Building a Bullpen, 2019 edition

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
I’m ok with adding quality depth like Brach as well rather than a big ticket risk like Kimbrel.

The thing is though, even a 2/$12 contract for Brach alone pushes them over the 2nd threshold. So why just stop there? Either go for Ottavino, or go for Brach plus another reliever in that tier. This pen is not good enough without wishcasting coming true.

Lakins, Feltman, and Hernandez should have to force their way into the plan, not start there. Brewer, Velazquez, and Poyner still have options. Putnam is on a minor league contract and can start in Pawtucket to prove he’s healthy while awaiting the first injury or flameout. The most likely outcome with Thornburg is that he’s useless again. Workman and Johnson are out of options but exactly who they should be looking to upgrade with Brach and someone like Sipp.
Unless you are signing stopgap relievers to one year deals, the problem with making Lakins, Feltman and Hernandez force their way into the plan is they are now blocked. Being a big farm guy, the one thing that's infuriated me the most about the Sox over the last decade or so is their reluctance to use their minor league relief pitchers although it's been better since DD arrived.
 

Dewey'sCannon

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
870
Maryland
Unless you are signing stopgap relievers to one year deals, the problem with making Lakins, Feltman and Hernandez force their way into the plan is they are now blocked. Being a big farm guy, the one thing that's infuriated me the most about the Sox over the last decade or so is their reluctance to use their minor league relief pitchers although it's been better since DD arrived.
That's part of the reason I think they won't be signing any relievers to three or four year deals, because they think some of these guys can contribute, cost-effectively, within that timeframe, and they like the pieces they already have. The other part being that they will want to use that money on at least some of the upcoming FAs in 2020 and 2021. So I think they are looking for one year deals whenever possible, or two years at most. So I think Brach is a definite possibility on that kind of deal, but probably not Ottavino. If Kimbrel would take 1/18, then I think that's a possibility - I don't get the impression that staying below the top CBT threshold is of paramount importance.
 

Pozo the Clown

New Member
Sep 13, 2006
745
...Being a big farm guy, the one thing that's infuriated me the most about the Sox over the last decade or so is their reluctance to use their minor league relief pitchers although it's been better since DD arrived.
I'm curious, are there specific relievers that you feel weren't given an opportunity that you can cite as examples? Thanks.
 

Plympton91

bubble burster
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,408
The minor league guys and the guys with options who’ve been riding the shuttle should “have to force their way into the roster” as bosox79 said.

I don’t find the argument that “they’ll be blocked” compelling at all for 2 reasons.

First, there are 7 relievers, there will be injuries and some of them will be ineffective. Brasier’s 2018 is as likely a mirage as real. The only one who should get much rope at all is Barnes. Plenty of opportunity for someone dominating AAA like Brasier last year to get a run.

Second, Feldman was merely decent in high A last year not dominant, and so no rational championship minded team plans on someone like that jumping 3 levels in one season or even 2. He’d be a huge success if he’s ready in 2021. Lakins was decent in AAA last year despite already being 25; his ZiPs projections are awful, as they are for everyone else not named Barnes, Brasier, or Hembree. There’s no reason to think he’s any better than Hembree and Workman, if that. And another Hembree is not what they need. They need set up guys, not mop up guys. Hernandez is putting up dominant numbers in relief. He’s someone I’m excited about —for 2020 — if he dominates AA and AAA in 2019.

One other guy no one is talking about is this Taylor guy they put on the 40 man for seemingly no apparent reason. Maybe they’ve got proprietary stuff that causes them to think he’s the next rags to riches reliever.
 
Last edited:

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
I'm curious, are there specific relievers that you feel weren't given an opportunity that you can cite as examples? Thanks.
They traded the vast majority of them away and some got very small chances, I guess. I'm not saying they would have been great but they deserved a chance to fail. Noe Ramirez, Ty Buttrey, Williams Jerez, and Alex Wilson come to mind in recent years. I think they've also been slow to convert SP to bullpen arms but those guys haven't done anything in Webster and Ranaudo.
 

Adrian's Dome

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2010
4,424
They traded the vast majority of them away and some got very small chances, I guess. I'm not saying they would have been great but they deserved a chance to fail. Noe Ramirez, Ty Buttrey, Williams Jerez, and Alex Wilson come to mind in recent years. I think they've also been slow to convert SP to bullpen arms but those guys haven't done anything in Webster and Ranaudo.
Buttrey you could make an argument, but given we needed to solidify 2B defense and we won the WS...

You can't be serious with the rest of that group. You should be GLAD they weren't given chances to fail.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
Buttrey you could make an argument, but given we needed to solidify 2B defense and we won the WS...

You can't be serious with the rest of that group. You should be GLAD they weren't given chances to fail.
How is that group all that different than Brandon Workman and Heath Hembree? They are cheap and cost nothing. It's really not that different than Joe Kelly unless you think he turned a corner in the playoffs.

Why pay for mediocrity when you can get it for league minimum? Not every team is going to have 7 arms the quality of Matt Barnes.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,872
Maine
How is that group all that different than Brandon Workman and Heath Hembree? They are cheap and cost nothing. It's really not that different than Joe Kelly unless you think he turned a corner in the playoffs.

Why pay for mediocrity when you can get it for league minimum? Not every team is going to have 7 arms the quality of Matt Barnes.
Alex Wilson is about the only one that fits the "didn't give him a chance" in Boston, but the guy they got for him has been a pretty damn solid contributor and easily exceeds what Wilson would have provided.
 

Plympton91

bubble burster
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,408
How is that group all that different than Brandon Workman and Heath Hembree? They are cheap and cost nothing. It's really not that different than Joe Kelly unless you think he turned a corner in the playoffs.

Why pay for mediocrity when you can get it for league minimum? Not every team is going to have 7 arms the quality of Matt Barnes.
Noe Ramirez is so tantalizing, but the sample size is getting pretty large and he just can’t keep the baseball in the park. Career FIP of 4.94. Hembree 4.09 and Workman 4.27.

Ultimately you are right that they’re not different in kind at all. That’s the crux of my argument. The Red Sox have a full stable of great, cheap options like Workman or Ramirez to be the 10th, 11th, and 12th men on their staff. They have 1 guy who should be anywhere near an 8th or 9th inning lead.

I agree Buttrey may also be one who got away. I’d feel quite a bit better if he was here. But you don’t take a championship off the board.
 

Adrian's Dome

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2010
4,424
How is that group all that different than Brandon Workman and Heath Hembree? They are cheap and cost nothing. It's really not that different than Joe Kelly unless you think he turned a corner in the playoffs.

Why pay for mediocrity when you can get it for league minimum? Not every team is going to have 7 arms the quality of Matt Barnes.
Other than Workman and Hembree being better than the lot of them? Nothing else, I guess.
 

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
Second, Feldman was merely decent in high A last year not dominant, and so no rational championship minded team plans on someone like that jumping 3 levels in one season or even 2.
He's already jumped 2 levels in one season, so I don't see why he couldn't do it again. He allowed zero baserunners while striking out 7 in 4 innings in Lowell, got a quick promotion to Greenville, struck out 14 while walking 1 in 7 innings there, got a quick promotion to Salem, and there struck out 15 while walking 3 in 12.1 innings with a 2.19 ERA. On none of these stops did he allow a home run.

That's an interesting definition of "decent not dominant."

Also, it's Feltman, not Feldman.
 

Plympton91

bubble burster
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,408
He's already jumped 2 levels in one season, so I don't see why he couldn't do it again. He allowed zero baserunners while striking out 7 in 4 innings in Lowell, got a quick promotion to Greenville, struck out 14 while walking 1 in 7 innings there, got a quick promotion to Salem, and there struck out 15 while walking 3 in 12.1 innings with a 2.19 ERA. On none of these stops did he allow a home run.

That's an interesting definition of "decent not dominant."

Also, it's Feltman, not Feldman.
A major college player doesn’t even belong below high-A in the first place, so I totally discount anything at Lowell or Greenville. 2.19 for a reliever in high-A in a small sample is good, I’m sure there have been myriads who did better, and never made it past AAA (Cesar Cabral in 2011, Michael Olmstead in 2013)

An old poster here, Philly Sox Fan, once did a study of how much WAR to expect from a given draft slot. I forget the particulars, but it’s safe to say that Feltman faces high odds of ever making a significant big league impact and 12 high A innings don’t change the unconditional probability much. Now add to that the odds you’re adding—you are not only saying the Red Sox should expect him to succeed, but also expect him to succeed— immediately — and as a high leverage reliever (because they don’t need low leverage guys ) — after less than 1 full season of pro experience. How many players out of the thousands drafted in the first 5 rounds have done that? Billy Wagner, one of the GOAT, took 2 full minor league seasons to break in after college. Craig Hanson, never made it anywhere, after being even more dominant than Feltman jumping right to double A after the draft.

Feltman certainly is a nice player to watch. He has promise for sure. I hope he continues to succeed. The Red Sox should hope as well. But they should plan on him not, and they should especially plan on him not helping at all in 2019, or much in 2020 for that matter.
 
Last edited:

charlieoscar

Member
Sep 28, 2014
1,339
Sox Prospects has this to say about Feltman:

Summation: Potential late inning bullpen arm with power fastball/slider combo. Both pitches have plus-to-better potential. Pure relief type who could move very quickly if the organization chooses that path.
 

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
you are not only saying the Red Sox should expect him to succeed, but also expect him to succeed— immediately — and as a high leverage reliever (because they don’t need low leverage guys ) — after less than 1 full season of pro experience.
Show me where I said the Red Sox "should expect him to succeed immediately." I said I assumed that he was "in the plan", meaning that they are thinking of him as a puzzle piece who might turn out to be both needed and useful before 2019 is over. I certainly don't expect him to break camp with the big club, and it's probably at best a 50/50 shot that he sees the major leagues at all this year. But it's not a long shot.

As for prior examples of college draftees called up in their 2nd pro season who had successful careers as relievers, here are a few from the past couple of decades:

David Robertson
Huston Street (broke camp with Oakland after a half-year in the minors)
B.J. Ryan
J.P. Howell
Cody Allen
Addison Reed

The list would be far longer if we included guys called up in their 3rd pro season, so saying Feltman is unlikely to contribute in 2020 seems particularly silly; a 3rd-year callup seems almost the default for college relievers over the past decade or two. (This makes sense, as I would expect a lot of the development arc for college grads to be about command of secondaries, which is obviously less of an issue for relievers.) But as you can see, being called up in your second year, while unusual, is far from unheard of. Obviously we don't know yet if Feltman is going to join that group, but the scouting consensus seems to be that he's capable of it.
 

Plympton91

bubble burster
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,408
“Far from unheard of” is not the standard that a team fancying itself a World Series contender should be using in planning its 2019 bullpen. Feltman is a good prospect. Prospect. The Red Sox need 2 more 8th inning with a 1 run lead caliber relievers for April 1st. You can’t use Matt Barnes in both the 8th and 9th, and even if Brasier wasn’t a mirage, you can’t use Barnes and Brasier 3 and 4 days in a row all of April and May.

Currently, the Red Sox have 1 reliever who would make the Yankees pitching staff, and he’d be their 4th option at best.

If that’s ok with you. I guess we’ll just have to agree to disagree.
 
Last edited:

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
“Far from unheard of” is not the standard that a team fancying itself a World Series contender should be using in planning its 2019 bullpen. Feltman is a good prospect. Prospect. The Red Sox need 2 more 8th inning with a 1 run lead caliber relievers for April 1st. You can’t use Matt Barnes in both the 8th and 9th, and even if Brasier wasn’t a mirage, you can’t use Barnes and Brasier 3 and 4 days in a row all of April and May.

Currently, the Red Sox have 1 reliever who would make the Yankees pitching staff, and he’d be their 4th option at best.

If that’s ok with you. I guess we’ll just have to agree to disagree.
:Bangs head against desk:
  • Your first sentence is a quintessential strawman. "Far from unheard of" is not a standard or criterion that I was proposing the Red Sox would use in deciding whether to bring Feltman up this year. It was my assessment of the general likelihood that his progress might justify such a decision. The level of reading comprehension required to appreciate this distinction seems pretty elementary to me.
  • If anybody's denying that the Sox could use at least one more reliever capable of pitching high-leverage innings, it isn't me. Whether they need two is debatable. They certainly need one.
  • If you're insisting that the Sox' bullpen must be demonstrably as good as the Yankees' before we feel good about it, then yeah, we're going to agree to disagree.
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
It seems to me that the piece of the bullpen puzzle that we sometimes forget in January, but becomes vital in June, is the need for optionable pieces for the back-end of the pen, for those days after an extra-inning slog, for those days after a double-header, for those times when one of your regular guys is going thru a minor injury. For me, that is why it is important to keep those 11th and 12th slots open for young players.

The added value is it means that you can see what you have over the early part of the season, even barring any of the aforementioned moments, by cycling 3-5 guys through those couple slots, during some extended big league tryouts in low-lev innings.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,675
It seems to me that the piece of the bullpen puzzle that we sometimes forget in January, but becomes vital in June, is the need for optionable pieces for the back-end of the pen, for those days after an extra-inning slog, for those days after a double-header, for those times when one of your regular guys is going thru a minor injury. For me, that is why it is important to keep those 11th and 12th slots open for young players.

The added value is it means that you can see what you have over the early part of the season, even barring any of the aforementioned moments, by cycling 3-5 guys through those couple slots, during some extended big league tryouts in low-lev innings.
Right, and that’s a big clue DD is not done. You can’t go into the year with Barnes, Brasier, Hembree, Workman, Johnson, Thornburg, and Wright because the only guys you can send down are the two best arms in your pen.
 

Pozo the Clown

New Member
Sep 13, 2006
745
Can we now revise the title of this thread to "Atrophying a bullpen - 2019?"

I'm sure I'm not alone in thinking that the 2019 Sox bullpen would include hopefully 2 (and at the very least 1) of the following:

Kimbrel
Kelly
Britton
Robertson
Ottavino
Herrara
Soria

Sure, there are still guys out there but I was hoping for an Adam named Ottavino not an Adam named Warren (though one could do worse).
 

Adrian's Dome

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2010
4,424
Maybe, just maybe, Dombrowski believes throwing big money at the bullpen is a mistake and would like to retain more future payroll flexibility for Mookie/Sale/etc.

His plan sure seems to be throwing high-upside guys at the wall and seeing what sticks, and frankly, I believe it's a good play.

Yeah, the Yankees are going to have a monster pen next season. We'll see how much $$$ they have for that when Sev/Judge/Sanchez/etc start making big dollars.
 

Plympton91

bubble burster
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,408
Right, and that’s a big clue DD is not done. You can’t go into the year with Barnes, Brasier, Hembree, Workman, Johnson, Thornburg, and Wright because the only guys you can send down are the two best arms in your pen.
Can we now revise the title of this thread to "Atrophying a bullpen - 2019?"

I'm sure I'm not alone in thinking that the 2019 Sox bullpen would include hopefully 2 (and at the very least 1) of the following:

Kimbrel
Kelly
Britton
Robertson
Ottavino
Herrara
Soria

Sure, there are still guys out there but I was hoping for an Adam named Ottavino not an Adam named Warren (though one could do worse).
This. We need additional weapons in the pen.
Welcome to the dark side.

The fact that they wouldn’t go 3/10 on Ottavino raises the likelihood that they are simply determined to stay below the second threshold this year and we are going to have to live through this potentially pathetic bullpen all year.

Maybe, just maybe, Dombrowski believes throwing big money at the bullpen is a mistake and would like to retain more future payroll flexibility for Mookie/Sale/etc.

His plan sure seems to be throwing high-upside guys at the wall and seeing what sticks, and frankly, I believe it's a good play.
We obviously have a very different definition of “high upside.” He’s stockpiling people whose upside is 10th man — that’s all somebody like Putnam ever was, even before his elbow blew up. They need set up men, and they’re just stockpiling the absolute best mop up men available.
 

Pozo the Clown

New Member
Sep 13, 2006
745
...His plan sure seems to be throwing high-upside guys at the wall and seeing what sticks, and frankly, I believe it's a good play...
It's a risky play. Presently, Barnes is by far the closest thing to a sure bet in that pen. Is that a comforting thought? Is Brasier the guy we saw last year or a guy who was in the Japanese minor leagues the year before? Will Wright's knee hold up? If (God-forbid) Barnes succumbs to injury, Wright continues to have knee issues and Brasier's 2018 was a mirage, we could be looking at the likes of Heath Hembree as the closer.

Undoubtedly, there will be arms available via trade during the year, but that will require trading pieces from a farm that needs bolstering, not depleting.

With Sale, X, Porcello, Pearce. Moreland and potentially JDM all in their walk years, I really don't view DD forgoing the $9M - $13 AAV investment in the likes of at least one of the Ottavino/Robertson/Britton group as a "good play." I hope I'm wrong!
 

Adrian's Dome

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2010
4,424
Is the "woe is me, we didn't win the offseason!" crowd done yet?

The last post effectively outlined Heath Hembree being the closer. If that isn't a panicky overreach, nothing is.

And lastly, before you whine about the Yankees and effectively give up the season 3 months before it begins, they should be just as terrified of watching their defense at this point. Relief pitching isn't gonna do you much good with the worst starting infielder in the majors at 3B and a massive question mark at SS.

Boston still has better starters, a more balanced lineup, and far better D on paper. Given that, I'm perfectly fine with the upside pen play.
 
Last edited:

nattysez

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2010
8,486


Sounds pretty clear that DD is not going to pay for bullpen arms that'll push them over the cap.
 

Pozo the Clown

New Member
Sep 13, 2006
745
Is the "woe is me, we didn't win the offseason!" crowd done yet?
Personally, I have absolutely no interest in "winning the offseason." My interest is in winning another Championship ASAP. As presently constructed, the Sox roster's largest weakest in attaining that goal is the vulnerability of the bullpen. If pointing this out constitutes "woe is me" behaviour, then I suggest you guzzle down some more Kool-Aid as you fantasize about the "upside" of the flotsam and jetsam relievers that have been added so far this offseason.

The last post effectively outlined Heath Hembree being the closer. If that isn't a panicky overreach, nothing is.
Tell me, if Barnes goes down and Brasier fails to repeat last year's performance, who is the closer (from the present roster)?
 

In my lifetime

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
959
Connecticut
The Yankees are currently projected for 2019 to be at 220 MM while the RS are at 237 MM for tax purposes. I'm satisfied if the off-season ends and the Yankees don't have Harper or Manny M on their payroll. The RS are just much tighter to their top end budget than the Yankees. In the end, they both may be done making big off-season moves or they could potentially end up at 250 (RS + Kimbrel; MFYs + Manny or Harper). I would certainly expect the Yankees to bolster their roster in-season by taking on salary if they don't make that big final splash. All that being said, the RS have a much stronger starting pitching staff and we've seen how they can manipulate that staff in a playoff series.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,128
The Yankees are currently projected for 2019 to be at 220 MM while the RS are at 237 MM for tax purposes. I'm satisfied if the off-season ends and the Yankees don't have Harper or Manny M on their payroll. The RS are just much tighter to their top end budget than the Yankees. In the end, they both may be done making big off-season moves or they could potentially end up at 250 (RS + Kimbrel; MFYs + Manny or Harper). I would certainly expect the Yankees to bolster their roster in-season by taking on salary if they don't make that big final splash. All that being said, the RS have a much stronger starting pitching staff and we've seen how they can manipulate that staff in a playoff series.
NY will be moving Gray’s $7.5M shortly, maybe even today, so that would leave them the room under $246M to add Machado, potentially anyway.
 

TomBrunansky23

Member
SoSH Member
May 4, 2006
772
Crapchester, NY
Whether by plan or by necessity, Eovaldi is going to be the closer. Unless you are bringing Kimbrel back, which it sure sounds like they are not, then nothing else makes any sense.

I can't see how you spend $246mm on payroll and go forward expecting to seriously contend with the bullpen as presently constituted. You can call me crazy if you like.

Eovaldi's $17mm per is a lot for a closer but there are several who make at least that much if not more. The hole in the rotation they can plug. The hole in the bullpen they cannot.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,128
Whether by plan or by necessity, Eovaldi is going to be the closer.
As an outside observer, IMO there is zero percent chance of this happening. If this was ever a consideration, DD would have spent that money on two relievers instead. Eovaldi as a SP is one of the best weapons you have against NY, who couldn't touch him last year.
 

Murderer's Crow

Dragon Wangler 216
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
23,543
Garden City
All that being said, the RS have a much stronger starting pitching staff and we've seen how they can manipulate that staff in a playoff series.
Anyone can manipulate their starters as extra relief in the postseason and that's certainly something the Sox and probably even the Yankees could look to do. The issue is that last year the Red Sox were incredibly rested going into the playoffs and theoretically, the division will be much tougher this year. I fully expect the Rays to put up a good fight as well.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,661
Well the Yankees' bullpen is just absolutely insanely loaded. With improved starting pitching and a killer lineup that should only get better.

The Sox' work is really cut out for them.
 

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
Whether by plan or by necessity, Eovaldi is going to be the closer. Unless you are bringing Kimbrel back, which it sure sounds like they are not, then nothing else makes any sense.
Things Matt Barnes was better than Nathan Eovaldi at in 2018:

1. ERA (3.65 to 3.81)
2. FIP (2.71 to 3.60)
3. SIERA (2.78 to 3.71)
4. K/9 (14.0 to 8.9)
5. HR/600 BF (11.4 to 18.6)
7. Barrels/PA (3.8 to 4.2)

I'm not saying Barnes is a better pitcher than Eovaldi, because being a starter is harder than being a reliever, so these things are a bit apples-and-oranges. And there are a few things Eovaldi was better at, like BB rate. But it's pretty hard, based on the numbers, to make a case that Eovaldi is a better pitcher than Barnes. So I'm not sure why making him the closer would be the only thing that makes any sense. Seems to me they're both really good, though not elite, pitchers who should be allowed to keep doing what they're best at.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,872
Maine
I seem to recall a whole lot of kvetching and handwringing a year ago at this time because the Yankees were loaded for bear with a killer pen (that they only added to mid-summer) and a killer lineup. Then they played the season and we know how that turned out.

Anyone bitching right now is worried about winning the off-season. Period. Couch it as worrying about winning a title, but they don't win titles in January and February.
 

Adrian's Dome

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2010
4,424
I seem to recall a whole lot of kvetching and handwringing a year ago at this time because the Yankees were loaded for bear with a killer pen (that they only added to mid-summer) and a killer lineup. Then they played the season and we know how that turned out.

Anyone bitching right now is worried about winning the off-season. Period. Couch it as worrying about winning a title, but they don't win titles in January and February.
Exactly.

Also, sad as it may be that this has to be pointed out, but THE OFFSEASON IS NOT OVER.

DD, if he cares to, can still very well make moves. That Kimbrel guy hasn't signed, and there are still quite a few interesting FA relievers left, but hey, let's kvetch and concede the division already even though we've got 99% of the same roster as the greatest Red Sox team to ever exist already lined up.
 

Bob Montgomerys Helmet Hat

has big, douchey shoulders
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
I seem to recall a whole lot of kvetching and handwringing a year ago at this time because the Yankees were loaded for bear with a killer pen (that they only added to mid-summer) and a killer lineup. Then they played the season and we know how that turned out.

Anyone bitching right now is worried about winning the off-season. Period. Couch it as worrying about winning a title, but they don't win titles in January and February.
A year ago? Hell, this kvetching and handwringing continued through the season and heading into the playoffs.

This is the opposite of right.
But to be fair, it is 100% wrong.