works for his team’s talent, and gets all the players to buy into the scheme.
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,322
Lynn
I think there is a disconnect to what an iso actually is. An iso isn’t necessarily a one-on-one penetration but also includes jumpers in those same isolated matchups which is a large part of both of their games.
I’m almost positive nba.com includes those jumpers as part of their isolation numbers.


Do post-ups count as isolations? I think they are recorded as separate "post-ups" in the tracking data, but both Tatum and Brown are very capable skill-wise in exploiting a switch onto a smaller defender and punishing them back-to-the-basket. It's one of the reasons spacing from the non-J players is so important, as well as having people who can recognize the mismatch and throw good entry passes.
Post ups are separate on nba.com, Jaylen does it 3.6% of the time and is in the 54th percentile. Tatum does it 8.3% of the time and is in the 48th percentile.

https://www.nba.com/stats/players/isolation/
 
Last edited:

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,322
Lynn
Where does this day Jaylen gets the other 90% of his shots from?
22% of his offense is in transition, which is around Giannis/Westbrook territory. 21% of it is as a spot up guy, 15% is the PnR ball handler, 10% running off of screens, and 10% in dribble handoffs.

The rest is a combination of posting up, cutting off ball, being the PnR roll man, isolation, and miscellaneous plays. He gets out in transition a ton, but is only in the 55th percentile as a transition scorer, struggles finishing on the break, and turns the ball over way too much.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,762
Where does this day Jaylen gets the other 90% of his shots from?
15.2% as PnR ballhandler,
1.2% as PnR Roll man
21% on spot-ups
9.4% on handoffs
3.8% on cuts
9.3% off screen
3.8% putbacks
22.4% transition
3.1% on MISC that don't fall cleanly into any other category.
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,322
Lynn
I’d like to see Udoka come up with better offense for when Tatum gets doubled. He was the most double teamed frontcourt player in the league this past season, at 20.4 times a game. When he’s on the court, defenses treat everyone else like an afterthought. Hoping the staff can come up with some plays that will either make defenses pay for doubling him, or softening how often they double him.

A big part of this is on Tatum needing to make quicker decision when facing hard doubles, but he’s way ahead of the curve. Would love to see some off ball action that will get guys easy looks.
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,752
Saint Paul, MN
"Ton of great shooters" caught my eye as well. After the J's the next 3 core rotation guys are Richardson, Smart and Schroeder, all of whom you'd be thrilled if they shot league average from 3. They can defend and do some ball handling, but shooters not so much. Nesmith and PP are the guys who might project to be great shooters, but we'll see how they develop.
Just one point. Richardson is just about exactly an average 3 point shooter. Has shot better than league average 3 times, under league average 3 times. His 35.8% three point average is just a tiny bit below the league average for the past 6 years of 35.9%
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,337
Just one point. Richardson is just about exactly an average 3 point shooter. Has shot better than league average 3 times, under league average 3 times. His 35.8% three point average is just a tiny bit below the league average for the past 6 years of 35.9%
I don’t know what happened to his game but when he was in Miami he was so much more than a 3-point shooter. He was a legit 2-way borderline All-Star at age 24/25.
 

bakahump

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 8, 2001
7,558
Maine
At the end of the day a team needs other guys to score. Regardless of if you had Jordon, Lebron and Wilt on your team. (that would be a hilarious "Big 3")

Tatum isnt gonna avg 68 next year. And Jalen isnt going to average 45. So if we want to win we are gonna need Smart, Schrode, AN, TL and Al to score some points.

Best case both those guys will average 30 (has that ever been done.....and yea this is hyperbole.....they wont do it next year). Leaving 45-50 points that SOMEONE needs to score. The Point being that Ime, is trying to figure out Where those (more realistic) 60-70 points will come from and make it easier on the secondary (tertiary???) guys to get them.
 

Spelunker

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
11,971
At the end of the day a team needs other guys to score. Regardless of if you had Jordon, Lebron and Wilt on your team. (that would be a hilarious "Big 3")

Tatum isnt gonna avg 68 next year. And Jalen isnt going to average 45. So if we want to win we are gonna need Smart, Schrode, AN, TL and Al to score some points.

Best case both those guys will average 30 (has that ever been done.....and yea this is hyperbole.....they wont do it next year). Leaving 45-50 points that SOMEONE needs to score. The Point being that Ime, is trying to figure out Where those (more realistic) 60-70 points will come from and make it easier on the secondary (tertiary???) guys to get them.
AKAIK, once: Elgin Baylor / Jerry West in 61/62:
  • Elgin Baylor, 38.3
  • Jerry West, 30.8
Caveat: Baylor missed half the year for Army Reserve. But in the 48 games he did play, he averaged 38/19/5. Jeebus
 

Big McCorkle

Member
SoSH Member
May 9, 2021
231
Summer coach-speak?

“Ton of great shooters?” :oops:
I choose to assume that what this quote actually means is that Udoka knows something about Robert Williams that nobody else does.

More seriously, Tatum and Brown obviously qualify. Pritchard shot 41% on 248 3PA as a rookie. Nesmith has shot something like 40% on his last 400 3PA going back to college (and for three months last year had a TS% over 60), and that's including the "rookie playing in his first NBA action" stretch where he couldn't hit anything. Horford is good for a big man, he'll be somewhere between 36-40% in all likelihood. And after them, Smart, Richardson, and Schroder are pretty much average shooters on decently high volume. So, two guys who are known to be great, two guys who very well could be great, and then a number of guys who at least force you to cover them at the three point line. I'm not sure how well that compares to the rest of the NBA, but I think it's probably pretty solid? If nothing else, if Pritchard and Nesmith achieve what would not be unreasonable to expect from them, Udoka could include a Pritchard-Nesmith-Brown-Tatum-Horford lineup in his rotations that would have hilariously good spacing.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,642
This seems like a clear message to the team that if there is an open shooter, the ball needs to be kicked out to them. Setting aside his spin on the number and type of shooters that might be open, he is telling the players not to think about who is there - just that someone is open and the ball needs to find them. If that person misses the shot, so be it. Process >>results.

Stevens and all of the other coaches in their lives have likely preached some form of this as well. Ime is upping the ante by letting us in the huddle.
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
I dont care about the total weight of their shooters part of the comment. I do care about moving the ball. Not just at the assist level. In order to get the defense to move (and thus give the offense some sort of advantage) the ball and the players have to move, just for the sake of movement. That happened far too few times last year. I'm not certain that will necessarily translate into gains in assist rate, but I think that's a secondary consideration. As frustrating as Hayward was when he seemingly turned down open shots, I think that's what he recognized. Garnett did as well. And I think Horford will be tremendously valuable there. The idea is to convince the best players that there is plenty of time to go iso if the clock gets too low, but unless there's a hot mismatch or a seriously open shot early, job 1 is to make the defense move.
I would love PP and Nesmith to spend a few hours watching Ray Allen or Reggie Miller move without the ball. Those two guys would run miles every game, literally running circles around the offensive halfcourt off of 3, 4, 5 screens. It must have been exhausting for their opponents. And it should naturally open up lanes for other options, drives, cuts, backdoor moves, etc. Too much Celtic offense lately has been 1 or 2 players locked into the corners, turning the rest of the offense into 3v5.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,707
I would love PP and Nesmith to spend a few hours watching Ray Allen or Reggie Miller move without the ball. Those two guys would run miles every game, literally running circles around the offensive halfcourt off of 3, 4, 5 screens. It must have been exhausting for their opponents. And it should naturally open up lanes for other options, drives, cuts, backdoor moves, etc. Too much Celtic offense lately has been 1 or 2 players locked into the corners, turning the rest of the offense into 3v5.
RayRay and Reggie were primary scorers. Pritchard and Nesmith won't need to work that hard as they'll be playing off of the JayCrew. I guarantee you that the Celtics will run exactly zero double or triple screens for their outlet shooters next year. Their job is to move to daylight as the defenses collapse around Tatum and Brown. And when you have those two guys there will always be loads of daylight.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,337
I would love PP and Nesmith to spend a few hours watching Ray Allen or Reggie Miller move without the ball. Those two guys would run miles every game, literally running circles around the offensive halfcourt off of 3, 4, 5 screens. It must have been exhausting for their opponents. And it should naturally open up lanes for other options, drives, cuts, backdoor moves, etc. Too much Celtic offense lately has been 1 or 2 players locked into the corners, turning the rest of the offense into 3v5.
That isn’t their role in the offense though. In a lineup with Tatum and Jaylen they are each going to be weak side spot up shooters when they are on the floor as the shot creators create. Pritchard of course will have additional responsibilities but that will be the krux of their job offensively.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,781
RayRay and Reggie were primary scorers. Pritchard and Nesmith won't need to work that hard as they'll be playing off of the JayCrew. I guarantee you that the Celtics will run exactly zero double or triple screens for their outlet shooters next year. Their job is to move to daylight as the defenses collapse around Tatum and Brown. And when you have those two guys there will always be loads of daylight.
Nesmith did a great job sprinting to daylight behind the arc Tuesday, and PP got him the ball right quick. He made a conscious effort to sprint to daylight and launch quickly. On a Nesmith drive and kick, PP dashed to the left slot for a quick fired three.
 

Big McCorkle

Member
SoSH Member
May 9, 2021
231
Has there been talk from Udoka or someone else about Jaylen (either specifically, or in a roundabout way) really needing to develop the skills that would make him not a liability as an off-ball defender? It's one of the most incredibly frustrating things, to see him staring at the ball motionless as his guy cuts behind him, or just be standing in the exact wrong place or in the wrong orientation, or not reacting fast enough to contribute with help when someone is driving on someone else near him. I'm hoping the change in coaches can get something moving there, get rid of the apparent developmental stagnation.
 

chilidawg

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 22, 2015
5,972
Cultural hub of the universe
Nesmith did a great job sprinting to daylight behind the arc Tuesday, and PP got him the ball right quick. He made a conscious effort to sprint to daylight and launch quickly. On a Nesmith drive and kick, PP dashed to the left slot for a quick fired three.
That decisiveness was very encouraging, as was Nesmith's ability to shoot with a hand in his face. Not many of his shots were of the wide open variety. He's long and has a high release, which makes his shot tough to defend. PP needs the added range because he needs to be open to get his shot off.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,512
around the way
Has there been talk from Udoka or someone else about Jaylen (either specifically, or in a roundabout way) really needing to develop the skills that would make him not a liability as an off-ball defender? It's one of the most incredibly frustrating things, to see him staring at the ball motionless as his guy cuts behind him, or just be standing in the exact wrong place or in the wrong orientation, or not reacting fast enough to contribute with help when someone is driving on someone else near him. I'm hoping the change in coaches can get something moving there, get rid of the apparent developmental stagnation.
You just described the whole fucking team last year.
 

Big McCorkle

Member
SoSH Member
May 9, 2021
231
You just described the whole fucking team last year.
I mean, fair, it's hyperbolic but you're not wrong, but it is something that Jaylen specifically has had a lot of problems with for many years now. At least there's good reason to think that an energized Udoka ought to be able to force the general malaise out of the roster in a way that last year's burnt-out, walking dead version of Brad just couldn't.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,512
around the way
I mean, fair, it's hyperbolic but you're not wrong, but it is something that Jaylen specifically has had a lot of problems with for many years now. At least there's good reason to think that an energized Udoka ought to be able to force the general malaise out of the roster in a way that last year's burnt-out, walking dead version of Brad just couldn't.
Probably some truth to that.

I see it as more of a system problem than anything else. Everyone is going to have times when they're beat backdoor or are building out because of ball-watching. It happens to Kawhi too, just not as often. I think that everyone will look better this year in that regard, and the advanced metrics will suddenly look like everyone got way better. But they won't have. There will just be fewer catastrophic breakdowns due (mostly, imo) to communication breakdowns on court and in system implementation. I don't think that Ime is going to make Jaylen et al. try harder. They'll just know better where they're supposed to be, when to cheat/hedge, be more purposeful at helping (but not overhelping), etc. You may be right that there's a motivational piece as well, but I think that mostly it's a system thing. Or we wouldn't be talking about how everyone took a step back on D.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,707
Yeah, the Cs' defense worked best when they had one signal caller on the back line (Al) and another out on the perimeter (Marcus). You'll see a lot fewer defensive breakdowns now that they'll have two guys out there calling out warnings.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,337
Yeah, the Cs' defense worked best when they had one signal caller on the back line (Al) and another out on the perimeter (Marcus). You'll see a lot fewer defensive breakdowns now that they'll have two guys out there calling out warnings.
We will always have a ton more veterans on the floor which will go a long way toward proper defensive reactions. Even the younger players will have an extra year under their belt.
 

Big McCorkle

Member
SoSH Member
May 9, 2021
231
Probably some truth to that.

I see it as more of a system problem than anything else. Everyone is going to have times when they're beat backdoor or are building out because of ball-watching. It happens to Kawhi too, just not as often. I think that everyone will look better this year in that regard, and the advanced metrics will suddenly look like everyone got way better. But they won't have. There will just be fewer catastrophic breakdowns due (mostly, imo) to communication breakdowns on court and in system implementation. I don't think that Ime is going to make Jaylen et al. try harder. They'll just know better where they're supposed to be, when to cheat/hedge, be more purposeful at helping (but not overhelping), etc. You may be right that there's a motivational piece as well, but I think that mostly it's a system thing. Or we wouldn't be talking about how everyone took a step back on D.
That everyone took a step back on D is what suggests to me that it was a motivational thing, at least to a significant degree. It's not so much a "they don't give a shit" sort of motivational thing but a "it's become difficult to get them to be locked in at all times." It's not effort per se, it's focus. It's not as though the system changed, as far as I'm aware, it's that the players weren't consistently doing their job within that system. Which makes sense in context, we're talking about a team whose coach was, reportedly, burnt out by everything that'd happened over the previous few seasons, had gone through the grueling bubble just a few months before the season started, and were playing in the middle of a pandemic with all the limits that entails as well as missing a lot of game and practice time to Covid protocols and just random-ass injuries. Both the internal and external factors were pretty grim.

To me, saying it's a system thing implies that Brad made some very bad changes to the system he had previously been using to produce elite defenses even with IT, Kyrie, and Kemba at point guard. I don't think that's the case. But I don't think I disagree with anything you're saying beyond the single term used to summarize it.

However, with Jaylen specifically all that stuff has been a problem for a long while. You can go back and watch him in the bubble, he just has so many defensive lapses when he's playing off-ball that it's halfway infuriating. It's such that while I think with the team as a whole it's just a matter of getting them all to focus and execute, with Jaylen he needs to actually put in a lot of time and work to improve his feel for the defensive game and just learn the fundamental processes of off-ball defense. Jaylen's not like other players (such as one Jayson Tatum Sr.) who maybe lapsed a bit last year but have a track record of being good to even elite off-ball defenders; he's practically never been good at it, and it's by far the biggest weakness to his game.
 
Last edited:

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,342
Santa Monica
However, with Jaylen specifically all that stuff has been a problem for a long while. You can go back and watch him in the bubble specifically, he just has so many defensive lapses when he's playing off-ball that it's halfway infuriating. It's such that while I think with the team as a whole it's just a matter of getting them all to focus and execute, with Jaylen he needs to actually put in a lot of time and work to improve his feel for the defensive game and just learn the fundamental processes of off-ball defense. Jaylen's not like other players (such as one Jayson Tatum Sr.) who maybe lapsed a bit last year but have a track record of being good to even elite off-ball defenders; he's practically never been good at it, and it's by far the biggest weakness to his game.
You are correct, JB's off-ball defense has been sloppy for a while. Smart and JT have a tendency to bark at JB on defense. On-ball JB's solid, BUT he does have a tendency to stare at the ball and lose his man off-ball.

I'd like to see him at the top of a 2-3 zone occasionally or play the 4/bigger swings on D. JB is sneaky long/very strong. Improving his help and off-ball D would show tremendous growth, it's possible he gets better on D with a new coach/voice.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,737
PP and Nesmith both have the potential to be legitimately great shooters. Remains to be seen how many minutes they will get, but that's about the extent of the great shooting on the team (Unless Ime has big plans for Hauser).

We should have enough average-ish 3 point shooting outside of those PP and AN that you still want taking OPEN 3s.... so Tatum and Brown hopefully will have enough playmaking options.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,218
PP and Nesmith both have the potential to be legitimately great shooters. Remains to be seen how many minutes they will get, but that's about the extent of the great shooting on the team (Unless Ime has big plans for Hauser).

We should have enough average-ish 3 point shooting outside of those PP and AN that you still want taking OPEN 3s.... so Tatum and Brown hopefully will have enough playmaking options.
Agree w the point that the shooting is pretty average, but unless the standard of "great shooter" is "just Steph", Tatum is a great shooter.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,737
Agree w the point that the shooting is pretty average, but unless the standard of "great shooter" is "just Steph", Tatum is a great shooter.
Agree. I wasn’t too clear, but I was referring to above posts about Ime’s quote that Tatum and Brown playing with “great shooters”.

Wasnt including those 2 in my comment, but rather just their teammates.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,218
Agree. I wasn’t too clear, but I was referring to above posts about Ime’s quote that Tatum and Brown playing with “great shooters”.

Wasnt including those 2 in my comment, but rather just their teammates.
Ah ok, yeah agree that the surrounding shooting is pretty average.