That was then: Celebrating what was

TheoShmeo

Skrub's sympathy case
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
12,890
Boston, NY
ImageUploadedBySons of Sam Horn1486393496.990170.jpg

Celebrating being able to give Roger the salute he so royally deserves. From my perch last night.

Cross posted from another thread..if anything can suffer a little redundancy....
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,430
At today's press conference, Brady walked away from the podium and forgot his MVP trophy. They had to call him back to get it.

 

cgrove13

New Member
Feb 2, 2010
23
I generally like the Around the NFL podcast (which is the NFL.com beatwriters). Their recap episode is basically 70 minutes of them sitting in a studio at 2am walking through the comeback, using the Socci/Zolak radio calls for highlights. The moderator is a salty Jets fan, and one of the writers is a Pats fan.

http://www.nfl.com/podcasts?series=aroundtheleague-podcast (and itunes etc)
 

steveluck7

Member
SoSH Member
May 10, 2007
4,002
Burrillville, RI
Why is this team the best? BB at his presser answering a question about soaking it in and even re-naming his boat:
"The reality is, we're 5 weeks behind everyone else in preparing for 2017"
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,662
This game really was so strange. Even when the Pats were losing 28-3, they were ahead in yards, first downs, and time of possession. So they were kind of controlling the game. Three monster mistakes, however:

- The Blount fumble, when it looked like the Pats were marching down to score.
- The Brady pick-six, when it looked like the Pats were marching down to score and all of a sudden it's 7 points the other way.
- The Bennett hold, which cost them 4 points.

Then the Pats' D clamped down, the offense really got rolling, and they started making plays, instead of mistakes.

The final numbers actually are the kind of numbers that suggest a HUGE Patriots' blowout win:

Total Yards: NE 546, Atl 344
First Downs: NE 37, Atl 17
3rd Downs: NE 7-14, Atl 1-8
Total Plays: NE 93, Atl 46
Time of Possession: NE 40:31, Atl 23:27

I mean, in all those ways, that looks like a game that the Patriots would win by at least two touchdowns, if not more.

So we can look at this game one way and say, boy, they were incredibly fortunate to pull it out. But looking at it another way, you say, my goodness, they pretty much dominated the Falcons, and if it wasn't for a few uncharacteristic mistakes, they probably blow them out.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
24,896
Unreal America
This game really was so strange. Even when the Pats were losing 28-3, they were ahead in yards, first downs, and time of possession. So they were kind of controlling the game. Three monster mistakes, however:

- The Blount fumble, when it looked like the Pats were marching down to score.
- The Brady pick-six, when it looked like the Pats were marching down to score and all of a sudden it's 7 points the other way.
- The Bennett hold, which cost them 4 points.

Then the Pats' D clamped down, the offense really got rolling, and they started making plays, instead of mistakes.

The final numbers actually are the kind of numbers that suggest a HUGE Patriots' blowout win:

Total Yards: NE 546, Atl 344
First Downs: NE 37, Atl 17
3rd Downs: NE 7-14, Atl 1-8
Total Plays: NE 93, Atl 46
Time of Possession: NE 40:31, Atl 23:27

I mean, in all those ways, that looks like a game that the Patriots would win by at least two touchdowns, if not more.

So we can look at this game one way and say, boy, they were incredibly fortunate to pull it out. But looking at it another way, you say, my goodness, they pretty much dominated the Falcons, and if it wasn't for a few uncharacteristic mistakes, they probably blow them out.
Late in the game I looked at the box score on my phone and saw that Atlanta had only run 46 plays. 28 points on 46 plays. Crazy.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Atlanta got 1.6 more yards/play at were +1 on turnovers, the combination of which usually isnt indicative of losing a game by 2 TDs or more.
 

Ralphwiggum

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2012
9,837
Needham, MA
Atlanta 1-8 on third down. If they convert even one more Atlanta probably scores again and/or the Pats probably do not have enough time to come back and win.
 

mwonow

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 4, 2005
7,124
This game really was so strange. Even when the Pats were losing 28-3, they were ahead in yards, first downs, and time of possession. So they were kind of controlling the game. Three monster mistakes, however:

- The Blount fumble, when it looked like the Pats were marching down to score.
- The Brady pick-six, when it looked like the Pats were marching down to score and all of a sudden it's 7 points the other way.
- The Bennett hold, which cost them 4 points.

Then the Pats' D clamped down, the offense really got rolling, and they started making plays, instead of mistakes.

The final numbers actually are the kind of numbers that suggest a HUGE Patriots' blowout win:

Total Yards: NE 546, Atl 344
First Downs: NE 37, Atl 17
3rd Downs: NE 7-14, Atl 1-8
Total Plays: NE 93, Atl 46
Time of Possession: NE 40:31, Atl 23:27

I mean, in all those ways, that looks like a game that the Patriots would win by at least two touchdowns, if not more.

So we can look at this game one way and say, boy, they were incredibly fortunate to pull it out. But looking at it another way, you say, my goodness, they pretty much dominated the Falcons, and if it wasn't for a few uncharacteristic mistakes, they probably blow them out.
Kind of reminds me of Bs vs. Canucks - came down to Game 7, but the Bs had enough of a plus goal differential to make 3-3 a headscratcher
 

JMDurron

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
5,128
This game really was so strange. Even when the Pats were losing 28-3, they were ahead in yards, first downs, and time of possession. So they were kind of controlling the game. Three monster mistakes, however:

- The Blount fumble, when it looked like the Pats were marching down to score.
- The Brady pick-six, when it looked like the Pats were marching down to score and all of a sudden it's 7 points the other way.
- The Bennett hold, which cost them 4 points.

Then the Pats' D clamped down, the offense really got rolling, and they started making plays, instead of mistakes.

The final numbers actually are the kind of numbers that suggest a HUGE Patriots' blowout win:

Total Yards: NE 546, Atl 344
First Downs: NE 37, Atl 17
3rd Downs: NE 7-14, Atl 1-8
Total Plays: NE 93, Atl 46
Time of Possession: NE 40:31, Atl 23:27

I mean, in all those ways, that looks like a game that the Patriots would win by at least two touchdowns, if not more.

So we can look at this game one way and say, boy, they were incredibly fortunate to pull it out. But looking at it another way, you say, my goodness, they pretty much dominated the Falcons, and if it wasn't for a few uncharacteristic mistakes, they probably blow them out.
This reminds me of the 2004 ALCS, both in the moment and with the benefit of hindsight. In the moment? Biggest, most amazing comeback in the history of the sport at that stage. In hindsight? Still the former, but it's just as surprising that they were ever that far down to begin with, based on the actual talent level and general level of execution from the two teams heading into the game/series.
 

teddykgb

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
11,068
Chelmsford, MA
This game really was so strange. Even when the Pats were losing 28-3, they were ahead in yards, first downs, and time of possession. So they were kind of controlling the game. Three monster mistakes, however:

- The Blount fumble, when it looked like the Pats were marching down to score.
- The Brady pick-six, when it looked like the Pats were marching down to score and all of a sudden it's 7 points the other way.
- The Bennett hold, which cost them 4 points.

Then the Pats' D clamped down, the offense really got rolling, and they started making plays, instead of mistakes.

The final numbers actually are the kind of numbers that suggest a HUGE Patriots' blowout win:

Total Yards: NE 546, Atl 344
First Downs: NE 37, Atl 17
3rd Downs: NE 7-14, Atl 1-8
Total Plays: NE 93, Atl 46
Time of Possession: NE 40:31, Atl 23:27

I mean, in all those ways, that looks like a game that the Patriots would win by at least two touchdowns, if not more.

So we can look at this game one way and say, boy, they were incredibly fortunate to pull it out. But looking at it another way, you say, my goodness, they pretty much dominated the Falcons, and if it wasn't for a few uncharacteristic mistakes, they probably blow them out.
I don't think you can do this at all. While Atlanta didn't go super conservative, they certainly seemed to play to the clock a bit and I don't think the game plays the same if the score hadn't been so lopsided. Those with access to the all-22 could confirm but it certainly looked like they backed off quite a bit defensively for a while there in an effort to trade yards for time. The game just played out in a way where Atlanta sort of had to try to manage the clock and dare the Patriots to do the most improbable thing possible. Unfortunately for them, they did, and doubly unfortunately for them they neglected to do the most important thing when you make that choice which is to play mistake free error free situational football.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,662
Late in the game I looked at the box score on my phone and saw that Atlanta had only run 46 plays. 28 points on 46 plays. Crazy.
Their offense only managed 21 points. I think every single one of us would have happily taken that at the start of the game, right?

Atlanta got 1.6 more yards/play at were +1 on turnovers, the combination of which usually isnt indicative of losing a game by 2 TDs or more.
Another indication that it was a strange game.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,837
AZ
Their offense only managed 21 points. I think every single one of us would have happily taken that at the start of the game, right?
I was convinced before the game, that other than there being some kind of crazy lopsided turnover differential, the one stat that would completely tell the story was Atlanta's third down efficiency.

If you told me before the game that Atlanta would be 1-8, I would have been partying about the blowout.

Strange game indeed.
 

Captaincoop

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
13,488
Santa Monica, CA
Until I was in my twenties, I could only imagine how amazing it would be if the Pats won just one Super Bowl. Even getting there in '85 was spectacular.

Now, after last night, the Patriots officially have "B Side" Super Bowl wins. The Eagles one? Yeah, that was okay...

This organization has reached unimaginable heights.
 

Kevin Youkulele

wishes Claude Makelele was a Red Sox
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 12, 2006
8,934
San Diego
In the 21st century, New England is the only region with championships in each of the NFL, NBA, NHL and MLB. New England has the most total championships in those four leagues in the 21st century (10; LA/Anaheim is second with 8, while having 6 teams to New England's 4). San Antonio has the most championships per team in the 21st century, because they have one team (Spurs) with four titles. New England is second with 2.5 championships per team. There are eight regions with four or more combined championships; the other five are Chicago (5) and NYC/NJ, PIT, MIA, and SF/OAK/SJ, all with 4.
upload_2017-2-6_9-22-4.png upload_2017-2-6_9-22-11.png .
 

Dollar

Member
SoSH Member
May 5, 2006
11,089
Gives me a cold sweat to think about how close Brady and BB are to being 0-7.
Rewatching some old 3 Games to Glory films yesterday before the game, I started thinking that in some alternate universe Ricky Proehl is mentioned in the same breath as Bucky Dent and Aaron Boone after scoring game-tying, walk-in touchdowns in two Super Bowls in three years with two different teams. Thank god for Brady and Vinatieri.
 

mwonow

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 4, 2005
7,124
I kept thinking of this quote as the game went on. From BB on Jan 31st:

(On monitoring player's energy throughout this ultimate game)
"That's a very challenging situation because there is so much leading up to the game. It's such a long game between pregame, the start of the game, halftime, TV timeouts and so forth. It just extends longer than what it normally does including the pregame part of it. We just try and pace ourselves through that. Some of that is nutrition, hydration and things like that. Part of it is an understanding of what it's going to be like so you don't get surprised and get into the middle of the game or the middle of the third quarter. That's kind of when the game would be ending but there's still another 20 minutes to play or so. I think understanding that and making sure that the pace of the game for each individual, which is different, for an offensive line or defensive line, the pace is a little different than receivers or defensive backs that are running 30, 40, 50 yards to cover. It's the difference between boxing and distance running. Then, you have a lot of guys in between. It's definitely challenging but it's the same for both teams. It's the same environment. Everyone needs to try and maximize all those things I just talked about. Their rest, attentiveness and pace so they don't burn out too soon. It's a challenge. This game is unlike any other that way.

Pats definitely won that last 20 minutes!
 

jsinger121

@jsinger121
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
17,682
Gives me a cold sweat to think about how close Brady and BB are to being 0-7.
The Eagles game wasn't even as close as the score indicated. Garbarge time touchdown to cut the lead from 24-14 to 24-21 and even when the Eagles got the ball back with 46 seconds left at their own 4. There was little hope they were going to move the ball into field goal range.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,662
I don't think you can do this at all. While Atlanta didn't go super conservative, they certainly seemed to play to the clock a bit and I don't think the game plays the same if the score hadn't been so lopsided. Those with access to the all-22 could confirm but it certainly looked like they backed off quite a bit defensively for a while there in an effort to trade yards for time. The game just played out in a way where Atlanta sort of had to try to manage the clock and dare the Patriots to do the most improbable thing possible. Unfortunately for them, they did, and doubly unfortunately for them they neglected to do the most important thing when you make that choice which is to play mistake free error free situational football.
Keep in mind that I pointed out that even when the Pats were down 28-3, they were ahead in yards, first downs, and time of possession. It was the three huge uncharacteristic mistakes that had done them in to that point, but overall, they were, in some ways, outplaying Atlanta. Not on the scoreboard, obviously, but there were signs.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,552
On my phone so apologies for the lack of a link but Shea Serrano (who I think is one of the best sports "columnists" around) had this gem in a good cotext:

"Death always comes. So does Belichick."
 

Koufax

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
5,944
Reminds me of something that someone on NFL network said this morning. He said that the Patriots are like cockroaches. You can't get rid of them. If there were a nuclear war, somehow the Patriots would survive and would be playing in the Super Bowl.
 

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
19,334
Keep in mind that I pointed out that even when the Pats were down 28-3, they were ahead in yards, first downs, and time of possession. It was the three huge uncharacteristic mistakes that had done them in to that point, but overall, they were, in some ways, outplaying Atlanta. Not on the scoreboard, obviously, but there were signs.
To be fair they put the ball on the ground a lot this year. They recovered many of them though so it doesn't stand out as an issue.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
"As great as today feels ... we're five weeks behind the other teams for the 2017 season," Belichick said at a press conference Monday.
 

EL Jeffe

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 30, 2006
1,325
I cried (like a bitch) after Butler's pick in 49. This one...I was just numb. In the 3rd quarter down 25 points, I found peace in the amazing run of four Super Bowls and the embarrassment of riches that I've basked in from being a Patriots fan for my 43 years on this planet. And then stuff started happening and kept happening until it became clear they were going to win that fucking game. I am in awe of that coach, QB and organization, and their spectacular ability to simply win.

I don't know what it was like to be a Celtics fan alive in the 60's, but this...this is fun.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,481
The Eagles game wasn't even as close as the score indicated. Garbarge time touchdown to cut the lead from 24-14 to 24-21 and even when the Eagles got the ball back with 46 seconds left at their own 4. There was little hope they were going to move the ball into field goal range.
That's true. Six out of seven with the winning score coming in the last two minutes is still nuts.
 

Spelunker

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
11,943
Something little I didn't notice until watching this (cheesy) video: as folks were starting to run back to the middle of the field, LGBT *flies* across the screen into the endzone, towards White.

Seriously, that might be the fastest I've ever seen him run.

 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
12,806
Belo Horizonte - Brazil
Something little I didn't notice until watching this (cheesy) video: as folks were starting to run back to the middle of the field, LGBT *flies* across the screen into the endzone, towards White.

Seriously, that might be the fastest I've ever seen him run.

Something that bothered me during the broadcast was Buck and Aikman talking about how that pass to Bennett was "underthrown". It was perfectly thrown to the back shoulder, Brady wasn't trying to lead him into the endzone. Even with the egregious contact, Bennett was in great position to make a play on the ball, just couldn't hang on.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,075
New York City
In the 21st century, New England is the only region with championships in each of the NFL, NBA, NHL and MLB. New England has the most total championships in those four leagues in the 21st century (10; LA/Anaheim is second with 8, while having 6 teams to New England's 4). San Antonio has the most championships per team in the 21st century, because they have one team (Spurs) with four titles. New England is second with 2.5 championships per team. There are eight regions with four or more combined championships; the other five are Chicago (5) and NYC/NJ, PIT, MIA, and SF/OAK/SJ, all with 4.
View attachment 14387 View attachment 14388 .
New York area doesn't have an NBA championship in the last 5 decades, let alone the 21st century.
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,747
If it helps, they're even closer to 7-0.

Actually, that just makes me sweat even more.
Here's the thing. They've been so consistently great that if we replayed the last 16 years 1000x the Pats almost certainly always come out with somewhere between 3 and 8 trophies and probably average around five...but it might be a completely different five.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Keep in mind that I pointed out that even when the Pats were down 28-3, they were ahead in yards, first downs, and time of possession. It was the three huge uncharacteristic mistakes that had done them in to that point, but overall, they were, in some ways, outplaying Atlanta. Not on the scoreboard, obviously, but there were signs.
No they weren't. They were getting crushed in yards per play and were -2 in turnovers. Getting crushed in yards per play and losing the turnover battle while being down 28-3 isnt indicative of outplaying your opponent.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,075
New York City
Here's the thing. They've been so consistently great that if we replayed the last 16 years 1000x the Pats almost certainly always come out with somewhere between 3 and 8 trophies and probably average around five...but it might be a completely different five.
This is really a fact. 2006 and 2015 are both years they could have easily won the SB.(get the 3rd down against the Colts, get the 2 pt conversion and win in OT against the Broncos) 2001 could have been a loss. Obviously both Giants games could have been wins. And Carolina, Seattle, and Atlanta could have been losses.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Feels like five is fair value or pretty close to it, but got there in a bit of a peculiar way. Talking about the Patriots luck the last two Super Bowls while ignoring they had to be pretty unlucky to not ship one between 2005 and 2013 is a scalding hot take.
 

loshjott

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2004
14,987
Silver Spring, MD
Feels like five is fair value or pretty close to it, but got there in a bit of a peculiar way. Talking about the Patriots luck the last two Super Bowls while ignoring they had to be pretty unlucky to not ship one between 2005 and 2013 is a scalding hot take.
And that luck in 2015 and 2017 includes five 4th Q or OT GOAT drives. Five. Cinco.
 

dbn

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 10, 2007
7,785
La Mancha.
A few years back someone posted some data about how many seasons during the BB/TB12-era various teams have won so many games, conference championships, etc. I've put together some similar data and, because I love plots, I made plots. The "wins numbering" refer to regular-season only. I'll spoiler them for space reasons.












 

Kevin Youkulele

wishes Claude Makelele was a Red Sox
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 12, 2006
8,934
San Diego
It just occurred to me that the Patriots scored four touchdowns without a single successful XP kick (miss, 2-pt, 2-pt, walkoff). I wonder if that has ever happened before.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,075
New York City
This thread started in September of 2015. Since then, NE(coming off a SB title) lost a heartbreaker to Denver in the AFCCG and then won the Super Bowl with the biggest comeback, by a mile, in the history of the Bowl.

Who knows where the Pats are in two years? But this thread has good mojo.