LOLI am so psyched for "2 1/2-ish Games to Glory."
Super Bowl hero James White had an extraordinary performance to lead his team to a record-setting Super Bowl title Sunday night in Houston, so it shouldn’t be a surprise what he’s going to do next.
He’s going to Walt Disney World Resort!
Late in the game I looked at the box score on my phone and saw that Atlanta had only run 46 plays. 28 points on 46 plays. Crazy.This game really was so strange. Even when the Pats were losing 28-3, they were ahead in yards, first downs, and time of possession. So they were kind of controlling the game. Three monster mistakes, however:
- The Blount fumble, when it looked like the Pats were marching down to score.
- The Brady pick-six, when it looked like the Pats were marching down to score and all of a sudden it's 7 points the other way.
- The Bennett hold, which cost them 4 points.
Then the Pats' D clamped down, the offense really got rolling, and they started making plays, instead of mistakes.
The final numbers actually are the kind of numbers that suggest a HUGE Patriots' blowout win:
Total Yards: NE 546, Atl 344
First Downs: NE 37, Atl 17
3rd Downs: NE 7-14, Atl 1-8
Total Plays: NE 93, Atl 46
Time of Possession: NE 40:31, Atl 23:27
I mean, in all those ways, that looks like a game that the Patriots would win by at least two touchdowns, if not more.
So we can look at this game one way and say, boy, they were incredibly fortunate to pull it out. But looking at it another way, you say, my goodness, they pretty much dominated the Falcons, and if it wasn't for a few uncharacteristic mistakes, they probably blow them out.
Kind of reminds me of Bs vs. Canucks - came down to Game 7, but the Bs had enough of a plus goal differential to make 3-3 a headscratcherThis game really was so strange. Even when the Pats were losing 28-3, they were ahead in yards, first downs, and time of possession. So they were kind of controlling the game. Three monster mistakes, however:
- The Blount fumble, when it looked like the Pats were marching down to score.
- The Brady pick-six, when it looked like the Pats were marching down to score and all of a sudden it's 7 points the other way.
- The Bennett hold, which cost them 4 points.
Then the Pats' D clamped down, the offense really got rolling, and they started making plays, instead of mistakes.
The final numbers actually are the kind of numbers that suggest a HUGE Patriots' blowout win:
Total Yards: NE 546, Atl 344
First Downs: NE 37, Atl 17
3rd Downs: NE 7-14, Atl 1-8
Total Plays: NE 93, Atl 46
Time of Possession: NE 40:31, Atl 23:27
I mean, in all those ways, that looks like a game that the Patriots would win by at least two touchdowns, if not more.
So we can look at this game one way and say, boy, they were incredibly fortunate to pull it out. But looking at it another way, you say, my goodness, they pretty much dominated the Falcons, and if it wasn't for a few uncharacteristic mistakes, they probably blow them out.
If it helps, they're even closer to 7-0.Gives me a cold sweat to think about how close Brady and BB are to being 0-7.
This reminds me of the 2004 ALCS, both in the moment and with the benefit of hindsight. In the moment? Biggest, most amazing comeback in the history of the sport at that stage. In hindsight? Still the former, but it's just as surprising that they were ever that far down to begin with, based on the actual talent level and general level of execution from the two teams heading into the game/series.This game really was so strange. Even when the Pats were losing 28-3, they were ahead in yards, first downs, and time of possession. So they were kind of controlling the game. Three monster mistakes, however:
- The Blount fumble, when it looked like the Pats were marching down to score.
- The Brady pick-six, when it looked like the Pats were marching down to score and all of a sudden it's 7 points the other way.
- The Bennett hold, which cost them 4 points.
Then the Pats' D clamped down, the offense really got rolling, and they started making plays, instead of mistakes.
The final numbers actually are the kind of numbers that suggest a HUGE Patriots' blowout win:
Total Yards: NE 546, Atl 344
First Downs: NE 37, Atl 17
3rd Downs: NE 7-14, Atl 1-8
Total Plays: NE 93, Atl 46
Time of Possession: NE 40:31, Atl 23:27
I mean, in all those ways, that looks like a game that the Patriots would win by at least two touchdowns, if not more.
So we can look at this game one way and say, boy, they were incredibly fortunate to pull it out. But looking at it another way, you say, my goodness, they pretty much dominated the Falcons, and if it wasn't for a few uncharacteristic mistakes, they probably blow them out.
I don't think you can do this at all. While Atlanta didn't go super conservative, they certainly seemed to play to the clock a bit and I don't think the game plays the same if the score hadn't been so lopsided. Those with access to the all-22 could confirm but it certainly looked like they backed off quite a bit defensively for a while there in an effort to trade yards for time. The game just played out in a way where Atlanta sort of had to try to manage the clock and dare the Patriots to do the most improbable thing possible. Unfortunately for them, they did, and doubly unfortunately for them they neglected to do the most important thing when you make that choice which is to play mistake free error free situational football.This game really was so strange. Even when the Pats were losing 28-3, they were ahead in yards, first downs, and time of possession. So they were kind of controlling the game. Three monster mistakes, however:
- The Blount fumble, when it looked like the Pats were marching down to score.
- The Brady pick-six, when it looked like the Pats were marching down to score and all of a sudden it's 7 points the other way.
- The Bennett hold, which cost them 4 points.
Then the Pats' D clamped down, the offense really got rolling, and they started making plays, instead of mistakes.
The final numbers actually are the kind of numbers that suggest a HUGE Patriots' blowout win:
Total Yards: NE 546, Atl 344
First Downs: NE 37, Atl 17
3rd Downs: NE 7-14, Atl 1-8
Total Plays: NE 93, Atl 46
Time of Possession: NE 40:31, Atl 23:27
I mean, in all those ways, that looks like a game that the Patriots would win by at least two touchdowns, if not more.
So we can look at this game one way and say, boy, they were incredibly fortunate to pull it out. But looking at it another way, you say, my goodness, they pretty much dominated the Falcons, and if it wasn't for a few uncharacteristic mistakes, they probably blow them out.
Their offense only managed 21 points. I think every single one of us would have happily taken that at the start of the game, right?Late in the game I looked at the box score on my phone and saw that Atlanta had only run 46 plays. 28 points on 46 plays. Crazy.
Another indication that it was a strange game.Atlanta got 1.6 more yards/play at were +1 on turnovers, the combination of which usually isnt indicative of losing a game by 2 TDs or more.
I was convinced before the game, that other than there being some kind of crazy lopsided turnover differential, the one stat that would completely tell the story was Atlanta's third down efficiency.Their offense only managed 21 points. I think every single one of us would have happily taken that at the start of the game, right?
Rewatching some old 3 Games to Glory films yesterday before the game, I started thinking that in some alternate universe Ricky Proehl is mentioned in the same breath as Bucky Dent and Aaron Boone after scoring game-tying, walk-in touchdowns in two Super Bowls in three years with two different teams. Thank god for Brady and Vinatieri.Gives me a cold sweat to think about how close Brady and BB are to being 0-7.
The Eagles game wasn't even as close as the score indicated. Garbarge time touchdown to cut the lead from 24-14 to 24-21 and even when the Eagles got the ball back with 46 seconds left at their own 4. There was little hope they were going to move the ball into field goal range.Gives me a cold sweat to think about how close Brady and BB are to being 0-7.
Keep in mind that I pointed out that even when the Pats were down 28-3, they were ahead in yards, first downs, and time of possession. It was the three huge uncharacteristic mistakes that had done them in to that point, but overall, they were, in some ways, outplaying Atlanta. Not on the scoreboard, obviously, but there were signs.I don't think you can do this at all. While Atlanta didn't go super conservative, they certainly seemed to play to the clock a bit and I don't think the game plays the same if the score hadn't been so lopsided. Those with access to the all-22 could confirm but it certainly looked like they backed off quite a bit defensively for a while there in an effort to trade yards for time. The game just played out in a way where Atlanta sort of had to try to manage the clock and dare the Patriots to do the most improbable thing possible. Unfortunately for them, they did, and doubly unfortunately for them they neglected to do the most important thing when you make that choice which is to play mistake free error free situational football.
To be fair they put the ball on the ground a lot this year. They recovered many of them though so it doesn't stand out as an issue.Keep in mind that I pointed out that even when the Pats were down 28-3, they were ahead in yards, first downs, and time of possession. It was the three huge uncharacteristic mistakes that had done them in to that point, but overall, they were, in some ways, outplaying Atlanta. Not on the scoreboard, obviously, but there were signs.
I fucking love that guy."As great as today feels ... we're five weeks behind the other teams for the 2017 season," Belichick said at a press conference Monday.
Imagine how the Falcons feel. Five weeks behind, no OC, and....."As great as today feels ... we're five weeks behind the other teams for the 2017 season," Belichick said at a press conference Monday.
That's true. Six out of seven with the winning score coming in the last two minutes is still nuts.The Eagles game wasn't even as close as the score indicated. Garbarge time touchdown to cut the lead from 24-14 to 24-21 and even when the Eagles got the ball back with 46 seconds left at their own 4. There was little hope they were going to move the ball into field goal range.
Something that bothered me during the broadcast was Buck and Aikman talking about how that pass to Bennett was "underthrown". It was perfectly thrown to the back shoulder, Brady wasn't trying to lead him into the endzone. Even with the egregious contact, Bennett was in great position to make a play on the ball, just couldn't hang on.Something little I didn't notice until watching this (cheesy) video: as folks were starting to run back to the middle of the field, LGBT *flies* across the screen into the endzone, towards White.
Seriously, that might be the fastest I've ever seen him run.
New York area doesn't have an NBA championship in the last 5 decades, let alone the 21st century.In the 21st century, New England is the only region with championships in each of the NFL, NBA, NHL and MLB. New England has the most total championships in those four leagues in the 21st century (10; LA/Anaheim is second with 8, while having 6 teams to New England's 4). San Antonio has the most championships per team in the 21st century, because they have one team (Spurs) with four titles. New England is second with 2.5 championships per team. There are eight regions with four or more combined championships; the other five are Chicago (5) and NYC/NJ, PIT, MIA, and SF/OAK/SJ, all with 4.
View attachment 14387 View attachment 14388 .
Here's the thing. They've been so consistently great that if we replayed the last 16 years 1000x the Pats almost certainly always come out with somewhere between 3 and 8 trophies and probably average around five...but it might be a completely different five.If it helps, they're even closer to 7-0.
Actually, that just makes me sweat even more.
No they weren't. They were getting crushed in yards per play and were -2 in turnovers. Getting crushed in yards per play and losing the turnover battle while being down 28-3 isnt indicative of outplaying your opponent.Keep in mind that I pointed out that even when the Pats were down 28-3, they were ahead in yards, first downs, and time of possession. It was the three huge uncharacteristic mistakes that had done them in to that point, but overall, they were, in some ways, outplaying Atlanta. Not on the scoreboard, obviously, but there were signs.
This is really a fact. 2006 and 2015 are both years they could have easily won the SB.(get the 3rd down against the Colts, get the 2 pt conversion and win in OT against the Broncos) 2001 could have been a loss. Obviously both Giants games could have been wins. And Carolina, Seattle, and Atlanta could have been losses.Here's the thing. They've been so consistently great that if we replayed the last 16 years 1000x the Pats almost certainly always come out with somewhere between 3 and 8 trophies and probably average around five...but it might be a completely different five.
And that luck in 2015 and 2017 includes five 4th Q or OT GOAT drives. Five. Cinco.Feels like five is fair value or pretty close to it, but got there in a bit of a peculiar way. Talking about the Patriots luck the last two Super Bowls while ignoring they had to be pretty unlucky to not ship one between 2005 and 2013 is a scalding hot take.
8PM WednesdayWhen do we get a soundfx? It might be epic.