It is a goalpost move because your original post talked about being built for the playoffs and the underlying reasoning behind your post was that they were going to be ousted by the Bulls. Here's the money quote (emphasis added):In the OP I talked about winning a championship, so that's not at all a goalpost move.
"The Celtics, simply put, are not built for the playoffs. They are built for regular season success, which is no small or unimportant thing. But if they want to be a championship team, they need to be constructed differently. They need to add more top-end talent, even if it sacrifices some depth. And they need to add toughness. I think the former is more important than the latter, but I think both are needed."
You also talked about things like rotations being shorter, the playoffs being more physical, and the like as reasons why the Cs wouldn't be successful in the playoffs.
I know you're going to say something to the effect of, "But I did say that if they wanted to be a championship team they have to be constructed differently." But 98% of your approximately 700 word post - actually everything except that one use of the phrase "championship team" had nothing to do with championships, it had to do with regular season versus playoffs.
Look, this is a message board. We're trying to have fun here talking about a team that we love to watch and talk about. I don't think anyone really cares if you are right or wrong about your opinions but there is a basic honesty that people need to have. It would be better - in my opinion - if you simply said that you misjudged the team and owned it rather than talking about being "partially right and partially wrong."
One other thing. I don't know how tough you think Fultz is, but if he really is the next coming of Russell Westbrook (except with wanting to get his teammates involved), it's certainly possible that adding Fultz is going to make the Cs a championship caliber team without adding any toughness.